
Wildfire-Led Indoor Activity May Raise Flu Transmission Risk
Researchers found that wildfire-induced deterioration of air quality led to substantial increases in indoor activities, creating a cascade effect that could dramatically increase the spread of respiratory pathogens such as the influenza virus.
METHODOLOGY:
The 2020 West Coast wildfires highlighted how extreme weather events coupled with deteriorating air quality can influence disease transmission through changes in human behavior, particularly increased indoor activity.
Researchers performed a modeling analysis to quantify behavioral changes induced by wildfires and assess their impact on the transmission dynamics of respiratory viruses.
During the peak wildfire period, mobile phone data were used to track weekly visits to indoor locations (such as schools, hospitals, and grocery stores) vs outdoor locations (such as parks and cemeteries), comparing counties with an air quality index > 150 (most affected counties) with those with an index < 100 (unaffected counties).
Using mathematical simulations, researchers assessed how these behavioral shifts (from outdoor to indoor activities) and indoor mask-wearing would influence the spread of faster and slower spreading viruses.
TAKEAWAY:
In counties with elevated air quality index from wildfire smoke, sustained increases in indoor activity were reported — 10.8% in Washington, 14.3% in Oregon, with peak increase of 16% in Seattle and 11% in Portland. However, unaffected counties reported no change.
Diseases with shorter generation times (influenza and SARS-CoV-2 ) showed a twofold increase in peak incidence in affected vs unaffected areas, attributed to increased indoor activity; this effect declined with longer generation time.
Even with 50% population having immunity from past infection or vaccination, wildfire-affected counties showed higher incidence of influenza, suggesting that wildfire-driven behavior changes can still boost disease transmission.
The study demonstrated that a modest 10% increase in mask usage notably reduced disease spread; however, substantial protection, required mask compliance rates of around 50%.
IN PRACTICE:
'By revealing how behavioral shifts induced by wildfires can elevate disease spread, our study advocates for the inclusion of behavioral responses in public health strategies. As climate change continues to alter our environment, it is crucial for public health interventions to evolve accordingly, equipping us to tackle the multifaceted and interconnected risks of a warming world,' the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Beatriz Arregui-García, Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. It was published online on June 18, 2025, in PLOS Climate.
LIMITATIONS:
This study focused on a single wildfire season in the US, possibly limiting the generalizability of the findings. The analysis relied only on the ratio of indoor-to-outdoor activities and did not account for indoor activities at home. The study did not incorporate public health data on infection rates, limiting a direct correlation between behavioral changes and disease outcomes.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by the Fritz Family Fellowship. One author disclosed receiving salary support from the fellowship program. Other authors declared having no competing interests.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Wire
2 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Seattle health-tech startup Kevala acquired by Residex in bid to enhance senior care with AI
GeekWire's startup coverage documents the Pacific Northwest entrepreneurial scene. Sign up for our weekly startup newsletter , and check out the GeekWire funding tracker and venture capital directory . Todd Owens, CEO of Seattle-based health-tech startup Kevala. (Gavin Haag Photo) Seattle-based Kevala, a startup that helps healthcare facilities find and manage workers, has been acquired by Residex, a Denver company that also uses AI to manage records and more for senior living communities. Terms of the deal were not shared in a news release on Monday. Kevala was spun out of Seattle's Pioneer Square Labs in 2020. The company raisied $4 million in January 2021 and another $12.1 million in February 2022. Co-founder and CEO Todd Owens previously led staffing company TalentWise, which was acquired by Sterling Talent Solutions; was CEO at Appuri (acquired by DocuSign); and was CEO at Azuqua (acquired by Okta). According to Residex, the acquisition will strengthen the company's position in the senior care technology market by adding staffing optimization to platform. Residex uses AI to help manage resident health records, medication administration, care planning, assessments, and clinical documentation. Kevala's software, called Quin, enables healthcare facilities to schedule workers, organize the labor pool and track caregiver credentials. 'This acquisition validates our vision of using AI to solve the industry's most pressing operational challenge of ensuring topline workforce management,' Owens said in a statement. By combining Quin's workforce intelligence with Residex's clinical expertise, we're creating a powerful ecosystem that ultimately enhances the quality of life for residents.' As of April of this year, Kevala employed 28 people and had raised $21 million. Related:


Gizmodo
32 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
New Study Fuels Debate Over World-Changing Comet Strike 12,800 Years Ago
Roughly 12,800 years ago, as Earth was emerging from its last great ice age, temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere suddenly plummeted back to near-glacial conditions. The cause of this abrupt shift—known as the Younger Dryas cool period—remains a mystery to this day, but new evidence may give credence to its most controversial explanation. Researchers analyzed sediment cores extracted from the seafloor of Baffin Bay near Greenland, finding indicators of a cosmic impact event inside the layer that correlates to the Younger Dryas. The findings, published August 6 in the journal PLOS One, suggest that a comet—or its remnants—exploded in Earth's atmosphere at around the same time that this 1,200-year-long cold snap began. The study offers new support for the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis. In 2007, researchers proposed that fragments of a disintegrating comet or asteroid struck Earth around 12,800 years ago, triggering wildfires across North America. Such a calamity would have produced enough soot and ash to blot out the Sun and plunge the Northern Hemisphere back into a colder state. It's an elegant explanation, but a highly contested one. Researchers haven't found an impact crater that would prove this event took place, so proponents largely rely on geochemical evidence found in sediment layers that date back to just before the Younger Dryas began. Amid a lack of definitive evidence for the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, most experts instead subscribe to the Meltwater Pulse Hypothesis, which suggests that a deluge of freshwater from the melting ice sheet that covered most of North America during the Pleistocene temporarily interfered with Earth's heat-transporting ocean currents. Previous geochemical evidence from ocean sediment cores supports this idea, but scientists have yet to determine the exact route taken by this apparent flood. The authors of this latest study, led by University of South Carolina archaeologist Christopher R. Moore, suggest that both hypotheses may be true. 'The [Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis] is often cited as an alternative to the Meltwater Pulse Hypothesis,' Moore said in an interview with PLOS One. 'What many don't understand is that the YDIH proposes the impact event (potentially involving many thousands of impacts and airbursts globally) would destabilize the glacial ice sheet in the Northern Hemisphere, leading to the collapse of massive glacial meltwater lakes and subsequently shutting down the ocean's conveyor belt.' Previous studies of terrestrial sediment cores have found geochemical clues of a comet impact around the onset of the Younger Dryas, but Moore and his colleagues wanted to see whether ocean cores would contain the same clues. If so, this would dispel arguments that land-based evidence of a Younger Dryas impact event resulted from ancient human activities, according to Moore. His team uncovered multiple impact proxies that date back to the appropriate time period inside the ocean cores, including metal particles with compositions that suggest cometary origin and iron- and silica-rich microspherules. Still, not everyone is convinced. 'I do not see anything in this new paper that overcomes the chronic and ongoing problems with their previous papers,' Mark Boslough, an applied physicist and research professor at the University of New Mexico, told Gizmodo in an email. As an outspoken critic of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, he believes there are much simpler explanations that are more consistent with our current understanding of impact and airburst physics, earth science, and astronomy. 'On the surface, they report materials that sound exotic and impressive, but these are not expected results of extraterrestrial events, and I don't think the authors seriously considered more ordinary explanations,' Boslough said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vaccine panel fired by Kennedy had lowest rate of financial conflicts since 2000, study shows
By Nancy Lapid (Reuters) -Conflicts of interest on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory committee were at historic lows around the time when Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all 17 members in June, new data published in a medical journal on Monday showed. Kennedy had said, based on findings from a 2007 report, that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was rife with conflicts. The new study published in JAMA found that between 2000 and 2024, ACIP's annual reported conflict of interest rate declined from 42.8% to 5%. ACIP advises on which groups of people should take each vaccine approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and when they should be administered. Conflict of interest rates on the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), which advises the agency on whether to approve vaccines, have remained below 4% since 2010, including 10 years when it was 0%, the researchers also found. The most frequently reported conflict of interest was funding for research, which is generally considered less concerning than financial ties associated with personal income, the researchers said. The prevalence of conflicts related to personal income – such as from consulting, royalties, or stock ownership – had been below 1% for both committees since 2016. 'In the past, there have been high levels of reported conflicts on influential vaccine committees, but there has been substantial progress since the early 2000s,' study leader Genevieve Kanter of the Schaeffer Center at the University of Southern California said in a statement. 'Secretary Kennedy is right that conflict of interest is an important issue, but he is wrong that it is present at substantial levels on (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) vaccine advisory committees,' co-author Peter Lurie, president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest and former FDA associate commissioner, said in a statement. Responding to the study, Department of Health and Human Services press secretary Emily Hilliard said, "Secretary Kennedy is committed to eliminating both real and perceived conflicts to strengthen confidence in public health decisions." Earlier this year, the agency launched its ACIP Conflicts of Interest Disclosures tool, she noted. Solve the daily Crossword