Jim Irsay, longtime Indianapolis Colts owner, dies at 65
Indianapolis Colts owner and CEO Jim Irsay has died at the age of 65, the team announced on Wednesday.
The Colts said Irsay died 'peacefully in his sleep' on Wednesday afternoon. No cause of death was given.
'Jim's dedication and passion for the Indianapolis Colts in addition to his generosity, commitment to the community, and most importantly, his love for his family were unsurpassed,' the team said in a statement.
Before becoming the owner of the franchise, Irsay was named general manager at 24 years old, the youngest in team history to ever hold that job, according to the Colts.
In 1995, he took a more prominent role within the team before becoming the sole owner in December 1997, after the death of his father, Robert Irsay.
During his time with the organization, the Colts won 10 division championships, made two Super Bowl appearances and oversaw the team winning their fourth title in 2006, when Indianapolis defeated the Chicago Bears in Super Bowl XLI.
'Jim will be deeply missed by his family, the Colts organization, and fans everywhere, but we remain inspired by his caring and unique spirit,' the team added.
Earlier on Wednesday, Irsay tweeted his support for the Indiana Pacers ahead of Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals against the New York Knicks.
'Go PACERS. Good luck to Herb, the entire @Pacers organization, and our city!,' Irsay wrote.
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell called Irsay a 'friend' and a 'man deeply committed to his family, the game, the Colts, and the Indianapolis community.'
'He led with integrity, passion and care for the Colts' players, coaches and staff, and his courageous work in support of mental health will be a lasting legacy. Outside of football, he was a talented musician and built an extraordinary collection of historical and musical artifacts that he shared with people across the country,' Goodell added.
'On behalf of the entire NFL, I extend my heartfelt condolences to Jim's daughters and their families, and to his many friends throughout the NFL.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Grizzlies' Zach Edey reinjures left ankle, will have surgery and miss start of 2025-26 season
Memphis Grizzlies center Zach Edey reportedly will miss the beginning of the 2025-26 season because of surgery to repair a left ankle he reinjured during an offseason training session. On Saturday, ESPN's Shams Charania reported the injury and noted the All-Rookie big will undergo surgery to restabilize the ankle. Advertisement The Purdue product has a history of ankle injuries with the first one coming in November 2024. The issues came back in March and then again in April. In his debut season with the Grizzlies, Edey averaged 9.2 points, 8.3 rebounds and 1.3 blocks. The 23-year-old shot 58% from the field and started in 55 of his 66 appearances. Edey played four seasons at Purdue and averaged 25.2 points, 12.2 rebounds, 2 assists and 2.2 blocks during his senior campaign. The Grizzlies selected Edey with the ninth pick in the 2024 NBA Draft after he led Purdue to the NCAA tournament title game, losing to UConn. Memphis finished with the eighth seed in the Western Conference with a 48-34 record. After beating the Dallas Mavericks in the play-in tournament, the Grizzlies were swept by the Oklahoma City Thunder in the first round of the playoffs.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spurs Enouraged Not to Trade for Giannis
Spurs Enouraged Not to Trade for Giannis originally appeared on Athlon Sports. If the San Antonio Spurs trade for Giannis Antetokounmpo, they will likely be title favorites. Even with giving up the second overall pick, a core of Antetokounmpo, Victor Wembanyama, Stephon Castle, and De'Aaron Fox seems impossible to beat. Advertisement However, adding the Greek Freak comes at a cost. He is still very much in his prime, but questions will emerge about how much longer he can produce at that level. By giving up the second pick, as well as plenty of quality young players, in a trade for Giannis, the Spurs would severely limit their future flexibility. "One of the concerns people in San Antonio told me about is, you go and deal for a guy like Giannis, all of a sudden you've created a championship window, but it is a window with a closing date," said Sports Illustrated's Chris Mannix. "You've got De'Aaron Fox, who's in his late 20s, Giannis in his early 30s, and the last thing they want is to have a roster after those guys kind of age out where when Wembanyama is maybe looking around going, 'All right, where are the young guys I'm going to play with after that?'" Even though Giannis is a better player than Wembanyama right now, the Spurs would still firmly be Wemby's team, and their timeline would be built around the younger star. Even in the most lopsided deal in San Antonio's favor, the Spurs still have to give up the second pick, Harrison Barnes, and Devin Vassell, severely limiting their shooting prowess. Advertisement For Giannis, it would surely be worth it, but the Spurs are focused on the next 15 years, not the next three. "It certainly is a problem for another day, but that's on the mind of the San Antonio Spurs," Mannix continued. "That's why they want to hold on to Stephon Castle, so he can be that second guy opposite Wembanyama for a long time, assuming they trade that No. 2 pick." Cheaper trade candidates like Lauri Markkanen, Kevin Durant, and even Jaylen Brown have all been floated as possible targets, although the Spurs holding the line and building through the draft seems like the most realistic outcome. Check out the Inside the Spurs home page for more news, analysis, and must-read articles. Advertisement Related: Jeremy Sochan Gets Brutally Honest About Role With San Antonio Spurs Related: Adam Silver's All-Star Announcement Should Please Victor Wembanyama This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 5, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Ever Happened to Carbureted Engines?
What happened to carbureted engines? Once the most popular option amongst classic car enthusiasts and garage mechanics everywhere, it's been a few decades since we last saw one, as they're now reduced to a nostalgic commodity in cars, though they do still exist on small engines, such as lawn mowers. Back in the good old days, however, carburetors were found on some of the most exciting classic sports cars, and they were a reasonable option for owners and drivers looking to wrench on their vehicles. If this method of fuel delivery was so beloved, why did it drop to the wayside? As the popularity of fuel injection grew, we started to see the end of mass-produced vehicles with carbureted engines. Carbs, while simpler to work on and maintain and also more affordable, had some unfortunate downsides compared to the newer tech of fuel injection. As RSP Motorsports points out, fuel injection offered better fuel economy as it could optimize fuel delivery based on real-time engine conditions, as opposed to the fixed jets of a carburetor. This was due in part to the rise of electronic control units (ECUs), which gave cars computers that could calculate and make adjustments — although they also added a layer of expense and complexity. Because of adjustable fuel delivery, fuel injection was also more efficient, providing a more precise air-fuel mixture that reduced emissions compared to carburetors. By the mid-1980s, we were nearing the end of the carbureted engines in everyday cars on U.S. production lines as the world witnessed the rise of fuel injection. Fuel injection may be more complex, but its benefits made it more marketable to some consumers. American car enthusiasts might remember the carburetor sitting under the hood of their sports car, but these systems weren't exclusive to the U.S. market. On the global market, carbureted engines had a longer life span for many automotive brands, according to the Ask Car Guys subreddit. These markets focused less on fuel economy and efficiency, and also didn't see the consequences of laws and regulations cracking down on emissions. European, Asian, and African car markets continued to see cars produced with carbureted engines into the mid-1990s. Just because they've been phased out of production doesn't mean people don't still love cars with carbureted engines. Without the need for complex electronics we have in today's modern cars, carb engines were much simpler to work on, as stated by — and, for many people, more enjoyable. You could work on your car in the garage without concern for complex ECUs, and they could be manually tuned and adjusted if you knew what you were doing, without the need for expensive, complicated software. Outside of simplicity, many fans of the carbureted engine just enjoy the engine sound and feel. They have a distinct sound, throttle response, and feel that is very dissimilar to cars we have in production today, making many people loyal to this now nostalgic form of fuel delivery. Carburetors were easy to make adjustments and tuning changes to, as they didn't require fancy computers and knowledge to figure out, but Electronics for Imaging (EFI) provided arguably smoother throttle response and wasn't as annoying to try to start on a cold day — a struggle anyone who has owned a carbureted car probably knows well after messing around with a manual choke on a cold winter day. Just because we don't see cars with carburetors coming off the assembly line doesn't mean they are off the road. Many car collectors and classic car enthusiasts still enjoy wrenching, owning, and driving carbureted cars today. They may be "gone," but they will never be forgotten — there will always be something tried and true about a carbureted engine that enthusiasts will always have an appreciation for.
