logo
The war on hot women: Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney

The war on hot women: Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney

Fox News7 days ago
Let's cut the nonsense: liberal women aren't mad at Sydney Sweeney because she's "setting women back." That's just the excuse they're throwing around because they don't want to admit the truth.
They're mad because she's young, hot, white, and blonde. And they're mad that corporations are finally waking up to the truth: that the American people are done with woke!
If she were 300 pounds and identified as gender-fluid, she'd be hailed as a revolutionary. If she threw her pronouns into every interview, wore a "FEMINIST" crop top to the red carpet, and spouted progressive talking points on cue, they'd be tripping over themselves to give her a GLAAD Award. But because Sydney Sweeney simply exists - confident, traditionally feminine, and not bending the knee to the woke agenda, she's a target.
This isn't about feminism. It's about envy. It's about a cultural movement that now punishes beauty, shames femininity, and exalts victimhood as the highest form of virtue.
And the hypocrisy? It's off the charts.
Where was all this feminist outrage when Dylan Mulvaney, a biological male, was handed women's brand endorsements by Nike, Bud Light, and Maybelline for "celebrating womanhood"? Where were these voices when Mulvaney mocked the female experience with Barbie cosplay and tampon tutorials? Nowhere. In fact, they were applauding. Because in today's woke dystopia, a man pretending to be a woman gets more respect than an actual woman who dares to look like one.
Where were these self-proclaimed champions of women's rights when actual female athletes were getting steamrolled by biological males in their own sports? When Lia Thomas was shoving real women off the podium, where was the outrage? Crickets. Because defending the rights of actual women doesn't fit the narrative. It's not politically useful.
That's why they loathe women like Sydney Sweeney. She doesn't play along. She's not trying to be edgy. She's not rewriting what it means to be a woman but instead, she's embodying it. Beautifully, confidently, and unapologetically. That's the real threat.
The truth is, the modern Left has declared war on hot women. Because hot women don't need to play the victim. Hot women don't need to be coddled or redefined. They don't need to pretend that beauty is a social construct or that femininity is oppressive. They just live it. And that drives the gender-studies crowd insane.
Sydney Sweeney represents everything the woke mob hates: effortlessness, elegance, and the refusal to apologize for qualities that used to be admired. In a culture obsessed with "smashing beauty standards," she reminds us that some standards were never the problem. Our culture's new obsession with woke-fueled mediocrity is.
This isn't to say that beauty makes someone better but it certainly shouldn't make them worse in the eyes of the media or the public. We've gone from celebrating women for being empowered in their femininity to vilifying them for being conventionally attractive.
Feminism, as the Left now defines it, has nothing to do with empowering women. It's about enforcing ideological conformity. If you don't submit to the narrative—whether it's on gender, politics, race, or body positivity—you get attacked.
So let's stop pretending this is about Sydney Sweeney. It's not. It's about a movement that tells women they should be anything but what she is: attractive, traditional, proud, and free.
Sydney Sweeney didn't set women back. She triggered the insecurities of those who've built their identity on grievance rather than grace.
And for that? More power to her.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jim Acosta sparks fury with ‘interview' of dead Parkland teen's AI avatar
Jim Acosta sparks fury with ‘interview' of dead Parkland teen's AI avatar

Washington Post

timea minute ago

  • Washington Post

Jim Acosta sparks fury with ‘interview' of dead Parkland teen's AI avatar

The independent journalist Jim Acosta sparked an intense backlash this week with what he called a 'one of a kind interview': A video of him talking with an AI-generated avatar modeled on Joaquin Oliver, a teenager killed in the Parkland high school shooting in 2018. The video, which the former CNN White House correspondent posted Monday to his Substack newsletter, began with Acosta making small talk about LeBron James and 'Star Wars' with the late teenager's AI duplicate, which Oliver's father created to bring attention to gun violence.

Attorney for Sean ‘Diddy' Combs confirms they've approached Trump administration about pardon
Attorney for Sean ‘Diddy' Combs confirms they've approached Trump administration about pardon

CNN

timea minute ago

  • CNN

Attorney for Sean ‘Diddy' Combs confirms they've approached Trump administration about pardon

Nicole Westmoreland, a member of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' all-star defense team, told CNN in an exclusive interview on Tuesday that the music mogul's team has reached out to the Trump administration about a potential pardon following his conviction on two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution last month. 'It's my understanding that we've reached out and had conversations in reference to a pardon,' Westmoreland said. Last month, a jury convicted Combs on two lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution and acquitted the hip-hop mogul of the most serious charges – racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Combs was facing up to life in prison. Instead, he now faces a maximum sentence of 20 years – though, he is likely to serve a shorter sentence, according to legal analysts. Prosecutors have not formally said what sentence they're going to pursue – presentencing filings aren't due until September – but had previously indicated he could face a minimum range of 51 to 63 months in prison. In a filing last week, they indicated their assessed range could end up be 'substantially higher.' Asked of Combs' feelings about his chances of a pardon, Westmoreland said Combs 'is a very hopeful person and I believe that he remains hopeful.' Prosecutors accused Combs of leading a criminal enterprise made up of some of his closest employees, alleging they used threats, violence, forced labor, bribery and other crimes to force Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and another woman, 'Jane,' to engage in drug-fueled sex acts with male escorts called 'Freak Offs' or 'hotel nights.' During the two-month trial, Combs' defense attorneys focused much of their efforts on questioning – and attempting to discredit – witnesses brought forth by the prosecution. The prosecution presented its case over six weeks and called 34 witnesses during the federal criminal trial. Combs' defense presented a roughly 30-minute case and called zero witnesses. Combs did not testify. Of their approach, Westmoreland said their strategy was to 'tell the truth.''We didn't need a creative story. We didn't need to overreach. We knew that telling the truth would mean not guilty. We knew that he had not sex trafficked anyone and we knew that RICO was absurd. So we figured, hey we'll tell the truth and that will pay off. And I believe for the most part that strategy worked.' More to come…

Meghan toasts to ‘beautiful day' as she launches new rose wine
Meghan toasts to ‘beautiful day' as she launches new rose wine

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Meghan toasts to ‘beautiful day' as she launches new rose wine

The Duchess of Sussex has toasted to a 'beautiful day' to mark the launch of her latest rose wine. Meghan released her As Ever Napa Valley Rose 2024 – described as evoking the same 'soft notes of stone fruit, gentle minerality, and a lasting finish' as the 2023 rose – on Tuesday. It comes after the previous rose, launched last month, sold out within an hour. In a video posted on her Instagram, Meghan can be seen uncorking a bottle marked 'Bottle #1' in front of bouquets of pink and cream flowers – followed by close-up of the cork bearing the As Ever logo. Alongside the clip, she wrote: 'Here we go! First bottle off the line! 'Toasting to a beautiful day: Our Napa rose is live @aseverofficial.' As with the previous wine, the beverage is priced at more than £67 for a minimum three-bottle order – and only appeared to be available for US customers to buy, with shipping addresses limited to America. As Ever is Meghan's lifestyle brand which also sells cookie mix, herb tea, flower sprinkles and jams. A post on the company's Instagram show the corks branded with the As Ever logo, with a caption reading: 'C'est l'heure. 'Enjoy your last sips of summer with the newest vintage of our beloved Napa Valley rose.' The website describes the drink as 'thoughtfully curated by Meghan, Duchess of Sussex' and that it has been 'made to be enjoyed with the ones you love'. The pale pink wine, which comes in a clear bottle with a white, gold-rimmed label, has an ABV (alcohol by volume) of 13.5% – one percent lower than its predecessor. As with the 2023 rose, the newest wine is not available to buy in orders of less than three bottles. Three bottles cost 90 US dollars (around £67), six bottles cost 159 dollars (around £119) including a 12% discount, and 12 bottles are priced at 300 dollars (around £225) including a 17% discount. Meghan and the Duke of Sussex left the UK and moved to California five years ago for a new life after stepping down from the working monarchy. Napa Valley wine country is in northern California, around 50 miles from San Francisco.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store