Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick kicked out of House for a second time
Swarbrick was urging Government MPs to support her bill sanctioning Israel, saying: 'If we find six of 68 Government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history'.
Speaker Gerry Brownlee told her to apologise. When she refused, she was kicked out of the House and barred for a week.
When Swarbrick returned to the House today, a similar scenario played out.
Brownlee again asked her to apologise and kicked her out when she refused. He also 'named' her, among the harshest penalties a Speaker can dish out on the spot and results in her pay being docked.
As she left the House, she said: 'Free Palestine'.
After Swarbrick left the chamber, other MPs questioned the Speaker's decision to name Swarbrick.
Labour MP Willie Jackson said he had been kicked out but not barred from the House for twice calling David Seymour a liar. He noted this incident, in which Swarbrick has been very seriously disciplined, did not sit well with that precedent.
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer referred to Act MP Brook Van Velden's use of the word c**t in the House without punishment.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said a Speaker's Ruling from Jonathan Hunt was that when the MP leaves the chamber on the day the original incident occurred, the matter was considered over.
But Brownlee said a new ruling, from 2017, superseded that.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the matter should have been considered over when Chlöe Swarbrick left the house on Tuesday. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Speaking to reporters outside the debating chamber, the Greens co-leader said the punishment was unprecedented and the Speaker was not treating her party fairly.
MPs had said far more egregious things in the House before without facing such a tough punishment, she said.
'As far as I am aware, there is no situation in which a Speaker has asked for somebody to withdraw and apologise, that person has refused to apologise, then been ordered to leave the house ... and the person has complied.'
She said she felt as though the rules were being made up.
'This is uncharted territory. There is no precedent to cling to here.'
Swarbrick already has plans to be in her electorate of Auckland Central tomorrow. Her party would continue discussing the issue with the Clerk.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Supreme Court gives green light to riverbeds' inclusion in Māori customary marine title orders
Photo: Getty Images / Hagen Hopkins The Supreme Court has found riverbeds can be included in Māori customary marine title orders - if other legal tests are meet. The court released its second judgement today on claims to customary rights in the eastern Bay of Plenty. The first, which was released in December 2024, overturned a previous Court of Appeal decision which made it easier for Māori to gain customary title. This second judgement resolves the remaining issues on seven separate appeals - which included the issue of riverbeds. It comes as the government forges ahead with plans to amend the law to make it harder for Māori to win customary title . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.
The Spinoff
4 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Covid-19 inquiry row reignites political battle over pandemic legacy
Four ex-ministers say they've already given full evidence in private, but their successors accuse them of dodging public accountability, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Former Labour ministers defend inquiry no-show To a greater or lesser extent, four former Labour ministers – Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Grant Robertson and Ayesha Verrall – spent much of yesterday defending their decision not to appear at the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19. As summarised in a minute published by the commission this week, the four believed their attendance would have been 'performative' rather than 'informative' and expressed concerns that livestreamed or published evidence could be manipulated or misused, especially given reports of abuse towards earlier witnesses. All have already provided extensive private testimony – Ardern's spokesperson said her most recent interview lasted three hours – and offered to answer any further questions in private, The Post's Kelly Dennett reports (paywalled) Writing in the Herald (paywalled), Thomas Coughlan says Ardern and her colleagues had good reasons to stay away: 'What some of the royal commission hawks seem to want is not an inquiry, but a trial', in which the ex-ministers are punished with a 'brief, livestreamed public grilling for their perceived crimes'. Government seizes on 'gutless' decision Government ministers were swift to condemn the Labour group's decision. As RNZ's Russell Palmer reports, deputy prime minister David Seymour accused the group of 'running from accountability', contrasting their daily televised briefings during the pandemic with their reluctance to front now. Senior minister Chris Bishop said they were 'ashamed of their record', highlighting the 'debt disaster' the government had inherited as a result of Labour's pandemic-era spending. Justice minister Judith Collins called Ardern's decision 'gutless and hypocritical', while foreign minister Winston Peters said the 'Podium of Truth' – a reference to Ardern's 1pm Covid-era updates – had become the 'Podium of Evasion'. Meanwhile prime minister Christopher Luxon stated confidently, but wrongly, that the four had defied a summons. In fact, explains Stuff's Lloyd Burr, the commission confirmed it had decided against compelling attendance, judging that doing so would be adversarial and unlikely to yield new information. The chair, Grant Illingworth KC, said their non-appearance would not hinder the inquiry's work, though public confidence might have been enhanced had they attended. Phase two under fire Hipkins has previously criticised the second phase of the inquiry – established by the current government – as 'far more political' than the first, accusing it of providing a platform for 'conspiracy theorist views'. He argued the terms of reference had been 'deliberately constructed to achieve a particular outcome', in part by excluding from consideration the period when Labour governed with NZ First. Phase two covers the years 2021 and 2022 only, and examines whether lockdowns, vaccine mandates, MIQ and other measures struck the right balance between public health and social and economic costs. But the inquiry has also faced scrutiny from the right. Documents obtained by Newsroom's Marc Daalder show Act's Brooke van Velden, the minister responsible for royal commissions, was advised to press Illingworth to improve planning, risk assessment and reporting, warning that failure to deliver on time and within budget would 'further undermine' confidence. Van Velden says she now has confidence in the chair and still expects the final report to be delivered to her by February 2026. Debating the pandemic's toll While the inquiry probes the social consequences of the Covid-19 response, debate continues over its impact on mortality. Writing in The Spinoff last month, University of Canterbury epidemiologist Michael Plank examined claims that New Zealand dramatically under-reported excess deaths to the end of 2023. His team found total deaths between 2020 and 2023 were between 2% higher and 0.8% lower than expected – far below excess mortality rates in countries like the UK or US. The timing of excess deaths closely matched Covid-19 waves, suggesting the virus, not indirect effects, was the main driver. Plank concluded: 'New Zealand's response was far from perfect, and there were undoubtedly harms as a result of lockdowns and other measures that are not reflected in mortality statistics. But there can be no doubt that the response saved thousands of lives compared with the alternatives.'
