Nottingham Forest stadium expansion given green light
A major revamp of Nottingham Forest's stadium has been approved.The plans will see the existing Peter Taylor Stand demolished and replaced with a 10,000-seater stand, increasing the City Ground's overall capacity to 35,000.Full planning permission was granted unanimously by Rushcliffe Borough Council's planning committee on Thursday evening, subject to a range of conditions.In a statement, the club said it was "delighted" at the decision."We look forward to working closely with our partners on the next steps and will provide a further update in due course," it said.
Plans for an expansion were first unveiled in 2019, and outline planning permission was initially granted in 2022, but the project has since encountered a number of complications.Council documents published last week said the "extended passage of time" meant the application required "fresh consideration".Construction was originally expected to cost about £94m, but an estimate from January 2025 indicates this has risen to £130m.The latest report, however, states the development is expected to boost the local economy by an extra £13m a year and create hundreds of jobs.As a condition of the planning permission, Forest will be required to make contributions to local infrastructure - what is known as a section 106 agreement.These include paying just over £1m to improve local bus services, £150,000 to upgrade the A60/Cattle Market Road junction, and £200,000 for cycle improvements along Lady Bay Bridge.The club is also set to enter into a legal agreement with Nottingham Rowing Club to replace its Britannia boathouse, which is set to be demolished as part of the plans.Replacement facilities will have to be in place before any demolition work takes place, but it was stated during the committee meeting that a location for the new boathouse has not yet been identified.The club has also been given outline planning permission to build up to 170 flats next to the stadium, but this element will need further consideration at a later date.The plans for the new stand and the flats were "de-coupled" earlier this year, so that the two do not depend on one another to get planning consent.Taking into account the structural roof trusses, the new stand will be approximately 38m (124ft) high, making it the tallest stand at the City Ground.
Neil Clarke, leader of Rushcliffe Borough Council, said: "Forest play such an important role in the community."We are proud they call Rushcliffe home. It's heartening we can support them with their aspirations."A number of objections to the development were raised by local councillors and residents, including increased congestion in the area on matchdays and a lack of parking provision.Councillor Penny Gowland told the meeting the area "grinds to a halt" when Forest play in midweek."Bus services collapse, so a 45-minute commute takes two hours. Bus routes are diverted as they can't get along roads due to appalling parking. People in wheelchairs are stuck at home," she said.The committee report states 2,538 letters of support from the general public were received, along with 116 letters of objection.The approval paves the way for the club to buy the freehold of the land which the City Ground sits upon.Last year, Forest's then-chairman said the club could relocate away from the ground because of a dispute with Nottingham City Council over the rent the club pays.The local authority has since agreed to sell the land, but the club previously said any decision to buy the freehold would be "entirely conditional" on it being granted planning permission for the stadium expansion.No date has been set for construction to start, but planning rules mean it will have to begin within three years of a final decision being signed.Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis has previously said he eventually hopes to increase the ground's capacity to 50,000.
Analysis
By Hugh Casswell, BBC Nottingham political reporter
If you're a Forest fan, you may be asking yourself two things - why has this taken so long, and why have they had to go through it all twice?It's worth noting there is a big difference between the outline planning permission the scheme had before and the full planning permission it has now.It's also an incredibly complex project which has needed all sorts of technical adjustments as well a lot of haggling over those section 106 agreements.But in a funny sort of way, part of the answer may also lie in Forest's success on the pitch.Having spent three years in the Premier League and secured European football since the plans were first considered, the club clearly now has even bigger ambitions.Those ambitions prompted the question - why pump hundreds of millions of pounds into redeveloping a site where the lease will run out in the coming years?That triggered the very public row with the City Council last year, and while that row now seems to have been resolved, it was just one factor of many which combined to slow everything down.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
States of Guernsey to close loop-hole to stop tax avoidance
The States has confirmed it will close a tax loophole as part of plans to help tackle the government's £44m the current law, people are able to create their own personal investment companies, lend them money, and then take it back as loan repayments without paying any guidance has been added to the Statement of Practice M45 "Legal avoidance" to make it clear that if anyone uses this type of company to take money out as a loan repayment, it will be treated as a dividend, and Policy and Resources Committee also approved a proposal to amend the Income Tax (Guernsey) Law, 1978, so the change will be included in the island's 2026 budget. Deputy Lyndon Trott, committee president, said: "When it comes to income tax, we have to ensure that everyone is paying their fair share, including businesses and individuals."But we are even more acutely aware of this at a time when we as a government have a £44 million deficit."This isn't the panacea for our financial woes, but we're taking action to close this loophole to make sure that we're collecting tax that belongs to the public purse."
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Centrica preparing to take 15% stake in Sizewell C nuclear plant, reports say
British Gas owner Centrica is preparing to take a 15% stake in the UK's new nuclear power plant Sizewell C, reports have said. The boss of the Windsor-based energy group earlier this year said he was 'hopeful' of striking a deal to invest in the facility. The investment would mean Centrica has about the same size stake in Sizewell C as French energy giant EDF, the Financial Times reported on Friday. EDF, which owns and runs Britain's nuclear facilities, and the Government were the first backers of the project. But they have been trying to raise billions more from prospective investors, including Centrica. A spokeswoman for Centrica said it would not comment on speculation about acquisitions or investment. In February, chief executive Chris O'Shea said the group was in discussions over injecting cash in the new Suffolk-based nuclear plant, with aims to secure a deal in the first half of this year. He said: 'I like nuclear. I'm really hopeful we can make progress with Sizewell C this year.' But he said it 'all depends on the overall cost of the project and returns'. Mr O'Shea declined to give details on the size of stake Centrica was looking to take in the group, except to say it would be 'between 1% or 2% and 50%'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves earlier this month said £14.2 billion will be invested to build the power plant, marking the end of a long journey to secure funding for the project since it was first earmarked in 2010. Sizewell C will power the equivalent of six million homes and is planned to be operation in the 2030s, and is expected to create 10,000 jobs, the Government said. The Financial Times reported that all sides were hopeful of reaching a final investment decision on the project before Parliament breaks for recess on July 21, citing sources familiar with the discussions.
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
Three Mobile customers urged to apply for compensation after network went down for 14 hours
THREE Mobile customers are being urged to file complaints and seek compensation following a 14-hour outage. Tens of thousands of customers reported being unable to make or receive phone calls or send SMS text messages on Wednesday. 1 The outage began at 8am, with angry customers flooding social media with complaints. Three, which recently merged with Vodafone, swiftly acknowledged the issue with a post on X (formerly Twitter). It read: "We're aware of an issue affecting voice services and are working hard to fix it. " Data services are working normally. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused." Despite the early update, the mobile network didn't confirm the issue was resolved until 10pm last night. Since then, many customers have asked if they'll get compensation. A third customer said: "I hope we all get compensated from you." So, can customers claim compensation? Three Mobile network down with customers unable to make or receive calls We reached out to Three, but the company declined to confirm if it will pay out. Telecom regulator Ofcom has an automatic compensation scheme for broadband and landline customers when services are disrupted. However, mobile customers aren't covered and don't receive the same protection for connection issues. That said, you can still request compensation directly from your provider. Simrat Sharma, Uswitch mobiles expert, said: "Three's reported outages this week will be incredibly frustrating for customers - and it's understandable that many will be thinking about compensation. "Ofcom advises that compensation for mobile signal outages is 'dependent on the circumstances'. "But in extreme cases where repairs take much longer, you may be entitled to an additional refund or account credit. "If you've experienced huge disruption from the outage, don't hesitate to contact your provider to see if they can help." Customers can use the 'Live Chat' feature on Three's website or dial 333 from their mobile to file a complaint and request compensation. It's likely compensation would be considered on a case by case basis, for example if you use your phone for your business and you were unable to make calls or if you needed to use your phone urgently, then it might be worth logging a complaint. There's no guarantee on whether compensation will be paid - but it might be worth asking. An Ofcom spokesperson added: "Anyone who has been affected by this outage should get in touch with Three directly, and if they are dissatisfied then they can consider logging a formal complaint." How to complain and WIN compensation If your provider hasn't fixed the issue on time or you're unhappy with the delay, follow the formal complaints process. Take screenshots of the outage on your phone and note how long your service was down. Be clear about any extra costs you faced because of the outage, as you might be able to claim them back. To complain, call Three on 333 or use their live chat. Keep copies of receipts or bills to show any extra costs caused by the outage – these will help strengthen your case. If your formal complaint doesn't resolve the issue, you can ask for a "deadlock letter" after eight weeks and take your dispute to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) scheme. ADR schemes are free and act as an independent mediator between you and your provider when complaints can't be settled directly. There are two ADR schemes in the UK - the Communications Ombudsman and CISAS. Providers must be part of one, and you can check which scheme covers your provider at Three is a member of the Communications Ombudsman. To file a complaint, you can fill out the claims form on the ADR scheme's website by visiting or send a letter. The ADR scheme looks at the evidence from you and your provider before making a decision. If it agrees you should get compensation and you accept the decision, your network has 28 days to pay. If you reject the decision, you won't be able to claim the resolution offered. CUT YOUR TELECOM COSTS By James Flanders, Chief Consumer Reporter Switching contracts is one of the single best ways to save money on your mobile, broadband and TV bills. But if you can't switch mid-contract without facing a penalty, you'd be best to hold off until it's up for renewal. But don't just switch contracts because the price is cheaper than what you're currently paying. Take a look at your minutes and texts, as well as your data usage, to find out which deal is best for you. For example, if you're a heavy internet user, it's worth finding a deal that accommodates this so you don't have to spend extra on bundles or add-ons each month. In the weeks before your contract is up, use comparison sites to familiarise yourself with what deals are available. It's a known fact that new customers always get the best deals. Sites like MoneySuperMarket and Uswitch all help you customise your search based on price, allowances and provider. This should make it easier to decide whether to renew your contract or move to another provider. However, if you don't want to switch and are happy with the service you're getting under your current provider - haggle for a better deal. You can still make significant savings by renewing your contract rather than rolling on to the tariff you're given after your deal. If you need to speak to a company on the phone, be sure to catch them at the right time. Make some time to negotiate with your provider in the morning. This way, you have a better chance of being the first customer through on the phone, and the rep won't have worked tirelessly through previous calls which may have affected their stress levels. It pays to be polite when getting through to someone on the phone, as representatives are less inclined to help rude or aggressive customers. Knowing what other offers are on the market can help you to make a case for yourself to your provider. If your provider won't haggle, you can always threaten to leave. Companies don't want to lose customers and may come up with a last-minute offer to keep you. It's also worth investigating social tariffs. These deals have been created for people who are receiving certain benefits.
