Government 'megafund' pension plans could give £6k boost to savers
Plans to double the number of UK pension "megafunds" by 2030 could see workers get a £6,000 boost to their retirement pot, the government has said.
The UK Treasury confirmed plans on Thursday to expand the number of UK pension megafunds in the next five years. Under reforms set to be introduced through the Pension Schemes Bill, the government said that multi-employer defined contribution and local government schemes will pool to operate at megafund level, managing at least £25bn in assets by 2030.
The Treasury said that evidence from Australia and Canada showed that this size enabled pension funds to invest in large infrastructure businesses and private businesses, both boosting the economy and potentially driving higher returns for savers.
The government said that this would help drive more than £50bn in investment for UK infrastructure, new homes and fast-growing businesses. This comes on the back of the government's recent announcement of a new agreement, known as the Mansion House Accord, in which Britain's biggest pension funds committed to invest 5% of assets in the UK.
On Thursday, the government also published the final report from its Pensions Investment Review, setting out its final policy decisions following on from feedback provided to its consultation. It said that figures from the report showed that these reforms would drive higher returns for savers, "in part by cutting waste in the system".
Read more: Trending tickers: Nvidia, Salesforce, HP, Tesla and M&S
According to the Treasury, these schemes could be saving £1bn a year by 2030 through economies of scale and improved investment strategies. As a result, the government said average earner who saves over their career could see a £6,000 boost to their defined contribution pension pot. That's based on its estimate that this megafund consolidation could deliver at least a six-basis-point reduction in fees, as well as an increase in allocations to "productive" assets such infrastructure projects.
"We're making pensions work for Britain," said chancellor Rachel Reeves. "These reforms mean better returns for workers and billions more invested in clean energy and high-growth businesses — the Plan for Change in action."
Meanwhile, deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said that the "untapped potential of the £392bn Local Government Pension Scheme is enormous. Through these reforms we will make sure it drives growth and opportunities in communities across the country for years to come"
In Thursday's announcement, the Treasury also said that a "backstop power [is] set to be taken in the Pension Schemes Bill to protect the interests of LGPS [local government pension scheme] members and local taxpayers where necessary by directing an administering authority to participate in a specific investment pool."
According to a Financial Times report, officials confirmed that this could include specific targets to UK assets. A spokesperson for the Treasury had not responded to Yahoo Finance UK's request for comment at the time of writing.
Matt Tickle, chief investment officer at Barnett Waddingham, said: "The main concern for schemes following the government's wide ranging pension announcements is the looming threat of 'mandation'.
"While the chancellor's 'backstop' power – which could compel funds to back British assets – appears to have deterred that threat for now, any move towards mandated investment is a blunt tool, leaving members and society as a whole at risk of poorer outcomes."
"That said, the fact that there is time gives some of the government's better policies, around planning reform, value for money and retirement pathways more space to succeed," he added.
"If they do, they could generate opportunities that pension schemes will willingly invest in. Efforts to improve the flow of investable opportunities are certainly positive, however there is still an urgent need to focus on reforms rather than enforcing mandates."
Helen Morrissey, Yahoo Finance UK columnist and head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "While scale is important in delivering better outcomes for savers, it must not come at the cost of reducing competition, member choice and much needed innovation. This has the ability to really drive up member engagement with their pensions, improve decision making and boost outcomes."
"It's important to pick through the detail of the report and later regulation to see how this is supported," she said. "For instance, detail needs to be fleshed out on how the transition pathway for providers looking to reach scale by 2035 will work.
"If the market is to thrive, then there needs to be space for smaller, innovative providers. It's a lesson learned in the retail banking market where competition from smaller challenger banks has put pressure on larger incumbents to improve user experience and product offerings."
Read more:
Odds of more Bank of England interest rate cuts fall as food inflation rises
UK 'bargain' stocks that have outperformed the market long-term
Trump tariffs to hit UK economy next year, says IMF
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stocks brave tariff-induced volatility to swing higher
Stock indexes closed higher on Monday despite uncertain economic news as Trump's tariffs continue to be fought over in court. After posting their strongest month since 2023 in May, stocks started off June on a strong foot. Indexes opened in the red but closed higher Monday, powering through a poor manufacturing report and ongoing uncertainty over U.S. trade negotiations. The S&P 500 closed 0.3% higher. The Dow gained 0.08% and the Nasdaq gained 0.7%. Nvidia gained 2.2% and Meta rose 3.6%, helping pull the overall index higher. According to the Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing report this morning, the sector contracted for the third month in a row, with new orders, backlogs, production, and employment all shrinking. Respondents to the ISM's monthly survey overwhelmingly cited uncertainty about tariffs and higher input costs as challenges. 'In May, U.S. manufacturing activity slipped further into contraction after expanding only marginally in February,' Susan Spence, chair of the ISM's Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, said in a statement. She added that deliveries were delayed because of additional processing time at ports and because 'suppliers and panelists' companies are haggling over who pays for applied tariffs.' Last week, an appeals court permitted the Trump administration's tariffs to stay in place while lawsuits on their legality proceed, potentially going all the way up to the Supreme Court. However, even if the current 'reciprocal' tariffs are ruled illegal, analysts note, the White House has several legal options to pursue its tariff policies. 'Either way, tariff rates are likely to get back over 10% and stay there, one way or another,' researchers at LPL Financial said in a note. 'Trade negotiations will continue, economic growth and deficit concerns will remain, and markets are likely to continue to be volatile around lingering trade policy uncertainty.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This AI Giant Is Among the Top 5 Holdings of Billionaires David Tepper, Philippe Laffont, and Stephen Mandel Jr. -- and It's Not Nvidia
Billionaires are betting on the AI revolution, and this particular company already is winning in the field. This tech player also has built a solid earnings track record over time. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Investors, including billionaires, have generated enormous returns by investing in Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) in recent years. The artificial intelligence (AI) chip giant climbed more than 800% from the start of 2023 through the end of last year as demand for its products and services soared. And with the AI market forecast to reach beyond $2 trillion a few years down the road, it's likely Nvidia will continue to benefit. But it's important to remember that Nvidia isn't the only attractive AI bet to be found. In fact, right now, some of the world's top investors are favoring another AI giant over Nvidia. This particular player is among the top five holdings of billionaires David Tepper of Appaloosa Management, Philippe Laffont of Coatue Management, and Stephen Mandel Jr. of Lone Pine Capital. This company, like Nvidia, already has brought in billions of dollars in revenue thanks to AI -- and could win as the AI boom continues. Let's find out more. First, it's important to note that these three billionaires have significant positions in technology stocks, with other such players among their top 10 holdings. So they clearly believe in the AI revolution and are setting themselves up to potentially gain as AI becomes more and more a part of our daily lives and the operations at businesses of every size. For example, Tepper and Mandel each have three Magnificent Seven stocks among their 10 most heavily weighted holdings, and Laffont has four. So, which company has caught the eye of these technology-focused investors? None other than AI powerhouse Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). As of the first quarter of the year, Amazon is the third biggest stock position in Tepper's $8.3 billion portfolio, the second-biggest in Laffont's $22 billion portfolio, and the third- largest in Mandel's $11 billion fund. Here are the details: Tepper holds 2,510,000 Amazon shares, and the stock represents 5.7% of the portfolio. Laffont holds 10,753,808 Amazon shares, and the stock represents 9.02% of his portfolio. Mandel holds 4,352,740 Amazon shares, and they represent 7.15% of his portfolio. This is according to the billionaires' 13Fs, filings that managers of $100 million or more must submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission on a quarterly basis. Now the question is: These billionaires clearly see Amazon as a fantastic AI investment, but is it right for you too? After all, though billionaires have demonstrated their investment expertise, some of their moves may not suit your investment strategy or comfort with risk. It's important to take these elements into consideration before diving in. You probably are most familiar with Amazon thanks to its e-commerce business. It's built an empire in the area, and one that extends around the globe. The operation helps the company generate billions of dollars in revenue year after year, and its extensive fulfillment network and popular subscription program Prime offer it a significant competitive advantage, or moat. But Amazon also is becoming a leader in AI, using the technology to streamline those e-commerce operations and even developing and selling AI products and services to customers through its Amazon Web Services (AWS) unit. In fact, due to Amazon's aggressive push into the AI space, AWS recently delivered a $117 billion annual revenue run rate. So Amazon already is generating significant growth from this hot technology. And since AWS is the world's leading cloud services provider, it's in the perfect spot to capture more and more business. As AWS customers develop AI projects, they have all that they need right at their fingertips on AWS -- from access to top chips like Nvidia's to a fully managed service that tailors popular large language models to a customer's needs. The AI buildout continues, and AWS is set to gain from this and from the next stages of AI, as customers apply AI to their businesses more and more. Meanwhile, Amazon offers a solid track record of earnings growth and has demonstrated its ability to manage turbulent times and go on to grow. For example, the company revamped its cost structure when higher inflation hurt earnings a few years ago and returned to growth within a year. All of this shows that Amazon is well positioned to benefit from the AI boom, but the stock also offers you security thanks to its well-established and profitable e-commerce and cloud businesses. And this means that, whether you're a cautious or aggressive investor, you may, like the billionaires, want to make Amazon one of your key AI bets. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This AI Giant Is Among the Top 5 Holdings of Billionaires David Tepper, Philippe Laffont, and Stephen Mandel Jr. -- and It's Not Nvidia was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's family business death tax won't help keep us safe
To govern is to choose. And this week we have heard ad nausem from Sir Keir Starmer about the tough choices he claims he is having to make to fund our islands' defence. Or rather presumably would have to make in order to get to a firm 3 per cent of GDP in this Parliament rather than the equivocal 3 per cent at the end of the next one he will not even commit to. But amidst the menu of choices, like the Chagos surrender costing our forces £100 million a year, there's one very easy choice that would pay back on many levels. To reverse his family business (and family farm) death tax. This prejudiced decision may turn out, according to new analysis, to cost more money than it raises, punishes aspiration and risks wiping out centuries-old businesses in a single parliamentary term. New independent research published by CBI economics confirmed in another example of Rachel Reeves's dodgy accountancy that this one tax will put 200,000 jobs at risk and lower the size of the wider economy by £15 billion. The Prime Minister must not go ahead with it. Family businesses represent years of work, skills and investments made, passed down carefully through generations. They currently receive relief on inheritance tax when passing it down to the next custodians. This is a feature introduced by a previous Labour government to ensure the success of a constituent part of the economy providing 14 million jobs in the UK. But this is an anti-business government, driven by what works in socialist screeds rather than the shop floor. So, it's no wonder Starmer and his ministers are intent on attacking them. The Cabinet don't have any real business experience between them – the Business Secretary [Jonathan Reynolds] embarrassingly lied on his CV even about being a qualified lawyer – and it shows. Labour came into the general election promising not to tax working people, but that is exactly what they are doing. This is a small business death tax, which will be paid for in the jobs of working people. While some businesses' assets may be valuable on paper, they don't equate to hard cash. There are plenty of family businesses for whom being forced to sell assets (like machinery) on the factory floor will mean emptying the factory floor. They're asset rich but cash poor – and they'll be forced to shut up shop. This is the latest in a long line of decisions aimed squarely at punishing wealth creators and risk takers by a government that at the most charitable interpretation doesn't know about business interests, nor foresee the outcome of their assaults on business. All the more reason to listen when independent forecasters say your numbers are wrong. More shockingly, what started as a pre-election prawn cocktail offensive aimed at charming business has become an all-out war on private enterprise. Because this is only the start. The Employment Bill, which will do the exact opposite of what it says on the tin, is costing businesses £5 billion and allows trade unions to reconquer private businesses. Many of those who won't be able to cope with its hundreds of pages more regulations will be the same small, family businesses already suffering under the burden of the death tax. As part of my role as shadow business secretary, I have been going around the country engaging with businesses from the biggest automotive firms to village shops. All seriously worried about what this government will do next. It is no wonder that there has been an exodus of wealth creators since Starmer has taken office. Last year, over 10,000 millionaires fled Labour's socialist attacks on businesses and wealth creators. The tax bills they took with them are the equivalent of losing 300,000 average taxpayers. These are ambitious, courageous people, many of them entrepreneurs who have choices – and they're not choosing Labour's Britain. These people create jobs, drive growth, and pay for our public services. We will all be worse off without them. But still, Reeves dogmatically ploughs on, not paying attention to the warning lights on the dashboard flashing red or the millionaires leaving every 45 minutes. It is a stark reminder of what socialists are capable of when they get their hands of the levers of power. The Conservatives understand family businesses and wealth creators because so many of us have worked in the private sector. While other parties fight over who can spend the fastest more taxpayers' money we cannot afford, we continue to advocate for government that spends only within its means and balances its books without fiddling the rules. That means making the genuinely tough choices that will prioritise defence over ballooning welfare costs. We know that those who start businesses are taking a risk. We need to create a society where people aren't afraid to fail and are rewarded for those risks when they pay off. At the very least, those who start family businesses should know that they are able to pass their business down to the next generation. Unless the Prime Minister sees sense soon, Britain's legion of quietly successful family business will be consigned to the dustbin of history and our future with them. Andrew Griffith is the Conservative shadow business and trade secretary Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
