Mailbag: Urge Rep. Kim to vote ‘no' on taking basic health care away from people
Americans will live sicker and die sooner if Congress approves massive cuts to Medicaid, marketplace plans and private insurance. But it's not too late for Rep. Young Kim to stand up for her constituents, including the nearly 358,000 people in her district who rely on Medicaid.
This week, I joined the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network to deliver a clear message at Rep. Kim's Anaheim office: Vote 'no' on taking basic health care away from nearly 11 million people nationwide.
Instead of working to lower costs, Congress is moving quickly to slash at least $793 billion over 10 years from Medicaid and raise the costs of premiums and services for millions of people.
As a cancer survivor who relies on Medicaid for lifesaving care, I call on Rep. Kim to vote against these devastating cuts that make it more difficult and more expensive for people to get the care they need.
Dolly LinFullerton
When I was 18, spending the summer in Corona del Mar with friends from USC, my goal was simple: to be the darkest person on the beach. I don't know if I succeeded, but I tried. After two-plus months of surfing and laying in the sun almost every day — without sunblock — I was extremely tan.
Back then, in 1967, no one ever suggested I didn't belong here. But if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had been rounding up thousands of people a day like they are now, I easily could have been mistaken for an undocumented immigrant. That possibility never crossed my mind back then but it certainly would today. Imagine living legally in the U.S. for 30 years — working, paying taxes, and raising a family — only to be detained or arrested at a car wash or Home Depot because of how you look. It's no wonder thousands of day laborers have gone into hiding. The fear of being wrongfully deported without due process isn't just stressful — it's paralyzing.
When Donald Trump ran for office, he promised to deport the 'worst of the worst.' I naively assumed he meant convicted drug lords, killers, and rapists — not mothers and fathers trying to support their families. Yet, this is exactly what's happening. Because arrest and deportation numbers are lagging behind White House expectations, aides have convinced the president that a sweeping crackdown is necessary — even if it pushes the bounds of constitutionality. The last line of the Pledge of Allegiance reads, 'with liberty and justice for all.' I wish more Americans understood that living in fear, as millions are doing now, is not liberty. And being rounded up in an ICE raid, as so many are today, is not justice.
Denny FreidenrichLaguna Beach
I agree with Councilmember Twining that 'There is a clear need to turn down the rhetoric and restore civility during Huntington Beach Council meetings.'
What has led to this incivility is the frustration that the City Council has taken a MAGA ideological position on most issues. These include anti-LGBTQ, anti-DEI and human rights, book banning and elimination of citizen committees. Since the citizen comments at council meetings require no response from the council, there is no exchange of points of view, nor any way to hold the council members accountable. In the past, my husband and I have volunteered on citizen committees. They offer opportunity for two-way exchanges.
Despite the fact that more than half of H.B.'s population are not MAGA devotees, the City Council has chosen to simply not listen to the 'other side.' Their disdain for opposing opinions is evident in their voting. 'My way or the highway' is the council meeting undercurrent. In other words, community members from the left and center know they are speaking to deaf ears.
If Twining and other council members want civil interchanges, then they need to stop their autocratic decision-making and actions and do what is best for all Huntington Beach residents, not just their MAGA constituents.
Judith A. Lewis Retired Los Angeles County sheriff's captainHuntington Beach
I am so disgusted. The mayor of Huntington Beach, Pat Burns, was caught on hot mic calling a constituent 'Another f—ing cow' during Tuesday's City Council meeting. Instead of being grateful to a courageous young woman for sharing her thoughts during public comments, he chose to disparage her. Burns also called other council members who were not on the side of the conservative council majority 'pieces of s**t' last year.
My personal experience speaking to the council has not been quite this dramatic. When I have spoken, which is often, the mayor yawns, chats with others or stares at the ceiling. He leans far back in his chair to make it clear that he isn't listening. My input is unwanted. Burns rigidly supports an extreme MAGA agenda. He clearly doesn't care about the people of Huntington Beach. I call for the resignation of Pat Burns in his failure to represent all of us, to treat all constituents with respect and to behave professionally as he represents our beleaguered city. Goodbye, Pat Burns.
Nora PedersenHuntington Beach
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive poll: Most voters back Iran strikes, but worry about attacks on U.S.
The U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities Saturday have left American voters with contradictory feelings, a new poll finds: A majority favored limited strikes, but nearly as many said they were worried about a widening war and Iran retaliating on U.S. soil. Meanwhile, most viewed the U.S. attacks as a success — and are likely to back similar military action as a result. Why it matters: The survey sheds light on Americans' nuanced views of war and rapidly evolving foreign policy. Republicans overwhelmingly approved of bombing Iran; sizable majorities of Democrats and independents did not. But once they were told the bombings only targeted Iran's uranium enrichment for its nuclear program, support increased in each group. The big picture:"When voters understand the strategic rationale behind the strikes, support increases," said pollster Ryan Tyson, head of the Tyson Group, which conducted the survey. It recently worked for Elon Musk's political committee when it supported President Trump's re-election. The broad support for military action that the survey found among Republicans and self-identified MAGA voters suggested that the divisions within Trump's base over Iran were more talk than reality. The poll also measured Trump's job performance, finding that 46% of Americans approve and 51% disapprove. Voters are deadlocked on his handling of foreign policy, but he's underwater by double digits when it comes to handling inflation. More concerns for Trump: There's persistent worry in the U.S. electorate about blowback from the bombings and the contagion of war. 75% of voters think that despite the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the conflict could escalate into a wider war. 46% think some sort of Iranian attack on U.S. soil is now likely. And 45% believe the strikes didn't make the U.S. safer, while just 36% said they did. The good news for Trump: By 50-33, voters would support airstrikes similar to those launched Saturday, a sign they see it as a success and a manageable risk. Two-thirds believe more U.S. attacks like last Saturday's are likely. 56% agree with the sentiment that military force is justified to stop a nuclear Iran. 55% believe that Iran's nuclear program was either "obliterated," to use Trump's words, or dealt a major setback. Just 25% thought it was barely affected or was unscathed. 62% said the strikes will have been worth it if Iran stops enriching uranium. The intrigue: The poll also reflected how Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza has been a drag on how U.S. voters view America's ally. By 2 percentage points, U.S. voters oppose the war in Gaza, the poll found. By 54-27%, they believe Israel has too much influence on American foreign policy. Voters are more inclined to arm Ukraine than Israel, the survey found. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has solid favorability numbers as well, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ratings are negative. Methodology: The Tyson Group's national survey of 1,027 U.S. voters was conducted online June 25-26. The survey has a margin of error of ±3.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. To analyze only the responses of those identifying as Republicans, an oversample was used to ensure the margin of error remained consistent. That did not affect the top-line results of the survey.
San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
6 Americans detained in South Korea for trying to send rice and Bibles to North Korea by sea
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Six Americans were detained Friday in South Korea for trying to send 1,600 plastic bottles filled with rice, miniature Bibles, $1 bills and USB sticks toward North Korea by sea, police said. The Americans were apprehended on front-line Gwanghwa Island before throwing the bottles into the sea so they could float toward North Korean shores on the tides, two Gwanghwa police officers said. They said the Americans are being investigated on allegations they violated the law on the management of safety and disasters. The officers, who requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak to media on the issue, refused to provide personal details of the Americans in line with privacy rules. Gwanghwa police said they haven't found what is on the USB sticks. The U.S. Embassy in South Korea had no immediate public comment. For years, activists have sought to float plastic bottles or fly balloons across the border carrying anti-North Korea propaganda leaflets and USB thumb drives carrying South Korean dramas and K-pop songs, a practice that was banned from 2021-2023 over concerns it could inflame tensions with the North. North Korea has responded to previous balloon campaigns with fiery rhetoric and other shows of anger, and last year the country launched its own balloons across the border, dumping rubbish on various South Korean sites including the presidential compound. In 2023, South Korea's Constitutional Court struck down a controversial law that criminalized the sending of leaflets and other items to North Korea, calling it an excessive restriction on free speech. But since taking office in early June, the new liberal government of President Lee Jae Myung is pushing to crack down on such civilian campaigns with other safety-related laws to avoid a flare-up tensions with North Korea and promote the safety of frontline South Korean residents. On June 14, police detained an activist for allegedly flying balloons toward North Korea from Gwanghwa Island. Lee took office with a promise to restart long-dormant talks with North Korea and establish peace on the Korean Peninsula. Lee's government halted frontline anti-Pyongyang propaganda loudspeaker broadcasts to try to ease military tensions. North Korean broadcasts have not been heard in South Korean front-line towns since then. But it's unclear if North Korea will respond to Lee's conciliatory gesture after vowing last year to sever relations with South Korea and abandon the goal of peaceful Korean reunification. Official talks between the Koreas have been stalled since 2019, when U.S.-led diplomacy on North Korean denuclearization derailed.
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Republicans Prepare to Open ‘Pandora's Box' of Budget Gimmicks
Over decades of intense disputes about the federal budget, Republicans and Democrats have shared a set of expectations for what government spending and taxes would look like in the future. The baseline, as it is called, assumed that Congress would operate on a form of autopilot. Spending would climb every year, in part to keep up with inflation, and tax rates would go up or down based on laws already on the books. The cost of policy changes would then be assessed against this rough sketch of the country's fiscal trajectory. Senate Republicans are preparing to upend that standard with the broad tax and health care bill they are trying to muscle into law. They want to create a new baseline of their own and wipe away much of the stated cost of the bill. The accounting gambit has angered Democrats and depressed independent budget experts. It could also soon force a reckoning between Republicans' ambitions for cutting taxes and the Senate's longtime parliamentary rules. 'We do worry about the precedent that this sets for both parties to say that this thing, whether it's a spending increase or a tax cut, doesn't cost what traditional scoring conventions, the conventions we've been using for decades, say it costs,' said Andrew Lautz, an analyst at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank. 'You worry about opening Pandora's box when it comes to scoring.' The Republican effort focuses on changing how scorekeepers represent the cost of tax cuts. Under traditional standards, extending tax cuts beyond their scheduled expiration is treated as passing a new tax cut — and therefore a new cost to the budget. In wonky budget-speak in Washington, this is called the 'current law baseline.' Because much of their legislation is dedicated to extending temporary tax cuts from 2017, Senate Republicans have become preoccupied with this accounting practice. Just maintaining the 2017 tax cuts after this year would cost roughly $3.8 trillion over a decade under the current law baseline. How Much the Tax Portion of the Senate Bill Would Add to Deficits G.O.P. alternative baseline Traditional baseline If the cost of tax cut extensions is not counted, $441 billion would be added to deficits over 10 years. If the cost of tax cut extensions is counted, $4.2 trillion would be added. $500 bil. increase $500 bil. increase $400 $400 $300 $300 $200 $200 $100 $100 2025 2034 2025 2034 G.O.P. alternative baseline Traditional baseline If the cost of tax cut extensions is not counted, $441 billion would be added to deficits over 10 years. If the cost of tax cut extensions is counted, $4.2 trillion would be added. $500 bil. increase $500 bil. increase $400 $400 $300 $300 $200 $200 $100 $100 2025 2029 2025 2029 2034 2034 The alternative baseline refers to the current policy baseline, and the traditional baseline refers to current law. Source: Joint Committee on Taxation The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
