More heat, more harm: Climate change doubling pregnancy risk days worldwide
Being exposed to extreme heat while pregnant has previously been linked to a range of problems, including a higher risk of premature birth, stillbirth, birth defects and gestational diabetes.
The new report from the US-based research group Climate Central sought to measure how much more pregnant women have been exposed to excessive heat since 2020 — and to what extent climate change is to blame.
In 222 out of the 247 countries and territories studied, 'climate change at least doubled the average annual number of pregnancy heat-risk days experienced during the past five years', the report said.
The biggest increases were in developing countries where access to healthcare is limited, such as in the Caribbean, Central and South America, the Pacific islands, South-east Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
The researchers only looked at the rise in potentially dangerous hot days and did not examine the extent to which pregnant women were actually affected by heat in the countries.
Ana Bonell, a maternal health and extreme heat researcher at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine not involved in the report, said it 'gives clear evidence of the growing exposure risk to extreme heat'.
The findings could also apply to the elderly, another group who are more at risk during blisteringly hot periods, she told AFP.
While researchers are increasingly documenting the many ways that extreme heat can threaten human health, there remain 'many unknowns' about the physiological mechanisms to explain why this happens, Bonell said.
A large 2024 study in Nature Medicine estimated that heatwaves increase the odds of having a complication during pregnancy by 1.25 times.
Beyond wider efforts to fight climate change — which is largely caused by humans burning fossil fuels — experts advised local policies to help communities beat the heat.
These include 'greening neighbourhoods, limiting pollution, creating cool areas and informing residents about the risks,' French epidemiologist Lucie Adelaide said.
In a statement linked to the new report, she also recommended that existing information about the health risks of heatwaves include warnings for pregnant women, who are currently rarely mentioned in such efforts. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
5 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Dangerous dreams: inside the internet's ‘sleepmaxxing' trend
Experts say there is no proof that online trends such as sleep cocktails, neck hanging and mouth taping can actually improve one's sleep. (Facebook / X pics) PARIS : From mouth taping to rope-assisted neck swinging, a viral social media trend is promoting extreme bedtime routines that claim to deliver perfect sleep – despite scant medical evidence and potential safety risks. Influencers on platforms including TikTok and X are fuelling a growing wellness obsession popularly known as 'sleepmaxxing', a catch-all term for activities and products aimed at optimising sleep quality. The explosive rise of the trend – generating tens of millions of posts – underscores social media's power to legitimise unproven health practices, particularly as tech platforms scale back content moderation. One so-called insomnia cure involves people hanging by their necks with ropes or belts and swinging their bodies in the air. 'Those who try it claim their sleep problems have significantly improved,' said one clip on X that racked up more than 11 million views. Experts have raised alarm about the trick, following a Chinese state broadcaster's report that attributed at least one fatality in China last year to a similar 'neck-hanging' routine. Such sleepmaxxing techniques are 'ridiculous, potentially harmful, and evidence-free', Timothy Caulfield, a misinformation expert from the University of Alberta in Canada, told AFP. 'It is a good example of how social media can normalise the absurd.' Another popular practice is taping of the mouth for sleep, promoted as a way to encourage nasal breathing. Influencers claim it offers broad benefits, from better sleep and improved oral health to reduced snoring. But a report from George Washington University found that most of these claims were not supported by medical research. Experts have also warned the practice could be dangerous, particularly for those suffering from sleep apnoea, a condition that disrupts breathing during sleep. Other unfounded tricks touted by sleepmaxxing influencers include wearing blue- or red-tinted glasses, using weighted blankets, and eating two kiwi fruits just before bed. 'My concern with the 'sleepmaxxing' trend – particularly as it's presented on platforms like TikTok – is that much of the advice being shared can be actively unhelpful, even damaging, for people struggling with real sleep issues,' Kathryn Pinkham, a Britain-based insomnia specialist, told AFP. 'While some of these tips might be harmless for people who generally sleep well, they can increase pressure and anxiety for those dealing with chronic insomnia or other persistent sleep problems.' Ironically, the quest for the perfect sleep can keep you up at night. (Envato Elements pic) While sound and sufficient sleep is considered a cornerstone of good health, experts warn that the trend may be contributing to orthosomnia, an obsessive preoccupation with achieving perfect sleep. 'The pressure to get perfect sleep is embedded in the sleepmaxxing culture,' said Eric Zhou of Harvard Medical School. 'While prioritising restful sleep is commendable, setting perfection as your goal is problematic. Even good sleepers vary from night to night.' Pinkham added that poor sleep was often fuelled by the 'anxiety to fix it' – a fact largely unacknowledged by sleepmaxxing influencers. 'The more we try to control sleep with hacks or rigid routines, the more vigilant and stressed we become, paradoxically making sleep harder,' Pinkham said. 'Looksmaxxing' Many sleepmaxxing posts focus on enhancing physical appearance rather than improving health, reflecting an overlap with 'looksmaxxing' – another online trend that encourages unproven and sometimes dangerous techniques to boost sexual appeal. Some sleepmaxxing influencers have sought to profit from the trend's growing popularity, promoting products such as mouth tapes, sleep-enhancing drink powders, and 'sleepmax gummies' containing melatonin. That may be in violation of legal norms in some countries like Britain, where melatonin is available only as a prescription drug. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine has recommended against using melatonin to treat insomnia in adults, citing inconsistent medical evidence regarding its effectiveness. Some medical experts also caution about the impact of the placebo effect on insomnia patients using sleep medication – when people report real improvement after taking a fake or nonexistent treatment because of their beliefs. 'Many of these tips come from non-experts and aren't grounded in clinical evidence,' said Pinkham. 'For people with genuine sleep issues, this kind of advice often adds pressure rather than relief.'
Malay Mail
12-08-2025
- Malay Mail
‘Silent Killer': Experts reveal the underestimated dangers of rising global heatwaves
PARIS, Aug 13 — As Europe and North America endure or brace for yet another wave of sweltering heat and out-of-control wildfires this summer, experts are sounding the alarm over heat stress. The condition kills more people than hurricanes, floods or any other climate-related extreme, but what is heat stress exactly, and how is it measured? 'Silent killer' Heat stress occurs when the body's natural cooling systems are overwhelmed, causing symptoms ranging from dizziness and headaches to organ failure and death. It is brought on by prolonged exposure to heat and other environmental factors that work together to undermine the body's internal thermostat and its ability to regulate temperature. 'Heat is a silent killer, because symptoms are not so easily evident. And when these underlying conditions are present, the consequences can be very bad, and even catastrophic,' said Alejandro Saez Reale of the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). Infants, the elderly, people with health problems and outdoor workers are particularly vulnerable. City dwellers surrounded by concrete, brick and other heat-absorbing surfaces also face an elevated risk. The WMO estimates that heat kills around half a million people a year but says that the true toll is not known, and could be 30 times higher than is currently recorded. As climate change makes heatwaves longer, stronger and more frequent, people across the planet will be increasingly exposed to conditions that test the limits of human endurance. More than a maximum Temperature might be the most widely used and easily understood weather reading, but headline-catching 'maximum highs' do not fully tell how heat might affect the human body. For example, 35 degrees Celsius feels very different in the dry heat of the desert compared to the humid climes of a jungle. To build a more complete picture, scientists consider a host of factors including temperature but also humidity, wind speed, clothing, direct sunshine, and even the amounts of concrete or greenery in the area. All these play a big role in how the body perceives and, most importantly, responds to extreme heat. There are many ways to measure heat stress, some of which are decades old, but all try to boil down different environmental readings into a single number or graph. 'Feels like' One of the oldest methods is known as wet-bulb temperature, a useful gauge in situations where the thermometer reading may not seem too extreme but when combined with humidity becomes unbearable, even lethal. Just six hours exposed to 35 degrees Celsius with 100 percent humidity is enough to kill a healthy person, scientists said in 2023. Above this limit, sweat cannot evaporate off the skin, and the body overheats and expires. Copernicus, the EU's climate monitor, uses the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), which considers temperature and humidity but also wind, sunshine and radiated heat to rank heat stress levels from moderate to extreme. Extreme heat stress, as judged by this index, is a 'feels like' temperature of 46 Celsius and above, at which point it is necessary to take action to avoid health risks. The Heat Index, used by the US National Weather Service, offers an 'apparent temperature' based on heat and humidity in the shade, and a colour-coded graph denoting the likelihood of illness from exposure. Canada has developed the Humidex rating, which combines heat and humidity into one number to reflect the 'perceived temperature' and presents the associated risk in a four-step 'guide to summer comfort' chart. Limitations Other examples of 'thermal stress' indices include the Tropical Summer Index, Predicted Heat Strain and the mean radiant temperature. They are not without limitations, and heatwave expert John Nairn said that some measures worked better in some climates than others. 'It's not the same all around the world, about the way you approach it,' Nairn told AFP. The UTCI, for example, is excellent at reading heat stress in Germany, where it was first developed, but 'a very poor measure' in global south countries, he said. 'It saturates and over-measures far too much. And it would over-alert for those communities who are chronically exposed to heat,' said Nairn, who has advised governments and the WMO on heatwave policy. These locations might receive better heat stress readings using wet-bulb temperature, he said. These indices also do not consider the impact of heat beyond health, he said, even though a heatwave could strand trains or overload air-conditioners. 'If your heat challenge is such that it gets to a level where your infrastructure is not going to operate, and it starts failing, that will have a return on humans no longer being protected,' Nairn said. — AFP
Malay Mail
12-08-2025
- Malay Mail
Extreme heat from climate change driving sharp decline in tropical bird populations, study finds
PARIS, Aug 12 — Tropical bird populations have plummeted not only due to deforestation but also extreme heat attributable to climate change, according to a study published on Monday in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution. Intensifying temepratures caused a 25-38 per cent reduction in tropical bird populations between 1950 and 2020, compared to a scenario without manmade global warming, scientists based in Europe and Australia reported. 'The findings are pretty stark,' lead author Maximilian Kotz, a researcher at the National Supercomputing Centre in Barcelona and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP. Bird populations in the tropics now face 30 days of heat extremes per year compared to three per year in the mid-20th century, he noted. 'This has major consequences for how we think about biodiversity conservation,' Kotz said by email. 'Protecting pristine habitats is crucial, but without dealing with climate change it won't be enough for birds.' Nearly half of all bird species are found in biodiversity-rich tropical regions. These often colourful animals perform essential services for ecosystems, such as dispersing plant seeds. Invasive species another threat But birds living in these regions may already be 'close to the limits' of their tolerance to high temperatures, which can cause heatstroke (hyperthermia) or dehydration. The overview study does not provide figures for individual species, but earlier literature is rich with examples of the devastating impact of rising temperatures. One documented the heat-related decline of birds in Panama, including the king quetzal, the red-crested quetzal, the two-coloured kingfisher and the aurora trogon. Another study published in 2017 showed how some tropical hummingbirds are now forced to seek shade to regulate their temperature in extreme heat, cutting into the amount of time they can spend searching for life-sustaining nectar. Extreme heat waves, which are becoming more frequent, represent a far greater threat than increases in average temperatures or rainfall, another result of human-induced climate change. Up to now, it has been assumed that the decline in bird populations worldwide was due mainly to other well-identified factors, especially habitat loss, pesticide use, hunting, and invasive species, especially snakes that snack on bird eggs and mosquitos carrying avian malaria. But the new findings 'challenge the view that direct human pressures have so far been the dominant driver of impacts on bird populations compared to climate change in tropical regions,' according to the authors. To reach this conclusion, they analysed observational data from more than 3,000 bird populations around the world and used statistical modelling to isolate the effects of extreme weather from other factors. The findings help complete the picture of tropical bird decline, noted Aimee Van Tatenhove, a post-doctoral fellow at Cornell University's Center for Avian Population Studies who was not involved in the study. 'Deforestation has an obvious impact—trees are cut and habitat is destroyed,' she told AFP. 'We need long-term datasets like the authors used to understand how extreme temperatures impact avian populations.' 'This study is an important reminder that we need to continue examining different causes of population declines and apply those findings to conservation initiatives,' she continued. — AFP
