
Kurds gain asylum in UK over threat from Iraqi Shiite militia
Two Iraqi Kurds have gained the right to remain in the UK after claiming they faced threats from the Popular Mobilisation Forces militia. The men, who have been granted anonymity, said they fled their homeland due to the fear of 'persecution' by the Shiite militia, also known as Hashd Al Shaabi. The network of mainly pro-Iran paramilitary units was formed to battle against ISIS in 2014, when Iraq's army collapsed, but has been accused of widespread human rights abuse. The men made separate asylum claims, which were initially rejected but the same judge has now overturned each case on appeal. In the first case, the immigration hearing was told that in June 2021 a group of ISIS fighters broke into one of the men's family farm and stole livestock, which he reported to Hashd Al Shaabi, but when members arrived to investigate they were ambushed by the extremists. A gun battle ensued in which three militia fighters were killed, along with the man's brother. The man, referred to in court documents by the initials AM, said Hashd Al Shaabi believed he had led them into an ambush and began to hunt him down. His mother was killed by the militia and he fears 'serious harm if he is returned to Iraq'. His claim was initially rejected by the judge as lacking credibility on the basis he had only assumed the armed men at his farm were ISIS fighters. They were wearing black clothes and face masks, and proclaimed 'Allahu akbar', but a judge insisted there was 'no reasonable explanation as to why they just did not tell him' they were from ISIS. In overturning the decision, Judge Peter Lewis said his colleague did 'not explain how she reached the decision as to what ISIS look like or say when greeting farmers in Iraq'. Judge Lewis said his colleague also claimed Hashd Al Shaabi 'would not have walked into an ambush'. The judge added: 'Given that ambushes are by definition a surprise, the judge gives no proper reason for dismissing the possibility of an ambush.' In the other case, the man known by the initials AA said he was at risk from the PMF because he refused to join the fight against ISIS, as well as his political activities as part of the Dakok Support Centre, a UK-based organisation that campaigns on human rights issues in Iraq. His account was initially dismissed as lacking credibility, but Judge Lewis again overruled on the grounds his colleague had accepted the man was politically active in the UK. The PMF was created in response to a fatwa by Iraq's highest Shiite authority, Ayatollah Ali Al Sistani. It was initially an umbrella organisation of about 70 predominantly Shiite armed groups, with up to 250,000 members. Groups linked to the PMF resumed attacks on US forces in 2019 when the war against ISIS was winding down, ending an uneasy alliance between coalition advisers helping the Iraqi army and government-funded militias. The US military launched 85 strikes against Tehran-backed militiamen in Iraq and Syria in 2024. At least 16 people were killed and 25 injured in Iraq, including civilians, the government in Baghdad said. The attacks were the first wave of retaliation ordered by US President Joe Biden for a drone attack that killed three US troops in Jordan on January 28. Iraq's parliament completed the first reading of new legislation on the PMF, containing 18 articles, on Monday. According to the draft seen by The National, it will keep the PMF under the command of Prime Minister, who's also the commander-in-chief for the armed forces, but as a parallel strong military force. The second reading will begin the process of debate and amendments, before the bill is put to a vote at the third reading.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Israel launches 'pre-emptive strike' on Iran
Israel launched a 'pre-emptive strike' on Iran in the early hours of Friday, according to the Israeli Defence Minister. Israel Katz said that following the strike, 'a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future'. He said schools would be closed in the country on Friday Explosions were heard north-east of Iran's capital Tehran, state-run Nour News reported. It added that the reasons for the explosions were not immediately clear. Videos and photos posted on social media showed plumes of smoke rising from several locations. The US denied involvement in the strike on Iran. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners." He also warned Tehran not to take action against the US. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel," Mr Rubio said. Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, said in a post on X before reports of the strike: 'At our Embassy in Jerusalem and closely following the situation. We will remain here all night. 'Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!'' Israel has repeatedly warned it could attack Iranian nuclear plants, particularly if US-Iran talks on a deal to put limits on Tehran's nuclear programme were to collapse. US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that a potential attack by Israel 'looks like it's something that could very well happen'. Tehran on Wednesday had threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, and if it were attacked over its nuclear programme. Further fuelling tension, Iran on Thursday said it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment plant, after the UN's atomic watchdog agency censured Tehran for failing to comply with non-proliferation obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon.

The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Israel's disconnection with allies and partners has rarely been clearer
Tuesday's decision by the UK to impose sanctions on two ultra-nationalist Israeli ministers means Britain has joined Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway in taking the extraordinary step of introducing travel bans and financial restrictions on members of an ostensibly friendly government to these countries. Perhaps even more extraordinary was the response from one of the ministers concerned. A statement issued by the office of Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich the same day confirmed that Israel cancelled a waiver that allowed the country's banks to work with Palestinian ones. Instead of retaliating against the UK directly, Mr Smotrich instead authorised a move that threatens to paralyse Palestinian financial institutions. Such intransigence – and its deeply embedded position within the current Israeli government – explains why more and more of the country's allies and trade partners are losing patience and taking action. Tuesday's sanctions are the latest example of Israel's increasing isolation and the substantial diplomatic and political cost it is paying for its war of collective punishment in Gaza and continuing military occupation of Palestinian land. The fact that Mr Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are determined opponents of a just political settlement of the conflict also highlights the disconnection between Israel's current leadership and most of the international community. Next week, hundreds of diplomats will gather in New York for a UN summit on the two-state solution, co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. Israel's leadership has already said it will not attend; that is its choice, but it is a poor one. Determinedly opposing the majority of international opinion – that is in favour of an equitable settlement – puts the onus on Israel to provide a realistic alternative that does not involve further displacement or other illegal policies. If it cannot, then it will be clear that Israel, which is currently led by a divided and precarious coalition with an uncertain future, is on a collision course with the international community, one that may even try the patience of a much more capricious and transactional White House. The coming UN summit must be bold and ambitious, holding fast to the overall framework of a solution that most of the international community supports: an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the return of the remaining Israeli hostages, the release of Palestinian detainees as well as a process that leads to Palestinian freedom coupled with security guarantees for Israel. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed It is a source of frustration that the case for this position has to be made time and again. Arab nations have already said they are ready to play their part, as was made clear in the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. Last September, while speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said 57 Muslim and Arab countries were 'willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation' and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state. However, what the world is witnessing right now on the streets of the West Bank and in the rubble of Gaza is what the absence of a peace process looks like. More partners of Israel are making it clear that this situation is simply unsustainable. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed.


The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Israel 'could very well' strike Iran, Donald Trump says
US President Donald Trump on Thursday said Israel may well strike Iran but stressed that he had cautioned against an attack while nuclear talks with Tehran continue. Mr Trump's comments come as the US has authorised the departure of non-essential personnel from Iraq and elsewhere as fears grow that Israel may attack Iran's nuclear sites. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. The prospect of military action in the Middle East comes as the US-Iran nuclear talks appear to be stalled over whether Tehran would be able to continue to enrich uranium in any capacity. Mr Trump this week said he was less confident a deal could be reached, and Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. But Mr Trump on Thursday said the US and Iran are 'fairly close to a pretty good agreement'. 'We've had very good discussions with Iran. It's got to be better than pretty good, though, but it's got to be – I prefer an agreement, as long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think that would blow it,' Mr Trump said. In another sign that a strike on Iran may not be imminent, US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff plans to travel to Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of talks with Iran. 'Discussions are expected to be both direct and indirect, as in previous rounds,' a source said. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed to Iranian news outlet Tasnim that a delegation from Tehran would attend the talks. Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, and if it were attacked over its nuclear programme, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike the country's uranium enrichment sites. Further fuelling tension, Iran on Thursday said it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment plant, after the UN's atomic watchdog agency censured Tehran for failing to comply with non-proliferation obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. The US State Department has begun preparing to evacuate non-essential staff from the American embassy in Baghdad. At the same time, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the departure of military dependents from locations across the region. The US embassies in Kuwait and Bahrain have not changed their staffing levels, the State Department said. Meanwhile, the UK Maritime Trade Operations on Thursday said in an advisory note that the situation in the Middle East remains 'highly volatile'. The UKMTO has advised ships to use caution when passing through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz.