Iran says US accountability for attacks on nuclear sites part of future talks
TEHRAN : Iran said today it would hold the US accountable for attacks on its nuclear sites in any future negotiations, while ruling out direct talks with Washington.
The US struck key Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22, briefly joining a war launched by Israel that had derailed talks on Tehran's atomic programme.
'In any potential negotiation… the issue of holding the US accountable and demanding compensation for committing military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities will be one of the topics on the agenda,' foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a press briefing today.
Asked whether Iran would engage in direct talks with the US, Baqaei said: 'No.'
In mid-June, Israel launched an unprecedented attack targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites, but also hitting residential areas over 12 days of war, which US forces joined with attacks on nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.
The fighting derailed talks that began in April and had been the highest-level contact between Tehran and Washington since the US abandoned in 2018 a landmark agreement on Iran's nuclear activities.
Following the war, Tehran has suspended cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog and demanded guarantees against military action before resuming any negotiations.
Washington has dismissed Tehran's call for compensation as 'ridiculous'.
Baqaei said today that Iran was committed to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, but criticised what he described as the 'politicised and unprofessional approach' of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The foreign ministry spokesman said that the IAEA's deputy chief is expected in Iran 'in less than 10 days'.
Last month, Iran said future cooperation with the UN agency would take on a 'new form'.
On July 25, Iranian diplomats met with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, in the first meeting since the war with Israel ended.
The three European powers are parties to the 2015 nuclear deal, which unravelled after the US withdrew during Trump's first term.
In recent weeks, the trio has threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran failed to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors.
Iran has repeatedly called reimposing sanctions 'illegal' and insisted on its right to enrich uranium.
Israel and western nations accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
No-arms deal a ‘grave sin' as Israel bombs away: Hezbollah ministers walk out of Lebanese cabinet meeting
BEIRUT, Aug 7 — Hezbollah said Wednesday that it would treat a Lebanese government decision to disarm the militant group 'as if it did not exist', accusing the cabinet of committing a 'grave sin'. Amid heavy US pressure and fears Israel could expand its strikes on Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval, and another cabinet meeting is scheduled for Thursday to continue the talks, including on a US-proposed timetable for disarmament. Hezbollah said the government had 'committed a grave sin by taking the decision to disarm Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy'. The decision is unprecedented since Lebanon's civil war factions gave up their weapons three and a half decades ago. 'This decision undermines Lebanon's sovereignty and gives Israel a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence... Therefore, we will treat this decision as if it does not exist,' the Iran-backed group said in a statement. 'Serves Israel's interests' The government said its decision came as part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, which culminated in two months of full-blown war. Hezbollah said it viewed the government's move as 'the result of dictates from US envoy' Tom Barrack. It 'fully serves Israel's interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence', the group said. Hezbollah was the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war. It emerged weakened politically and militarily from its latest conflict with Israel, its arsenal pummelled and its senior leadership decimated. Israel has kept up its strikes on Hezbollah and other targets despite the November truce, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed. An Israeli strike on the southern town of Tulin on Wednesday killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said. Israel also launched a series of air strikes on southern Lebanon, wounding at least two people according to the health ministry. The Israeli military said it struck 'weapons storage facilities, a missile launcher and Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure which stored engineering tools that allowed for the re-establishment of terrorist infrastructure in the area'. Hezbollah said Israel must halt the attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defence strategy could begin. 'Pivotal moment' 'We are open to dialogue, ending the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, liberating its land, releasing prisoners, working to build the state, and rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal aggression,' the group said. Hezbollah is 'prepared to discuss a national security strategy', but not under Israeli fire, it added. Two ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and its ally the Amal movement walked out of Tuesday's meeting. Hezbollah described the walkout as 'an expression of rejection' of the government's 'decision to subject Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli occupation'. The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of 'rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions' to Israel when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks. It called Thursday's cabinet meeting 'an opportunity for correction'. Hezbollah opponent the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was 'a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history – a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty'. The Free Patriotic Movement, the other major Christian party and a former ally of Hezbollah, said it was in favour of the army receiving the group's weapons 'to strengthen Lebanon's defensive power'. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a televised interview that any decision on disarmament 'will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself'. 'We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions,' he added, noting that the group had 'rebuilt itself' following setbacks during its war with Israel. — AFP
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘They are not made to tell the truth': Grok wrongly identifies Gaza news photo, fuelling misinformation and exposing black box flaws, political bias
PARIS, Aug 7 — This image by AFP photojournalist Omar al-Qattaa shows a skeletal, underfed girl in Gaza, where Israel's blockade has fuelled fears of mass famine in the Palestinian territory. But when social media users asked Grok where it came from, X boss Elon Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot was certain that the photograph was taken in Yemen nearly seven years ago. The AI bot's untrue response was widely shared online and a left-wing pro-Palestinian French lawmaker, Aymeric Caron, was accused of peddling disinformation on the Israel-Hamas war for posting the photo. At a time when internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, the furore shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok, when the technology is far from error-free. Grok said the photo showed Amal Hussain, a seven-year-old Yemeni child, in October 2018. In fact, the photo shows nine-year-old Mariam Dawwas in the arms of her mother Modallala in Gaza City on August 2, 2025. Before the war, sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Mariam weighed 25 kilogrammes, her mother told AFP. Today, she weighs only nine. The only nutrition she gets to help her condition is milk, Modallala told AFP — and even that's 'not always available'. Challenged on its incorrect response, Grok said: 'I do not spread fake news; I base my answers on verified sources.' The chatbot eventually issued a response that recognised the error — but in reply to further queries the next day, Grok repeated its claim that the photo was from Yemen. The chatbot has previously issued content that praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and that suggested people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate. Grok's mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as 'black boxes', said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics. — AFP pic Radical right bias Grok's mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as 'black boxes', said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics. 'We don't know exactly why they give this or that reply, nor how they prioritise their sources,' said Diesbach, author of a book on AI tools, Hello ChatGPT. Each AI has biases linked to the information it was trained on and the instructions of its creators, he said. In the researcher's view Grok, made by Musk's xAI start-up, shows 'highly pronounced biases which are highly aligned with the ideology' of the South African billionaire, a former confidante of US President Donald Trump and a standard-bearer for the radical right. Asking a chatbot to pinpoint a photo's origin takes it out of its proper role, said Diesbach. 'Typically, when you look for the origin of an image, it might say: 'This photo could have been taken in Yemen, could have been taken in Gaza, could have been taken in pretty much any country where there is famine'.' AI does not necessarily seek accuracy — 'that's not the goal,' the expert said. Another AFP photograph of a starving Gazan child by al-Qattaa, taken in July 2025, had already been wrongly located and dated by Grok to Yemen, 2016. That error led to internet users accusing the French newspaper Liberation, which had published the photo, of manipulation. 'Friendly pathological liar' An AI's bias is linked to the data it is fed and what happens during fine-tuning — the so-called alignment phase — which then determines what the model would rate as a good or bad answer. 'Just because you explain to it that the answer's wrong doesn't mean it will then give a different one,' Diesbach said. 'Its training data has not changed and neither has its alignment.' Grok is not alone in wrongly identifying images. When AFP asked Mistral AI's Le Chat — which is in part trained on AFP's articles under an agreement between the French start-up and the news agency — the bot also misidentified the photo of Mariam Dawwas as being from Yemen. For Diesbach, chatbots must never be used as tools to verify facts. 'They are not made to tell the truth,' but to 'generate content, whether true or false', he said. 'You have to look at it like a friendly pathological liar — it may not always lie, but it always could.' — AFP
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Israel bans Jerusalem's grand mufti from Al-Aqsa Mosque for six months over Gaza-focused sermon
JERUSALEM, Aug 7 — Israeli authorities have banned Jerusalem's top Muslim cleric from entering the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound for six months over a recent sermon, his attorney told AFP on Wednesday. Muhammad Ahmad Hussein, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, will be prevented from entering the holy site in the Israeli-annexed Old City until January 2026, according to lawyer Khaldoun Najem. Najem said Israeli police 'did not interrogate' or held a hearing for the mufti prior to their decision. Contacted by AFP, police did not immediately comment. Hussein's lawyer said that the ban was due to a Friday sermon the mufti gave at Al-Aqsa – Islam's third-holiest site and a Palestinian national symbol – in late July, 'which contained nothing inappropriate'. Palestinian news agency Wafa said the sermon had focused on deteriorating conditions in Gaza and growing starvation in the territory, where Israel's nearly two-year war against Hamas has led to a dire humanitarian crisis. Israel had already issued an eight-day ban against Hussein following that sermon, Wafa said. The Al-Aqsa compound is Judaism's holiest site, known to Jews as the Temple Mount. Israel occupied and annexed east Jerusalem and including the Old City in 1967. Much of the international community does not recognise Israel's annexation of the area. Earlier this month, Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir publicly conducted a Jewish prayer on the grounds of the Al-Aqsa compound – a highly contentious move that violates a long-held understanding at the site. The compound has long served as a flashpoint in tensions between Israelis and Palestinians and frequently been the spark for larger unrest. — AFP
