Tennis fans call out Nick Kyrgios for allegedly fat-shaming broadcaster Ben Rothenberg in social media post
Kyrgios, 30, responded to a post on X, formerly Twitter, which showed a picture of Rothenberg.
The original post by the account @TennisCentel claimed that Rothenberg was 'built like a groundhog' - a notion that Kyrgios appeared to back with the comment as he responded 'tennis central'.
While Kyrgios may have made the comment as a joke, its tone was not appreciated by fans of the sport, who were quick to voice their support for Rothenberg.
One user commented: '[Rothenberg is] still more relevant in tennis than you.'
A second remarked: 'Bully and nothing else. Just sad. Used to support you.'
Bro Ben Rothenberg is built like a groundhog LMAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/ShuA340nq4
— TENNISCentel (@TennisCentel) July 6, 2025
Rothenberg responded to Kyrgios' comments as the pair engaged in a war of words
Kyrgios then replied to further stoke fuel on the fire that was raging between them
Another stated: 'This isn't high school, grow up'.
In response to Kyrgios, Rothenberg wrote: 'Bro you have tweeted about me four times already this month and it's only July 6th. Let's work on getting you a job again.'
The former world number 11 responded: 'Awwww Benny I'm doing just fine. Someone's feelings are hurting...not so fun anymore is it?'
Their online battle of words marks the latest episode of a clash between the pair that has lasted almost five years.
The American journalist has repeatedly called for Kyrgios to be removed from covering tennis events - most recently for controversial tweets demeaning a WTA player.
'Honestly a bit surprised to see ESPN didn't yank Nick Kyrgios off air mid-#USOpen final, seeing his most recent disparaging tweet about a WTA player circulating,' Rothenberg wrote last year during the US Open.
That came after he replied to a tweet responding to a post about Jannik Sinner's girlfriend Anna Kalinskaya - in which he wrote 'second serve'.
Kyrgios was also critical of the doping saga that engulfed Australian Open champion Jannik Sinner last year.
Tennis fans were quick to lambast Kyrgios for his comments
The Italian was later banned for three months for breaching the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA) rules last year after he provided two positive drugs tests.
A further comment read: 'And then you wonder why the BBC dropped you from their Wimbledon coverage.
For someone who has been open about their mental health struggles, it's pretty damn obvious that you've still got a hell of a lot of work left to do in that department.'
Kyrgios - a Wimbledon finalist in 2022 - was axed from the BBC's coverage of this year's tournament following backlash that he was included as part of the original presenter line-up for 2025.
He was part of the broadcaster's coverage of the event in 2024, 12 months after Kyrgios had admitted to assaulting his former girlfriend Chiara Passari.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Andy Murray blasts Wimbledon for closing roof during Sinner-Dimitrov match
Sir Andy Murray has hit out at the All England Club's roof policy, questioning why the later stages of Jannik Sinner's match against Grigor Dimitrov could not have been played in the open air. As it happened, the match never reached completion, because a pectoral injury forced Dimitrov to retire. But Murray's point was that Dimitrov – who led by two sets to zero when the decision was taken – was on track to close out a famous victory well before the light was due to fail. 'So ridiculous to close the roof at this stage of the match,' Murray posted on X. 'At least an hour of light left… well over a set of tennis can still be played... it's an outdoor tournament!' Murray's criticism, which was posted when the roof closed at around 8.30pm, continues a trend of controversy around decision-making at this tournament, even if this was a very different type of call to the line-judging debates we have heard in recent days. A two-time Wimbledon champion, Murray has been promised a statue on the grounds by the summer of 2027 – the 150th anniversary of the Championships. His argument on the roof was supported by BBC pundit John McEnroe, who said: 'They should have played a third set [before closing the roof] because there was 45 minutes to an hour left.' But Tim Henman, another BBC pundit who is also a senior figure at the AELTC, was more equivocal. 'I don't think [they could have played a whole set before nightfall] on Centre Court,' said Henman. 'Outside it will be brighter but inside there is less light so they probably could have played six games, get to sort of quarter to nine, then it gets dark. But they try to shut the roof at a convenient time.' The AELTC's roof policy has changed noticeably over the years, with the initial instruction to referees being to keep it open unless there was absolutely no alternative. These days, we see a more proactive approach in which the primary goal is to avoid an awkward hiatus at a tense moment of play. The roof mechanism takes around 10 minutes to complete the closure, but there is usually a further two or three-minute delay while the players warm up again after the break. Meanwhile, giant fans flood the arena with dry air to prevent the humidity from climbing too high. With 15,000 Centre Court spectators all breathing water vapour into a closed space, the grass would otherwise become dangerously slippery. Wimbledon's policy is that, if artificial lighting is required, it can only be used under a closed roof on Centre or No 1 Courts. Continuing after nightfall also risks the players' safety because of dew. If there is a danger of the roof needing to be closed during a match, or even a set, the referee – who is now Denise Parnell – tends to take the initiative and make the decision early. Murray's former coach Brad Gilbert was another observer who remarked upon the closure. His post on X stated that 'this is day 8 @Wimbledon and the 7th time this tournament will finish under roof, not for rain because of long matches, never seen this happen before.' As Gilbert implied, matches are becoming longer, which begs the question of why the AELTC does not start play on Centre Court earlier than 1.30pm. When responding to this enquiry in previous years, the club has cited the danger of the grass wearing out under the stress of longer hours of play, as well as the need to give spectators from further afield enough time to arrive for the start. There is also a theory that the BBC enjoys having plenty of live play to televise in the evening, when its audience figures are highest.
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sinner fortunate to reach quarter-finals as Dimitrov retires injured leading by two sets
If Jannik Sinner goes on to win his first Wimbledon title this weekend, he will look back on this moment as the time when his luck turned. The world No 1 was trailing two sets to love – 6-3, 7-5, 2-2 – against an inspired Grigor Dimitrov, with a mountain to climb, when the Bulgarian hit an ace and then instantly fell to the ground clutching his pectoral muscle. He knew, there and then, that his Wimbledon was over and after a brief medical timeout, off the court, he returned in tears, before shaking Sinner's hand. The Italian goes through to a quarter-final against Ben Shelton, the big-serving American who advanced to the last eight at Wimbledon for the first time with an entertaining four‑set win against Lorenzo Sonego of Italy. It was not, of course, the way Sinner wanted to go through, but he lives on and maybe now he will believe the tennis gods are on his side. 'I don't take this as a win at all, this is just an unfortunate moment for us to witness,' the world No 1 said. 'He has struggled in grand slams with injuries a lot so seeing him again with this injury is very tough. We all saw by his reaction how much he cares about the sport and he is one of the hardest working players on tour. This is not the end we wanted to see and it's very sad. Seeing him in this position – if there was a chance for him to be in the next round he would deserve it. I hope he has a speedy recovery.' It was brutal on Dimitrov, who had hit 36 winners, controlling the match in every way, but the incident means he has now pulled out through injury in each of the past five grand slam tournaments. Ironically, it was Sinner who seemed to be struggling physically early in the match, rubbing his right elbow at times and later, early in the second set, taking a time‑out of his own. The 34-year-old Dimitrov was playing the tennis of his life at that point, dominating Sinner with brilliant serving – he lost just eight points on first serve in the entire match – beautiful slices, that took the Italian out of his comfort zone on arguably his worst surface. Dimitrov had been to the quarter‑finals only once before, in 2014, the year he beat Andy Murray on the way to the last four. But for two and a bit sets, he was right at his very best. Some of his volleys were Roger Federer-like and even the great man, watching in the royal box, approved. Dimitrov has always had an abundance of talent, more options than most players, so many choices at his hand, and Sinner was forced into a series of uncharacteristic errors. The Bulgarian broke in the second game on his way to a 3-0 lead in the first set and maintained the lead to take the set. Another early break put him in charge in the second but Sinner looked to have turned it around when he broke back for 5-5. Dimitrov broke again to move ahead and served out to double his lead. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion The roof was closed at the end of the second set, something Sinner would have been happy with, taking away the wind that had made life difficult. At 2-2, the drama happened. Dimitrov began the game serving and volleying, as he had done many times before, and hit his 14th ace, only to fall to the court immediately, clutching his right pectoral muscle. The pain was clear for everyone to see. Sinner came straight to his aid but it was obvious, even then, that nothing could be done. When he returned, Dimitrov was in tears and had to be helped from the court. Shelton will present a big challenge too after coming through another hugely entertaining clash with Sonego. The pair produced magic, as they always do and, as has usually been the case, it was Shelton who came out on top to reach the quarter-finals here for the first time. The left-handed Shelton, who has made the semi-finals of the US Open and Australian Open, served rockets, carved angles and slashed winners all over the place as he claimed a 3-6, 6-1, 7-6 (1), 7-5 victory. It is 25 years since an American man – Pete Sampras – last won the title here, and the way Shelton plays makes him a threat.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Player faith in technology shaken by storm around AI line-calling at Wimbledon
When the Wimbledon organisers announced last year that electronic line-calling would replace line judges for the first time at the Championships this year, plenty of criticism could have been anticipated. Some people would take issue with the more sterile landscape on court and the lack of human touch, while the cull of around 300 linesmen and women would also surely be a sore point. It is difficult, however, to imagine they were prepared for the firestorm that has followed its long-awaited implementation at this tournament. Electronic line-calling, or ELC, which uses automated ball-tracking technology has, after all, long been used in professional tennis tournaments, starting with the Next Gen ATP Finals in 2018. It has been four years since the Australian Open became the first grand slam to utilise the technology and this year, for the first time, the men's tour, the ATP, is using ELC at all of its events. Although all other men's clay-court events use ELC, the French Open is now the only grand slam that still employs human line judges. Instead of this year offering Wimbledon to step into the future, however, the All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) has spent the first eight days of the tournament defending its implementation of the technology. For the first five days of the tournament the most significant blows were the parting shots from Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu, the men's and women's British No 1 players, who each criticised the ELC system following their defeats. Both players believed they had been subjected to incorrect calls. 'It's kind of disappointing, the tournament here, that the calls can be so wrong, but for the most part they've been OK. It's just, like, I've had a few in my other matches, too, that have been very wrong,' Raducanu said. The AELTC maintained that the system was working optimally and that ELC remains considerably more accurate than the line judges it replaced. Wimbledon employs Hawk-Eye, one of numerous ELC providerswhich uses a system that incorporates 10 cameras placed around the court, and which track the bounce of the ball. Hawk-Eye states that its margin of error is 2.2mm. Wimbledon had previously used ELC only as a safety net, allowing players to challenge calls conducted by line judges. 'It's funny, because when we did have linesmen, we were constantly asked why we didn't have electronic line-calling because it's more accurate,' Debbie Jevans, the chair of the AELTC, told the BBC. Then came a disastrous series of events on Centre Court. As Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova held game point on her serve at 4-4 in the first set against Sonay Kartal on Sunday, a backhand from Kartal clearly flew long but it was not called out. After a lengthy delay, it emerged that some of the ELC cameras had not been functional on Pavlyuchenkova's side of the court for some time during the game. The umpire Nico Helwerth opted to replay the point. Around 10 minutes later, after losing that service game, Pavyluchenkova faced a set point on Kartal's serve. In the end, the AELTC was fortunate with the outcome. Pavlyuchenkova, who told Helwerth the tournament had 'stolen' the game from her, recovered to win both the set and the match, limiting the significance of the error. The AELTC announced in a statement on Sunday night that the ELC had been accidentally deactivated on Pavlyuchenkova's side of the court by one of the operators running the system. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Bright on Monday morning, the Wimbledon chief executive, Sally Bolton, fielded a contentious scheduled meeting with the media, which was almost entirely centred around ELC. Bolton asserted repeatedly that the mistake was purely down to human error, that the protocols had been changed to prevent a similar issue and that ELC has otherwise been working accurately during the tournament. At the very least, the situation with Pavlyuchenkova also underlined the importance of having contingency plans for when technology fails, including the possibility of umpires using video replay. Since the implementation of ELC, player reaction has largely been positive as it was rolled out on hard courts, with players recognising the greater accuracy provided by the system compared to human errors. However, after numerous dramatic moments during the clay-court season, as some players were frustrated with the differences between the ball marks and the ELC's judgments, the first week of ELC at Wimbledon has been a difficult one. It is clear that faith in its implementation on the surface has diminished and both privately and publicly, players and coaches have expressed scepticism about its accuracy. As the tournament moves into the latter stages, it remains to be seen if that faith will be restored.
