Authorities make disturbing discovery after inspecting man's luggage at the border: 'Threats and violence can often escalate'
A man entering Nigeria from Cameroon was found to be in possession of a shocking number of illegally trafficked wildlife relics, including 346 bird heads and chimpanzee parts, the Sun reported in March.
Nigeria's Customs Service apprehended the suspect, Bello Abubakar, whose illegal possessions violated both Nigerian law as well as international laws regarding endangered species trade, according to the news outlet.
Comptroller Gabriel Ogbonna made a statement detailing the confiscated items.
"The individual was found in possession of 213 parrot heads, 29 packs of parrot feathers, 128 heads of African hornbill and 5 eagle heads," he said, per the Sun. "Others are 1 pack of eagle feathers, 2 heads, 4 hands and 4 legs of chimpanzee."
The Sun reported that Abubakar had given a brief interview, where he shared that he had bought all of the items in an open market in Cameroon and was coming to Nigeria to resell them.
Officials stated that Abubakar was being investigated and would face prosecution.
Illegally killing and trading wildlife and wildlife parts has ripple effects that go beyond the animals that are killed.
As the Sun explained, wildlife trafficking "not only undermines Nigeria's biodiversity but also fuels crime, threatens economic stability, and jeopardises public safety."
Removing a species for illegal trading can undermine the healthy functions of the entire ecosystem, as it upsets the balance of the food web and other natural checks and balances within the environment. Conversely, introducing invasive species into foreign environments can result in habitat destruction, population loss, and the advent of new diseases.
Further, illegal trafficking is fraught with violence. The United Nations explains that not only are rangers regularly killed by poachers, but "threats and violence can often escalate — along with the scale of depletion — if organized criminal groups become involved in wildlife, forest, and fisheries crime."
What's the longest flight you'd be willing to take?
Less than five hours
Five to 10 hours
Ten to 15 hours
Over 15 hours
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Several groups — including governments, international organizations, nonprofits, companies, and community-led programs — are actively working to combat poaching and trafficking.
As a consumer, it's important to keep a sharp eye out for illegal wildlife products, from the materials used in clothing to the animals sold in pet shops. This also extends to where you choose to travel; many wildlife-centric destinations are rife with animal abuse and maltreatment.
If you suspect illegal trading, you can report it anonymously to the dedicated office in your area.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court strikes down Mexico's lawsuit against US gun manufacturers
The United States Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit from the government of Mexico that argued American gun manufacturers like Smith & Wesson failed to prevent illegal firearm sales to cartels and criminal organisations. In one of a slew of decisions handed down on Thursday, the top court decided that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act shielded the gun manufacturers from Mexico's suit. The court's decision was unanimous. Writing for the nine-member bench, Justice Elena Kagan explained that even 'indifference' to the trafficking of firearms does not amount to willfully assisting a criminal enterprise. 'Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers,' Kagan wrote (PDF). 'We have little doubt that, as the complaint asserts, some such sales take place — and that the manufacturers know they do. But still, Mexico has not adequately pleaded what it needs to: that the manufacturers 'participate in' those sales.' The Mexican government's complaint, she added, 'does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted'. The case stems from a complaint filed in August 2021 in a federal court in Boston, Massachusetts. In that initial complaint, the Mexican government — then led by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador — argued that the sheer volume of firearms illegally smuggled into its country amounted to negligence on the part of gun manufacturers. Those firearms, it said, had exacted a devastating toll on Mexican society. The country has some of the highest homicide rates in the world, with the United Nations estimating in 2023 that nearly 25 intentional killings happen for every 100,000 people. Much of that crime has been credited to the presence of cartels and other criminal enterprises operating in Mexico. The Igarape Institute, a Brazil-based think tank, estimated that Mexico's crime cost the country nearly 1.92 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) from 2010 to 2014. The US is the largest arms manufacturer in the world — and also the largest source of illegally sourced firearms. The stream of firearms that pour into Mexico and the broader Latin America region, for instance, has been dubbed the 'iron river'. Nearly 70 percent of the illegal guns seized in Mexico from 2014 to 2018, for instance, were traced to origins in the US, according to the Department of Justice. That has led countries like Mexico to demand action from the US to limit the number of firearms trafficked abroad. In its lawsuit, Mexico targeted some of the biggest names in gun manufacturing in the US: not just Smith & Wesson, but also companies like Beretta USA, Glock Inc and Colt's Manufacturing LLC. But the firearm companies pushed back against the lawsuit, arguing they could not be held responsible for the actions of criminals in another country. The Supreme Court itself cast doubt on some of Mexico's arguments, including the idea that the gun manufacturers designed and marketed their products specifically for cartel buyers. 'Mexico focuses on production of 'military style' assault weapons, but these products are widely legal and purchased by ordinary consumers. Manufacturers cannot be charged with assisting criminal acts simply because Mexican cartel members also prefer these guns,' Justice Kagan wrote. 'The same applies to firearms with Spanish language names or graphics alluding to Mexican history,' she added. 'While they may be 'coveted by the cartels,' they also may appeal to 'millions of law-abiding Hispanic Americans.'' On Thursday, an industry trade group, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), celebrated the Supreme Court's decision as a 'tremendous victory' against an unfair charge. It had filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants in the case. 'For too long, gun control activists have attempted to twist basic tort law to malign the highly-regulated U.S. firearm industry with the criminal actions of violent organized crime, both here in the United States and abroad,' the group's senior vice president, Lawrence G Keane, said in a statement. Keane added that he and others in the firearm industry felt 'sympathetic to plight of those in Mexico who are victims of rampant and uncontrolled violence at the hands of narco-terrorist drug cartels'. But he said the issue was about 'responsible firearm ownership', not the actions of gun manufacturers.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aid leaders urge Houthis to release humanitarian workers detained in Yemen
The heads of 10 major international charities and United Nations agencies have demanded the release of aid workers held captive by Yemen's Houthi rebels. In a statement released to mark the one-year anniversary of the kidnapping of 23 UN staff and five humanitarian workers in northern Yemen, they said nothing could justify the ordeal the hostages had been through. 'They were doing their jobs, helping people in desperate need: people without food, shelter, or adequate health care,' they said in the letter, seen by The Telegraph. The Iran-backed group's action, they added, have had a 'chilling effect across the international community' and 'undermined mediation efforts for lasting peace' in Yemen. Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary-General, said: 'The UN and its humanitarian partners should never be targeted, arrested or detained while carrying out their mandates for the benefit of the people they serve.' He strongly condemned the death of a World Food Programme (WFP) staff member in detention in February. The worker, who has only been identified by his first name, Ahmed, had delivered food aid with the organisation since 2017. It is unclear how he died. 'The Houthi de facto authorities have yet to provide an explanation for this deplorable tragedy,' he said. Hisham al-Hakimi, 44, Save the Children International's safety and security director in Yemen, also died in Houthi custody in October 2024. The organisation described his death as 'unexplained' and called for an investigation. Ten years of civil war have devastated Yemen and triggered one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. More 150,000 people have died and 24 million people – around 60 per cent of the population – are in need of humanitarian assistance. One in two children under the age of five is suffering from malnutrition. In January, the UN said it would pause all operations in the northern governorate of Saada, a stronghold of the Houthi movement, citing safety concerns. It is also actively engaging with senior Houthi officials to try to secure the release of all its detained employees, it added. Human rights groups have also accused the Houthi movement of routinely kidnapping, torturing and arbitrarily detaining hundreds of civilians. Last June, when it arrested the aid workers, the group claimed to have dismantled an 'American-Israeli spy network' – a claim the UN rejected as baseless. Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

4 hours ago
Former Zambian President Edgar Lungu has died at 68
LUSAKA, Zambia -- Former Zambian President Edgar Lungu, who served as the leader of the southern African nation from 2015-2021, died Thursday, his daughter said. He was 68. Lungu's daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, announced his death in a video posted on the official Facebook page of his political party, the Patriotic Front. She said he died in a hospital in South Africa after having been under 'medical supervision' in recent weeks. Lungu-Mwansa, who is a lawmaker, did not give a cause of death. Lungu became president in 2015 to complete the term of Michael Sata after he died in office. Lungu was elected to a full presidential term in 2016, beating current Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema. Lungu later lost to Hichilema in the 2021 election. Lungu had sought to challenge Hichilema in next year's presidential election, but a court last year barred him from standing. The court ruled his time as president from 2015-2016 counted as a full term and said he had, therefore, served the maximum length of two terms. Lungu alleged there was political interference in the court ruling. His wife and other family members have faced corruption allegations. Lungu claimed last year that his movements were being monitored by police and he had effectively been placed under house arrest to restrict his return to politics. Police said it was standard to monitor former presidents for their safety.