ED withdraws summons to senior lawyer
The agency wrote to senior advocate Pratap Venugopal, intimating him that the summons have been withdrawn with 'immediate effect'.
SCAORA president Vipin Nair had written to CJI B R Gavai on the 'deeply disquieting development' having 'serious ramifications for the independence of the legal profession and the foundational principle of lawyer-client confidentiality'.
'It has come to our notice that senior advocate Pratap Venugopal, has received on June 19, a summons dated June 18, by ED under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in its investigation into the Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) granted by M/s Care Health Insurance Ltd for a purported legal opinion rendered by senior advocate Arvind Datar, wherein Pratap Venugopal, was the advocate-on-record, supporting the grant of stock options to former Religare enterprises chairperson Rashmi Saluja,' the letter said.
Venugopal told TNIE the probe agency's action was completely illegal, unconstitutional, unwarranted. 'It is sad and unfortunate. The action of issuing summons to advocates is an alarming practice besides being wholly contrary to the provisions of Sec 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Property documents, digital devices seized during ED search on premises linked to Minister I. Periyasamy
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) said on Monday that it had seized documents relating to properties/investments during the recent searches at the residences of I.P. Senthil Kumar, DMK MLA and son of senior Minister I. Periyasamy; Indra, daughter of Mr. Periyasamy; and the office premises of Irulappa Mills India Pvt. Ltd., Dindigul, in which Mr. Periyasamy and his younger son P. Prabhu are directors. In a statement, it said the search team also found certain 'paper companies' being operated from the premises of Irulappa Mills. The accounts of these companies were being verified. The digital devices seized were also being analysed. Further investigation was under way. On Saturday, the ED conducted searches at multiple locations in Dindigul and Chennai linked to Mr. Periyasamy, the Minister for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development; Mr. Senthil Kumar, the Palani MLA; and others under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The investigation was initiated on the basis of a disproportionate assets case registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) against Mr. Periyasamy and his family. The ED said the offences invoked in the charge sheet are scheduled offences under the PMLA. According to the charge sheet, Mr. Periyasamy and his family were in possession of assets worth ₹2 crore disproportionate to the known sources of their income. It was alleged that Mr. Periyasamy had generated these assets when he was the Minister for Revenue and Prisons. The special court for DVAC cases in Dindigul had discharged Mr. Periyasamy and his family from the case. However, on an appeal by the DVAC, the Madras High Court set aside the discharge order in April 2025 and directed the special court to conduct the trial and complete it early. However, the Supreme Court, on August 18, stayed the trial, the ED said in the statement.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court's remarks on the Enforcement Directorate are based on facts: CJI
The Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Monday (August 18, 2025) said any adverse oral remarks made by the Supreme Court against the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) were dispassionate and based entirely on facts, even as the Central agency's counsel rued these comments 'percolate' to create a bad impression among the people and even within the judiciary itself. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Tamil Nadu, intervened to remark that the perception of the ED was out there in the public domain, with or without the court's comments. 'The perception is out there… Even if the court does not say anything, the perception remains,' Mr. Sibal said. The court had taken up a petition filed by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging the investigation and raids conducted by the ED on the offices of the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC). The Madras High Court had, in April, declined to stay the ED's investigation and raids on the corporation. In the previous hearing of the case, on May 22, the CJI had orally remarked that the ED was 'crossing all limits' while staying the probe. 'How can a corporation commit an offence? The ED is crossing all limits,' Chief Justice Gavai had asked Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the Central agency. Chief Justice Gavai had said the ED's actions against the State corporation had breached the federal structure of the country. 'You are totally violating the federal structure of the country,' CJI Gavai had remarked. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, for TASMAC, had said the phones of the employees were cloned. 'There is something called privacy,' Mr. Rohatgi had submitted. Mr. Sibal, for Tamil Nadu, had at the time submitted that the State itself had registered 41 First Information Reports (FIRs) against liquor outlet operators over allegations of corruption. The ED had entered the scene in 2025 and proceeded to raid the headquarters of TASMAC to confiscate the phones and devices found there. 'How can a criminal offence be made out against the corporation? You may register FIRs against the individuals, but against the corporation, in a criminal matter?' the CJI asked. The Additional Solicitor General had argued that the investigation involved a fraud committed to the tune of ₹1,000 crore, and that politicians were involved in the case.
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Jharkhand illegal sand mining: ED seizes 30 properties worth Rs 3 crore
In fresh action against Jharkhand's illegal sand mining mafia, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) attached 30 movable/immovable properties valued at Rs 3.02 crore, a statement said on Monday. The properties, attached on August 14, under provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, belonged to Ankit Raj. Ankit Raj and his associates reportedly used a sophisticated, multi-layered system to illegally mine, store, and transport sand, said the statement His operation was designed to maximise illicit profits by deliberately evading mining regulations and abusing public authority, it said. According to ED, the seized properties were acquired using proceeds of crime (POC) generated through these illegal activities. The ED initiated an investigation into the case on the basis of 16 FIRs registered by the Jharkhand Police on December 15, 2023, involving the charges of extortion, illegal sand mining, disruption of government work, and operating a militant group known as the Jharkhand Tiger Group. During the investigation, the ED conducted searches on March 12 and 13, 2024, and July 4, 2025, to gather evidence related to the Proceeds of Crime (POC), the statement said. A survey was also carried out on July 18, 2025, at the District Mining Office in Hazaribagh to collect documents related to Ankit Raj's illegal sand business. Based on witness statements, documents from the District Mining Authorities, and evidence from digital devices, the investigation revealed that Ankit Raj continued to illegally extract sand from the Haharo, Plandu, and Damodar rivers even after his mining license for Sonpura Ghat expired in 2019, said the ED. In July, the ED carried out raids at eight locations linked to close associates of former Congress MLA Amba Prasad from Jharkhand's Barkagaon Assembly constituency. The raids were part of an ongoing money laundering probe involving a prominent company engaged in coal transportation, infrastructure, and the power sector. According to sources, simultaneous searches were conducted in Ranchi, Hazaribagh, and Barkagaon.
