The ugly truth of Trump's America first agenda
As reported in the book "Hitler's Gift" by Jean Medawar and David Pyke, Germany had long been the acknowledged world leader in the hard sciences. Between 1901 and 1933, it had won a full one-third of all the Nobel Prizes. Between 1933 and 1960, it won only eight. According to the book, 'some 2600 scientists and other scholars left Germany within the first year [alone], the vast majority of them Jewish. Twenty-five per cent of all physicists were lost from German universities in an insane squandering of talent.' Almost all of them emigrated to the United States and the U.K., winning a vast number of Nobel prizes in the ensuing years. They included such luminaries as Albert Einstein, Edward Teller, Leo Szilard, John von Neumann, Hans Bethe and Stanisław Ulam among many others.
This ended up being Hitler's gift to America which spent the next 90 years welcoming the very best minds from around the world to study here and do the research that made the U.S the world's leader in physics, medicine, chemistry and economics which has led to the astonishing innovations such as this contraption you're reading this on right now. The alliance between the federal government and the great American research universities is one of the most successful public-private partnerships in history.
The parallels between what happened to Germany's scientific community and what is happening here isn't perfect, but it's close enough. The Trump administration has embarked on a concerted effort to end America's role as a world leader in science and innovation. They aren't singling out Jewish scholars, although plenty of Jews will be caught up in it. They are instead using a blunderbuss to blast the whole system by targeting foreign students for deportation and defunding the research that will lead to the breakthroughs of the future.
There is no logical reason for any of this. Their reasons change day to day. One day it's because the research is "DEI" which simply means we have no need to understand anything about diverse populations. Another day it's withholding money for universities allegedly because of antisemitism and revoking Harvard University's right (and probably others in the future) to enroll foreign students. Now we've gone into full red scare McCarthyism toward Chinese students and scientists.
Listen to the Secretary of Homeland Security speak about it over the weekend:
That's just ignorant smearing by someone who doesn't even know what habeas corpus is. But it's a problem since our secretary of state has just announced that he will 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students." There are over a quarter of a million of them studying in the country as well as other Chinese and Chinese-American researchers who are very heavily represented in the scientific fields. They are now being hunted, apparently because our government doesn't value scientific innovation and wants them to go elsewhere to share their talents and ambition.
According to the American Association of Universities:
[A] recent brief from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) found that the NIH has canceled $1.9 billion in funding across hundreds of grants over the past few months.
'This year's terminations of biomedical research grants funded by the National Institutes of Health are unprecedented in the history of the agency,' stated AAMC in the brief.
Every day, there are stories of researchers seeing their life's work being capriciously destroyed without any thought or consideration for the value they bring to the country's economic and social well-being. Foreign scientists working in the country are harassed by ignorant customs officials and, in some cases, thrown in prison on spurious grounds. It's impossible not to see this as another example of an authoritarian government purging the country of its finest minds simply as a way of exerting control.
To make matters even worse, we seem to be also intent upon replacing our scientific community with woo-wellness influencers and conspiracy cranks, led by none other than the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert Kennedy Jr. It's a lethal one-two punch.
Meanwhile, the rest of the world is eagerly anticipating that they will reap the benefits of "Trump's Gift." According to Politico, he has sparked Europe's "New Enlightenment."
European universities and top politicians have mobilized in response to Trump's domestic measures, creating new initiatives aimed at attracting top foreign talent to Europe by offering generous grants and greater academic freedom.
Earlier this month, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and French President Emmanuel Macron unveiled a €500 million plan named 'Choose Europe for Science' aiming to lure foreign researchers to the EU.[...]
The Commission last month announced plans to accelerate visa procedures to attract U.S. researchers and EU research ministers met in Brussels on May 23 to discuss how to increase Europe's competitiveness in science and innovation.
China and India are also stepping up efforts to lure foreign talent and keep their own at home.
All of this is going to affect not just the cutting-edge medical advances, but it's also going to affect U.S. business competitiveness and the jobs of the future. The dynamism of the American economy has been the envy of the world for decades, but we are throwing away the very engine that drives it. But then, the Trump administration keeps insisting that Americans yearn to work in factories and eschew material things in order to engage in more spiritual pursuits, so perhaps our future really lies with supplying the rest of the world with consumer goods while they engage in the services and investing that made America wealthy in recent years.
In some ways, it's odd that Trump would go along with all this. He's always been a big admirer of the MIT big brains like his uncle, who taught there (which he often uses as validation of his own alleged genius), and he went to Penn as did Don Jr., Ivanka and Tiffany, and it's an Ivy League school. But then he does have tremendous status envy, which was exacerbated during the pandemic when he commonly made a fool of himself with his attempts to discuss serious scientific subjects. And he certainly senses how much his followers loathe the intellectual elite.
At this point, the battle with Harvard is simply a battle of wills. He wants to see them crawl. Whether they do or not, much of the damage is already done. The top scientific talent from around the world is already seeking opportunity elsewhere and they are being offered plenty of incentives. It's only a matter of time before American talent does the same because they won't have the support or the resources to do their work here anymore.
It's a hell of a "gift" to the rest of the world. So much for America first.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
Under Trump, the federal government is stepping back. Charities, states, and others are stepping up.
Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT The Trump administration has cut funding to states, universities, nonprofit organizations, and public media. It has shrunk access to Medicaid and food stamps. And it has changed the federal government's longstanding approach to public education and vaccination guidelines. But as the federal government steps back, states, philanthropies, and individuals in New England and across the country are stepping up to fill some of the gaps. Charities are funding nonprofits that have lost federal support. States are considering creating their own vaccine guidelines. Listeners are chipping in to keep their local radio stations afloat. Advertisement 'These are all noble efforts,' said David Cicilline, who leads the Rhode Island Foundation, one of the charitable groups that has used its giving to offset lost federal funding. But, he added, they're at best partial solutions. 'We just simply don't have the ability to make up for what the federal government is cutting, and the harm to our communities is real.' Plugging holes The Rhode Island Foundation, founded in 1916, has helped the state weather World War II and the Covid pandemic. But when the Trump administration began withholding federal funding from nonprofits there and across the country, the need to respond was clear. 'We understood after hearing from many of the organizations we support what the impacts of these either changes in federal policy or cuts in funding mean,' said Cicilline, who became the chief executive of the foundation in 2023 after representing Rhode Island in Congress as a Democrat. Advertisement In recent months, the foundation has directed The story is similar elsewhere. Earlier this month, the Boston Foundation announced a And it's not just foundations. Giving to local NPR and PBS stations spiked in recent months, with 120,000 new donors Some states have reached for solutions beyond money. As the administration mulls cutting resources Advertisement And as the administration weighs not recommending Covid vaccinations this fall, Massachusetts officials have contemplated teaming up with Connecticut, Rhode Island, and other states to make their own vaccine recommendations A ways to go But the US government is arguably the most well resourced entity on Earth, and there's only so much anyone can do to fill the vacuum. 'There isn't any organization where we were able to replace 100 percent of what they lost,' Cicilline said of the Rhode Island Foundation's recent giving. The foundation has focused on supporting organizations that work on basic needs like health care, housing, and hunger, even as groups that support the arts Even when organizations do get a lifeline, losing federal funding can be fatal. Surging donations haven't matched what Congress cut from public media, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting A future Congress or president could restore much of the funding Trump has cut. But in the meantime, the problems that lost money was meant to address seem likely to fester. The administration's cuts to food stamps and Medicaid are Advertisement And, of course, there's still three and a half years of Trump left to go. 'We're going to continue to monitor this and, obviously, be asked to do more,' Cicilline said. 'I don't think this is the end of it.' 🧩 7 Across: 70° POINTS OF INTEREST Judge Frank Caprio inside Municipal Court at the Providence Police Station in 2017. Jessica Rinaldi/GLOBE STAFF Steve Tompkins: The Suffolk County sheriff, charged with extortion, Rhode Island prosecutor: Attorney General Peter Neronha vowed to 'sanction' a prosecutor who told police who she was and that they'd regret arresting her. Republicans criticized Neronha #1: Massachusetts once again has the most public high schools in the top quarter of US News & World Report's ranking of the country's best. America's 'nicest judge': Frank Caprio, the municipal judge whose charming and forgiving temperament captured hearts across the world through his 'Caught in Providence' TV show, Off to the races: Karishma Manzur, a progressive nonprofit leader, Overbooked: Why don't Harvard students encounter a diverse range of viewpoints? Because Trump vs. the Fed: The president demanded Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook's resignation after an administration official accused Cook, a Biden appointee, of possible mortgage fraud. Cook said she wouldn't be 'bullied.' ( Advertisement Jeffrey Epstein: Another judge refused the Trump administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case — and said what's them 'pales in comparison' to documents the administration is refusing to release. ( DOGE's legacy: Eastern Kentucky is among the most flood-battered parts of the country. It now has among the most Israel-Hamas war: Israel approved new settlements in the occupied West Bank, dimming hopes for a future Palestinian state, and will expand military operations in Gaza City, where it says Hamas remains active. ( BESIDE THE POINT 📚 New books to read…: Browse the 40 titles the Globe's critics 📱 …assuming you still do: The share of Americans who read for fun fell 40 percent between 2003 and 2023, a study found. Technology could be to blame. ( 🧳 Be spontaneous: These 8 New England destinations are close enough for a weekend getaway — 💸 'Cute debt': Buy-now-pay-later services, promoted as interest-free borrowing, are targeting female shoppers. ( ✉️ Stamp act: The US Postal Service recently unveiled a pair of commemorative stamps that celebrate Boston's role in the American Revolution. 🎵 Boston born: James Taylor, the 77-year-old singer-songwriter, is ⛳ Stroke of genius: What makes a great mini golf course? When it offers a built-environment journey that leaves you Advertisement Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at


San Francisco Chronicle
a minute ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Ukrainian suspected in the Nord Stream pipeline blasts arrested in Italy, German prosecutors say
BERLIN (AP) — A Ukrainian citizen suspected of participating in the undersea explosions in 2022 that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines between Russia and Germany has been arrested, German prosecutors said Thursday. The suspect, identified only as Serhii K. in line with German privacy rules, was arrested overnight in Italy's Rimini province, federal prosecutors said. They added that he is believed to be one of the coordinators of the operation. Explosions on Sept. 26, 2022, damaged the pipelines, which were built to carry Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea. The damage added to tensions over the war in Ukraine as European countries moved to wean themselves off Russian energy sources, following the Kremlin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The explosions ruptured the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which was Russia's main natural gas supply route to Germany until Moscow cut off supplies at the end of August 2022. They also damaged the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which never entered service because Germany suspended its certification process shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine in February of that year. Russia has accused the U.S. of staging the explosions, a charge Washington denies. The pipelines were long a target of criticism by the U.S. and some of its allies, who warned that they posed a risk to Europe's energy security by increasing dependence on Russian gas. In 2023, German media reported that a pro-Ukraine group was involved in the sabotage. Ukraine rejected suggestions it might have ordered the attack and German officials voiced caution over the accusation.


The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump ignores legacy admissions in push for college ‘fairness'
President Trump has repeatedly said he's pushing for 'fairness' in the college admissions process, but his administration has done nothing to go after legacy admissions, despite their unpopularity along bipartisan lines. Reforming the university application and acceptance process has been a key part of many of Trump's moves on higher education, including the deals to restore federal funding he's made with multiple schools. But the practice of accepting applicants based on alumni or donor status, which some schools have sought to roll back independently, has been left alone by the administration. 'If the Trump administration was truly concerned about merit, legacy admissions would be one of the first policies they would challenge, and by ignoring it, it makes their rhetoric around meritocracy just hollow,' said Wesley Whistle, project director of higher education at New America. Legacy admissions have been a bipartisan target for years, especially since the renewed push for racial equality in 2020 and since the 2023 Supreme Court decision banning affirmative action in college admissions. Advocates argue legacy preferences unfairly boost white and rich applicants, with selective and private institutions more likely to use the practice. Education Reform Now says some 420 U.S. colleges still use legacy admissions, though that is down more than 50 percent from 2015. While some schools don't use legacy to determine acceptance, they will give scholarships based on legacy status. Trump often focuses his higher education rhetoric more on reforming classroom curricula, faculty ideology or the handling of protests, but changes to admissions have regularly been part of his demands. In restoring federal funding to Brown and Columbia universities, agreements were struck regarding transparency of admission data and ensuring 'merit-based' admissions. Trump also signed a memorandum directing the Department of Education to collect more admissions data from universities and compile the information into an easily accessible database for parents and students. 'American students and taxpayers deserve confidence in the fairness and integrity of our Nation's institutions of higher education, including confidence that they are recruiting and training capable future doctors, engineers, scientists, and other critical workers vital to the next generations of American prosperity. Race-based admissions practices are not only unfair, but also threaten our national security and well-being,' the order reads. The Trump administration has largely justified its going after schools over their alleged inaction against campus antisemitism, which advocates say should make legacy an even more attractive target as Jewish applicants were among those disadvantaged by the practice. 'Attacking legacy preferences would be directly in line with these three arguments Trump has been making about merit, about a rigged system and about antisemitism. It's troubling that the administration hasn't said anything from our legacy preferences,' said Richard Kahlenberg, director of the American Identity Project at the Progressive Policy Institute 'So for all three of those reasons, it would be very natural for the Trump administration to go after legacy preferences. So, it's baffling that they have not, and I think, deeply hypocritical,' he added. The White House and the Education Department did not respond to The Hill's request for comment. Admissions information has largely been a well-kept secret among higher education leaders, with advocates eager to see more data but afraid what the Trump administration might do in response to it. Many universities have been proactive about independently, or in response to state laws, ridding themselves of legacy admissions. Well-known schools such as Amherst College have ended it on their own, and states such as Virginia and Illinois have outlawed the practice at public universities. California has sought to make legacy admissions illegal even for private entities. Multiple bipartisan bills have been introduced to ban legacy admissions nationwide, but none have succeeded despite public support. While the practice is widely unpopular, some believe it is the right of private institutions to decide their policies on this issue and that legacy students can be beneficial to institutions. All the Ivy League schools still consider legacy admissions. Stanford University decided to defy the new California state law and keep legacy preferences, forfeiting money from a state grant program for its decision. 'Should a private university have legacy admissions? We argue that's up to the university, but there are some good reasons, in some cases, to have it, and those include, for instance, students are more likely to select themselves in or out if someone they know and trust, like their own father or mother, has gone there,' said Adam Kissel, visiting fellow in the Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy. 'If I were an admissions officer and someone is a legacy applicant, I would say I'd be surprised if they're not a fit here, because they probably know whether they're a fit. There's less of a risk on that person. But it's not about merit necessarily, and so that brings up the merit question,' he added.