US second-hand clothing exports help combat waste, boost Guatemala's economy
Garson & Shaw CEO Lisa Jepsen said: 'This report is significant because it shifts the conversation from waste to opportunity. It offers concrete evidence that global reuse systems are not only environmentally beneficial but also economically and socially valuable. It highlights the need to integrate international reuse into US waste and circular economy policy.'
The US is one of the largest producers of textile waste globally, with a staggering 85% of used clothing ending up in landfills or incinerators annually.
As per the report, Guatemala imported 131 million kilograms of used clothing from the US in 2023, which represents 98% of its total used clothing imports.
The study found that nearly 90% of these garments are reused within the country.
The report notes that second-hand clothing industry in Guatemala is advancing gender equity, with close to 60% of related businesses being women-owned.
In Guatemala, imported second-hand clothing are categorised as either sorted, bales that are already categorised by item type and quality or unsorted, which refers to bales that contain a mix of garments in their original collected condition.
Unsorted bales are particularly valued as they provide local businesses with opportunities for sorting based on specific market demands, thus creating jobs and adding value to the local economy.
Full Cycle Resource founder and lead author of the report Jennifer Wang said: 'Second-hand clothing shipped to Guatemala goes through multiple layers of value extraction by local sorters, retailers, and vendors.
'In fact, 88% to 92% of clothing is sorted for reuse. What we found is that the activity of sorting locally was not only valued but vital. It adds economic value, creates jobs, and ensures clothing can meet the specific needs of local markets.'
Central America's used clothing importer Megapaca co-founder and general manager Mario Peña added: "Unsorted bales are the backbone of what we do. They allow us to create thousands of jobs in our sorting centres and stores, while enabling us to meet demand across diverse markets and income levels."
Recommendations for US policymakers
The report calls for enhancing public education on responsible textile donating and harmonising collection regulations to improve textile collections.
It also urges ensuring that new Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies consider global reuse to prevent trade barriers and preserve second-hand garment quality.
'To build truly circular economies, the Global North must recognise its role in supporting reuse systems that work. By doing so, we can reduce waste at home and contribute meaningfully to sustainability and economic inclusion abroad,' Jepsen added.
In March, the Secondary Materials and Recycled Textiles Association (SMART) called on the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to address the restrictions imposed on US exports of second-hand clothing.
"US second-hand clothing exports help combat waste, boost Guatemala's economy" was originally created and published by Just Style, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Australian court fines Qantas US$59 million for illegal layoffs
An Australian court fined Qantas Aus$90 million (US$59 million) on Monday for illegally laying off 1,800 ground staff during the Covid-19 pandemic, ending a five-year legal battle over the workers' rights. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said he wanted the penalty to be a "real deterrence" to firms that might be tempted by the financial rewards of breaching employment law. Qantas decided to sack the workers and outsource their jobs in August 2020, a period of lockdowns and border closures when no Covid-19 vaccine existed. Australia's Federal Court subsequently found that Qantas had acted illegally despite its stated "commercial imperatives" and later dismissed an appeal by the airline. It said the carrier had prevented staff from accessing their rights to collectively bargain or take industrial action. Long-dubbed the "Spirit of Australia", 104-year-old Qantas has been on a mission to repair its reputation, which was hit in recent years by the illegal sackings, soaring ticket prices, claims of sloppy service, and the selling of seats on already-cancelled flights. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson took over in 2023, promising to improve customer satisfaction. She replaced Alan Joyce, who stepped down earlier than planned as Qantas endured heavy criticism over its treatment of workers and passengers, despite delivering bumper profits for shareholders. - 'Move on' - Qantas' fine is to be paid in two parts, the court said, with Aus$50 million going to the Transport Workers Union and Aus$40 million being held for future payments to the former workers. The penalty is in addition to a compensation payment of Aus$120 million for affected former employees that Qantas agreed to last year. "It has been five long years. Today is a victory, not just for our colleagues but for all Australian workers," said Anne Guirguis, who worked at Qantas for 27 years cleaning aircraft before being laid off. "We can close this chapter and move on now," Guirguis told reporters outside court. Transport Workers' Union National Secretary Michael Kaine described Monday's decision as a "final win" for the Qantas workers. "Qantas was not sorry to workers when it illegally outsourced these workers, many finding out they'd lost their jobs over a loudspeaker in the lunch room," Kaine said. "Qantas is only sorry now that it has to pay the largest penalty fine of any employer in Australian corporate history." lec/djw/cwl Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Buys a Beaten Down Healthcare Stock: Should You Follow?
Warren Buffett has struck again – this time in healthcare's rubble. Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B) recently disclosed a five million share position in United Healthcare Group (NYSE: UNH), the nation's largest health insurer. The timing is quintessentially Buffett. UNH shares have plummeted more than 50% from their all-time highs, battered by regulatory pressures and industry headwinds. While most investors flee the carnage, the Oracle of Omaha is doing what he does best – hunting for value in the wreckage. But as with everything Buffett does, context matters. Putting Things in Perspective The United Healthcare position is estimated to be worth around US$1.6 billion based on Berkshire's five million share purchase. That's a sizable sum of money by any measure. Here's what you need to know: Berkshire Hathaway's stock portfolio is worth close to US$295 billion. Therefore, the UNH position is less than 0.6% of the company's overall stock holdings. In contrast, Berkshire's largest position is actually Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), valued at US$65 billion – representing more than a fifth of the total stock portfolio. Put simply, while the United Healthcare investment grabbed headlines, it wouldn't be moving Berkshire's needle anytime soon. Beyond that, there's a crucial question: did Buffett actually make this call? The Real Decision Makers Every Berkshire Hathaway stock purchase gets dissected as if it came straight from Warren Buffett himself. But the Oracle doesn't fly solo anymore. Berkshire brought on Todd Combs in 2010, followed by Ted Weschler in 2012. Both serve as investment managers with significant autonomy. Initially, Buffett allocated US$2 billion to each manager. By 2017, that figure had quintrupled to US$10 billion per person. Given this structure, the US$1.6 billion UNH bet could be from either Combs or Weschler – not Buffett himself. Get Smart: Look before you leap Context matters when it comes to investing. If you jump in and buy shares without understanding the full picture, you could get hurt in the process. For Berkshire, even if the UnitedHealth investment doesn't work out, you won't see the company sweating over a position worth less than 0.6%. Does the same apply to you? That's food for thought if you decide to pull the trigger. Dive into the future of technology with our newest FREE report, 'The Rise of Titans.' Discover how the big 7 US tech stocks can be your ticket to huge long-term gains. Download your copy today and see how easy it is to supercharge your portfolio. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Telegram for the latest investing news and analyses! Disclosure: Chin Hui Leong owns shares of Apple and Berkshire Hathaway The post Warren Buffett Buys a Beaten Down Healthcare Stock: Should You Follow? appeared first on The Smart Investor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Australian court fines Qantas US$59 million for illegal layoffs
An Australian court fined Qantas Aus$90 million (US$59 million) on Monday for illegally laying off 1,800 ground staff during the Covid-19 pandemic, ending a five-year legal battle over the workers' rights. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said he wanted the penalty to be a "real deterrence" to firms that might be tempted by the financial rewards of breaching employment law. Qantas decided to sack the workers and outsource their jobs in August 2020, a period of lockdowns and border closures when no Covid-19 vaccine existed. Australia's Federal Court subsequently found that Qantas had acted illegally despite its stated "commercial imperatives" and later dismissed an appeal by the airline. It said the carrier had prevented staff from accessing their rights to collectively bargain or take industrial action. Long-dubbed the "Spirit of Australia", 104-year-old Qantas has been on a mission to repair its reputation, which was hit in recent years by the illegal sackings, soaring ticket prices, claims of sloppy service, and the selling of seats on already-cancelled flights. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson took over in 2023, promising to improve customer satisfaction. She replaced Alan Joyce, who stepped down earlier than planned as Qantas endured heavy criticism over its treatment of workers and passengers, despite delivering bumper profits for shareholders. - 'Move on' - Qantas' fine is to be paid in two parts, the court said, with Aus$50 million going to the Transport Workers Union and Aus$40 million being held for future payments to the former workers. The penalty is in addition to a compensation payment of Aus$120 million for affected former employees that Qantas agreed to last year. "It has been five long years. Today is a victory, not just for our colleagues but for all Australian workers," said Anne Guirguis, who worked at Qantas for 27 years cleaning aircraft before being laid off. "We can close this chapter and move on now," Guirguis told reporters outside court. Transport Workers' Union National Secretary Michael Kaine described Monday's decision as a "final win" for the Qantas workers. "Qantas was not sorry to workers when it illegally outsourced these workers, many finding out they'd lost their jobs over a loudspeaker in the lunch room," Kaine said. "Qantas is only sorry now that it has to pay the largest penalty fine of any employer in Australian corporate history." lec/djw/cwl