&w=3840&q=100)
A step forward or strategic ploy? Why Russia-Ukraine talks offer little real hope for a ceasefire
The first high level talks between Russia and Ukraine since the early months of Moscow's 2022 attack showed they are far from agreement on steps needed for a ceasefire, even though they promised a major swap of prisoners of war. read more
The first high-level talks between Russia and Ukraine since the early stages of Moscow's 2022 attack have concluded with a stark reminder of the immense gulf separating the two nations, offering scant optimism for an imminent ceasefire. While a significant exchange of prisoners of war was promised, the talks revealed a profound lack of common ground on the fundamental steps required to halt the ongoing conflict.
Despite the palpable distance in their positions, a sliver of diplomatic possibility remains. Turkey, the host nation said that both Russia and Ukraine had agreed in principle to hold further negotiations. The statement offers a glimmer of hope for US President Donald Trump, who has called for a swift peace agreement.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Peter Slezkine, senior fellow and director of the Russia program at the Stimson Center, described the talks as 'substantial steps.' He said, 'I do think that they are a very hopeful sign, because the two sides coming into direct contact is an important development.'
However, the initial optimism generated by the meeting quickly faded upon closer examination of the stated positions. Ukraine, backed by the United States and other Western allies, has consistently called for a 30-day ceasefire without any preconditions to facilitate meaningful peace negotiations.
In stark contrast, Russia, which currently occupies nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory, displayed minimal inclination towards compromise. Moscow reiterated its maximalist demands, insisting on Ukraine's withdrawal from and recognition of Russia's claim over four Ukrainian regions – territories the Kremlin unilaterally annexed but does not fully control.
The carefully worded statements released by both sides following the Istanbul talks did little to conceal the deep chasm that persists between them. A Ukrainian diplomatic source, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions, revealed that Russia presented demands that were 'detached from reality and go far beyond anything that was previously discussed.' These reportedly included ultimatums for Ukrainian forces to withdraw from sovereign Ukrainian land, alongside 'other nonstarters and non-constructive conditions.'
Adding a chilling perspective, the Kremlin's chief negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, suggested that Russia was prepared to continue its military campaign for as long as necessary to achieve its objectives. Drawing a historical parallel to Russia's protracted 18th-century war against Sweden, he argued that Kyiv's resistance to Russia's 'peace demands' was only hastening its own demise.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A senior Ukrainian government official with direct knowledge of the abortive 2022 peace talks with Russia expressed little surprise at the outcome in Istanbul, telling Reuters that it unfolded 'entirely as expected.' The source offered a more pragmatic, if less hopeful, view: ''Every journey begins with a single step. This is the beginning of the journey. Demands are always exaggerated at the start of any negotiations. That's classic.''
The fragile outcome places renewed emphasis on President Trump's role. Just before the talks, Trump abruptly shifted stance, saying he needed a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to achieve a breakthrough. This move temporarily undercut European efforts to pressure Washington into imposing tougher sanctions on Russia.
Earlier in the week, leaders of four major European powers had visited Kyiv, warning Russia of fresh sanctions if it failed to agree to a 30-day ceasefire by May 12, a position supported by the US However, when Putin proposed talks instead of a ceasefire, Trump urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on social media to accept the proposal immediately, without mentioning impending sanctions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Zelenskyy, wary of alienating the influential US President, publicly supported direct talks with Putin. The Kremlin's response was to dispatch a delegation for the Istanbul talks that conspicuously excluded Putin himself, as well as any high-ranking ministers.
Russian political analyst Vladimir Pastukhov wryly commented on the appointment of Medinsky, a figure from the failed 2022 talks, as delegation head, saying, 'You don't send undertakers to a wedding.'
After the Istanbul talks, Trump and the leaders of the four European powers spoke again with Zelenskyy to discuss the way forward. Publicly, the Ukrainian team renewed calls for direct negotiations between Zelenskyy and Putin, arguing only the Russian president has the authority to resolve key issues.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump expressed optimism about reaching an agreement but added that he would impose sanctions on Russia if no deal could be made.
While the talks represent a diplomatic step forward, the entrenched positions and expansive Russian demands suggest that a genuine ceasefire remains elusive for now, raising questions over whether the negotiations mark the beginning of peace or merely a strategic ploy in a protracted conflict.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Iran says U.S. travel ban shows 'deep hostility' for Iranians, Muslims
Iran on Saturday (June 7, 2025) blasted U.S. President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries including the Islamic Republic, saying it showed "deep hostility" toward Iranians and Muslims. "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law," a senior Foreign Ministry official said in a ministry statement posted on the X social media platform. Editorial | Insular, paranoid: on Donald Trump, the U.S., legal migration Mr. Trump's proclamation on Wednesday will bar citizens from 12 countries starting on Monday at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). The countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The ban, which Mr. Trump said was necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists", was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Harvard gains support from top US universities in Trump funding battle
A group of 18 leading US research universities, including Princeton, MIT, Caltech and Johns Hopkins, asked a federal judge for permission to file legal arguments in support of Harvard University in its high-stakes showdown with the Trump administration over more than $2 billion in frozen grant money. The institutions have all received millions of dollars from the federal government for research that has 'advanced scientific knowledge, safeguarded national security, strengthened the American economy, and saved countless lives,' they said in a court filing Friday in Harvard's lawsuit. Harvard sued in April, claiming the government freeze violates the university's First Amendment guarantee of free speech and federal law governing administrative rulemaking. The fight is part of a broad-based effort by President Donald Trump to force sweeping changes at Harvard and other elite US universities. The government has also frozen or is reviewing federal funding to Princeton, Cornell, Northwestern and Columbia universities, among others. Harvard claims in its suit, filed in Boston federal court, that the Trump administration illegally suspended its funding in retaliation for its refusal to bow to 'unconstitutional demands' to overhaul governance, discipline and hiring policies, as well as diversity programs. The president claims Harvard, the nation's oldest and richest university, has failed to combat antisemitism on campus and encourage viewpoint diversity. 'The cuts will disrupt ongoing research, ruin experiments and datasets, destroy the careers of aspiring scientists, and deter long-term investments at universities across the country,' the universities said in a request to file amicus curiae or 'friend of the court' arguments supporting Harvard's case against the government. The request to support Harvard also comes from Boston University, Brown University, Colorado State University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, Oregon State University, Rice University, Rutgers University, Tufts University, University of Maryland at College Park, University of Oregon, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh and Yale University. A group of states led by Massachusetts, where Harvard is located, also asked to file arguments in support of the university on Friday. The case is President and Fellows of Harvard College v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 25-cv-11048, US District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston).
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
China rare earth curbs choke India automakers, add to tensions
China, the world's biggest producer of rare earth elements, has begun restricting exports of the minerals as it increasingly weaponises its dominance over this supply chain and uses it as geopolitical leverage over opponents. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Indian automakers are facing conditions tougher than others in importing rare earth magnets from China , according to people familiar with the matter, risking a crippling shortage that may disrupt production within has turned down at least two applications for India-bound shipments, industry and government officials in New Delhi said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private.A requested shipment to the Indian unit of a global firm was rejected by the Chinese government, while its German and US subsidiaries were allowed to import magnets, the people said on the condition of to Indian auto parts makers have been stuck at Chinese ports since April 4, when China began enforcing strict curbs on exports of seven rare earth minerals, they added. These also apply to products, like magnets, containing even small amounts of those the world's biggest producer of rare earth elements, has begun restricting exports of the minerals as it increasingly weaponises its dominance over this supply chain and uses it as geopolitical leverage over President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday agreed to further talks to ease up the supplies of rare earth magnets that are used in making everything from fighter jets to electric vehicles and Chinese curbs are causing pain to automakers across the world, notably in the US and Europe as they face major delays in securing supplies. In India, businesses also face an added layer of uncertainty given the country's complicated ties with the two sides recently eased tensions along border areas, India continues to maintain restrictions on Chinese early April, as a reaction to US's steep tariffs, China imposed stricter new end-user certification process. This requires importers to confirm magnets won't be used for defence or re-exported to the US. The process takes at least 45 days and is now facing a global backlog, the people least 30 import applications have been endorsed by the Indian government but none of the companies have been approved nor have any shipments arrived, the people said. At least 11 applications from companies in the other parts of the world have passed Ministry of Heavy Industries and Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't reply to requests for comment. China's Ministry of Commerce didn't respond to a faxed request for automakers sought urgent talks between China and India to fast-track pending approvals and ease the onerous process, according to a May 28 presentation by the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, or SIAM, to Indian government many companies have received Chinese embassy endorsements, SIAM said none have got final approvals by China's Ministry of Commerce in its made from rare earths are important for fossil-fuelled cars but absolutely critical for electric vehicles. 'Even if one magnetised part is missing, the vehicle cannot be built,' SIAM industry body also cautioned in this presentation that if imports continue to be restricted, automakers' supplies of magnets will run out as early as this month and 'some Indian players might even consider setting up operations in China.'SIAM did not respond to an email requesting firms are navigating a complex certification maze involving more than half a dozen steps: securing notarised and apostilled documents, getting them endorsed by the Chinese embassy and sending it to exporters in paperwork is then filed by their Chinese suppliers as part of their permit application to Chinese authorities.'The rare earth situation is a very difficult one,' Bajaj Auto Ltd.'s Executive Director Rakesh Sharma told analysts last week. 'Supplies and stocks are getting depleted as we speak, and if there's no relief in shipments, production will be seriously impaired in July.A delegation of Indian businesses is planning a visit this month to their Chinese counterparts facilitated by the Indian Embassy in Beijing, the people Indian Embassy has reached out to China's Commerce Ministry too, seeking quick disposal of applications and transparency in the process, they so far has not directly intervened. The Ministry of External Affairs didn't respond to a email seeking comments on this meeting between India and Chinese business groups could help the Narendra Modi government determine what could be China's ask in return for easing the supplies of rare earth magnets, they said.A meeting was held at the Indian Prime Minster's Office earlier this week to discuss options for breaking this impasse, one person government officials told the industry representatives to start working on alternative supply chains for rare earth minerals and develop indigenous refining capacity to pare reliance on China, the people local refining capacity, however, would be a years-long project rather than immediate Indian government has also been advising firms to explore ferrite magnets or magnet-free designs — options that come with trade-offs in cost and performance, the people none of these will ease the immediate threat of disruption for Indian automakers, Indian automakers have begun weighing expensive workarounds: importing motors or sub-assemblies, shifting focus to fossil-fuel fed vehicles or prioritising exports over domestic earth magnets are 'the backbone of electric mobility and advanced electronics,' said Vinnie Mehta, Director General of India's Automotive Component Manufacturers Association pain arising from 'import restrictions has been escalated to the highest levels in government,' Mehta says this reliance on a single supplier has emerged as a strategic risk.
