Chief Justice calls for coordination between government offices and legal services authority
Kerala High Court Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar has stressed the need for coordination between government offices and the legal services authority.
Delivering the inaugural address at 'Legal Services Summit 2025' organised by the Thiruvananthapuram District Legal Services Authority (TDLSA) here on Saturday, the Chief Justice said the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KELSA) was formed under the Legal Services Authorities Act that was enacted to provide access justice to the most vulnerable sections of society. Each of KELSA's schemes was mirrored in statutory enactments that placed responsibility on government offices to perform the same work as the National Legal Services Authority or KELSA schemes did. The Legal Services Summit was important as it brought together all those working towards a common cause, he said.
'The synergy between legal services authority and statutory authority is not optional; it is a necessity,' the Chief Justice said.
Almost all schemes of the legal services authority worked in the same areas as government departments did. For these schemes to succeed, KELSA could not work in isolation. And without proper coordination, even the best schemes could not reach the people who need them the most, he said.
Giving the example of Samvada or other schemes to help children in trouble or in need of protection, he said these would find their mirror in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and the Right to Education Act. The Women and Child Development department and the Education department played a major role in this area.
Giving many more examples, he underlined that the schemes were well planned and there were strong laws, but what was needed was proper coordination and sharing of information by departments with each other and with the legal services authority so that people were not denied justice that they were desperately seeking for.
Justice, he said, could not be delivered in isolation. The promise of access to justice would require multi-pronged action, the Chief Justice said.
High Court judge and KeLSA executive chairman A. Muhamed Mustaque and High Court judge Raja Vijayaraghavan V. spoke. Nazeera S, principal district and sessions judge and chairperson of TDLSA presided. S. Shamnad, senior civil judge and secretary of TDLSA, welcomed the gathering.
Awards were given away to individuals and institutions for their contributions to legal services.
A legal awareness session on 'Gender sensitisation and women-centric laws' and 'Free and competent legal services – an overview' was held as well as an interactive session.
A legal awareness play scripted by the TDLSA and the Kerala Police was also staged.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
37 minutes ago
- NDTV
UK Export Of F-35 Parts To Israel Was Lawful, Court Rules
London: Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, was lawful, London's High Court ruled on Monday. Al-Haq, a group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, had taken legal action against Britain's Department for Business and Trade over its decision to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended some arms export licences last year. The United Kingdom had assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law, in relation to humanitarian access and the treatment of detainees, as the basis for its decision. But Britain decided to "carve out" F-35 licences, with the government saying suspending those licences would disrupt a global programme that supplies parts for the aircraft, with a knock-on impact on international security. Any such disruption would "undermine U.S. confidence in the UK and NATO", the Ministry of Defence said. Al-Haq argued at a hearing last month that the decision was unlawful as it was in breach of Britain's obligations under international law, including the Geneva Convention. But the High Court dismissed the group's challenge in a written ruling.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Judges rule against human rights groups claim that the UK is illegally arming Israel
LONDON — Human rights groups lost their legal challenge Monday to the British government's decision to supply Israel with parts for F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment. The Palestinian group Al-Haq and the U.K.-based Global Legal Action Network alleged that the government broke domestic and international law and was complicit in atrocities against Palestinians by allowing essential components for the warplanes to be supplied to Israel. The government last year suspended about 30 of 350 existing export licenses for equipment deemed to be for use in the conflict in Gaza because of a 'clear risk' the items could be used to violate international humanitarian law. Equipment included parts for helicopters and drones. But an exemption was made for some licenses related to components of F-35 fighter jets, which are indirectly supplied to Israel through the global spare parts supply chain and have been linked to bombing the Gaza Strip. While rights groups argued the U.K. shouldn't continue to export parts through what they call a 'deliberate loophole' given the government's own assessment of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law, the government said the parts were distributed to a collaboration involving the U.S. and six other partners to produce the jets. Components manufactured in the U.K. are sent to assembly lines in the U.S., Italy and Japan that supply partners — including Israel — with jets and spare parts, the court said. Two High Court judges ruled that the issue was one of national security because the parts were considered vital to the defense collaboration and the U.K.'s security and international peace. They said it wasn't up to the courts to tell the government to withdraw from the group because of the possibility the parts would be supplied to Israel and used to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn wrote in a 72-page judgment. Compared with major arms suppliers such as the U.S. and Germany, British firms sell a relatively small amount of weapons and components to Israel. The Campaign Against Arms Trade nonprofit group estimates that the U.K. supplies about 15% of the components in the F-35 stealth combat aircraft, including its laser targeting system.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
NGO loses bid to block U.K. export of military equipment to Israel
The High Court in London rejected a legal challenge on Monday (June 30, 2025) brought by a Palestinian rights group seeking to block the U.K. from supplying components for Israeli F-35 fighter jets. Israel has used the jets to devastating effect in its bombardment of Gaza. Both sides have been accused of atrocities during a conflict that has killed tens of thousands -- the vast majority of them Palestinian civilians, according to figures the United Nations deems reliable. The U.K. government suspended some export licences for military equipment after concluding there was a risk Israel could be breaching international humanitarian law but made an exemption for some parts for Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth jets. In its claim to the High Court, rights group Al-Haq called for a judicial review, saying the 'carve out' was unlawful and alleging the government had misunderstood the applicable rules of international law. It was supported by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and others in its case. Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said they 'reject all' of the grounds for challenging the government's decision. The case was not about 'whether the U.K. should supply arms or other military equipment to Israel', said the judges. Rather, the case was concerned with 'whether it is open to the court to rule that the U.K. must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration' because of the prospect that some U.K. manufactured components may be used by Israel in the Gaza war in actions that could break international humanitarian law. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to parliament, and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts,' said the judges. 'Once the true nature of the issue is identified, it is clear that the claim must fail. Accordingly, permission to bring a judicial review claim is refused,' they added. Shawan Jabarin, General Director of Al-Haq, said in a statement issued to AFP: 'By exposing serious government failings in facilitating international crimes against Palestinians through its arms exports, civil society and human rights organisations have achieved a crucial breakthrough. 'We will continue to persevere in the U.K. and beyond until governments are held accountable. Israel's impunity is challenged and justice for the Palestinian people is realised,' he added. 'Loophole' The U.K. contributes components to an international defence programme that produces and maintains the F-35s. Defence Secretary John Healey argued a suspension would impact the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'. Lawyers for Al-Haq said the government had known there was a 'clear risk' Israel would use the jet parts to commit violations of international law. But government lawyer James Eadie said the court was not placed to rule on the legality of Israel's actions, and that attempting to do so could have a 'potentially deleterious' effect on 'foreign relations with a friendly state, namely Israel'. In September 2024, the new Labour government announced it was suspending around 30 of 350 export licences following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. But the partial ban did not cover British-made F-35 parts, which include refuelling probes, laser targeting systems, tyres and ejector seats, according to Oxfam. Mr. Healey has previously said suspending F-35 licences would 'undermine U.S. confidence in the U.K. and NATO' but lawyers for Al-Haq have described the exemption as a 'loophole'. U.K.-based NGO Campaign Against Arms Trade has said that licencing figures showed the government had made a 'shocking increase in military exports to Israel' in the months after its September 2024 announcement of partial suspensions. It said the figures showed the U.K. approved £127.6 million ($170 million) in military equipment to Israel in single-issue licences from October to December 2024, saying this was more than for the period from 2020 to 2023 combined. Most of the licences were for military radars, components and software, as well as targeting equipment, according to the NGO, which was involved in the case against the government. Israel launched war on Gaza after an attack by militants from Palestinian group Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56,500 people in Gaza, an occupied Palestinian territory, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry. The U.N. considers these figures to be reliable.
