
Russia's Hmeimim Airbase In Syria Is Extremely Vulnerable
A portrait of Russia's President Vladimir Putin hangs above as Russian military trucks enter the ... More Russian-leased Syrian military base of Hmeimim in Latakia province in western Syria on December 29, 2024. (Photo by AAREF WATAD/AFP via Getty Images)
The Russian military leased Hmeimim airbase in western Syria's coastal Latakia province faced its deadliest attack since the December 2024 fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on May 20. While much remains unclear about this particular attack, it has aptly demonstrated the increasingly vulnerable position of Russia's sole airbase in the Middle East.
On Tuesday, May 20, militants of unknown affiliation attacked Hmeimim, leaving at least two soldiers and two of the attacking militants dead. It's unclear if the soldiers were Russian personnel or security forces of the incumbent Syrian Transitional Government in Damascus.
Kyle Orton, an independent Middle East analyst, said the details of the attack remain 'very murky,' although there are some possible clues as to what exactly happened.
'Russian military bloggers on Telegram admit that the Russians suffered casualties but did not say how many,' Orton told me.
'Some social media reports from Syria suggest as many as five Russian soldiers were killed; it is impossible to say,' he said. 'Likewise, we do not really know how many attackers were killed; one claim that has spread around is that it was four.'
'What is clear is that the attackers were jihadists, and at least some of them were foreign.'
Orton noted that the alleged kunya, a title given to an adult derived from the name of their eldest first-born child, of one of the Syrians killed was Abu Bakr al-Safarani. Abu Jihad al-Masri was allegedly the name of another attacker reportedly killed and was believed to have been an Egyptian.
'As to what actually happened, we are again rather in the dark,' Orton said. 'I have seen estimates of the size of the attack team that range from eight to 20; both could be (probably are) wrong, but it does seem it was a small team.'
'The martyrdom notices for the jihadists claim they were inghimasi, that is, shock troops who break through enemy lines and kill as many people as they can until they are killed,' he added. 'While this seems to be true, there are conflicting reports about whether the attackers actually got into the base.'
Russia first deployed military personnel, fighter-bomber jets, and air defenses at Hmeimim in 2015 during the Syrian civil war on the side of the Assad regime. Its warplanes relentlessly bombed Syrian cities and opposition-held urban areas in support of Assad, including Aleppo and Idlib. However, at the end of last year, the Islamist opposition group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham burst out of its Idlib stronghold and, in coordination with other groups, swiftly advanced on the capital Damascus. Assad promptly fled to his new life in exile in Moscow.
HTS dissolved itself into the new Syrian Transitional Government headed by its former leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, previously known by his nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Julani during his militia leader years. Moscow scrambled to forge new relations with the leader whose forces it had bombed for almost a decade in hopes of retaining at least some access to Hmeimim and the Tartus naval base. Shortly after Assad's fall, Russia withdrew its strategic S-400 air defense missile systems and other heavy equipment from its Syria airbase.
Today, its presence in western Syria is a mere shadow of its former self and a standing symbol of how Russia's days as a kingmaker in the country have come and gone. In March, Islamist groups descended on Latakia near Hmeimim. They massacred hundreds, if not thousands, of civilians from the province's Alawite minority, from which the Assad family and members of the former regime originated. While several civilians sought refuge in Hmeimim, there was nothing Russian forces could do to influence or shape events outside the base's perimeter, which STG forces have guarded since December. That incident demonstrated how Russia's continued presence remains at the whim of the new powers in Damascus.
Orton noted that some posts celebrating the attack on Hmeimim dubbed the attackers 'Red Bands,' a name previously used by HTS special forces. Whether that name is in reference to those officially disbanded forces or borrowed by an entirely different group also remains unclear.
'What seems consistent in the reporting is that the attackers were part of a group whose leadership is nominally under the control of al-Sharaa's Ministry of Defense,' Orton said.
'There is an obvious political interest for Al-Sharaa and his supporters to stick to the narrative that this was a group of radicals who defied their MoD-loyal leaders to avoid there being any official link between this attack and the current Syrian government.'
However, even if that proved accurate, he pointed out that would underline how 'distinctly incomplete' Sharaa's integration of former Islamist groups has been and the 'dismal resulting security situation' in the country where 'free-wheeling Islamist militias roam the land.'
There is likely no shortage of factions or wannabe militias in Syria who want revenge on Russia for its post-2015 actions in Syria.
'There is an enormous amount of anger against the Russians in Syria—obviously among the (mostly Sunni) pro-revolution sections of the population because of the Kremlin's role in supporting Assad's atrocities against them,' Orton said. 'But even the (mostly Alawite) pro-Assad sections of the population have grievances due to the perception Moscow did not do enough at the end and let Assad fall.'
'In some ways, the question is why Russian facilities have not been attacked before now,' he added. 'One answer is that Al-Sharaa decided against such things—indeed, decided to enter negotiations that might allow Russia to keep Tartus and Hmeimim.'
Undoubtedly aware of the newfound vulnerability of Hmeimim and Tartus after Assad's sudden fall, Moscow knew it needed to buy time to at least draw down forces and equipment from these bases now that they had become vulnerable to any potential attacks authorized by Sharaa.
If ordered to do so eventually, Russia would likely want to withdraw from these two strategic bases orderly. Moscow undoubtedly would welcome a coordinated and orderly and somewhat dignified withdrawal over a chaotic and dangerous one like the U.S. pullout from Afghanistan in August 2021.
Orton personally observed Hmeimim on a trip across Syria this March, mere days before the massacres in Latakia in the Russian base's vicinity.
'My impression in visiting Hmeimim was that it is basically defenseless,' Orton said. 'This was certainly the view of the HTS militiamen on the gates at Hmeimim, who said the Russians were in a 'prison'—albeit quite an open one, where HTS escorts them to Tartus three to five times a week to get supplies—and felt sure that if an order came through from Damascus to take over the base, that could be accomplished in short order.'
'One of the outstanding questions about the May 20 attack—which will solve a lot of the mysteries around it, including whether the attackers managed to infiltrate the base—is whether the HTS guards stood firm or stood aside.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing
Republican senators came out firing during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hearing on Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on armed forces. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pressed Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) driving home the point later in the hearing; Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Senate appropriator, scolded the Pentagon's delays with budget information; and Sen. Lisa Murkowski closed out the hearing by questioning the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy. McConnell, one of three Republicans who opposed Hegseth's confirmation, gaveled in the hearing by calling out the Trump administration for what he views as a flat base-line defense budget. He then launched into strong warnings against the U.S. cozying up to Russia in its bid to end its war in Ukraine. McConnell said Washington's allies are 'wondering whether we're in the middle of brokering what appears to be allowing the Russians to define victory. I think victory is defined by the people who have to live there — the Ukrainians.' The former Senate majority leader who now chairs the subcommittee, McConnell asked Hegseth which side he wanted to win the war. The Defense chief said the Trump administration wanted the killing to end but would not choose a side. 'America's reputation is on the line,' McConnell said. 'Will we defend Democratic allies against authoritarian aggressors?' Later in the hearing, Graham asked Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine if Russian President Vladimir Putin is going to stop at Ukraine. 'I don't believe he is,' Caine replied. Hegseth, meanwhile, said it 'remains to be seen. Graham fired back, referring to his previous allusion to appeasement of Adolf Hitler: 'Well, he says he's not. This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen.' The line of questioning laid bare the ideological divide within the GOP as to how the U.S. should confront Russia, seen by defense hawks as a global threat that must be countered with military assistance to prop up Ukraine and assert U.S. force in the European theater. But many in the Trump administration, including Hegseth, have taken a more ambivalent tone, arguing for an 'America First' approach that could see American troops rotated out of bases in Europe and an end to the flow of military aid from Washington to Kyiv. 'We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses,' McConnell told Hegseth. The hearing had a far more adversarial tone compared to Hegseth's appearance before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee a day prior, in which the Pentagon chief emerged largely unscathed, particularly at the hands of GOP members. Democratic and Republican senators grilled Hegseth over a sparsely outlined defense budget for next fiscal year, echoing rare bipartisan criticism during the House hearing. Collins reprimanded the Pentagon for being 'unacceptably slow' in submitting a detailed Pentagon spending request for the fiscal 2026. Congress is waiting on the information as the GOP struggles to agree on Trump's reconciliation package. She also told Hegseth that Trump's budget request represented a reduction in buying power compared to the 2025 military budget, when inflation is taken into account, but suggested the Senate might correct that. McConnell earlier was also critical of the administration's defense spending plan, pushing back at Hegseth's argument that the U.S. would be making the largest investment in the military in 20 years via Trump's reconciliation package. McConnell said putting defense dollars into that package while declining to increase military spending in the regular budget 'may well end up functioning as a shell game to avoid making the most significant annual investments that we spent years urging the Biden administration to make.' There was also no shortage of criticism from the panel's Democrats. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) bashed the Pentagon for cutting military medical research while spending $45 million for a grand military parade marking the Army's 250th birthday, set for Saturday. 'This is not consistent with what the men and women in uniform deserve,' Durbin said. Others, including Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) berated Hegseth for the Trump administration's decision to send National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles this week, calling the actions a wildly out-of-proportion response to sometimes violent protests against Trump's escalating immigration crackdowns. 'Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented; it is unconstitutional, and it is downright un-American,' Murray said, noting that the actions were undermining the readiness of the U.S. military. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) pressed Hegseth to reveal the cost or timeline of refurbishing Trump's luxury jet from the Qatari government, meant to become Air Force One. 'You have signed a contract with a company to reconfigure the Qatari aircraft. What is the price of that contract?' Reed asked. Hegseth replied that the information 'cannot be revealed in this setting,' prompting Reed to fire back. 'Why can't it be revealed? This is the appropriation committee of the United States Senate. We appropriate the money that you will spend,' Reed said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
GOP senators get heated over Hegseth answers
The Big Story Republican senators came out firing during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hearing on Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on armed forces. Greg Nash, The Hill Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pressed Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) driving home the point later in the hearing; Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Senate appropriator, scolded the Pentagon's delays with budget information. McConnell, one of three Republicans who opposed Hegseth's confirmation, gaveled in the hearing by calling out the Trump administration for what he views as a flat base-line defense budget. He then launched into strong warnings against the U.S. cozying up to Russia in its bid to end its war in Ukraine. McConnell said Washington's allies are 'wondering whether we're in the middle of brokering what appears to be allowing the Russians to define victory. I think victory is defined by the people who have to live there — the Ukrainians.' The former Senate majority leader who now chairs the subcommittee, McConnell asked Hegseth which side he wanted to win the war. The Defense chief said the Trump administration wanted the killing to end but would not choose a side. 'America's reputation is on the line,' McConnell said. 'Will we defend Democratic allies against authoritarian aggressors?' Later in the hearing, Graham asked Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine if Russian President Vladimir Putin is going to stop at Ukraine. 'I don't believe he is,' Caine replied. Hegseth, meanwhile, said it 'remains to be seen.' Graham fired back, referring to his previous allusion to appeasement of Adolf Hitler: 'Well, he says he's not. This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen.' The line of questioning laid bare the ideological divide within the GOP as to how the U.S. should confront Russia, seen by defense hawks as a global threat that must be countered with military assistance to prop up Ukraine and assert U.S. force in the European theater. But many in the Trump administration, including Hegseth, have taken a more ambivalent tone, arguing for an 'America First' approach that could see American troops rotated out of bases in Europe and an end to the flow of military aid from Washington to Kyiv. 'We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses,' McConnell told Hegseth. The hearing had a far more adversarial tone compared to Hegseth's appearance before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee a day prior, in which the Pentagon chief emerged largely unscathed, particularly at the hands of GOP members. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: US scales back personnel in Middle East as Israel-Iran tensions mount The United States is scaling back the number of personnel in the Middle East as the tensions between longtime foes Israel and Iran mount. The U.S. is downsizing its footprint in Iraq, while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has greenlighted the departures of military dependents across northeast Africa, the Middle East, and portions of South and Central Asia. 'President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, … Marines deployed near LA have not completed training on use of force, nonlethal weapons The 700 Marines mobilized to the Los Angeles area on Monday have not yet completed pre-mission training as of Wednesday morning, with no clear picture yet as to whether they will be deployed on the ground, a U.S. Northern Command official confirmed to The Hill. The Marines 'are still conducting pre-mission training and they have not been employed by Task Force 51, the DoD command element in Los Angeles,' a Northcom spokesperson … Troops in LA can detain individuals, general says A U.S. Army general said on Wednesday that troops tasked with ensuring security in Los Angeles will be able to temporarily detain individuals until law enforcement agents step in to arrest them. U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman told reporters Wednesday that the 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops, ordered to the City of Angels in response to the protests against the administration's immigration raids, will not … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: LA mayor casts Trump admin ICE raids as 'political retribution' amid unrest Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles were 'political retribution' against residents of the predominantly Democratic city. 'Angelenos are trying to live their lives—going to work, caring for their families—while facing the constant threat … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Where the 'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests are planned Organizers with the 'No Kings' movement are planning some 1,500 demonstrations across the country to protest the upcoming military parade … Read more Entire Fulbright board resigns, citing Trump administration interference All members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board resigned Wednesday, citing alleged political interference by members of the Trump administration. … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Senate rejects effort to block arms sales over Trump's dealings with Qatar and UAE
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans have blocked an effort by Democrats to temporarily block arms sales to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in response to President Donald Trump's dealings in the region. Democrats forced two procedural votes Wednesday to protest Qatar's donation of a $400 million plane to be used as Air Force One and a $2 billion investment by a UAE-backed company using a Trump family-linked stablecoin, a form of cryptocurrency.