China and the U.S. clash at the UN over the Panama Canal, a focus of Trump's attention
UNITED NATIONS — The United States and China clashed over the Panama Canal at the United Nations on Monday, with the U.S. warning that Beijing's influence over the key waterway could threaten global trade and security and China calling U.S. accusations a pretext to take over the canal.
The clash took place at a UN Security Council meeting where Panama's President José Raúl Mulino stressed the neutrality of the canal and his country's ownership of the waterway linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Panama holds the council presidency this month, and Mulino was chairing a meeting on challenges to maritime security. Interpol Secretary General Valdecy Urquiza told members these include piracy, armed robbery, transnational crime and cyber criminals weaponizing artificial intelligence to attack ports where there is 'minimal cyber security, maximum exposure.'
U.S. President Donald Trump thrust Panama into the spotlight even before winning election last November by suggesting that his country should consider retaking control of the Panama Canal and accusing Panama of ceding influence to China.
The U.S. built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Control of the waterway transferred to Panama in 1999 under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter.
China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong emphasized to the council that 'Panama has consistently and effectively managed the canal, making significant contributions to global shipping and trade.'
'China has always respected the permanent neutrality of the canal and firmly supports Panama in safeguarding its sovereignty over the canal to ensure its openness and smooth operation,' he said.
Acting U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea, who spoke afterward, went after China, expressing concern about its 'outsized influence over the Panama Canal area, especially over critical infrastructure and port operations.'
Alluding to its claims in the South China Sea, she said, 'China's expansive and unlawful maritime claims and aggressive actions demonstrate its threat to maritime security and commerce.' She said the U.S. rejects these claims and supports countries opposing them.
'China's influence in the canal area is not just a risk to Panama and the United States, but rather a potential threat to global trade and security,' Shea said.
The Trump administration has pressured China to have the Hong Kong-based operator of ports at either end of the canal sell those interests to a U.S. consortium that includes BlackRock Inc.
Panama has vehemently rejected a takeover of the canal, but in April, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Panama and agreed with Mulino to step up security coordination. The agreement also gives U.S. troops access to strategic air and naval facilities in the Central American nation, which sparked large protests in Panama's capital.
China's Fu asked for the floor to respond to Shea's accusations after all council members spoke, this time lashing out at the Trump administration.
'The United States' fabrication of lies and groundless attacks against China are nothing but a pretext for seeking control of the canal,' he said.
The Chinese envoy called the U.S. and its deployment of offensive weapons in the South China Sea area 'the biggest disrupter of peace and stability' in the region, and he accused the administration of exacerbating risks to global maritime security.
'China firmly opposes economic coercion and bullying practices and urges the United States to stop fabricating rumors, lies and creating trouble,' Fu said.
Murillo then responded, saying he wanted to stress Panama's sovereignty 'in terms of the ownership of the canal' and the multilateral treaty governing its administration. He called the canal's neutrality 'the only and the best defense' to any specific or global threats.
Edith M. Lederer, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Alleged illegal jet ski crossing into U.S. exposes 'holes' in border security: CBSA's union
While the search for a man who allegedly crossed the border illegally on a rented jet ski continues, some officials say the incident is exposing holes in Canada's border security. Sarnia police and its American counterparts are investigating after a Sea-Doo was recovered on the Michigan shore, after being rented by a Toronto man from a southwestern Ontario border city business. When the jet ski was not returned, a search was mounted and the jet ski found a few hours later. The man has still not been found. In a statement, Sarnia police said he remains outstanding in both Canada and the U.S. but " work is underway to apprehend him," and that the investigation is ongoing. Sarnia—Lambton— Bkejwanong MP Marilyn Gladu says more needs to be done to combat "porosity," at the border — noting that Sarnia does not have an RCMP office. "Really it's not ... patrolled formally," Gladu said. "You have the Coast Guard available if there's a concern expressed, but otherwise … we have to call London or Windsor to get any support from the RCMP. "We've had this concern for a while and both myself and [Sarnia mayor] Mayor Bradley have been calling on the government to address the porosity of the border here." In a Windsor stop on Tuesday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the border is short "thousands" of patrol officers and placed the blame on the previous federal government. In January, Ford's government launched Operation Deterrence, which saw hundreds of officers assigned to the borders. The province has also committed to buying the Windsor Police Service, among others, a helicopter for further surveillance. However, the premier added border patrol shouldn't be the responsibility of municipal or provincial police. Instead, he said it should rest with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). "We cannot have Windsor Police Service patrolling our borders, they have enough issues to take care of on the land," said Ford. Windsor harbourmaster says money, action needed to combat illegal border crossings 2 days ago While Gladu said she agrees with Ford, she also maintained any and all resources are needed. "All help that we can get is appreciated and more needs to be done." Border security has become a top issue since the re-election of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has made repeated comments about Canada's borders letting drugs and crime into his country — while also indicating a desire to annex Canada. In a bid to stave off tariffs in February, then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau committed to moving forward with a previously approved $1.3 billion border plan on border security and appointing Kevin Brosseau as the country's new fentanyl czar. The current federal government has also introduced the Strong Borders Act, which expands the powers of intelligence and security agencies. "This is essential to maintaining the safety and security of our country … it is also a priority that we share with our neighbours," said Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree when the bill was unveiled. But the president of the union representing CBSA workers says while they've been promised resources, they haven't seen much yet. Mark Weber of the Customs and Immigration Union says he wasn't surprised to hear about the Sarnia jet ski incident. "It is very commonly known," he said. "I think the issue of who takes care of things between ports of entry is a kind of a big blind spot right now that's completely left to the RCMP." Weber says if CBSA agents witness someone crossing the border illegally, they have to call the RCMP, despite having the same legal authority. "It makes no sense at all that we're not part of doing that work," Weber said. "We're not saying, we want to replace the RCMP or do all of that work. "It's a big border. It takes a lot of people and a lot of manpower to get that work done, but we want to be part of that solution." Staffing is a major concern, he said, with ports of crossings racking up virtually "unlimited" amounts of overtime. Weber says CBSA officers should be encouraged to tackle the issue of illegal crossings. Ride along with the RCMP to see how they're patrolling the Canada-U.S. border in new ways 5 months ago RCMP officers in the Windsor, Ont. detachment are patrolling the Canada-U.S. border in ways they've never done before ever since Donald Trump pushed for an increase in security between the neighbouring countries. In a statement, the RCMP said patrolling the Detroit and St. Clair Rivers is a joint effort between their officers and "federal, provincial and municipal" law enforcement partners. In Windsor, the RCMP maintains a Shiprider unit that does cross-border law enforcement alongside the U.S. coast Guard, OPP, Windsor police and Walpole Island First Nations police. That unit, a spokesperson said, works on activities including the illegal drug trade, migrant smuggling, firearms trafficking and terrorism — while also relying on its American partners for enforcement on the water.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Kelly McParland: Alaska summit offers no hope for Ukraine compromise
Article content From Putin's position, there's little reason to compromise now. He faces no serious internal opposition or public pressure. Russians as a people are so accustomed to centuries of all-powerful monarchs, dictators or one-party states controlling their lives — demanding unquestioning obedience while treating resistance with ruthless punishment — that it's bred in their bone. They're born to it, live with it and see little prospect of anything different. People who challenge Putin fall out of windows, die in exploding airplanes or expire in jails in some distant outback. He has valuable economic and commercial support from China, which has its own reasons for seeking a western world flummoxed by the uncertainty Putin's war creates. Article content On the other side of the table from Putin we have the president of the United States, who may have somewhat different motives, but could in no way be classed as a reliable friend of Ukraine or its people. Article content President Trump originally claimed he'd end the war in his first 24 hours in office. Later, he sought to squeeze off its weapon supplies, demanding a big chunk of its minerals in return for more. He eventually agreed to renew sales, but only if European allies paid the bill for them. Most recently, he set a deadline for Moscow to end the fighting; it came and went on Friday. The war goes on. Article content For Russia, the summit represents another chance to play for time, stringing along the president while continuing to pummel Ukraine and its people. His chances of gain increase the longer Washington procrastinates and Europe is distracted by the economic and security threats the conflict engenders. Article content So, why would Trump fly all the way to Alaska for the sit-down? European leaders — none of whom were invited to take part — declared both that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' and 'international borders must not be changed by force.' Zelenskyy has categorically rejected any surrender of territory, despite Trump's talk of 'swapping' territory. Article content The U.S. president likes a show. He admires Putin's avarice and cruelty, which he mimics in his monetization of the presidency and his treatment of immigrants and the homeless. He's remodelled the White House with a czarist taste for gilt and excess, and staged his own military parade with tanks rumbling through the streets of Washington just like they do through Red Square. While he may be mildly irked at Putin's delaying tactics, he's never shown the Russian despot the level of public disrespect Zelenskyy endured during a visit to the Oval Office. Article content
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
You can't fly sovereignty on foreign fuel
Omar Saleh is the chief operating officer at North Vector Dynamics. This week, China slapped a 75.8-per-cent preliminary anti-dumping duty on Canadian canola, threatening $5-billion a year in exports and putting the Prairie agricultural economy squarely in the crosshairs. Yet in this crisis lies an opportunity. The same crop now caught in a trade war could also be the key to fixing one of our biggest national security vulnerabilities. Canola has quietly become one of the most credible feedstocks for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) – chemically identical to conventional jet fuel, yet with up to 90 per cent lower life-cycle emissions. It's a drop-in fuel – usable in current engines, aircraft and refuelling systems with no modifications. The U.S. Air Force flies on it. Lufthansa uses it regularly. NATO is preparing to deploy it. Canada isn't. We have committed to spending $38.6-billion on North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) modernization and Arctic deployments – without securing the fuel to support them. No strategic reserve. No domestic supply chain. No plan. Poilievre urges Ottawa to cancel BC Ferries loan in response to Chinese canola tariffs At Canada's most remote base, CFS Alert, it takes seven litres of fuel to deliver just one usable litre. In a crisis, that's a logistics choke point an adversary wouldn't even need to attack – just wait for the supply chain to strain and watch operations slow. This isn't a technical gap. It's industrial abdication. Canada has the tools to lead. New high-oil varieties can grow on Class 4 marginal lands – millions of acres across Saskatchewan and Alberta that aren't used currently for food crops. That means no pressure on food systems, and no need to convert premium farmland. That shift wasn't driven by marketing – it was earned through hard science, better crop genetics and proven refining results. What's more, Canada has a real shot at global leadership not only because of what we grow, but also what we can store. Alberta already has one of the most advanced carbon-capture networks in North America. Facilities such as Quest, and the provincewide trunk line that supports it, are exactly what will separate low-carbon SAF from the ultralow-carbon SAF needed to win international contracts. That infrastructure is already there. Put it together and the Prairies don't just have the feedstock. They have the land, the logistics, the refining and the emissions solution. No other country has all five. So why are we still acting like this is someone else's opportunity? The European Union and Britain are mandating SAF blending – 2 per cent by 2025, climbing to 70 per cent by 2050. The United States has committed billions through the Department of Energy, Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Defense. Yet Canada remains on the sidelines, siloing SAF under clean fuel programs, ignoring it in procurement and treating it as someone else's file. We've got more to lose than most. Almost a quarter of Canada's jet fuel is imported, leaving our defence and Arctic operations dependent on foreign supply chains that are vulnerable to global disruptions. This isn't about emissions – it's about operational readiness and supply chain control. Scaling SAF to 15 per cent of Canada's jet fuel use could generate $3-billion to $5-billion annually across agriculture, refining and logistics. It could give farmers a new market, insulate us from geopolitical fuel shocks and create an Arctic fuel reserve that doesn't cost $10 a litre to deliver. It means rural jobs. It means Indigenous-led infrastructure and northern resupply chains. It means fuel security for defence operations without relying on U.S. or overseas supply. Ottawa wants certainty from China before making concessions on canola tariffs, minister says It also means leverage. SAF opens the door to premium export markets in the EU and U.S., and strengthens interoperability with NATO and NORAD fleets. Done right, this isn't just industrial policy – it's foreign policy. If Canada can't fuel its own jets, we don't control our defence. If we can't deliver fuel to our Arctic bases without draining our supply chain, we don't control our territory. And if we can't build the industrial system we're uniquely positioned to lead, we don't control our future. Ottawa must treat SAF as strategic infrastructure, not just a climate file. That means committing to a federal SAF procurement mandate for defence and Arctic operations, subsidizing Prairie-based SAF refineries and creating a domestic strategic reserve by 2028. It also means integrating SAF into NORAD modernization planning – so the next time we upgrade our northern air bases, we're upgrading their fuel supply, too. Sovereignty isn't a slogan. It's fuel in the tank. It's time to fill it.
