WV Senate Democrats raise legal concerns with DEI bill's passage
Democrats in the West Virginia Senate are urging Gov. Patrick Morrisey not to sign a bill they say was not legally passed because of a 'series of procedural irregularities.'
The letter concerns the Senate's passage of Senate Bill 474, a governor-requested bill that would end diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in the state.
The House of Delegates passed the bill late on Saturday, the last day of the 60-day legislative session. The Democrats say the Senate erred in the procedures it took late Saturday night as it approved the House's amended version of the bill.
In a letter to the governor, Senate President Randy Smith and Senate Clerk Lee Cassis Thursday, Sens. Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, and Joey Garcia, D-Marion, the only two senators from the minority party, say that Senate Republicans improperly suspended a rule they apparently used to bypass considering several pending amendments from Garcia and pass the bill in the final minutes of session. They also argue the Republicans made two other procedural errors.
'Due to the Senate's patent disregard of established legislative procedure, the bill did not properly complete legislative action, and it should not be enrolled, authenticated, or presented to the Governor for approval,' the letter says. 'If the bill is sent to the Governor, it must be vetoed on technical grounds due to the Senate's failure to adhere to its own binding rules of procedure.'
The Senate originally passed the bill March 26. The House passed the bill at 10:41 p.m. Saturday after nearly three hours of debate. When the bill went back to the Senate to approve the House's changes, more than a dozen amendments from Garcia appeared to be pending on the legislation.
Sen. Amy Grady, R-Mason, at first made a motion to concur with the House's changes to the bill and pass it. The senate stood at ease for a few minutes before Grady withdrew the motion.
A few minutes later, Sen. Eric Tar, R-Putnam, moved to suspend Joint Rule 3, which governs how amendments to amendments and disagreements are handled between the two legislative chambers, and concur and pass Senate Bill 474. The rule suspension required a two-thirds roll call vote by both chambers, but the approval was made by a voice vote and with objections heard. The Senate then passed the bill with a 31-2 vote.
A short time later, Tarr moved to reconsider the vote by which they concurred and passed the bill. The Democrats argue that the Senate failed to properly reconsider the motion. Tarr instead moved to withdraw his motion and then moved to concur with the House's version of the bill.
Next, Senate Majority Leader Patrick Martin, R-Lewis, moved the previous question. Smith turned down Garcia's request that pending amendments be considered, saying that another motion had been called.
The Senate then voted again to concur with the House's version of the bill and then passed the bill.
Even if the Senate's first passage of the bill was done properly, the Democrats argue, the Senate was required to consider the pending amendments before it could concur in the House's changes to the bill, and they failed to do so.
'If the senator and the governor don't do the right thing, I think this will be litigated and the bill will go down in flames,' Garcia said in an interview with West Virginia MetroNews Thursday.
The West Virginia Democratic Party and the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia have also condemned the way the bill was passed. The ACLU-WV wrote in a blog post Monday that the Senate likely broke its own rules in rushing the bill through at the last minute.
'If Gov. Morrisey signs the bill (which we fully expect he will) then we will see the state in court,' the organization wrote.
Representatives for Morrisey and Smith did not comment Thursday.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren County Republicans vie for Ohio Senate seat
The race to represent a Warren County seat in the Ohio Senate is heating up, as two Republican candidates have already announced their campaigns for a May 2026 primary. Sen. Steve Wilson currently represents District 7 but term limits prevent him from running again. The district includes Warren County and northern parts of Hamilton County. It has a 60% Republican lean and a population of about 366,000, according to analysis by Dave's Redistricting, which uses recent election results data to predict partisan split of electoral districts. It's not clear who else, Republican or Democrat, may run for the seat as it's too early to see who has pulled petitions for 2026 local elections. Who is Zac Haines? Symmes Township resident Zac Haines has announced his campaign to represent the 7th District. Haines is a Miami University trustee and CEO of DPA Buying Group, a marketing agency in Blue Ash. He was nominated by President Trump to be a trustee for the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation. He's been endorsed for the seat by U.S. Rep. Warren Davidson, a Republican from Troy, along with Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague, according a campaign news release. 'My goal is to make Ohio the best and most competitive state in the country,' Haines said in the release. Who is Scott Lipps? Scott Lipps, who previously represented Warren County in the Ohio House, has also pulled petitions to run for the Senate seat. Lipps last won reelection for the eastern Warren County House seat in 2022 with 75% of the vote. Term limits prevented him from running for the Ohio House again. Lipps has also served as Franklin mayor and city council member. He owns Sleep Tite Mattress Factory and Showroom in Franklin. Lipps said in a news release that he spent his time at the statehouse advocating for Second Amendment rights and for the rights of the elderly and those with disabilities. "It was an honor to represent Warren County and southwestern Ohio at the Statehouse. I am proud of my conservative record," Lipps said in the release. Regional politics reporter Erin Glynn can be reached at eglynn@ @ee_glynn on X or @eringlynn on Bluesky. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Warren County primary: meet the Republican candidates Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
MAGA Monks
Democrats downplay Trump's 'stunning' foreign policy wins, but the 'President of Peace' doesn't care. He's fighting to end hell on earth so he can get into heaven. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit FOX News Radio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California redistricting fight gets heated as lawmakers debate new congressional maps
The Brief A hearing was held Tuesday to discuss plans to redraw California's congressional districts. The committee hearing turned chaotic, with shouting and interruptions, as Republican Assemblymember David Tangipa and residents criticized the process, costs, and lack of public input. The California Legislature is expected to approve a proposed congressional map and declare a Nov. 4 special election by Thursday. SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A California legislative hearing turned into a shouting match Tuesday as a Republican lawmaker clashed with Democrats over a partisan plan to rewrite U.S. House maps to win Democrats more seats. What we know A committee voted along party lines to advance a new congressional map in response to a Republican redistricting effort in Texas that President Donald Trump wants. California Democrats do not need any Republican votes to move ahead. Assemblymember David Tangipa, one of two Republicans on the committee that was considering the proposal Tuesday, spent 30 minutes asking questions of his colleagues before being told to make time for other members, prompting some boos from audience members. When the committee began voting, he shouted for more time. At times during the hearing, lawmakers interrupted one another until the chair, a Democrat, called for order. "This is not the way we conduct our hearing," Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, who chairs the committee, said as she called for order several times after hours of discussion. Tangipa argued that California should spend its resources on other issues such as health care. Lawmakers are expected to schedule a Nov. 4 special election to put the new maps before voters, and they haven't revealed a cost estimate for the unexpected election. California Republicans estimated a special election could cost more than $230 million. "I'm asking how much this costs because the state is in a massive deficit and it's so personal to me," Tangipa said after the vote. He said his stepsister died a few weeks ago after a Medicaid provider refused to sign off on services she needed. California begins voting on proposed congressional map Tuesday's hearings were the first chance for California residents to tell lawmakers how they feel about the new congressional boundaries. A hearing in the Senate was far calmer, and the proposal passed easily. California Democrats said they are pushing back against Trump and his desire to reshape U.S. House maps to his advantage in an expanding fight over control of Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The California Legislature is expected to approve a proposed congressional map and declare a Nov. 4 special election by Thursday to get the required voter approval. In Texas, state Rep. Nicole Collier stayed at the Capitol overnight and into Tuesday to protest a Republican requirement that she and some of her Democratic colleagues have around-the-clock law enforcement surveillance after they ended a two-week walkout that delayed a vote on the Trump-backed map. RELATED:Redistricting California: Newly proposed congressional maps released On Tuesday, eight other Texas Democrats said they'll join Collier in spending the night on the House floor. State Department of Public Safety officers are shadowing the lawmakers to ensure they return to the Capitol and do not leave Texas again. To leave the House floor Monday, the Democrats had to sign what they called "permission slips" agreeing to the surveillance. Texas' Republican-controlled House scheduled a vote for Wednesday on the new map. California Republicans mount an opposition campaign Dozens of residents from up and down the state, leaders of local Republican groups and the conservative California Family Council showed up to a hearing Tuesday to voice opposition to Democrats' plan. Some said the process has been shrouded in secrecy because the map was drawn without meaningful public input. Others said they would rather have lawmakers focus on addressing issues instead of trying to bypass a bipartisan redistricting process. "There's different needs and different requirements for everybody," Jim Shoemaker, a Republican running for Congress in a district south of Sacramento, said in an interview. "But if you have somebody that just has a little portion of an area, they're not going to represent the people the way they should because they're looking at the wrong thing." Labor union members and several key Democratic political allies said the partisan plan is needed to protect democracy and to fight back the president's aggressive agenda. Public remarks may have little sway, though, as Democratic leaders are determined to rapidly advance the proposal. Some Republican lawmakers filed an emergency petition with the state Supreme Court arguing Democrats are violating the state constitution. They assert that lawmakers can't vote this week because the constitution requires new legislation to have a 30-day wait for public review. Democrats hold 43 out of California's 52 U.S. House seats and want to win five more. The proposal would try to expand that advantage by targeting battleground districts in Northern California, San Diego and Orange counties, and the Central Valley. Some Democratic incumbents also get more left-leaning voters in their districts. Texas Democrats have police escorts In Texas, Republican legislative leaders assigned state troopers to watch their Democratic colleagues and ensure they don't flee the state again, as they did recently to block a vote on new maps. Suburban Dallas Rep. Mihaela Plesa said one followed her on her Monday evening drive back to her apartment in Austin after spending much of the day on a couch in her office. She said he went with her for a staff lunch and even down the hallway with her for restroom breaks. "This is a waste of taxpayer dollars and really performative theater," Plesa said in a telephone interview. A message seeking comment was sent Tuesday to the Department of Public Safety. A national brawl unfolding Redistricting typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade after the census. But Trump is looking to use mid-decade redistricting to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the midterms during his first presidency. After gaining House control in 2018, Democrats used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. Nationally, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, several dozen districts are competitive, so even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. ___ Vertuno reported from Austin, Texas. Associated Press writer Sophie Austin in Sacramento and John Hanna from Topeka, Kansas contributed to this report. The Source Information for this story came from the Associated Press.
