Funerals held for Al Jazeera journalists assassinated by Israel in Gaza
On Monday, large crowds joined the funeral procession, carrying the journalists' bodies from al-Shifa Hospital to Sheikh Radwan Cemetery in central Gaza.
Colleagues, friends, and relatives embraced in grief, while a man lifted a 'press' flak jacket high above the crowd.
The strike late on Sunday killed seven people, including prominent correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Moamen Aliwa, and Mohammed Noufal. Freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khaldi was also among the dead. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said three more journalists were wounded.
Footage verified by Al Jazeera showed mourners chanting against the killings, with some pledging, 'With our soul and blood, we sacrifice for you, Anas,' in reference to the slain journalist.
Al Jazeera Media Network condemned the 'targeted assassination' by Israeli forces, accusing the military of deliberately striking the journalists' position. 'The Israeli military admitted to their crimes,' the network said, describing the attack as 'another blatant and premeditated assault on press freedom'.
Al-Sharif was 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists', said Al Jazeera, adding that the attack was 'a desperate attempt to silence voices in anticipation of the occupation of Gaza'.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said it was 'appalled' by the killings. 'Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' said CPJ's regional director, Sara Qudah. 'Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable.'
Media watchdog RSF also condemned what it described as the 'acknowledged murder by the Israeli army' of al-Sharif, calling him 'one of the most famous journalists from the Gaza Strip (and) the voice of the suffering Israel has imposed on Palestinians in Gaza'. The group said the attack mirrored the 2023 killing of Al Jazeera's Ismail al-Ghoul, who was also labelled a 'terrorist' by Israel.
'Without strong action from the international community… we're likely to witness more such extrajudicial murders of media professionals,' RSF warned, urging the United Nations Security Council to intervene.
Al-Sharif's assassination comes more than a year after Israel bombed his family home in a refugee camp, killing his 65-year-old father.
The killings of the Palestinian journalists come days after Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to occupy the Gaza Strip. The operation aims to seize Gaza City and forcibly clear nearly one million Palestinian residents.
Palestinians have pointed out that Gaza – home to 2.3 million people – remains under Israeli occupation. Nothing can go in or out without Israeli permission. A total Israeli blockade since March 2 has triggered a starvation crisis, killing more than 200 people, including 100 children, in the last few weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
32 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Afghans in US mark withdrawal anniversary amid Trump immigration crackdown
Four years have passed since Hanifa Girowal fled Afghanistan on a US evacuation flight. But every August, her mind returns to the same place. Like many Afghans evacuated amid the August 15 Taliban takeover of Kabul, Girowal, who worked in human rights under the former Afghan government, still remains stuck in 'legal limbo' in the United States. She is steadfastly pursuing a more stable status in the US, even as the political landscape surrounding her, and thousands of other Afghans in similar situations, shifts. 'I somehow feel like I'm still stuck in August 2021 and all the other Augusts in between, I can't remember anything about them,' Girowal told Al Jazeera. She often recalls the mad dash amid a crush of bodies at the crowded Kabul International Airport: people shot in front of her, a week of hiding, a flight to Qatar, then Germany and then finally, the US state of Virginia. Followed by the early days of trying to begin a new life from the fragments of the old. 'Everything just comes up again to the surface, and it's like reliving that trauma we went through, and we have been trying to heal from since that day,' she said. The struggle may have become familiar, but her disquiet has been heightened since US President Donald Trump took office on January 20. His hardline immigration policies have touched nearly every immigrant community in the US, underscoring vulnerabilities for anyone on a precarious legal status. There is a feeling that anything could happen, from one day to the next. 'I have an approved asylum case, which gives a certain level of protection, but we still don't know the future of certain policies on immigration,' Girowal said. 'I am very much fearful that I can be subjected to deportation at any time.' Unheeded warnings Four years after the US withdrawal, much remains unclear about how Trump's policies will affect Afghans who are already in the US, estimated to total about 180,000. They arrived through a tangle of different avenues, including 75,000 flown in on evacuation flights in the immediate aftermath of the withdrawal, as the administration of US President Joe Biden undertook what it dubbed 'Operation Allies Welcome'. Thousands more have since sought asylum by making treacherous journeys across the world to traverse the US southern border. Some have relocated via so-called Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs), reserved for individuals who worked directly with the US military in Afghanistan, under a notoriously backlogged programme. Others have been resettled through a special State Department programme, known as Priority 1 (P1) and Priority 2 (P2), launched by the administration of President Biden, meant for Afghans who face persecution for having worked in various capacities on behalf of the US government or with a US-based organisation in Afghanistan. Adam Bates, a supervisory policy counsel at the International Refugee Assistance Programme, explained that some of those pathways, most notably the SIV and refugee programmes, provide a clear course towards US residency and, eventually, citizenship. But, he clarified, others do not – a fact that advocates have warned leaves members of the population subject to perpetual uncertainty and political whims. 'A lot of the advocacy to the Biden administration officials was about finding more permanent legal pathways for Afghans,' Bates told Al Jazeera. 'That was with one eye towards the potential of giving the Trump administration this opportunity to really double down and target this community.' Pressure on Afghans in the US During Trump's new term, his administration has taken several concrete – and at times contradictory – moves that affect Afghans living in the US. It ended 'temporary protected status' (TPS) for Afghans already in the country at the time of the Taliban takeover, arguing the country shows 'an improved security situation' and 'stabilising economy', a claim contradicted by several human rights reports. At the same time, the Trump administration added Afghanistan to a new travel ban list, restricting visas for Afghans, saying such admissions broadly run counter to US 'foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism'. These actions underscore that 'the situation in Afghanistan seems to be whatever it needs to be, from the Trump administration's perspective,' according to Bates. Trump has offered his contradictory messaging, criticising the Biden administration on the campaign trail for its handling of the withdrawal, and as recently as July, pledging to 'save' evacuated Afghans subject to deportation from the United Arab Emirates. Meanwhile, the administration terminated a special status for those who entered the US via the CBP One app in April, potentially affecting thousands of Afghans who entered via the southern border. Advocates warn that many more Afghans may soon be facing another legal cliff. After being evacuated in 2021, tens of thousands of Afghans were granted humanitarian parole, a temporary status that allowed them to legally live and work in the US for two years, with an extension granted in 2023. That programme is soon set to end. While many granted the status have since sought other legal avenues, most often applying for asylum or SIVs, an unknown number could be rendered undocumented and subject to deportation when the extension ends. Legislation creating a clearer pathway to citizenship has languished in Congress for years. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has not publicly released how many evacuated Afghans remain in the US on humanitarian parole, and did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for the data. Evacuated Afghans' unease has been compounded by Trump's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement, which has increasingly seen those without criminal histories targeted for deportations and permanent residents targeted for their political advocacy. 'It's just an escalation across the board and a compounding of fear and instability in this community,' Bates said. 'It's hard to make life decisions if you aren't sure what's going to happen tomorrow or next week or in a year'. 'Pulled the rug out' Meanwhile, for the thousands of Afghans continuing to seek safety in the US from abroad, pathways have been severely constricted or have become completely blocked. The Trump administration has paused asylum claims at the US southern border, citing a national emergency. It has almost completely suspended the US Refugee Program (USRAP), allowing only a trickle of new refugees in amid an ongoing legal challenge by rights groups. Advocates say the special P1 and P2 programme created for Afghan refugees appears to have been completely halted under Trump. The administration has not published refugee admission numbers since taking office, and did not reply to Al Jazeera's request for data. 'It feels as if we have pulled the rug out from many of our Afghan allies through these policy changes that strip legal protection for many Afghans in the US and limit pathways for Afghans who are still abroad to come to the US safely,' Kristyn Peck, the chief executive officer of the Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area, told Al Jazeera. She noted that the SIV pipeline has continued to operate under Trump, although there have been some limitations, including requiring those approved for relocation to pay for their own travel. Meanwhile, resettlement agencies like Lutheran have been forced to seriously curtail their operations following a stop-work order from the administration on January 24. As of March, Peck said, the organisation has been forced to let go of about 120 of its staff. Susan Antolin, the executive director of Women for Afghan Women, a non-profit organisation that offers mental health, legal and social support to Afghans in the US, said organisations like hers are also bracing for sustained uncertainty. 'We are diversifying our funding and trying very hard, as so many other organisations are, to find other avenues to bring in that funding to continue to support our programmes,' she told Al Jazeera. 'As organisations that deal with this kind of work, we have to step up. We have to do 10 times more, or 100 times more, of the work.' 'No more a priority for the world' The unstable situation in the US reflects a broader global trend. The Taliban government, despite promising reforms in a push for international recognition, has continued to be accused of widespread human rights abuses and revenge killings. Still, it has upgraded diplomatic ties with several governments in recent years, and in July, Russia became the first country to formally recognise the group as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. At the same time, the governments of Pakistan and Iran have accelerated expulsions of Afghans back to Afghanistan, with more than 1.4 million Afghans either being expelled or leaving Iran alone from January to July of 2025, according to UNHCR. The Reuters news agency also reported in July that the UAE had notified Washington that it had begun returning evacuated Afghans. Germany, too, has begun deporting Afghans back to Afghanistan, in July, it conducted its second deportation flight since the Taliban came to power, despite continuing not to recognise or maintain diplomatic ties with the group. The collective moves send a clear message, evacuee Girowal said: 'We know that Afghanistan is no more a priority for the world.' Still, she said she has not abandoned hope that the US under Trump's leadership will 'not forget its allies'. 'I know the resilience of our own Afghan community. We are trained to be resilient wherever we are and fight back as much as we can,' she said. 'That's one thing that gives me hope.'
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Israel's Ben Gvir filmed threatening Marwan Barghouti in prison
Israel's Ben Gvir filmed threatening Marwan Barghouti in prison NewsFeed Palestinian officials have condemned Israeli threats against imprisoned leader Marwan Barghouti, as an 'unprecedented provocation.' National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir was filmed making the comments after what was described as 'a raid' on Barghouti's prison cell. Video Duration 01 minutes 06 seconds 01:06 Video Duration 01 minutes 04 seconds 01:04 Video Duration 03 minutes 00 seconds 03:00 Video Duration 01 minutes 01 seconds 01:01 Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46 Video Duration 02 minutes 42 seconds 02:42 Video Duration 01 minutes 00 seconds 01:00
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Palestinians condemn Israel's Ben-Gvir over Marwan Barghouti threat
Palestinian officials have condemned far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir's taunting visit to the jail cell of long-imprisoned Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti. Footage of the visit shared on social media on Thursday showed the minister making threatening remarks to the 66-year-old. In the footage, Ben-Gvir is seen telling Barghouti, who has been in prison since 2002, including years in solitary confinement: 'You won't win. Whoever messes with the nation of Israel, whoever murders our children and women – we will wipe them out.' 'You should know this, [this happened] throughout history,' Ben-Gvir added. The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the incident 'in the strongest terms'. In a statement on Thursday, the ministry said Ben-Gvir's actions were 'an unprecedented provocation and organised state terrorism, falling within the framework of the crimes of genocide, displacement, and annexation faced by the prisoners and our people'. It added that the Palestinian Authority will take the threat seriously and will follow up with the International Committee of the Red Cross, relevant states, the international community, and its specialised organisations and councils. Barghouti's wife, Fadwa, said he and other Palestinian prisoners are subjected to inhumane treatment behind bars. 'They are still, Marwan, chasing you and pursuing you even in the solitary cell you've been living in for two years, and the struggle of the occupation and its figures with you continues. The shackles are on your hands, but I know your spirit and determination, and I know you will remain free, free, free,' she wrote in a statement on Facebook. 'I know that the only thing that can shake you is what you hear about your people's pain, and the only thing that crushes and wounds you is the failure to protect our sons and daughters. You are of the people; wherever you are among the people, you are one of them and part of them.' 'Shocking' Israel's Channel 12 broadcast a video clip of Ben-Gvir's visit at Ganot Prison in central Israel. The channel reported that the minister's visit was intended to oversee stricter conditions for Palestinian prisoners. The video marks the first time for years that footage of Barghouti has been published. His family and rights groups said he has been in solitary confinement since Israel launched its war on Gaza in October 2023 after Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel. Relatives of Barghouti who viewed the footage told Al Jazeera Arabic there was a 'shocking' appearance in his features, apparently from 'exhaustion and hunger', and expressed fear that he would die in custody. In October, the Palestinian Prisoner's Society accused Israeli prison staff of 'brutally assaulting' and injuring Barghouti while he was being held in solitary confinement. The claims that he has several times been beaten by prison staff have been denied by the Israel Prisons Service. The Fatah leader was sentenced to five life sentences plus 40 years for his alleged role in planning attacks that caused the deaths of five civilians during the second Intifada.
