
Fungi, Carbon, And The Climate Risk Map We Missed
Soil fungi may not have ticker symbols but they move carbon at planetary scale, drawing an estimated 13 billion tons of CO₂ into the soil each year, equivalent to nearly a third of global fossil fuel emissions. And yet, they've been almost entirely absent from climate risk models, ESG reports, and conservation agendas.
Scientists from the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN) have released the first-ever high-resolution global maps of mycorrhizal fungal biodiversity, alongside the launch of a groundbreaking public platform called the Underground Atlas. The research, published in the journal Nature, marks the first large-scale scientific application of the global mapping initiative launched by SPUN in 2021. Built using over 2.8 billion fungal DNA sequences from 130 countries, the Atlas reveals a profound oversight: more than 90% of the planet's most diverse underground carbon ecosystems are unprotected.
'Soils store 75% of Earth's terrestrial carbon and contain ~59% of Earth's biodiversity. Yet, we've neglected to map, monitor, and protect fungal systems,' says Dr. Toby Kiers, executive director of SPUN. 'With the Underground Atlas, we're making these invisible networks visible, and therefore measurable.'
The Underground Carbon Crisis
Mycorrhizal fungi form vast underground networks that connect and sustain over 90% of all terrestrial plant species, channelling nutrients, supporting food systems, biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience. Critically, they also draw carbon from plants into the soil, playing a major role in carbon sequestration and climate regulation. But until now, these fungal networks have gone unmapped and unmonitored, and the implications of this are significant.
'We were surprised to learn that fungal biodiversity didn't align with traditional conservation indicators like plant richness,' says Dr. Kiers. 'That means we're missing high-value underground ecosystems that are being degraded or lost, increasing global warming and disrupting nutrient cycles.'
The Atlas will also be critical in leveraging fungi to regenerate degraded ecosystems. 'Restoration practices have been dangerously incomplete because the focus has historically been on life aboveground,' said Dr. Alex Wegmann a lead scientist for The Nature Conservancy. 'These high-resolution maps provide quantitative targets for restoration managers to establish what diverse mycorrhizal communities could and should look like."
Urgent action is needed to incorporate findings into international biodiversity law and policy. For example, the Ghanaian coast is a global hotspot for mycorrhizal biodiversity. But the country's coastline is eroding at roughly two meters per year and scientists are concerned that such critical biodiversity could soon be washed into the sea.
To build the Underground Atlas, SPUN and partners used machine learning models trained on billions of environmental DNA sequences, geospatial data, and climate variables. For the first time, decision-makers, restoration managers, and investors can explore mycorrhizal biodiversity at a 1km² scale, enabling them to identify high-value underground ecosystems that are critical to carbon cycling, crop resilience, and biodiversity.
'This is the most data-rich global compilation of fungal eDNA ever assembled,' says Dr. Michael Van Nuland, SPUN's lead data scientist. 'There just aren't many high-resolution global maps for soil organisms, especially for ecosystem engineers like fungi.'
The Atlas can make biodiversity predictions even in unsampled areas, identifying fungal richness, rarity, and degradation risk. This will enable regulators and restoration practitioners to anticipate biodiversity loss and carbon vulnerability at a landscape scale.
SPUN is already working with early adopters across conservation, restoration, and legal sectors, and has observer status at the upcoming UN COP16 biodiversity summit.
Implications For ESG And Restoration
The new maps reveal a critical blind spot for companies and governments relying on nature-based solutions, sustainable agriculture, and biodiversity finance. 'Conservation is about protecting the systems that sustain life, and those systems don't stop at the soil surface,' says Dr. Rebecca Shaw, chief scientist at WWF. 'Healthy fungal networks are tied to higher aboveground biodiversity and greater ecosystem resilience.'
Dr. Shaw says the maps should be incorporated into frameworks like the 30x30 biodiversity targets, National Biodiversity Strategies (NBSAPs), and even carbon markets. 'Much like the human gut microbiome transformed medicine, the soil microbiome is essential for planetary health,' she says. 'We must start incorporating these maps into our conservation plans, including at WWF.'
She emphasizes that mycorrhizal fungi need to be recognized as a priority in the 'library of solutions' to some of the world's greatest challenges, biodiversity decline, climate change, and declining food productivity. 'They deliver powerful ecosystem services whose benefits flow directly to people. This research should help elevate the protection and restoration of fungi and their networks to the top of conservation priorities.'
'This research maps where fungal communities are thriving or under threat,' she continues. 'There is an opportunity to integrate this knowledge into decision-making about building resilience into our food systems.'
These insights are also guiding restoration and corporate risk assessments. SPUN is currently piloting a project with a corporate partner to evaluate the use of mycorrhizal biodiversity assessments in material supply chains. 'This is helping us understand both the economic applications for our data and how these collaborations can contribute valuable information back to our global database,' says Dr. Van Nuland.
Soil fungi aren't just climate assets, they're agricultural assets. Research shows mycelial networks can reduce nutrient leaching by up to 50% and supply up to 80% of a plant's phosphorus needs, positioning fungi as vital components of sustainable farming.
Incorporating fungal biodiversity into agricultural planning offers a powerful hedge against food system risk, helping companies navigate fertilizer volatility, regulatory pressures, and the growing need to demonstrate climate-resilient practices. For businesses navigating nature risk, this may be the data layer they didn't know they needed.
Soil fungi are also being considered in legal and regulatory contexts. 'Underground biodiversity is included in the Convention on Biological Diversity,' says César Rodríguez-Garavito, director of NYU's More-Than-Human Life Program. 'But in practice, policies have focused almost entirely on aboveground ecosystems.'
Because fungal networks have been invisible in climate law, activities that disrupt them have gone largely unregulated, with serious consequences for carbon storage, soil health, and legal accountability. 'By making visible the presence of climate-significant soil fungi, this data can help prevent climate impacts that stem from their destruction,' he explains.
A litigation toolkit is also in development with NYU Law to help Indigenous communities protect underground ecosystems threatened by extraction.
Changing The Climate Narrative
Beyond risk and regulation, the Underground Atlas offers something deeper: a new way of seeing and valuing ecosystems.
'Fungi have long been overlooked because they don't fit neatly into our mental models,' says Dr. Merlin Sheldrake, SPUN's director of impact and author of Entangled Life. 'These tools help us overcome that blindness and see fungi as living infrastructure.'
The implications go beyond science or policy, they touch how we define intelligence, resilience and value in the natural world. While forests and coral reefs have long symbolized ecological richness, the quiet complexity of underground fungal networks has rarely captured public imagination or financial attention. That's beginning to change.
'When we understand that fungi store carbon, support biodiversity, and regulate water flows, we begin to grasp that protecting them is a matter of long-term value, not just ecological virtue.' Sheldrake argues that these maps are not just analytical tools, they are conceptual ones, helping businesses and governments see what sustainability has missed.
Recognizing fungi as climate infrastructure could shift how nature is factored into risk models, insurance products, and even accounting frameworks in the years to come.
Dr Van Nuland says that while the current launch represents the project's first major milestone, this is only the beginning. SPUN is currently working on more than 10 additional mapping pipelines that will expand the platform's capabilities, including maps of mycorrhizal carbon drawdown hotspots, underground threat assessments, and restoration potential analyses.
'We're only beginning to explore the economic and ecological uses of this data,' he says. 'We want to discover new applications and we're inviting researchers, funders, and policymakers to help us.'
In a world increasingly focused on risk, resilience, and real assets, the lesson is clear: funghi, and the fungal networks beneath our feet, are the billion-ton blind spot we can no longer afford to ignore.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Forest guard stunned after snapping photo of creature not seen in years — here's what happened
Long-billed vultures have been spotted in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh years after they were thought to have left the Barwani area, according to Bharat National. A forest guard thought he heard the birds, then spotted one and snapped a photo on his mobile phone. He didn't quite believe his own eyes, so he sent the photo to an expert for verification. They verified that he had, in fact, seen a bird that is considered to be on the verge of extinction. Officials in India are excited because these scavenging birds play a key role in maintaining ecological balance. More species means more biodiversity, and that's always a good thing. According to the U.S. National Park Service, biodiversity makes all life more resilient. More species can help regulate diseases, increase and maintain the food supply, and contribute to overall well-being for people and for other animals, too. This is why it's important that we learn to manage the environment around us well. When we do that, more species thrive, and that impacts each one of us. Wildcams explains that using tools like trail cameras can help us observe, track, and understand wildlife without having to interfere with their daily activities. They can help us be responsible stewards of the natural gifts we've been given without having a direct impact on plants and animals. Experts have used trail cameras in the past to catch glimpses of elusive species. They know these species are out there, but they don't see them often; the cameras help verify that they are alive and well. They have also helped us see animals that may be large or otherwise dangerous to track most of the time. Understanding climate issues can help us rejoice when creatures like these vultures in India are spotted. It can also help us to do all we can to promote their ongoing existence and thriving. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword


Gizmodo
a day ago
- Gizmodo
Physicists Create First-Ever Antimatter Qubit, Making the Quantum World Even Weirder
Readers following our existential physics coverage may remember a recent breakthrough from CERN concerning matter's evil twin, antimatter. An outstanding mystery in physics is that our universe contains more matter than antimatter, contradicting most theoretical predictions. Scientists, therefore, understandably want to explain why and how this is the case. CERN announced yet another significant leap for studying antimatter—and this time, the achievement creeps into the realm of quantum computing. In a Nature paper published on July 23, CERN's Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE) collaboration announced the first-ever demonstration of an antimatter quantum bit, or qubit—the smallest unit of information for quantum computers. The qubit in question is an antiproton, a proton's antimatter counterpart, caught in a curious quantum swing—arcing back and forth between 'up' and 'down' spin states in perfect rhythm. The oscillation lasted for 50 seconds. The technical prowess that enabled this result represents a significant leap forward in our understanding of antimatter, the researchers claim. For the experiment, the team applied a technique called coherent quantum transition spectroscopy, which measures—with chilling precision—a particle's magnetic moment, or its behavior inside magnetic fields. First, the team brought in some antiprotons from CERN's antimatter factory, trapping the particles in an electromagnetic Penning trap—a superposition of magnetic fields. Next, they set up a second multi-trap inside the same magnet, extracting individual antiprotons to measure and tweak the particle's spin states in the process. Quantum states are fragile and easily disturbed by outside distractions. The wrong push can immediately send them spiraling down the drain toward decoherence—at which point the system loses the valuable information physicists hope to find. This fundamental limitation of quantum systems was a major concern for the BASE collaboration, who in 2017 used a similar setup to the new experiment to confirm that protons and antiprotons had practically identical magnetic moments. The team made substantial revisions to its technology, paying special attention to developing the mechanisms needed to suppress and eliminate decoherence. This hard work paid off; the antiproton performed a stable quantum swing for 50 seconds—a motion akin to how qubits exist in superpositions of states, which theoretically could allow them to store exponential loads of information. Additionally, it marked the first time physicists observed this phenomenon in a single free nuclear magnetic moment, whereas previous experiments had only seen it in large groups of particles. 'This represents the first antimatter qubit and opens up the prospect of applying the entire set of coherent spectroscopy methods to single matter and antimatter systems in precision experiments,' BASE spokesperson Stefan Ulmer said in a statement. That said, the team doesn't believe the new results will introduce antimatter qubits to quantum computing, at least not anytime soon. 'It does not make sense to use [the antimatter qubit] at the moment for quantum computers, because, simply speaking, engineering related to production and storage of antimatter is much more difficult than for normal matter,' Latacz explained, adding that since matter and antimatter are known to share fundamental properties, opting for the latter wouldn't make practical sense. 'However, if in the future [we find] that antimatter behaves differently than matter, then it may be interesting to consider this.' There are additional improvements the team hopes to make, which will happen sometime very soon, Latacz said. The upgrades to BASE—termed BASE-STEP—will greatly improve our capacity to study antiprotons with higher precision and allow us to 'improve the measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton by at least a factor of 10, and in a longer perspective even a factor of 100,' she said. The new breakthrough could contribute to engineering advances in quantum computing, atomic clocks, and other areas. But as the researchers emphasize, such technological applications aren't anything we should expect any time soon. Nevertheless, the result itself presents some fascinating lessons for fundamental physics—questions that may take years to answer, but to quote physicist Sean Carroll from the other recent CERN finding, 'Well, it's a small part of a much bigger puzzle—but you know, every part matters.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Science Officially Confirmed That The 10,000 Steps Rule Is Outdated. Here's The New Number To Target.
A new meta review published in the Lancet officially confirmed that we've been calculating our step count number all wrong. The new findings suggest that you can actually reap the major health benefits well before you hit 10,000 steps. Here's what experts say about the 10k number and how this applies to your life. The idea that you need to log 10,000 steps a day for good health has been health gospel for ages. But as Women's Health previously reported this year, the 10,000-a-day steps goal (which roughly equates to five miles) isn't really based in science. In fact, it's more marketing than anything. But it's a nice, round number, and it's built into most fitness trackers. Now, a new scientific analysis in The Lancet Public Health officially confirms that this lofty steps count goal isn't actually necessary—and the potential health benefits start to level off well before you reach that point. If you've been happily clocking 10,000 steps a day and feel like it's working for you, there's no reason to stop. But if that number is intimidating and feels impossible to reach with everything else you've got going on in your life, this study probably has some findings you can use. Here's what the scientific review discovered, plus where experts and trainers recommend you try to land with your new step count goal. Meet the experts: Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab; Dani Singer, CPT, founder of Fit2Go Personal Training What did the new meta review find? For the review, researchers analyzed data from 88 different studies, looking at how step counts were linked with the risk of developing a slew of health conditions. Overall, the researchers discovered that the risk of developing serious health conditions like cardiovascular disease, dementia, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and depression was lower in people who logged 7,000 steps a day compared to those who only did 2,000 daily steps. But they also discovered that the health perks beyond 7,000 steps were actually pretty minimal. "Although 10,000 steps per day, an unofficial target for decades without a clear evidence base, was associated with substantially lower risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence, cancer mortality, dementia, and depressive symptoms than 7,000 steps per day, the incremental improvement beyond 7,000 steps per day was small, and there was no statistical difference between 7,000 steps per day and a higher step count for all the other outcomes," the investigators wrote. "Therefore, 7,000 steps per day might be a more realistic and achievable recommendation for some, but 10,000 steps per day can still be a viable target for those who are more active.' Where did the 10,000 number come from? The famous steps goal number has a long history behind it (you can do a deep dive here). But here's a quick recap: This number was formulated by a Tokyo doctor named Iwao Ohya who created a fitness tracker called Manpo-Kei (in Japanese, that means "10,000 step meter) with engineer Jiro Kato. It's been suggested that 10,000 steps was chosen because the Japanese character for 10,000 looks like a man running or walking, but it's not really clear if that's truly one of the reasons behind the number. (Both inventors have since died.) The number 10,000 eventually got picked up by researchers and fitness tracker developers, and its popularity spread. These days, almost everyone knows the number. Still, "no clinical data backed it then, and none was added later," says Dani Singer, CPT, founder of Fit2Go Personal Training. Why is it not accurate? While hitting 10,000 steps isn't bad for you (and means you're moving a lot throughout the day) the exact number is pretty much made up. "It was a marketing campaign,' says Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab. 'There wasn't a scientific basis for it.' Matheny stresses that the 10,000 steps a day goal isn't necessarily inaccurate from a health POV—but many people can get serious health perks between 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day. "The data show health gains level off well before 10,000," Singer says. "Mortality and cardiovascular risk improvements start at just 2,000. It's important to understand this so that you avoid an all-or-nothing mindset—especially one that isn't based on any actual data." If that's the number you like, and you hit it consistently, stick with it! But just remember: '10,000 steps per day is not the magic number," per Matheny. So, how many steps should I take per day? Based on the scientific review's findings, aiming for 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day is a good goal to reach for. That's roughly two to 3.5 miles per day, depending on your stride. 'There's nothing wrong with 10,000 steps, but it isn't based in science,' Matheny says. If you want to still aim for 10,000 steps, Matheny says you should go for it. 'If you don't get there, maybe you still get to 7,000,' he points out. But any amount of walking is helpful. 'A thousand steps is way better than zero,' Matheny says. You Might Also Like Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals Solve the daily Crossword