QuickCheck: Was the Badminton World Federation's YouTube channel hacked?
The incident, reportedly due to hacking, coincided with the Macau Open semi-finals.
Could it be true that the BWF's channel was compromised, leaving fans unable to watch live matches?
Verdict:
TRUE
The Badminton World Federation's official YouTube channel mysteriously disappeared after being hacked by an unknown individual.
This incident took place during the Macau Open semi-finals on Saturday (Aug) 2), just as matches on Court Two were scheduled to be livestreamed.
The channel's disappearance affected the broadcasting of two matches: the women's doubles featuring Indonesia's Meilysa Puspitasari-Rachel Rose against Taiwan's Hsieh Pei-shan-Hung En-tzu, and the all-Malaysian men's doubles between Wan Arif Wan Junaidi-Yap Roy King and Choong Hon Jian-Muhammad Haikal Nazri.
Despite the disruption, Pei-shan-En-tzu and Arif-Roy King secured their spots in the finals, although many fans were left frustrated, unable to watch the action live.
In a statement on social media, the BWF acknowledged the issue, stating, "The official BWF YouTube channel is currently experiencing technical difficulties and is temporarily hidden for security reasons.
"We are working with Google to restore all access and functionality as soon as possible."
The BWF YouTube channel, boasting 3.42 million subscribers and over 21,000 videos, is a crucial platform for fans worldwide to access live tournament action, interviews, and match highlights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia's rising shuttlers make gains in BWF world rankings
KUALA LUMPUR: A string of standout performances at the Macau Open has propelled several Malaysian back-up shuttlers up the BWF world rankings, with men's singles Justin Hoh and men's doubles Arif Junaidi-Yap Roy King leading the charge. Justin, 21, climbed eight rungs to a career-best No. 37 after reaching his first-ever World Tour final in the Super 300 tournament, bringing him a step closer to the crucial top-32 bracket that grants full access to all tiers of the World Tour. Fresh from lifting their maiden World Tour title in Macau, Arif-Roy King rose two spots to No. 22 in the men's doubles list — also a personal best for the pair. There was a much-needed boost too for Choong Hon Jian-Haikal Nazri, whose semi-final finish earned them a nine-spot jump to No. 43, a timely result after a run of early exits since returning from a lengthy injury spell in May. Meanwhile, Jimmy Wong-Lai Pei Jing's surprise run to the mixed doubles final paid off handsomely, as they surged from No. 127 to No. 84, marking their first entry into the world's top 100 since forming their partnership earlier this season. While most of Malaysia's top shuttlers skipped the Macau Open, there were still noticeable shifts in the latest world rankings due to the expiry of Paris 2024 Olympic points in the BWF's 52-week rolling system. Among the hardest hit was Olympic bronze medallist Lee Zii Jia, who slipped 17 spots to No. 52 in the men's singles — his lowest ranking since November 2016. However, the former All England champion, sidelined since March due to injury, will benefit from a protected ranking of No. 9, which allows him entry into all World Tour events (except the season-ending Finals) until year-end. Zii Jia is slated to make his comeback at the World Championships later this month. Leong Jun Hao remains Malaysia's highest-ranked men's singles player at No. 25. In the men's doubles, Aaron Chia-Soh Wooi Yik held steady at No. 2, while Goh Sze Fei-Nur Izzuddin reclaimed the No. 3 spot from Denmark's Kim Astrup-Anders Skaarup Rasmussen, with the Danes dropping points from last year's Olympic campaign. Malaysia boasts six pairs inside the top 32, including Man Wei Chong-Tee Kai Wun (No. 7), Nur Azryin Ayub-Tan Wee Kiong (No. 24) and Ong Yew Sin-Teo Ee Yi (No. 29). In the women's doubles, Pearly Tan-M. Thinaah held firm at a career-high No. 2, with Go Pei Kee-Teoh Mei Xing moving up two spots to No. 18 following reshuffling above them. Chen Tang Jie-Toh Ee Wei's run to the Macau Open semi-finals couldn't quite offset the Olympic point expiry — they slipped from No. 3 to No. 4 in the mixed doubles. Goh Soon Huat-Shevon Lai improved to No. 6, while Hoo Pang Ron-Cheng Su Yin (No. 16) and Wong Tien Ci-Lim Chiew Sien (No. 32) round out Malaysia's top four pairs. In women's singles, K. Letshanaa continues to lead the Malaysian pack at No. 40.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Nacsa investigates alleged data breach of 11 government portals
PETALING JAYA: The National Cyber Security Agency (Nacsa) is investigating a post made by a threat actor on a hacker forum that is allegedly offering live access to Malaysian government gateways and data for sale. A Nacsa spokesperson told LifestyleTech that the agency is aware of the situation and is currently looking into the matter. 'We are still investigating. We can't verify it yet. All claims by the actor have been escalated to relevant agencies to verify the authenticity. Some claims show inaccurate information. 'Some threat actors have a history of publishing recycled data and have claimed they are new ones. So their credibility is in question,' the spokesperson said. The post on the data leak first appeared on Saturday (Aug 2). The hacker claimed to have breached at least 11 government portals, including those belonging to the Defence Ministry, Health Ministry, Higher Education Ministry, and the National Registration Department (JPN), among others. Based on the sample data and screenshots shared in the post, the alleged leak includes 'display names', user IDs, passwords and IP addresses, along with screenshots that appear to show backend management dashboards. The post also lists live access and data for sale at US$19,999 (RM84,645) in cryptocurrency.
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Punch up, not down: The cruelty behind 'content culture'
LETTER | In a country where kindness is often celebrated as a national virtue, it's difficult to watch three Malaysian content creators proudly film themselves handing a homeless man a parcel of rice with nothing but leftover chicken bones. The video, posted on Instagram, begins with the trio happily enjoying a KFC meal. Then, in what they claim was a joke or 'social experiment,' they wrap up the scraps of picked-clean chicken bones and hand them to a sleeping homeless man. When he wakes and discovers the contents, his face falls. They film it all. The internet, understandably, erupts in disgust. Later, one of the creators claimed the man had been given a proper meal beforehand and agreed to act in the video. But that does little to change the moral calculus. Even if the man was paid, even if he agreed, the core message of the video remains the same: that a person's vulnerability can be turned into spectacle. That those who have little can be mocked in exchange for clicks. This is not a prank. This is punching down. And there should be a moral red line when it comes to creating content online. In a digital era where anyone with a camera phone can become a 'key opinion leader', going viral has become a drug. Social media rewards attention and not ethics, empathy, or decency. And when creators lack real talent or ideas, some turn to outrage bait and cruelty disguised as comedy. This isn't new, but it's getting worse. To be clear: I do not believe in state censorship as the first resort. Government over-regulation of content carries real risks to speech, creativity, and political dissent. We must always be cautious when addressing online harm, ensuring that any efforts to regulate content do not come at the expense of free expression or public trust. But we cannot stand by and pretend there is no problem either. What we need is not a clampdown, but a cultural shift. One that demands moral standards from creators, platforms, and viewers alike. We need to ask: Why do we reward content that humiliates others? Why do we give likes, shares, and algorithmic fuel to people who exploit the marginalised for laughs? And why are so many creators seemingly unaware, or worse, uncaring, about the power they wield? The creators in question claimed their video was meant to raise awareness. But here's the truth: awareness doesn't require cruelty. If your method of advocacy involves mocking, tricking, or emotionally wounding someone in need, then you're not raising awareness. You're just being cruel. The line between satire and sadism matters. Satire, at its best, punches up by challenging the powerful, critiquing injustice, and shaking the status quo. What these young men did was the opposite. They found someone at the bottom of society's ladder and used his circumstances as a prop. That's not bravery. That's cowardice. Social media platforms must take responsibility, too. Algorithms must stop promoting content based solely on engagement, without factoring in context or ethics. Social media platforms and agencies like the MCMC must help by supporting digital literacy campaigns and ethical content guidelines. They should not just ban content after it goes viral, but do more to cultivate a healthier online culture in the first place. Ultimately, the burden lies with us, viewers, creators, and citizens. We must set the tone. We must remind ourselves, and each other, that content is not exempt from conscience. That virality without values is hollow. And that the measure of a society is how we treat those who have the least. So to any aspiring content creator out there: punch up, not down. Use your platform to challenge injustice, uplift voices, and speak truth to power. But never, ever trade someone's dignity for your one minute of fame. That's not content. That's cruelty. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
