
Black box warning on menopause hormone therapies should be removed, experts say
Now, that advisory may be going away. Last week, a panel of experts convened by the FDA urged the federal agency to remove the cautionary language on at least some forms of hormone therapy.
I wanted to understand more about why these warnings were first added and the arguments for and against removing them now. What are hormone therapies used for, and what are the different forms of treatment? What is the history behind adding black box warnings, and why are some experts pushing to remove them? What should women know about managing menopause symptoms?
I turned to CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen to answer these questions. Wen is an emergency physician and adjunct associate professor at George Washington University. She previously was Baltimore's health commissioner.
CNN: When does menopause occur, and what kinds of symptoms do women experience during menopause?
Dr. Leana Wen: Menopause is the stage in a woman's life when her menstrual periods permanently stop. It marks the end of fertility and is accompanied by a decline in reproductive hormones such as estrogen and progesterone.
In the US, most women begin the menopause transition between ages 45 and 55, and the average age is 52. The definition of menopause is a full year without having a period. Except in situations where menopause is induced by surgery (for example, removal of ovaries) or specific medical conditions, this period is generally preceded by a stage called perimenopause, when women may have irregular periods and start experiencing menopause symptoms.
Symptoms associated with menopause can include hot flashes and night sweats. Hot flashes are sudden sensations of heat, skin flushing and sweating that can significantly disrupt daily activities. About one-third of women have more than 10 hot flashes per day.
When they occur at night, they can disrupt sleep and increase fatigue and irritability during the day. Menopausal declines in estrogen also may cause vaginal dryness, decreased libido and discomfort during intercourse. Some women experience other symptoms such as mood changes, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, dry skin and weight gain.
Moreover, while this is not a symptom of menopause per se, the risk of developing chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis increases significantly after menopause. This rise in risk is thought to be linked to the decline in estrogen levels, as estrogen has a protective effect on maintaining healthy blood vessels and supporting bone density.
CNN: What are hormone therapies used for? What are the different forms of treatment?
Wen: Hormone therapies are prescription drugs that are used to treat menopause symptoms. They replace the hormones that decline during menopause.
It's important to differentiate between two types of hormone therapy. The first is systemic therapy in which hormones are given in a way that is absorbed into the bloodstream. That could be through taking pills or using patches, sprays or gels. Systemic therapy is used to treat symptoms that affect the entire body, such as flashes and night sweats.
The second type is low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy. This is a cream or suppository administered into the vagina to treat vaginal dryness and reduce tissue thinning. Unlike systemic therapy, this type of therapy works locally; its purpose is not to raise hormone levels throughout the body.
CNN: What is the history behind adding black box warnings, and why are some experts pushing to remove them?
Wen: For decades, hormone therapy was considered the standard of care for menopause-related symptoms. Then, in the early 2000s, a landmark study called the Women's Health Initiative was published that suggested hormone therapy increased the risk of breast cancer, heart disease and stroke. It concluded that the benefits of this therapy did not outweigh these risks, leading to the FDA adding the black box warning in 2003.
Many researchers have since examined the methodological problems of the study. One significant issue was that the average age of participants was 63. The women studied were mostly postmenopausal, so the question answered was regarding the risks and benefits to postmenopausal women, not menopausal women.
Last year, scientists — including some of the original researchers of the Women's Health Initiative — published an updated analysis in the journal JAMA. They concluded that, in fact, hormone treatment with a combination of estrogen and progesterone is safe and effective for treating hot flashes and other systemic symptoms if started before age 60 or within 10 years of starting menopause and if the woman does not have specific contraindications — for instance, an estrogen-sensitive breast cancer.
This updated analysis is one reason cited by many advocates to remove the warning. Another major reason is that the black box warning is currently on all types of hormone treatments, including vaginal therapies that deliver far lower doses and do not have the systemic effect of, say, an estrogen-containing pill. Advocates argue that putting all forms of hormone therapy under the same warning misrepresents risk and makes it harder for women to receive relief from troublesome symptoms. Women are still able to access the therapies despite the warning, but some may be more hesitant to use them after seeing the warnings.
CNN: What are other arguments for and against this change?
Wen: In his opening argument, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary remarked that systemic hormone therapy, when started within 10 years of the onset of menopause, can actually reduce cardiovascular disease. This finding is suggested by some recent studies, which also show a benefit for bone health.
Not everyone agrees that hormone therapy should be taken for preventive purposes. There is also some controversy about process; specifically, the panelists who spoke at last week's FDA meeting were all selected by Makary and all favored hormone therapy. Some have said they would appreciate more balance by hearing from experts who have more nuanced views. In addition, there was no presentation by internal FDA scientists, who, in the past, have given their own analysis during these types of meetings.
CNN: While the FDA is considering changing the warning label, what is your advice for women about managing menopause symptoms?
Wen: The most important thing is that women who are experiencing significant symptoms during menopause don't need to suffer in silence. Effective treatments exist. Women should speak with their physicians about lifestyle measures that can help as well as hormonal and nonhormonal prescription therapies. They should also speak with their providers about preventive care to improve heart health and prevent bone loss. Those who want additional resources should look to the Menopause Society, which also has a searchable database of clinicians who are certified menopause practitioners and trained to guide women through this transition.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Novo Nordisk outgoing CEO blames compounded GLP-1s for decline in 2025 outlook
Novo Nordisk's (NVO) downward guidance Tuesday sent its stock diving 20%, even as new leadership remains bullish on the company's ability to maintain a market lead in the obesity drug space. The maker of GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Wegovy cut sales grown from 13%-21% down to 8%-14% for the year. That's about half, on the higher end, of the 26% growth seen in 2024. Outgoing CEO Lars Jøregensen told reporters Tuesday that the compounding, or copycat, market in the US is to blame. That is one of two key issues that appear to have taken the company by surprise. First was the shortage of both its GLP-1 drugs after they unexpectedly zoomed to popularity, creating a new weight-loss drug market. Jørgensen said that the prevalence of compounded products, which are now restricted after the FDA declared an end to the shortage, is to blame. "Despite the fact that it is now illegal ... it's still happening. And that's one of the assumptions in the prior guidance, that that would be reduced significantly. And we see, actually, that is actually the same volume as we saw earlier in the year, around a million patients using a compounded product," Jørgensen said. The compounded products include those from Novo's ex-partner, Hims & Hers (HIMS), which continues to sell the products based on a loophole in FDA rules that allows it to sell "personalized" products for patients who might have negative reactions or side effects to branded drugs — such as common GLP-1 side effects like nausea or dizziness. Novo recently ended its direct-to-consumer sales deal with Hims after the telehealth firm declined to stop selling compounded semaglutide vials. The result has been a loss in the company's first-to-market position, with competitor Eli Lilly (LLY) taking a harder stance, most recently lobbying Congress to help enforce the FDA rules and rid the market of compounding. Jørgensen said Tuesday, "Ultimately, compounding will disappear. But it will take some time before it's completely out of the market and we have a fair chance of regaining our fair share (of the market)." Incoming CEO Mike Doustdar, who has served as Novo's executive vice president of international operations, said the decline of the company's stock, and therefore shareholder value, is disappointing. "I don't like it as an employee ... as a CEO-elect, and I certainly don't like it as a shareholder myself. But setbacks don't define companies, our response does," Doustdar said, adding that the guidance cut reinforces his mandate to put the company back onto a growth path. Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, provider services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest health industry news and events impacting stock prices


Hamilton Spectator
33 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
US health officials crack down on kratom-related products after complaints from supplement industry
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. health officials are warning Americans about the risks of an opioid-like ingredient increasingly added to energy drinks, gummies and supplements sold at gas stations and convenience stores, recommending a nationwide ban. The chemical, known as 7- hydroxymitragynine , is a component of kratom , a plant native to Southeast Asia that has gained popularity in the U.S. as an unapproved treatment for pain, anxiety and drug dependence. In recent months, dietary supplement companies that sell kratom have been urging the Food and Drug Administration to crack down on the products containing 7-OH, portraying them as dangerously strong, synthetic versions of the original ingredient. The FDA action 'is not focused on natural kratom leaf products,' according to a statement Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The agency said it was releasing a report to educate about the risks of '7-OH and its distinction from the kratom plant leaf.' Regulators are also recommending that the ingredient be placed on the federal government's most restrictive list of illegal drugs, which also includes LSD and heroin. '7-OH is an opioid that can be more potent than morphine,' said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary. 'We need regulation and public education to prevent another wave of the opioid epidemic.' The agency's recommendation will be reviewed by the Drug Enforcement Administration, which sets federal rules for high-risk drugs including prescription medicines and illicit substances. Federal regulators have been scrutinizing kratom for about a decade after reports of addiction, injury and overdose. But users and distributors have long opposed efforts to regulate it, saying kratom could be a safer alternative to opioid painkillers that sparked the ongoing drug addiction epidemic. Last month, the FDA issued warning letters to seven companies selling drinks, gummies and powders infused with the drug. Regulators said the products violated FDA rules because they have not been evaluated for safety and, in some cases, claimed to treat medical conditions, including pain, arthritis and anxiety. Supplement executives quickly applauded the move. The FDA 'demonstrated the exact kind of data-driven, proactive regulatory excellence needed to safeguard unwitting consumers across the U.S.,' said Ryan Niddel of Diversified Botanics, a Utah-based company that sells kratom supplements. An industry group, the American Kratom Association, has lobbied Congress for years against restrictions on the plant. Legislation supported by the group would prohibit the FDA from regulating kratom more strictly than food and dietary supplements Nearly a decade ago, the federal government came close to a national ban on the substance. In 2016, the DEA announced plans to add kratom to the government's most restrictive schedule 1 of illegal drugs. But the plan stalled after a flood of public complaints, including a letter signed by more than 60 members of Congress. The FDA then began studying the ingredient, concluding in 2018 that kratom contains many of the same chemicals as opioids, the addictive class of drugs that includes painkillers like OxyContin as well as heroin and fentanyl. Since then, FDA regulators have continued to issue warnings about cases of injury, addiction and death with kratom supplements, which are usually sold in capsules or powders. In recent months, the FDA has also issued warnings on other unapproved drugs sold as supplements or energy drinks, including the antidepressant tianeptine . Sometimes referred to collectively as 'gas station heroin,' the drugs have been restricted by several states, but they are not scheduled at the federal level. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


Newsweek
37 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Shane Devon Tamura Highlights NFL's Head Trauma Problem
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The NFL's problem with head injuries is in the spotlight after a gunman killed four people before turning the firearm on himself at the league's headquarters in New York on Monday. The shooter, 27-year-old Shane Devon Tamura from Las Vegas, was found with a suicide note, alleging that he suffered from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a progressive brain disorder related to head injuries, which has been associated with football. It is not yet clear if Tamura actually had CTE. "Terry Long football gave me CTE and it caused me to drink a gallon of antifreeze. You can't go against the NFL, they'll squash you," the note allegedly read, according to sources that spoke to CNN. The note reportedly continued that Tamura wanted his brain studied. Terry Long was a former football player for the Pittsburgh Steelers, who died by suicide in 2005 after drinking antifreeze. An autopsy revealed he had CTE. Multiple sources also allegedly told CNN that Tamura had played competitive football when he was younger. A file photo shows an NFL player. A file photo shows an NFL player. Lindsey Wasson/AP What Is CTE? "CTE is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that develops as a result of repeated impacts over time, leading to the buildup of abnormal tau protein and progressive brain degeneration," Damian Bailey, a professor of physiology and biochemistry and director of the Neurovascular Research Laboratory at the University of South Wales, told Newsweek. Cumulative exposure to repeated sub-concussive or concussive impacts "significantly increases the risk" of developing the disease, he said. Other factors may influence susceptibility, he said, such as genetic factors and substance abuse, but "repetitive head trauma is currently the only confirmed environmental cause," meaning military personnel and athletes engaged with contact sports are most at risk. Bailey said it's important to note that contact doesn't have to be directly to the head in order to pose a problem, and could be a shoulder impact, for example. Also, 90 percent of concussions don't involve a loss of consciousness, he added, "so the damage is cumulative and often goes undetected." CTE can have wide-ranging effects on a person's life, potentially leading to severe mood instability including paranoia, suicidal or homicidal ideation, emotional dysregulation, aggression, impulsivity, and impaired judgement, Bailey said. The disease, "in rare but tragic cases, may contribute to violent behavior when combined with other stressors and access to weapons," he added. As diagnosis of the condition requires thorough examination of brain tissue, it can only be done after death, but experts have developed a clinical criteria for a group of symptoms associated with CTE, known as traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, to help inform patient care. It is crucial to note that, in light of the shooting on Monday evening, even if Tamura had CTE, "that would not justify these heinous actions," Dr. Daniel H. Daneshvar, co-director of the Mass General Brigham Sport Concussion Clinic, and professor at Harvard Medical School, told Newsweek. "While understanding brain health is vital, linking a single act of violence directly to CTE without evidence risks misunderstanding both the disease and the tragedy," he added. He said that there is "no direct, one-to-one connection between CTE pathology and a specific action," meaning that "many people with CTE never engage in violence, and most violent acts are not caused by CTE." Findings of CTE Among NFL Players Football is a contact sport that "involves frequent, repetitive head impacts, including many that do not cause acute symptoms, leading to cumulative brain trauma over time," Bailey said. "The combination of high-speed collisions in very powerful players, repeated sub-concussive hits, and a culture that historically downplays concussions increases the risk of long-term brain injury and corresponding CTE," he added. CTE typically develops following "thousands of head impacts over years," Daneshvar said. "As a result, the number of years and intensity of exposure matter—research has shown a dose-response relationship, where the risk and severity of CTE increase with more years of experiencing repeated head impacts," he said. This means that someone who only played through high school typically has a much lower level of exposure than a professional athlete, he added. In a 2024 study of almost 2,000 former players, researchers found that 34 percent believed they had CTE—although, given it cannot yet be diagnosed in a living person, they did not know for certain. Those that believed they had the condition were found to have higher rates of cognitive problems, mental health disorders, chronic pain, head injury and low testosterone. Around 25 percent of those who believed they had CTE also reported suicidality, while 5 percent of those who did not believe they had CTE reported the same. In a 2023 study, Boston University CTE Center found that 345 out of 376 former NFL players who donated their brains to the center for investigation had CTE—equating to 90 percent of them having the disease. However, the researchers noted that this does not suggest 90 percent of NFL players have the condition, as it can only be diagnosed after death, and prevalence remains unknown. Comparatively, a 2018 Boston University study conducted on 164 men and women from the general population found only one person had CTE—and the lone case was a former college football player. The findings suggest that, while cases of CTE seem to be extremely low in the general population, cases appear to be significant among former NFL players—tying the disease to the sport in a strong association. Other sports have also been associated with the condition, with documented cases of CTE in hockey, boxing, rugby union, wrestling, soccer, horse racing and mixed martial arts, Bailey said. What Has NFL Said About CTE? An NFL official first acknowledged the link between CTE and football in 2016, during a roundtable organized by the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Energy & Commerce. In the meeting, Jeff Miller, the league's senior vice president for health and safety, was asked if there was a link between the two, and, according to ESPN, Miller confirmed that there was. While previous officials had referred to the risk of concussions leading to long-term problems, it marked the first time the NFL addressed that frequent head trauma could lead to CTE. An NFL memo released that same year also reported that the league had "recognized for years that studies, including those done at Boston University, have identified retired players who were diagnosed with CTE following their deaths," and that the league has helped to fund the university's research, according to NBC Sports. However, while the NFL had spent millions on concussion research, it has spent comparatively very little on CTE studies, ABC News reported. Per the outlet, in 2017, $100 million was invested in concussion research by the NFL, while they had only funded one study on CTE—and that focused on jockeys rather than football players. The 2016 memo added that research is still in its "infancy" and said that the studies completed have been based on "a largely self-selected population," raising an issue of "selection bias," according to NBC Sports. Per the outlet, the NFL memo then stated "there is no reliable evidence on the incidence or prevalence of CTE," meaning the league could not provide any "reliable statement" on the risk of CTE in the sport. Newsweek has contacted the NFL via email for comment. What Needs To Be Done? Some focus has been placed on reducing concussions in the sport—with the NFL allowing players to wear Guardian Caps, extra head protection intended to reduce head injuries, during play as well as in practice. Reports have also indicated a drop in concussions in the sport. Yet, little has been done about tackling the broader risk of CTE in football. This could be down to multiple factors, such as "financial interests, cultural resistance to changing traditional gameplay, lack of immediate visible consequences, limited awareness or denial of the risks, and the complexity of fully understanding and diagnosing the condition which currently takes place at autopsy," Bailey said. However, he said that sports organizations and governing bodies "should implement stricter safety protocols, improve concussion detection and management, enforce rule changes to reduce head impacts, invest in education for players and coaches, and support ongoing research to better understand and prevent CTE." "We are currently running to stand still given the prevalence of contact in sport and I anticipate seeing an explosion of clinical cases," he added. If you or someone you know is considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988, text "988" to the Crisis Text Line at 741741 or go to