Serial conman Robert Markward jailed again for targeting elderly victims
Speaking at the High Court in Glasgow, Lady Ross said some of the people Markward had stolen from were particularly vulnerable. She added that Markward had committed "nasty offences". The court heard he posed as an electrician to gain access to an 88-year-old woman's retirement apartment in Ayr. He then stole her purse and bank card.On another occasion he asked to use the toilet in a 94-year-old woman's home, having claimed to be a friend of the woman's recently deceased neighbour.He then disappeared, and the woman realised her purse had been taken.
After the verdict the jury heard Markward had a string of previous convictions for similar crimes dating back to 1986.He had accumulated a total of 38 convictions involving 106 charges prior to his most recent trial.He was jailed for defrauding elderly people in 2002, when he was sentenced to four years in prison at the High Court in Glasgow.But while on home leave being prepared for parole he struck again.In 2005 he was jailed for six years, having posed as a priest and a hospice worker in Ayr and Prestwick to carry out crimes of dishonesty.He was released early on licence but within days he resumed his offending in Ayrshire and Glasgow.Markward was jailed in 2010 for seven years after stealing from several elderly victims. He told a 75-year-old woman he was a friend of her son's and persuaded her to give him Sunday lunch.He then stole a purse containing £120, bank cards and bracelets belonging to her grandchildren.Markward was released early again but was jailed for 10 years in 2016, after he targeted the elderly victims in Clydebank. He was released early in 2022.In the latest trial, the serial thief insisted that he definitely did not commit crimes against elderly people.A charge of stealing a purse in Prestwick on 27 March was not proven.Adam Stachura, the policy director of charity Age Scotland, previously said Markward's crimes were "sickening".He said: "I think the court has done a very important job in articulating how seriously they take offences of this kind, and hopefully it becomes a deterrent for people thinking of preying on the elderly."It's sickening to think of the number of people caught out by this guy."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Almost 4,000 afghans affected by new MoD data leak
A new data breach linked to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has potentially exposed the personal details of up to 3,700 Afghans. The breach occurred at Inflite The Jet Centre Ltd, a sub-contractor providing ground handling services at London Stansted Airport, following a cybersecurity incident. Affected individuals include Afghans resettled in the UK after assisting British troops, as well as those who travelled for routine military exercises. Potentially leaked information includes passport details such as name, date of birth, passport number, and Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) reference numbers. This incident marks another data loss following a previous breach that exposed details of 18,700 Afghan applicants, raising concerns about the MoD's handling of sensitive data.
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
League opener stopped after Semenyo reports racist abuse
The Premier League opener between Liverpool and Bournemouth was stopped in the first half after Cherries forward Antoine Semenyo reported being racially abused by someone in the crowd. More to follow.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Two-tier justice is a national disgrace
When Attorney General Richard Hermer told the BBC in June that it was 'disgusting' and 'wrong' to claim that Britain had a two-tier justice system, 'offensive' to the country's 'crown prosecutors' and 'courts', he was attempting to bat away a wave of criticism that sought to make the point that justice in this country is no longer blind. It did not help his point that just a few weeks before, the Sentencing Council for England and Wales had sought to make this implicit bias explicit, suggesting that some offenders should receive more lenient sentences based on their ethnicity. Even this Labour Government felt compelled to pass emergency legislation to block the move. Perhaps the most visible manifestation of two-tier justice is the treatment of Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor jailed after posting on social media that people could 'set fire to all the… hotels full of [asylum seekers] for all I care'. This was a stupid and reprehensible remark, fired into the void of social media with little thought as to its potential consequences. Ms Connolly entered a guilty plea, and was sentenced to 31 months' imprisonment. Had she stood her ground, she might well have walked free. Ricky Jones, a Labour councillor who made a seemingly explicit call for violence – telling a large crowd that they needed to 'cut' the 'throats' of 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and 'get rid of them all' – was cleared by a jury yesterday. There is a clear difference between a guilty plea and a jury decision. The clear disparity in outcomes, however, will further fuel criticism of a system that appears to function very differently for those from the correct part of the political spectrum. And for the cynical, there is the question of the pressure placed on Ms Connolly by the prospect of being held on remand for an extended period. This does not help with the 'community tensions' politicians are at pains to minimise. Nor does it help public acceptance of the justice system when visibly absurd outcomes mount up on a near daily basis. As Robert Jenrick has said in his interview with The Telegraph, the perception that judges 'act politically and bring their own personal politics into their job as a judge' has been immensely damaging. His proposals for tighter checks on appointments and a robust system for removals make a great deal of sense. This is particularly so in comparison with what appears to be the preferred outcome of the Government: for critics to shut up and accept that the legal system produces the right outcomes. Not only does this fail to silence criticism, it serves to further undermine faith in the law. Criticism of Britain's two-tier system will continue for as long as we get two-tier outcomes.
