logo
Google's Veo 3 AI video generator is unlike anything you've ever seen. The world isn't ready.

Google's Veo 3 AI video generator is unlike anything you've ever seen. The world isn't ready.

Yahoo2 days ago

At the Google I/O 2025 event on May 20, Google announced the release of Veo 3, a new AI video generation model that makes 8-second videos. Within hours of its release, AI artists and filmmakers were showing off shockingly realistic videos. You may have even seen some of these videos in your social media feeds and not realized they were artificially generated.
To be blunt: We've never seen anything like Veo 3 before. It's impressive. It's scary. And it's only going to get better.
Misinformation experts have been warning for years that we will eventually reach a point where it's impossible for the average person to tell the difference between an AI video and the real thing. With Veo 3, we have officially stepped out of the uncanny valley and into a new era, one where AI videos are a fact of life.
While several other AI video makers exist, most notably Sora from OpenAI, the clips made by Veo 3 instantly stand out in your timeline. Veo 3 brought with it several innovations that separate it from other video generation tools. Crucially, in addition to video, Veo 3 also produces audio and dialogue. It doesn't just offer photorealism, but fully realized soundscapes and conversations to go along with videos. It can also maintain consistent characters in different video clips, and users can fine-tune camera angles, framing, and movements in entirely new ways. On social media, many users are dumbfounded by the results.
Veo 3 is available to use now with Google's paid AI plans. Users can access the tool in Gemini, Google's AI chatbot, and in Flow, an 'AI filmmaking tool built for creatives, by creatives,' per Google.
Already, AI filmmakers are using Veo 3 to create short films, and it's only a matter of time until we see a full-length film powered by Veo 3.
On X, YouTube, Instagram, and Reddit, users are sharing some of the most impressive Veo 3 videos. If you're not on your guard and simply casually scrolling your feed, you might not think twice about whether the videos are real or not.
The short film "Influenders" is one of the most widely shared short films made with Veo 3. "Influenders" was created by Yonatan Dor, the founder of the AI visual studio The Dor Brothers. In the movie, a series of influencers react as an unexplained cataclysm occurs in the background. The video has hundreds of thousands of views across various platforms.
"Yes, we used Google Veo 3 exclusively for this video, but to make a piece like this really come to life we needed to do further sound design, clever editing and some upscaling at the end," Dor said in an email to Mashable. "The full piece took around 2 days to complete." Dor added, "Veo 3 is a massive step forward, it's easily the most advanced tool available publicly right now. We're especially impressed by its dialogue and prompt adherence capabilities."
Similar videos featuring man-on-the-street videos have also gone viral, with artists like Alex Patrascu and Impekable showing off Veo 3's capabilities. And earlier this week, a Wall Street Journal reporter made an entire short film starring a virtual version of herself using Veo 3. All this in just 10 days.
In "Influenders" and these other videos, some of the clips and characters are more realistic than others. Many still have the glossy aesthetic and jerky camera movements that are a signature of AI videos, a clear giveaway that's similar to the ChatGPT em dash.
Just a couple of years ago, AI creations with too many fingers and other obvious anatomical abnormalities were commonplace. If the technology keeps progressing at this pace, there will soon be no obvious difference between real video and AI video.
In promoting Veo 3, Google is eager to stress its partnerships with artists and filmmakers like Darren Aronofsky. And it's clear that Veo 3 could drastically reduce the cost of creating animation and special effects. But for content farms and bad actors producing fake news and manipulative outrage bait, Veo 3 is equally powerful.
We asked Google about the potential for Veo 3 to be used for misinformation, and the company said that safeguards such as digital watermarks are built into Veo 3 video clips.
"It's important that people can access provenance tools for videos and other content they see online," a representative with Google DeepMind told Mashable via email. "The SynthID watermark is embedded in all content generated by Google's AI tools, and our SynthID detector rolled out to early testers last week. We plan to expand access more broadly soon, and as an additional step to help people, we're adding a visible watermark to Veo videos."
Google also has AI safety guidelines that it uses, and the company says it wants to "help people and organizations responsibly create and identify AI-generated content."
A screenshot from an AI-generated video made by Google with Veo 3. Credit: Google
But does the average person stop to ask whether the images and videos on their timelines and FYP are real? As the viral emotional support kangaroo proves, they do not.
There's zero doubt that AI videos are about to become even more commonplace on social media and video apps. That will include plenty of AI slop, but also videos with more nefarious purposes. Despite safeguards built into AI video generation tools, skilled AI artists can create deepfake videos featuring celebrities and public figures. TV news anchors speaking into the camera have also been a recurring theme in Veo 3 videos so far, which has worrying implications for the information ecosystem online.
If you're not already asking "Is this real?" when you come across a video clip online, now is the time to start.
Or, as a chorus of voices are saying on X, "We're so cooked."
Follow Timothy Beck Werth () and Mashable () on X for the latest and analysis.
Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From MAGA to ‘TACO'
From MAGA to ‘TACO'

Boston Globe

time20 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

From MAGA to ‘TACO'

For a man who built his Make America Great Again brand, in part, on his cartoonish projection of strength, there can be no nastier comment than calling Trump a chicken. Advertisement With his mean-girl insults and movie-villain glare, Trump relishes being the self-righteous crusader who squares up against his enemies. Even during an assassination attempt at a Pennsylvania campaign rally last summer, Trump, his ear apparently grazed and bloodied by a bullet, pumped his fist in the air and yelled Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up That image, which Trump has Advertisement 'So I just tried to think of a catchy acronym, and TACO happened to be the most kind of amusing one that I could think of,' Armstrong said. It's amusing others as well. After Trump again walked back one of his trade-war threats, MSNBC host On his late night show, 'Let's Go TACO' is also a spin on 'Let's Go Brandon,' which, during former president Joe Biden's White House tenure, became a stand-in for a profane anti-Biden chant popular among Trump supporters. Why TACO riles Trump is obvious. It exposes the indecisiveness and chaos he tries to pass off as calculated leadership. But it also takes one of the president's favorite devices — deploying a punchy phrase such as 'You're fired,' from his reality show days on 'The Apprentice'; 'fake news,' now a staple of the autocratic lexicon; or his 'Big Beautiful Bill' — and flips it against him. Advertisement '[TACO] is actually entering the mainstream culture, and we can see this right here in Google searches,' Harry Enten, CNN's data guru, said during a recent segment. He pointed to a chart that showed a whopping '9,900 percent increase' in searches of the acronym between Tuesday and Thursday of last week. Armstrong came up with TACO to address Trump's erratic trade war. But the notion that he chickens out can be applied to other things, including his barely there negotiations with President Vladimir Putin of Russia on ending the Kremlin's unprovoked war against Ukraine. If Democrats calling his strange tangents during campaign rallies 'weird' during the 2024 presidential campaign got under Trump's thin skin, then TACO, which jabs at his weakness, cuts right to the bone. Back in the day on 'Saturday Night Live,' Chevy Chase portrayed then-president Gerald Ford as an inveterate klutz, which, right or wrong, publicly branded him as an incompetent dolt. Now, more than anything Democrats have concocted to counter Trump 2.0, TACO could have the same power to define and undercut this destructively unstable presidency. With one memorable term tailored specifically for Trump, the troller-in-chief is getting deservedly trolled. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

The Best Red-Light Therapy Device
The Best Red-Light Therapy Device

New York Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Times

The Best Red-Light Therapy Device

Connie Park/NYT Wirecutter Connie Park/NYT Wirecutter Connie Park/NYT Wirecutter At first blush, the LightStim for Wrinkles seems devoid of bells and whistles. But it dazzles where it truly matters: in the jam-packedness of its 72 LEDs, its handiness, and its foolproof one-button operating system. Like all wands, though, it requires you to actively engage with it, and it's not cordless. For a handheld device, it's loaded with LEDs. If you're going to put in the time and effort to manually move a wand around, it should cover a good portion of your face. And the LightStim does just that, with 72 LEDs packed into a circle that's just a skosh under 5 square inches. In comparison, the Lumicure Light Therapy Torch has three LEDs in a 0.78-square-inch circle, and while the Solwave 4-in-1's little 0.75-square-inch wand head has 14 (seven dual) LEDs, it requires significantly more elbow grease to equally treat the same amount of skin. Some testers liked that they could simply press the LightStim's large head against their faces until the three-minute timer signaled that they could move it to a different location. This wand emits four different wavelengths of red light. The wavelength is what determines light's color, and these LEDs are amber (605-nanometer wavelength), light red (630 nm), deep red (680 nm), and near infrared (855 nm). The varying wavelengths spark different reactions at various levels of the skin: Amber, red, and infrared penetrate to reduce oil and inflammation, as well as to stimulate collagen and elastin production, which makes skin look plumper and firmer and minimizes the appearance of fine lines. (Since infrared is invisible, the 865 nm LEDs might not appear lit, even when the power is on.) The Solawave 4-in-1, meanwhile, emits a single wavelength, 630 nm. One tester loved the LightStim's range of reds, especially for treating nasolabial folds and other lines around her mouth. The simple design makes it beyond easy to use, and silent. The LightStim is on or off — and that's all there is to it. Every three minutes, a quick tone indicates that it's time for you to move it to a different part of your face or body (unlike most of the devices we tested, this wand has no automatic shutoff). Whereas the Solawave 4-in-1 buzzes and lightly vibrates, the LightStim is dead quiet and inert in the palm, with one tester likening it in vibes and looks to an old-timey candlestick telephone. Testers also appreciated that the wand's single button required zero practice or guesswork. You also operate the Therabody TheraFace and Dr. Dennis Gross DRx Spectralite via on-device push buttons, but those models, both of which are masks, require cycling through many presses to change modes, and while the mask is attached to your face, it's hard to tell which color mode you're in. You can use it on other body parts. Signs of aging aren't limited to the face, and our testers liked using the LightStim on their necks, décolletages, and even scars, as well. Sure, our flexible mask pick, the Omnilux Men, can also be placed on or wrapped around body parts other than the face, but the LightStim was the easiest device to use in this regard. Flaws but not dealbreakers The LightStim can drag a bit against skin unless you use it with a serum. But this was true of all the wands we tried. Our testers found it more comfortable to press the wand head against the skin and hold it there for a bit. It needs to be plugged in. Of the 11 devices we tested, the LightStim is the only one that has a cord. For something you use for about 12 minutes at a time, staying within 6 feet of an outlet isn't such a big deal, and the wand will never conk out mid-treatment (as the rechargeable Solawave 4-in-1 did a few times in our tests). Complicating matters, though, is that the AC/DC adapter detaches from the wand — increasing its chances of being misplaced. The plastic housing feels a bit cheap. Especially when you consider the wand's $250 price tag. Key specs LEDs: 72 Wavelengths: 605 nm, 630 nm, 660 nm, 865 nm Irradiance: 65 mW/cm2 Treatment time: three minutes per area (no automatic shutoff) Charging: none; powered by AC/DC adapter Return policy: 30 days when bought from LightStim Warranty: five years

Google has 'paused' the Ask Photos rollout
Google has 'paused' the Ask Photos rollout

Engadget

time24 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Google has 'paused' the Ask Photos rollout

If you're still waiting on access to Google's AI-driven Ask Photos feature, you'll need to hold tight a little longer. Jamie Aspinall, a product manager for Google Photos, chimed in to a conversation on X to address some complaints about the feature. "Ask Photos isn't where it needs to be, in terms of latency, quality and ux," Aspinall wrote . He said the rollout was being paused "at very small numbers" and that a new version of Ask Photos is slated to ship in about two weeks. To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings. Please click here and view the "Content and social-media partners" setting to do so. I hear you both. Ask Photos isn't where it needs to be, in terms of latency, quality and ux. Rollout has been paused at very small numbers while we address these issues. In ~2 weeks we'll ship an improved version that brings back the speed and recall of the original search — Jamieasp (@jamieasp) June 3, 2025 Ask Photos was introduced at last year's I/O conference and began select early access availability in September. The feature uses the Gemini AI chatbot to find images from a photo library based on natural language queries. As with so many tech giants, Google's implementation of AI-powered features to its services has hit several snags. The AI Overviews feature in search had a notoriously bad introduction to users and its image-generation tool offered some baffling results at launch. Google has also seen critiques from former leaders and current employees about its approach to artificial intelligence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store