logo
Experts say eating MORE of an ultra-processed food is actually good for you

Experts say eating MORE of an ultra-processed food is actually good for you

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Few foods are more villainized than the ultra-processed, undergoing rounds of ingredient extraction, emulsifying, and additive and preservative infusion.
But not all ultra-processed foods are created equal.
Health experts are urging Americans to give faux meat a chance, citing lower risks of heart disease and a better carbon footprint.
Plant-forward diets, including the doctor-endorsed Mediterranean diet, are lauded for their inclusion of clean protein like nuts and legumes, mineral-rich leafy greens, and fibrous whole grains.
But doctors have been hesitant to recommend meat-alternative brands like Beyond Meat and Impossible Burgers because of the processing used to create them.
Meat substitutes may undergo various temperature treatments or 3D printing to mimic the texture of real meat, and may contain binders, emulsifiers, dyes, flavorings, stabilizers, and preservatives.
Despite this, doctors and nutritionists encourage their patients to make the switch to plant-based alternatives, which contain the same amount of protein, less saturated fat, fiber, and other beneficial vitamins.
Plant-based meat companies have a vested interest in appealing to carnivores who are concerned about the additives in everyday foods, including followers of the Make America Healthy Again movement.
Companies have overhauled some of their recipes amid flagging sales, lowering saturated fat and sodium, to bring them in.
A 2024 analysis published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology of dozens of studies found that compared with meat, plant-based alternatives, while considered ultraprocessed, are generally healthier than meat.
They contain less saturated fat and cholesterol and have more fiber, showing in clinical trials to confer lower bad cholesterol and reduced body weight.
'Doctors and dietitians are reluctant to consider alternative proteins when advising patients on nutrition because they view these foods as ultra-processed,' nutrition scientist Roberta Alessandrini, director of the Dietary Guidelines Initiative at PAN International, told CNN.
'Yet if carefully chosen, these foods can be a valid and helpful way to shift toward more plant-forward diets, which are good for people and the planet.'
Plant-based burgers generally have their basis in soy , pea, or rice proteins, coconut oil, potato protein, yeast to impart a meaty taste.
They also contain compounds to bind the 'meat' together, such as methylcellulose, which gives the burgers fiber and, in some cases beet juice extract to simulate blood.
Despite being nutrient dense and overall beneficial, meat-free alternatives come from highly synthesized ingredients like soy protein concentrate, processed fats like coconut oil, binders and texturizers to better resemble meat, and the addition of non-whole food-based nutrients like B12 and zinc.
An ultraprocessed plant-based burger is a far cry from an ultraprocessed Twinkie or hot dog, though.
Ultraprocessed junk foods have strong links to obesity, heart disease, and diabetes, all while packing little to no nutritional benefits. No such links have been established with meat-free alternatives.
An 85 percent lean ground beef burger contains around 6.5 grams of saturated fat, compared to six grams in an Impossible Burger and two grams in a Beyond Burger.
They all contain similar amounts of protein, ranging from 19 to 21 grams per serving.
The high sodium content of meat alternatives is a significant downside. A 2019 CNN analysis found that Beyond, Impossible, and more traditional grain-based burgers each contained 370 to 390 milligrams of sodium.
Store-bought turkey burgers, however, contained 95 to 115 milligrams of sodium, while beef patties had only 65 to 75 milligrams.
They caution that this might be a misleading comparison, given that many people salt and season their meat as they cook it.
Processed and red meats are fine to eat sparingly, but eating them every day or even several times a week has been linked to colorectal and breast cancers, heart disease, and diabetes, though evidence is limited.
Concerns over health and nutrition are the primary drivers of the shift toward plant-based meat, although many people opt for non-meat alternatives due to concerns related to climate change.
Global meat production is a significant contributor to climate change, and demand is projected to increase by at least 50 percent by 2050.
Still, most people begin to incorporate meatless alternatives into their diet due to concerns about their weight, cholesterol, blood pressure or other health-related red flags.
'The fat composition of beef is so undesirable for health that it's very easy to be better than that,' Dr Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard, said.
'Animal products not only have too much saturated fat but lack polyunsaturated fat, fiber, and many of the minerals and vitamins available in plants.'
Those minerals and vitamins, such as B12, can be added to meatless alternatives in a similar way to how producers add vitamins D and A to milk.
Ultra-processed junk foods have strong links to obesity, heart disease, and diabetes, all while packing little to no nutritional benefits.
Plant-based meats are nutrient-dense, though, more so resembling a can of beans.
'So I think we really need to look at each one of these novel products on its own merits,' Dr Willett said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ben Askren's wife admits he was ‘too close' to dying ‘a few times' as ex-UFC star leaves hospital after eight weeks
Ben Askren's wife admits he was ‘too close' to dying ‘a few times' as ex-UFC star leaves hospital after eight weeks

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Ben Askren's wife admits he was ‘too close' to dying ‘a few times' as ex-UFC star leaves hospital after eight weeks

BEN ASKREN'S wife admits he was 'too close' to dying after the former UFC star left hospital. Askren, 41, was rushed to the ER last month with a severe case of pneumonia. 3 3 3 The UFC legend was forced to undergo a double lung transplant. And Askren revealed 12 days ago that he 'died four times' on the operating table. The former welterweight star had been in hospital for eight whole weeks as he recovered from surgery. But Askren has now been released back home after a gruelling time away. He appeared with wife Amy to give fans an update on his condition. And Askren's other half revealed that he had been 'too close' to passing away throughout his ordeal. Askren first said: 'What's up guys? Day 59, I'm out. 'That was a long journey and it's not over because I still can't really walk, gotta re-teach myself to do that among many other things. 'I guess I can make light of it because it was me… and I don't really remember it, but Amy, how close was I to dying?' Wife Amy replied: 'Too close, a few times.' Askren added: 'Hopefully I'm not in this situation again for a really, really long time. I plan on living a while.' Askren's emotional message came a week after he opened up on his lungs getting 'stolen.' He said: 'I'm gonna plead guilty, I felt bad for myself one time. 'And that doesn't do anyone any good. 'Man, I never smoked one cigarette.' Never smoked any weed, why did my lungs get stolen from me? 'Why isn't this happening to someone who smokes? Then I realised, it happened. I can be bitter and angry, I could whine and cry, but that's not going to help anybody. 'I am where I am now and I'm going to move forward the best that I can.'

The main symptoms of Parkinson's disease explained
The main symptoms of Parkinson's disease explained

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

The main symptoms of Parkinson's disease explained

Ozzy Osbourne died on Tuesday after living with Parkinson's disease for nearly six years. The Black Sabbath singer was diagnosed with the progressive neurological condition in 2019 and had been experiencing constant pain for the past year. Parkinson's disease, which currently has no cure, is caused by the death of dopamine-producing nerve cells, leading to three main symptoms which include tremor, slowness of movement, and rigidity. Some subtle symptoms may include a change in a person's walking pattern, very small handwriting, a loss in their sense of smell, nerve pain or insomnia. Symptoms, which can develop slowly over several years, usually occur when the brain is no longer able to make enough dopamine to adequately control movement.

Families devastated as neighborhood cancer surge is traced to radioactive waste from first atomic bomb
Families devastated as neighborhood cancer surge is traced to radioactive waste from first atomic bomb

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Families devastated as neighborhood cancer surge is traced to radioactive waste from first atomic bomb

A chilling new study has confirmed the fears of generations - that children who grew up near a Missouri creek polluted by nuclear waste from the first atomic bomb project are suffering from elevated rates of cancer rates. The findings have been published this week in JAMA Network Open by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and provide the clearest evidence to date linking radioactive contamination in Coldwater Creek, a tributary of the Missouri River north of St. Louis, to long-term cancer risks in nearby residents. 'Our research indicates that the communities around North St. Louis appear to have had excess cancer from exposure to the contaminated Coldwater Creek,' said Marc Weisskopf, professor of environmental epidemiology and physiology at Harvard and corresponding author of the study. Weisskopf's team found that individuals who lived within one kilometer of the creek as children between the 1940s and 1960s were significantly more likely to develop cancer later in life. They believe the cancer is a result of ionizing radiation exposure from the creekbed, soil, and water. The source of the contamination dates back to one of the darkest and most secretive chapters in US history: the Manhattan Project, the clandestine federal initiative that developed the world's first nuclear weapons. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works, operating in downtown St. Louis, was responsible for processing uranium used in the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. But after the war, barrels of radioactive waste were moved to open-air storage sites near Coldwater Creek, where they remained for years, exposed to rain, wind, and runoff. Those toxins, including uranium and thorium, leached into the soil and water, contaminating the surrounding environment and putting thousands at risk, especially children, who played in the creek, dug in the dirt, and breathed in radioactive dust kicked up during gardening or construction. Now, decades later, the health toll is becoming undeniable. The Harvard study, based on a cohort of 4,209 individuals who lived in the Greater St. Louis area between 1958 and 1972, found that 24% reported having cancer. Among those living closest to the creek, that number rose to 30%. 'Our study found that children in the 1940s to 1960s who lived near Coldwater Creek… had a 44% higher risk of cancer compared to those living further than 20 kilometers away,' said co-author Michael Leung, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard's Department of Environmental Health, to Fox News. The types of cancer reported include leukemia, thyroid, breast, and colon cancers are consistent with illnesses linked to radiation exposure. For many in North St. Louis County, the revelation is both vindicating and heartbreaking. Families who grew up splashing in Coldwater Creek or building homes nearby have lost loved ones to aggressive cancers - often with no explanation, until now. The Harvard study suggests those deaths were not random but the byproduct of wartime secrecy, industrial negligence, and decades of environmental inaction. While the researchers acknowledged limitations in their study, including its sample size and reliance on self-reported outcomes, the statistical signal is clear enough to prompt renewed concern and action. The study comes at a pivotal moment. Last month, Congress passed an expanded version of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) as part of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' offering financial relief for Americans harmed by nuclear testing and contamination - including, for the first time, residents near Coldwater Creek. 'These findings may have broader implications - as countries think about increasing nuclear power and developing more nuclear weapons,' Weisskopf warned. 'The waste from these entities could have huge impacts on people's health, even at these lower levels of exposure.' Local families, activists, and health officials have long urged the government to take the cancer clusters seriously. In July 2023, an investigation published by The Associated Press, The Missouri Independent and MuckRock showed that the federal government and companies responsible for nuclear bomb production and atomic waste storage sites in the St. Louis area were aware of health risks, spills, improperly stored contaminants and other problems but often ignored them. The federal government formally acknowledged the contamination at Coldwater Creek in the 1980s, but efforts to clean up the area have been slow and piecemeal. Now, armed with hard scientific evidence, those affected are hoping for accountability. 'We hope these findings will support public health measures for affected communities, as well as ongoing efforts to remediate the creek,' Leung said. While nuclear workers had direct exposure, people who live near contamination sites worry about uncertainty. Many who grew up in the area weren't told about the risks for decades. In 2007, Chapman and Karen Nickel were so concerned about cancer and other unusual illnesses in their St. Louis County neighborhoods that they formed Just Moms STL. In 2019, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry issued a report that found people who regularly played in Coldwater Creek as children from the 1960s to the 1990s may have a slight increased risk of bone cancer, lung cancer and leukemia. The agency determined that those exposed daily to the creek starting in the 2000s, when cleanup began, could have a small increased risk of lung cancer. The government's sloppy handling of nuclear contamination over decades has understandably made people doubt official promises that conditions are safe now, said Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear expert and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. 'There is zero trust,' he said. People in the St. Louis area are concerned that more illnesses are caused by the contamination and some are pushing for legislation to compensate those who are sick. Others have sued those responsible for the waste. Several people with serious illnesses, or whose loved ones are sick, met recently at Nickel's house. Jim Gaffney, now in his 60s, grew up in the 1960s playing in Coldwater Creek - his childhood home backed up to the waterway. 'I was always in the creek,' Gaffney said. 'Told not to, but we had seven kids. Mom couldn't watch us all. We just thought it was fun. We built mudslides and everything. I'm sure I got exposed.' He and his wife, Susie, loved the neighborhood so much that when they got married, they moved into a home there. Their children grew up playing in a park that backs to the creek, Susie Gaffney said. 'We had no warnings. We had no fears,' she said. Jim Gaffney was diagnosed with Stage 4 Hodgkin lymphoma in 1981 and given little chance to survive. A bone-marrow transplant saved his life, but the toll of the radiation, chemotherapy and the disease has been enormous. 'Now I've got hypertension, heart failure, I've had at least five bladder tumors removed since ´95. I'm still here, but it's not been easy,' he said. The Gaffneys' son Joe has battled thyroid cancer since 1998 when he was 18. Tricia Byrnes swam in Weldon Spring quarries as a teenager. Eight years ago, her 15-year-old son was diagnosed with a rare cancer of the thymus, a small organ near the heart. She wonders about a connection. Byrnes she became so frustrated with the lack of acknowledgement about the health risk at Weldon Spring that she successfully ran as a Republican for the Missouri House, where she is pushing for federal compensation for those who believe their illnesses are connected to contamination. She said it's infuriating that the federal government not only allowed the contamination that made people sick, but didn't do enough to contain it. 'What the hell is wrong with people?' she asked.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store