
A welcome boost to press freedom
It was encouraging to read that Malaysia has climbed 19 spots to 88th in the 2025 World Press Freedom Index. While not our best-ever showing, the latest report by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) indicates a recovery from last year's plunge.
As someone who spent 29 years in the media, both at The Star and Malaysiakini, and as a former leader of the National Union of Journalists, I have a deep personal investment in press freedom. I consider it a vital cog in our nation's development.
I am hopeful that the Malaysian Media Council will be another step in the right direction. The bill to establish the council was passed earlier this year, and ideally, it will help create an independent body to safeguard media freedoms and integrity.
Let us not forget that in December, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced that the much-awaited Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill would likely be tabled in Parliament some time this year, following a decision by the Special Cabinet Committee on National Governance.
It is interesting to note some of the criticisms made in the RSF report, which claimed that the country scored poorly in the categories of legislation and politics. It also took aim at the government's attitude towards investigative reporters.
'The monarchy is an extremely sensitive subject, as are discussions on race and religion. Any form of commentary or reporting deemed critical of the monarchy can result in prosecution, leading to widespread self-censorship on the matter,' said RSF in its report.
I do wonder what criteria were used in ranking press freedom globally because Malaysia came in second among the Asean countries. It was narrowly behind Thailand (85th), but ahead of Brunei (97th), the Philippines (116th), Singapore (123rd), Indonesia (127th), Laos (150th), Cambodia (161st), Myanmar (169th) and Vietnam (173rd).
But if you are going to harp on the fact that press freedom includes the right to speak on the monarchy, surely Thailand's lese majeste laws are much harsher than our laws? As for political freedoms, Thailand has been frequently under military rule, which muzzles the press. The reformist Move Forward Party, which actually won the last election, was barred from forming the government and eventually dissolved. So again, I ask: what criteria are being used, and who are they talking to?
I find that in the last few years, press freedom in Malaysia has grown by leaps and bounds. I was able to report on custodial deaths, decriminalisation of marijuana, racial discrimination, workers' rights, indigenous land disputes and other such issues that were being suppressed just a decade ago.
RSF also said that starting a media outlet in Malaysia is risky due to strict licensing controls and concentrated ownership that undermines editorial independence. Honestly, there are over 100 mainstream papers, established online portals and independent media out here, operating in various languages. The saturation of media may affect profitability and sustainability, but it does not suggest a lot of restrictive control in 2025.
When I think back to just how badly the nation's press has been suppressed in the past during times like Ops Lalang, Reformasi, Bersih, and the 1MDB financial scandal, what we have now is a virtual oasis of open-source information. And the methods we use now to address dissent are very different.
A few days ago, I noticed my former employer had published a story where an activist used vulgar language against a minister. I texted a senior editor, suggesting the language be paraphrased. He agreed, and the change was made. I don't really consider it to be a moment of oppression. Perhaps those being surveyed feel otherwise.
When I first went into journalism in the 1990s, the then information minister Mohamad Rahmat would have come down on such conduct like a ton of bricks. Editors getting demoted or transferred, papers getting suspended, all that was the norm during the Dr Mahathir Mohamad era.
I am not pretending that the country is mature enough to allow unbridled freedoms. Considering that we have a right-wing opposition constantly attempting to stir racial and religious sentiments, it should be incumbent on some authority to act against that. How we can improve is by ensuring consistency of action so that accusations of double standards do not hold merit.
As the media industry evolves, it becomes necessary to put in new safeguards. This is imperative as traditional print and even online media decline in reach and are replaced by social media as the primary information source. Fake news, scams, trafficking, and sexual predators are all other factors that demand some action from the government.
Nonetheless, I am heartened by Anwar speaking out against any possible action against satirist Fahmi Reza, who was hauled up last December. I hope we continue evolving toward a media environment that values intellectual freedom and truth, while maintaining respect and space for dissenting voices.
Happy World Press Freedom Day, folks!
Martin Vengadesan is a former editor who currently serves as a strategic communications consultant to the communications ministry.
The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
36 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar's constitutional reference appeal for case management tomorrow
Anwar Ibrahim wants the Court of Appeal to refer eight legal questions, which he said arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther, to the Federal Court for determination. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has brought forward case management of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's constitutional reference appeal to tomorrow, with a view to disposing of the case on an expedited basis. Anwar is appealing against the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions – which he claims arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther – to the Federal Court for determination. An e-mail sent out by senior assistant registrar Ahmad Izuddin Fajri Fakrullah, sighted by FMT, said the case management was being brought forward as the appeals court bench had indicated this morning that an early hearing should be held. As such, Izuddin said case management, previously scheduled for Sept 2, has been brought forward to tomorrow. Lawyer Rafique Rashid Ali, appearing for Yusoff, who filed his suit in 2021 against Anwar over an alleged assault, confirmed the matter. 'The case management will be held online,' he said when contacted. Earlier today, a three-member bench chaired by Justice Ruzima Ghazali said the stay should be granted as Anwar had shown special circumstances. Ruzima, who sat with Justices Wong Kian Kheong and Lim Hock Leng, however, said parties were at liberty to apply for an early hearing date. On June 4, High Court Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application and directed that the trial proceed on the seven days previously set between June 16 and June 25. In her decision, Roz Mawar said none of the questions posed in the application had crossed the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 to justify a referral to the apex court. In a 21-page judgment, she said the application was misconceived as to the jurisdiction of the courts and based on speculative doctrines with no constitutional footing. On June 10, the Court of Appeal granted Anwar an interim stay pending today's hearing of the prime minister's stay application. The prime minister wants the apex court to determine whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. Yusoff's suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 22, 2022. A grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, Yusoff claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.


BusinessToday
2 hours ago
- BusinessToday
86% And Counting, PM Slams Claims Of ‘No Results'
Credits to PMO FB Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has dismissed claims that multibillion-ringgit investments bring no tangible results, stating that the manufacturing sector continues to deliver direct benefits to Malaysians through job creation, wage increases and industrial value-add. 'They say billions in investments, where are the results? There's nothing to show. The reality is, 86% of the approved projects are already operational,' he said. He revealed that 3,494 manufacturing projects have been approved by the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA) from 2021 until June 2025. Of these, 3,095 projects or 86.4%, have been realised and are now operational. Speaking at the monthly assembly of the Prime Minister's Department, Anwar noted that the implementation rate of approved projects stood at 90.6% in 2023, 79.2% in 2024 and 49.8% in the first quarter of 2025. 'I've told Minister Tengku Zafrul to continue publishing the relevant data and highlight the locations of operating plants — in Kulim, Johor, Sarawak, Sabah and the Klang Valley,' he added. He said most of the realised projects focus on digital and green industries. In the first quarter of this year alone, these projects have created 50,000 new jobs in the manufacturing sector. Median wages in the sector also rose by 5.4% to RM2,745, up from RM2,600 last year, aligning with the new minimum wage policy of RM1,700. Anwar also reported that since the establishment of the Invest Malaysia Facilitation Centre (IMFC) in December 2023, a total of 28,166 investor applications have been facilitated with a resolution rate of 99.9%. These applications involved matters such as approvals, permits, foreign worker quotas, utilities and tax-related issues. Related


BusinessToday
2 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Anwar: Fiscal Discipline Is Working, New Debt Down To RM77 Billion
Credits to PMO FB Prime Minister and Finance Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim reaffirmed that his administration has successfully reduced the country's annual new debt to RM77 billion in 2024, a significant drop from RM99 billion in 2022, signalling stronger fiscal prudence. Speaking at the monthly gathering of the Prime Minister's Department in Putrajaya today, he clarified that only the interest payments on legacy debt remain burdensome. 'The new debt taken by the government was RM99 billion in 2022, reduced to RM93 billion in 2023, and in 2024, the total is RM77 billion… that's a reduction,' he said. Criticising misleading claims circulating publicly, Anwar pointed out that some parties continue to accuse the government of increasing debt, despite the data. 'They say the overall debt is higher, including legacy debt and interest payments, but I've stated clearly that the government pledged to reduce new debt, and we've delivered. 'However, what's being spread around suggests that we're increasing the debt, as if we're deceiving the people. If you look at these figures, who's really lying?' he asked. He also underscored that this debt reduction aligns with efforts to narrow the country's fiscal deficit. The government aims to bring the deficit down to 3.8% in 2025 from 4.1% this year and 5.5% in 2022. Anwar explained that the government opted for a gradual reduction approach to avoid disrupting development and market confidence. 'We took over in 2022, and at the time, the fiscal deficit was 5.5%. What is a deficit? It means spending exceeds the country's revenue, which means we are borrowing,' he said. 'We manage the national economy like a household. If your income is RM5,000 but you spend RM7,000, that's a deficit. So now we're reducing expenses to RM6,500, RM6,000, RM5,500, but if we cut too fast, development would stall.' The Prime Minister also credited the civil service's efforts, highlighting Malaysia's 11-spot jump in the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking 2025 to 23rd place, up from 34th last year, the country's best showing since 2020. The rise, announced by the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry (MITI) in June, was attributed to improvements in economic performance and government efficiency. He further noted that the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its Article IV Mission report for 2025, commended Malaysia's fiscal reform agenda, particularly the introduction of the Public Finance and Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA). 'What does that mean? It means the Finance Minister has handed over part of his powers to Parliament to assess if targets are not being met. That's what we've done,' he said. Related