Robots race, play football, crash and collapse at Chinas robot Olympics
Games provide data for practical robot applications, organisers say
China invests billions in robotics amid tech competition with U.S
(Adds details from event, quote from participant)
By Liam Mo and Brenda Goh
BEIJING, Aug 15 (Reuters) - China kicked off the three-day long World Humanoid Robot Games on Friday, looking to showcase its advances in artificial intelligence and robotics with 280 teams from 16 countries.
Robots competed in sports such as track and field, and table tennis, as well as tackled robot-specific challenges from sorting medicines and handling materials to cleaning services.
Teams came from countries including the United States, Germany and Brazil, with 192 representing universities and 88 from private enterprises such as China's Unitree and Fourier Intelligence. Competing teams used robots from Chinese manufacturers such as Booster Robotics.
"We come here to play and to win. But we are also interested in research," said Max Polter, a member of HTWK Robots football team from Germany, affiliated with Leipzig University of Applied Sciences.
"You can test a lot of interesting new and exciting approaches in this contest. If we try something and it doesn't work, we lose the game. That's sad but it is better than investing a lot of money into a product which failed."
At the robot games in Beijing, which charged 128 to 580 yuan ($17.83-$80.77) for tickets, humanoids crashed into each other and toppled over repeatedly during football matches, while others collapsed mid-sprint during running events.
During one football match, four robots crashed into each other and fell in a tangled heap. In the 1500-metre running event, one robot suddenly collapsed while running at full speed, drawing gasps and cheers from spectators.
Despite frequent tumbles requiring human assistance to help robots stand, many managed to right themselves independently, earning applause from audiences.
Organisers said the games provide valuable data collection opportunities for developing robots for practical applications such as factory work.
Football matches help train robots' coordination abilities, which could prove useful for assembly line operations requiring collaboration between multiple units, commentators said.
China is investing billions of dollars in humanoids and robotics as the country grapples with an ageing population and growing competition with the U.S. over advanced technologies.
It has staged a series of high-profile robotics events in recent months, including what it called the world's first humanoid robot marathon in Beijing, a robot conference and the opening of retail stores dedicated to humanoid robots.
Morgan Stanley analysts in a report last week noted a surge in attendance to a recent robot conference from the general public compared to previous years, saying this showed "how China, not just top government officials, has embraced the concept of embodied intelligence."
($1 = 7.1805 Chinese yuan renminbi) (Reporting by Liam Mo and Brenda Goh; Editing by Michael Perry)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US-China tariff truce holds, ‘unprecedented' deal with Nvidia, and more
On Monday (August 11), US President Donald Trump extended his country's tariff truce with China for an additional 90 days, till November 10. Discussions between senior officials in Stockholm in late July had previously hinted at another extension, even as higher US tariffs have been imposed on several countries of late, including India. However, that doesn't mean all is smooth sailing in China-US trade, and the race for dominating the artificial intelligence domain saw something quite unusual this week. The Financial Times reported that the US government allowed the semiconductor giant Nvidia to sell previously restricted AI chips to China, if they agreed to pay a certain percentage of the sale to the government. Last week, we noted the reports of Prime Minister Narendra Modi likely visiting China next month for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit. Now, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected to visit India on August 18 for the Special Representative-level talks (the SR mechanism is for discussing border issues) with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. The Wall Street Journal also reported this week that Liu Jianchao, a key Chinese diplomat, was picked for questioning by authorities. Then on Friday, Reuters reported that a deputy to Liu, Sun Haiyan, was also detained. We wrote about Liu and what such 'disappearances' say about the Chinese establishment here. Bloomberg also reported that amid the greater bilateral engagements under the recent normalisation in India-China ties, direct flights may be resumed soon. Here is a closer look at these developments: A statement from the White House said that the tariff pause will provide time for 'remedying trade imbalances' and 'unfair trade practices'. 'Each round of negotiations with the Chinese has built on each other… to work toward fair and balanced trade with a key trading partner,' it said. Trump was also quoted as saying, 'We're getting along with China very well.' UPSHOT: An editorial in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece Global Times appreciated the development: 'This shows that China and the US are managing differences and expanding cooperation in an equal, pragmatic and constructive way.' That high tariffs were unsustainable in the long run was clear from the get-go, but many assumptions have been proven wrong. For example, the US has been the one to repeatedly ask China to come to the negotiating table, and China has been the only nation to counter with its own tariffs on the US — indicating both the intention and ability to challenge its actions. Simultaneously, the latest US economic data shows inflation remained moderate, despite the initial fears of American consumers quickly being impacted. There are several reasons for this, like the eventual lowering of tariff rates, but the prevalent view remains that the effects will show at some point. As the GT article noted, 'Data shows that China's exports to the US have declined for four consecutive months.' It would thus make sense for both sides to push for a settlement. Almost exactly a month ago, Nvidia chief Jensen Huang visited China. Around the same time, the company announced it was filing applications 'to sell the NVIDIA H20 GPU again', saying the US government assured it of requisite licenses. Now, Nvidia has agreed to pay the US government 15 percent of the money made from selling H20 chips to China, the FT reported on Monday. Another US chipmaker, AMD, will do the same for its MI308 chip revenues. Altogether, the deal was estimated to bring about $2 billion to the government, The New York Times said. UPSHOT: The US government restricted both these chips in April this year, over concerns that they would help accelerate the pace of AI development in China, and their potential military applications. This was seen as a progression of the Joe Biden-era restrictions on advanced AI chips being sold to China. In fact, the lower-quality H20s were designed to circumvent the directive. Huang had previously argued for allowing the sale, saying it was causing a US company to lose market share and allowing Chinese companies like Huawei to fill the gap. However, critics argued that China would stand to gain a significant strategic advantage with Nvidia products. This is also why the latest deal has been described as 'unprecedented'. Liza Tobin, a China expert who served on the National Security Council in the first Trump administration, told the FT, 'What's next — letting Lockheed Martin sell F-35s to China for a 15 per cent commission?' Notably, China has previously demanded the entry of H20s, but it may be changing its stance now, given its indigenous push to become self-reliant. A state media-affiliated author recently wrote an article criticising the H20. 'When a type of chip is neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe, as consumers, we certainly have the option not to buy it,' he wrote. The country's cyberspace regulators also summoned Nvidia officials 'over concerns that its H20 artificial intelligence computing chips could be tracked and turned off remotely'. Wang Yi is set to visit India next week. Separately, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that 'India and China are set to resume direct flight connections as soon as next month', citing people familiar with the negotiations. Flights were first restricted amid the Covid-19 pandemic. UPSHOT: Both developments come amid the larger normalisation process that was officially set in motion last October. It was followed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping meeting during the BRICS summit in Russia. Wang's visit is notable for another reason — it's the first high-level official visit by a Chinese leader to India after Operation Sindoor. Notably, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar visited China just a few weeks after the conflict with India, where the countries affirmed their 'brotherly' and 'ironclad' relationship. However, India and China also have several outstanding bilateral issues, most importantly concerning the Line of Actual Control (LAC) that serves as the de facto border. The 2020 LAC stand-off also contributed to limited flights and visa approvals, as well as people-to-people exchanges. As The Indian Express earlier reported, in January-October 2024, the total number of flyers (in both directions) between India and China was over 4.60 lakh. This marked a drastic fall from close to a million in the corresponding months of 2019. Beijing also perhaps expects to benefit from a resumption, as Chinese carriers held a dominant share of the direct flight market before the pandemic. However, Air India and IndiGo would also likely want to capitalise on it if resumption happens.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Sehwag wanted to retire from ODIs after Dhoni's big call, but Tendulkar changed his mind: ‘You are emotional'
Virender Sehwag would not have been part of the 2011 World Cup-winning team if Sachin Tendulkar hadn't changed his mind after former India captain MS Dhoni dropped him in 2008. Virender Sehwag had made up his mind to retire from ODIs after MS Dhoni dropped him in 2008. Image: Reuters Virender Sehwag was one of the architects of India's 2011 ODI World Cup victory, but it would not have been possible without an intervention by the great Sachin Tendulkar in 2008, after the former opener was dropped from the team by then captain MS Dhoni. 14 years after India's World Cup win at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium under Dhoni's captaincy, Sehwag has revealed that he had made up his mind to retire from ODIs in 2008 after being dropped from the side during a tournament in Australia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When Tendulkar stopped Sehwag from retiring in ODIs Sehwag wasn't in great form as Dhoni decided to replace him at the top with Robin Uthappa. India later went on to win the tri-series that also included Australia and Sri Lanka. Sehwag has revealed that he had decided to retire from ODIs as he was not a part of the playing XI, but Tendulkar convinced him not to make any decision in a hurry, and to play a few more series before taking the final call. 'In the 2007-08 series against Australia, I played the first three matches and then MS Dhoni dropped me from the side. I wasn't picked for a while after that. Then I felt that if I can't be a part of the playing XI, then there is no point in playing ODI cricket,' Sehwag said on Padamjeet Sehrawat's podcast. 'I went to Tendulkar and said, 'I am thinking of retiring from ODIs'. He said, 'No. I went through a similar phase in 1999-2000, where I felt I should leave cricket. But that phase came and went. You are going through a trough, but it will pass. Don't make any decision when you are emotional. Give yourself some time and 1-2 series, and then take a call,'' Sehwag added. It proved to be fantastic advice as Sehwag continued in the Indian team as its star opener and helped them win the 2011 World Cup. In the World Cup, Sehwag scored 380 runs at 47.50 average.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian cricket must not adjust for Bumrah, Bumrah must
I guess enough time has gone by for us to now look back at the India England series rationally and perhaps less emotionally. Jasprit Bumrah in action against England during the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy. (Action Images via Reuters) I must confess, I, too, like you, was floored by the performance of young India in an overseas, exhaustive Test series of 5 Test matches, each Test match lasting 5 days. Firstly, my feeling about young India batters does not change, my chest is still pumped in the way (Yashasvi) Jaiswal, (Shubman) Gill, (KL) Rahul, (Rishabh) Pant, (Ravindra) Jadeja and even (Washington Sundar) Washy batted. I won't tire saying that in this age of T20 cricket, what these T20 compatible batters have done is nothing short of phenomenal. And we are not talking only about results here... it's how these results were achieved, it was through hardcore old fashioned Test batting of the extreme kind, defending for hours with a still bat, leaving balls outside off, ball after ball, when rest of the year these same batters are trying to hit a 6 off every ball, it was not just unbelievable but even hard to fathom. They dug deep into their mental reserves not just for 2 or 3 or 4 Tests, but they still had enough left in the tank for another grind right at the end when most batters would be mentally done and finished. I am thinking of Yashasvi Jaiswal here. That all this happened in front of packed audiences was icing on the cake! A great Test series played in front of an audience & a country that truly loves Test cricket. Yes, it was a great Test series in many ways, especially for Indian fans a team devoid of all the big names, most of them on their first tour of England and that virtually every match finished so close was a much-needed blessing for Test cricket. So as a spectacle, it was two months of brilliance! I could stop right here and finish my piece, but it's also important to look at things a little more deeply, address, as they say, the elephant in the room. Great series for fans, yes great result for Indian cricket lovers yes, great advertisement for Test cricket yes, but what about quality? Was the cricket of the highest quality? No, it wasn't. For starters, sorry to burst the bubble, it has to be one of the weakest bowling attacks from both sides that I have seen in a series featuring two main stream teams. The one bowler with great skills and ability had a bizarre approach to playing in this series even before it began, so bowling greatness or excellence was seen very sporadically over 175 hours of Test cricket. Flat pitches made matters even worse, in fact one felt sorry for them and admired those bowlers with clear limitations bowling their hearts out and making a difference, Siraj through the series and Ben Stokes in the matches that he played in, both bowled with a lion's heart. That a class act like Kuldeep did not feature at all will remain one of the shocks of the series, when you are playing an opposition with a very weak bowling attack and a strange batting approach such selection blunders can cost you. A similar approach versus Australia and India would pay a heavy price for it, like we saw recently in the BGT. In the current euphoria these tactical mistakes if not questioned by the selectors and the BCCI, leave India vulnerable to another sound beating against a good side. While admiring how India played we must also acknowledge how bad England was, then the follow up question also springs to mind, was this Next Gen India team so impressive because England was poor? No, Jaiswal, Gill, Rahul & Pant & even Washy are your safe bets even against quality opposition but I fear for India's seam bowling and its strange tactics led by Gambhir with regards to playing XIs and bowling changes, if these controllables were handled better, India would have beaten the natives 3-1 you would think. But this should not take the sheen off India's overall performance especially the execution side of things... in this area, young India was fantastic. The second point I will make is this, that the game will always show us the mirror however much we try and gloss over things. It was poetic justice that the two Tests India won were two matches Bumrah did not play. This should embolden the Indian selectors to make some hard choices when it comes to big-name players. This series has been a great lesson to them and to us too, the two Tests victories India achieved did not feature Virat (Kohli), (Cheteshwar) Pujara, Rohit (Sharma), (Mohammed) Shami and Bumrah too! It reminded us of the eternal truth of sport and life, no one, however great, is indispensable. And this is how India must handle Bumrah. If he cannot play more than two matches in a row or sometimes even more than one, he must not be your frontline pick. Players who are match fit, eager, keen to play and perform should be picked any day for me over a highly skilled player. It will motivate such enthusiastic players even more. This is not an idealistic position to take, but it's the right one for the long term health of a team sport. In this series, Akash Deep & Siraj replicated the Bumrah impact in the two wins, of course, this is not likely become a pattern but it should give the selectors the guts to take hard calls on big name players, just as they do with Kuldeep Yadav. As for Bumrah, of whom I am a fan, if he really wants to serve Indian Test cricket, longevity and durability is an imperative for him, it's after all the true test of a great athlete is to still turn up when not 100% fit and deliver. Indian cricket must not adjust for Bumrah, Bumrah must. That is, if he wants to. By making some tough choices or working even harder on his fitness, this fitness bar can be raised to whatever levels one wants, like all fast bowling greats have done before him.
