Satellite Image Hints at North Korea's Biggest Military Factory
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
North Korea has begun work on what could become the country's largest military production facility, according to analysis of satellite images captured by Planet Labs.
The planned site is expected to dwarf the nearby weapons-producing machine factory—where leader Kim Jong Un recently praised efforts to modernize the nation's defense industry.
Why It Matters
The project comes amid heightened tensions with U.S.-allied South Korea, as Pyongyang continues a steady spate of ballistic missile tests and expands the Kim regime's nuclear missile program and naval capabilities.
North Korea's munitions factories were "operating at full capacity" last year, according to the South, whose defense ministry says the country has delivered millions of shells and rockets to Russian forces fighting against Ukraine. Pyongyang has also sent thousands of troops to aid in that conflict, now in its fourth year.
Newsweek reached out to the North Korean embassy in China by email with a request for comment outside of office hours.
Imagery provided by Google Earth shows the grounds of the Huichon Ryonha machine factory in North Korea's northern Jagang province, where analysis by the specialist website NK News says work has begun to create what...
Imagery provided by Google Earth shows the grounds of the Huichon Ryonha machine factory in North Korea's northern Jagang province, where analysis by the specialist website NK News says work has begun to create what could become the country's biggest weapons plant. More
Aribus/Google Earth
What To Know
Satellite photos analyzed by the North Korea-focused specialist website NK News show that several buildings have already been demolished in preparation for new construction.
Based on a 3D rendering displayed during Kim Jong Un's recent visit to the existing factory near the new site—in the city of Huichon, Jagang Province, about 80 miles northeast of Pyongyang—the new facility is estimated to eventually boast at least twice the floor space of the current plant.
If the planned complex ultimately matches the scale shown in the illustration, it will cover between 12 and 25 acres, although this would require the demolition of an additional dozen large structures and some leveling of the surrounding mountainside, NK News reported.
The U.S. and South Korea believe the North is receiving aid—including technical assistance and parts for weapons manufacturing—in exchange for its military assistance to Russia.
This photo released by state media shows Kim Jong Un on his May 7 visit to the Huichon Ryonha General Machine Plant in North Korea's Jagang Province.
This photo released by state media shows Kim Jong Un on his May 7 visit to the Huichon Ryonha General Machine Plant in North Korea's Jagang Province.
Korean Central News Agency
North Korea, like other socialist states before it, maintains an unofficial "second economy" built largely on arms production.
Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Un's grandfather and the country's founder, prioritized the development of this munitions industry as part of a dual policy of economic defense and growth, fueling the rise of the second economy, or an unofficial military economy.
However, North Korean defectors who previously worked for the regime have said resources are prioritized for the second economy over the people's economy, according to a report by the analysis group 38 North last year.
What People Are Saying
Colin Zwirko, senior analytic correspondent for NK News,wrote: "Only a few factory buildings in the country feature a single, uninterrupted production floor of a comparable but still smaller size, like the Taedonggang Battery Factory in the capital or the newly remodeled Kumsong Tractor Factory, but the new Huichon Ryonha facility may become the largest to boast an explicit military production function."
What's Next
North Korea is almost certain to continue its military buildup, which it says is necessary to deter "provocations" by U.S. and South Korean forces.
However, South Korea's newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, has signaled he aims to ease tensions with North Korea. Last week, for example, he ordered the shutdown of loudspeakers broadcasting daily anti-North Korean propaganda near the border.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
Red carpet for Putin, trade relief for China, penalties on India: Inside Trump's peculiar policy playbook
President Donald Trump is pursuing an unusual strategy — courting Russian President Vladimir Putin, holding fire on Beijing, all the while turning the screws on a close ally: India. Despite India being one of the earliest nations to engage in negotiations with the Trump administration, there is still no sign of it sealing a deal with the U.S. New Delhi is now also staring at a secondary tariff of 25% or a "penalty" for its purchases of Russian oil that is set to come into effect later this month. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday escalated criticism against India, accusing it of profiteering from cheap Russian oil imports and threatening to further raise tariffs on Indian goods. "We have planned to up the tariffs on India — these are secondary tariffs for buying the sanctioned Russian oil," Bessent told CNBC on Tuesday. Earlier this week, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro condemned the Asian giant's dependence on Russian oil as "opportunistic" and undermined international efforts to isolate Russia's war economy. "India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro said in an op-ed for the Financial Times . By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda. Professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore Bert Hofman The sharp rhetoric threatens to unravel years of improving ties between Washington and New Delhi — with India saying the U.S. was targeting it unfairly over its Russian oil purchases. "By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda," said Bert Hofman, professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore. India has emerged as a leading buyer of Russian oil, which has been sold at a discount since some Western nations shunned purchases and imposed restrictions on Russian exports over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was the second-largest purchaser of Russian oil, importing 1.6 million barrels per day in the first half of this year, up from 50,000 bpd in 2020, though still trailing China's 2 million bpd imports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Washington has not placed secondary tariffs on China for its Russian oil purchases. India has reiterated that it was the U.S. administration that had asked it to purchase Russian oil to keep the markets calm, while pointing to the European Union and even the U.S.' existing trade with Moscow. The country has taken aim at Washington, saying U.S. continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for the electric-vehicle industry, as well as fertilizers and chemicals from Russia. U.S. bilateral trade with Russia in 2024 stood at $5.2 billion, down from nearly $36 billion in 2021, government data showed. Bilateral trade between New Delhi and Moscow reached a record $68.7 billion for the year ended March 2025. In comparison, the European Union's trade with Russia stood at 67.5 billion euros ($78.1 billion) in 2024, while its services trade in 2023 was at 17.2 billion euros, according to European Commission data . "India has been victimized by these pressure tactics that that the Trump administration is trying to carry out. Trump is clearly using tariffs as a pressure tactic against Russia," Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at Washington-based think tank Wilson Center, told CNBC's " Squawk Box Asia ." Another factor determining the U.S. approach to India is that Trump feels "aggrieved," over how Modi undercut his bid to claim credit for playing a role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Kugelman emphasized. Adding to Trump's grievances is India's "unwillingness to lower barriers" to exports of American agricultural products such as soybeans and corn, Kevin Chen Xian An, associate research fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies pointed out. Oil trade for ceasefire Trump's true agenda has little to do with Washington's stated goal of curbing Moscow's oil revenues, but extracting leverages from the trading partners, according to several geopolitics experts. "The overarching objective for the Trump administration is to extract concessions from countries to figure out some justification for levying taxes on trade so that the government can fund its tax reductions on American citizens' income," said Drew Thompson, senior fellow at the think-tank RSIS. "It's not based on foreign policy principles [but] on power politics and gaining leverage," Thompson added. Last week, Trump rolled out a red carpet to greet Putin on his first visit to the U.S. in about a decade, sharing a ride with him in the presidential limousine to the venue. While the meeting did not appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in Ukraine — a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit — both leaders described the meeting as "productive." Speaking at the joint news briefing following the talks , Putin reiterated that "for the conflict resolution in Ukraine to be long-term and lasting, all the root causes of the crisis ... must be eliminated; all of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account." Kirill Dmitriev, one of Putin's top negotiators, hailed Monday's talks in Washington as an "important day of diplomacy," emphasizing Moscow's opposition to any short-term ceasefire deal with Ukraine. Trump is trying to "maximize his leverage ... pressuring India, and Russia via India," to get a trade deal with the former and a ceasefire pact with the latter, said Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical and U.S. strategist at BCA Research. These will eventually help boost Republicans' prospects in the upcoming midterm election, Gertken added. Not provoking China While India faces steep tariffs for its purchases of Russian crude, China, which has remained the largest importer of Russian crude, has been spared such levies. Trump said last Friday he was not considering retaliatory tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but might consider it in two or three weeks. China's purchases of Russian oil have risen to 46% of overall exports from Russia in the first half of this year, from 34% in 2022, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, followed by India which imported around 36% of Russia's supplies. When asked about China's role in Russian oil purchases, Bessent suggested that Beijing's imports were less egregious in the eyes of the Trump administration because it had already been a big buyer even before Russia invaded Ukraine. Going soft on China may also reflect Trump's desire not to scuttle a potential high-profile summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the coming months and the conclusion of a lasting trade deal, said Stephen Olson, a senior visiting fellow at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. The secondary tariffs on India may be intended as "a shot across Russia's bow" to show that the U.S. could turn up the pressure by extending similar tariffs to China, if Russia is not more compliant, Olson added. Following weeks of escalating tensions, Beijing and Washington agreed in May to suspend the hefty duties and loosen several punitive measures imposed in April, as both sides continued to work on hammering out a durable deal. Beijing has leveraged its sheer dominance of rare-earth minerals crucial for military and industrial use in its negotiations with Washington, maintaining a tight control on exports of the critical minerals. The relationship with China is complicated, and the Trump administration has not yet come out with "a clear, coherent policy toward China. Sometimes it seems like it wants to compete with China economically. Other times it seems like it wants to reach some type of understanding or a or a detente," Kugelman said.
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
North Korea Reportedly Has Secret Missile Base Near China
North Korea has quietly built and operated a sprawling long-range missile base near the Chinese border that stores Kim Jong Un's most advanced strategic weapons, demonstrating the regime's ongoing efforts to advance its nuclear strike capabilities, a think tank said. The base in Sinpung, North Pyongan Province, located 27 kilometers (17 miles) from the border with China, likely houses a brigade-sized unit equipped with six to nine nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missiles and their mobile launchers, a report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies showed Wednesday. 'These missiles pose a potential nuclear threat to East Asia and the continental United States,' the report said.
an hour ago
Gabbard slashing intelligence office workforce, cutting budget by more than $700 million
WASHINGTON -- The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will dramatically reduce its workforce and cut its budget by more than $700 million annually, the Trump administration announced Wednesday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a statement, 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence.' She said the intelligence community 'must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people and the U.S. Constitution by focusing on our core mission: find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers.' The reorganization is part of a broader administration effort to rethink its evaluation of foreign threats to American elections, a topic that has become politically loaded given President Donald Trump's long-running resistance to the intelligence community's assessment that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election. In February, for instance, Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded an FBI task force focused on investigating foreign influence operations, including those that target U.S. elections. The Trump administration also has made sweeping cuts at the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which oversees the nation's critical infrastructure, including election systems. Gabbard's efforts to downsize the agency she leads is in keeping with the cost-cutting mandate the administration has employed since its earliest days, when Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency oversaw mass layoffs of the federal workforce. It's the latest headline-making move by a key official who just a few months ago had seemed out of favor with Trump over her analysis of Iran's nuclear capabilities but who in recent weeks has emerged as a key loyalist. She's released a series of documents meant to call into question the legitimacy of the intelligence community's findings on Russian election interference in 2016, and this week, at Trump's direction, revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former government officials. The ODNI in the past has joined forces with other federal agencies to debunk and alert the public to foreign disinformation intended to influence U.S. voters. For example, it was involved in an effort to raise awareness about a Russian video that falsely depicted mail-in ballots being destroyed in Pennsylvania that circulated widely on social media in the weeks before the 2024 presidential election. Notably, Gabbard said she would be refocusing the priorities of the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which her office says on its website is 'focused on mitigating threats to democracy and U.S. national interests from foreign malign influence.' It wasn't clear from Gabbard's release or fact sheet exactly what the changes would entail, but Gabbard noted its 'hyper-focus' on work tied to elections and said the center was 'used by the previous administration to justify the suppression of free speech and to censor political opposition.'
