
A manufacturer's up-close view of Trump's tariffs
This is the hard truth for American manufacturers: Trump's tariffs are all but inescapable unless the global supply chain — the decades-long backbone of domestic manufacturing — is replicated stateside.
Why it matters: It won't happen overnight. For now, many businesses in the sector Trump hopes to revitalize face the prospect of higher costs and withering demand from foreign buyers.
What they're saying: "There isn't the capacity, knowledge, nor the facilities to have American manufacturing compete on this scale over a ten-year horizon, let alone one," says Megan Murphy, who owns La Crosse Milling Company, a which processes grains for food ingredients and animal feed at a plant in Cochrane, Wis. (outside of Buffalo City).
"I don't think there's a single small U.S.-based agricultural company that thinks this is a good long-term strategy for building manufacturing competitiveness," Murphy tells Axios.
The intrigue: Many U.S. factories, including Murphy's, run with machinery with foreign-made parts.
Domestic manufacturers may assemble the finished product in America, but key inputs are sourced globally.
Take World Emblem, a Florida-based company that manufacturers half a million clothing patches each day, and which sources thread from Europe.
The company ships raw materials to its factory in Mexico for early-stage manufacturing. It comes back to the states for final assembly before being shipped out to its customers.
" You can't pick up 500,000 square feet and 1,000 jobs and just drop it in the middle of the United States," says World Emblem CEO Randy Carr.
"There's the issue of time, money, training, square footage, developing the proper capacity and prepping the workforce," he adds.
The bottom line: Think about the trade policy whiplash over the past two decades — just a few years ago, the Biden administration supported near-shoring.
Trump ripped up the global trade playbook virtually overnight, a gamble to reinvigorate domestic industry that might take years to adapt — assuming this trade policy stays intact.
"If the plan is to get everybody to onshore, I'm okay with whatever we decide as a society, but we need time to wind things down and spin things back up in a way that doesn't impact our overall business and customers," Carr says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

34 minutes ago
Inflation expected to have ticked higher in May amid Trump tariffs
A fresh inflation report to be released on Wednesday will provide the latest test for President Donald Trump's tariffs as some retailers and economists warn the policy will raise prices. So far, the economy has defied fears of price hikes, instead giving way to a cooldown of inflation over the months since Trump took office. Economists expect inflation to have jumped slightly in May, registering year-over-year price increases of 2.4%. That would mark an increase from an inflation rate of 2.3% over the year ending in April, which amounted to the lowest inflation level since 2021. The small increase in inflation anticipated by economists would keep price levels near the Federal Reserve's target rate of 2%, putting them well below a recent peak of 9% in 2022. In recent weeks, Trump has dialed back some of his steepest tariffs, easing the costs imposed upon importers. Such companies typically pass along a share of the higher tax burden in the form of price hikes. A trade agreement between the U.S. and China in May slashed tit-for-tat tariffs between the world's two largest economies and triggered a surge in the stock market. Within days, Wall Street firms softened their forecasts of a downturn. The U.S.-China accord came weeks after the White House paused a large swath of Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs targeting dozens of countries. Trump also eased sector-specific tariffs targeting autos and rolled back duties on some goods from Mexico and Canada. Still, an across-the-board 10% tariff applies to nearly all imports, except for semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and some other items. Those tariffs stand in legal limbo, however, after a pair of federal court rulings late last month. Tariffs remain in place for steel, aluminum and autos, as well as some goods from Canada and Mexico. Warning signs point to the possibility of elevated prices over the coming months. Nationwide retailers like Walmart and Best Buy have voiced alarm about the possibility they may raise prices as a result of the levies. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, said this month it expects U.S. inflation to reach 4% by the end of 2025, which would mark a sharp increase from current levels. Federal Chair Jerome Powell, in recent months, has warned about the possibility that tariffs may cause what economists call "stagflation," which is when inflation rises and the economy slows. Stagflation could put the central bank in a difficult position. If the Fed were to raise interest rates, it could help ease inflation, but it may risk an economic downturn. If the Fed were to cut rates in an effort to spur economic growth, the move could unleash faster price increases. For now, the Fed appears willing to take a wait-and-see approach. At its last meeting, in May, the Fed opted to hold interest rates steady for the second consecutive time. "For now, it does seem like a fairly clear decision for us to wait and see," Powell said at a press conference in Washington, D.C., last month. The Fed will announce its next rate decision on June 18. Investors peg the chances of a decision to leave rates unchanged at 99.9%, according to the CME FedWatch Tool, a measure of market sentiment.

35 minutes ago
Appeals court to take up Trump's challenge to his criminal hush money conviction
Just over a year after Donald Trump became the first former president to be found guilty of a felony, an appeals court is set to hear the president's bid to move his case to federal court. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has scheduled oral arguments Wednesday to consider whether to move the president's criminal hush money case from state to federal court. Trump was found guilty last year on 34 felony counts after Manhattan prosecutors alleged that he engaged in a "scheme" to boost his chances during the 2016 presidential election through a series of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, and then falsified New York business records to cover up that alleged criminal conduct. Trump's lawyers have argued that the conduct at issue during his criminal trial included "official acts" undertaken while he was president, giving the president broad immunity for his actions and the right to remove the case to federal court. They say that the Supreme Court's landmark ruling last year granting the president immunity for official acts -- which was decided after Trump was convicted in May -- would have prevented prosecutors from securing their conviction. "The fact that it was not until after the conclusion of his state criminal trial that the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision defining the contours of presidential immunity -- including a broad evidentiary immunity prohibiting prosecutors from inviting a jury to probe a President's official acts, as President Trump's removal notice alleges occurred here -- supplies good cause for post-trial removal," Department of Justice lawyers argued in an amicus brief filed with the court. Trump decried the prosecution as politically motivated and successfully delayed his sentencing multiple times before New York Judge Juan Merchan, on the eve of Trump's inauguration, sentenced the former president to an unconditional discharge -- the lightest possible punishment allowed under New York state law -- saying it was the "only lawful sentence" to prevent "encroaching upon the highest office in the land." "I did my job, and we did our job," Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the case, said following Trump's conviction. "There are many voices out there, but the only voice that matters is the voice of the jury, and the jury has spoken." Bragg has pushed back on Trump's attempt to remove the case from state court, arguing that a case cannot be moved to federal court after sentencing. "These arguments ignore statutory indicia that Congress intended for removal of criminal cases to happen before sentencing by anticipating that essential federal proceedings will take place prior to a final criminal judgment," prosecutors have argued. Trump's appeal will be heard by a panel of three federal judges, each of whom was nominated to the bench by Democratic presidents. With Trump's former defense attorneys now serving top roles at the Department of Justice, the president will now be represented by former Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall of the elite law firm Sullivan & Cromwell. In an usual step, lawyers with the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in support of Trump's request. "The United States has a strong and direct interest in the issues presented in this appeal," they argued. If the appeals court grants Trump's request, his conviction would still remain. The only change is that his appeal will play out in a federal, rather than state, courtroom. In either scenario, Trump could ultimately ask the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. Moving the case into federal court could also open up the possibility that Trump could potentially pardon himself.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Yeah, I've changed': Former Republican congressman runs as Democrat for governor
A former GOP congressman turned MSNBC commentator made his pitch for Florida's governorship in next year's election at a packed town hall meeting on June 9 at Florida Atlantic University's Jupiter campus. 'Yeah, I've changed,' said David Jolly, and he wants his Republican opponents to make that the centerpiece of their attacks against him. During the 90-minute moderated discussion, Jolly positioned himself as a candidate who can bridge political divides and appeal across party lines in a state that hasn't elected a Democratic governor in over three decades. Next November's election will be a battle for what will be an open seat as Gov. Ron DeSantis is term limited according to Florida's constitution. Jolly's political evolution spans what he describes as 'a period of about 10 years,' moving from registered Republican to independent to Democrat. The attorney and former lobbyist served as the Republican representative in the 13th congressional district in Southwest Florida from 2014 to 2017 before leaving Congress. Now a network political contributor, he frames his party switches as an asset. 'I want my opponents to hit me on change. 'Jolly changed.' Yeah, I did,' he said. 'Is it okay to change your mind? I think it is, and that's part of my story.' Then he pointedly added: 'You know who else has changed? Most elected Republicans have changed.' During his time as a Republican congressman, Jolly said he supported positions that put him at odds with his party as it tilted toward President Donald Trump's America first and Make America Great Again movement, which Jolly has lambasted in network appearances. 'I was a Republican in Congress who supported marriage equality, climate science, gun control, campaign finance reform,' he told The Palm Beach Post. One of Trump's most ardent supporters on Capitol Hill, Republican U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, has already entered the race on the GOP side. The Naples congressman has the president's endorsement. Whoever the GOP nominee is will count on the party's more than 1 million-plus voter advantage over the rival Democrats. Not boding well for Jolly, either, is that the last Democratic nominee for governor, Charlie Crist, a former congressman who also was a Republican-turned-Democrat, got trounced by DeSantis in a nearly 20-point rout in November 2022. Jolly is centering his campaign on what he calls Florida's 'generational affordability crisis.' 'This is a lived experience for my wife and I. We have two young children, and I am not confident that our incumbent in Tallahassee or that the next Republican candidate for governor understands the urgency of it or a desire to fix it,' he said. This crisis transcends party lines, he argued. 'The affordability crisis doesn't know party. If you're a Democrat, independent, Republican, you're worried about your homeowners insurance, your rent, property taxes,' Jolly said His proposed solutions include a state catastrophic fund to remove hurricane and natural disaster coverage from private insurance markets. It is a proposal Jolly told the crowd that he offered in national scope during his term in Washington. 'In Congress, I introduced a national cap fund to aggregate fires out west, tornadoes in the midwest, ice in the northeast, hurricanes in the southwest into a national cap fund," he said. "It didn't pass. Republicans at the time called it socialism, I just called it cheaper insurance.' He said the fund could cut private insurance for homeowners by 50% to 60%. His platform includes education reform and social issues. He argues that 'public education has been abandoned in the state of Florida' and calls for ending what he calls 'culture wars' that target immigrant and marginalized communities. 'We have excellence today in public education only out of the sheer will and determination of public school teachers and administrators,' Jolly said. 'Politicians have tried to tell them how to teach, what to teach, what they can say. We don't respect them with pay, we don't respect them politically, and we need to be a state that celebrates public education.' At the town hall, he expanded on his social agenda. 'We have to return to a place where everyone is welcome and celebrated,' Jolly said at the town hall. 'Regardless of where you were born, the color of your skin, who you love or who you worship, we need to be a state that welcomes everyone and lifts everyone up.' On reproductive rights, Jolly supports leaving the decision up to the majority of voters, pointing to the support Florida's Amendment 4 on abortion received in November 2024. 'More than 50% of the state said they wanted it. There's no reason politicians in Tallahassee should stand in the way,' he said. The amendment received 57% support but failed to reach the required 60% threshold. The FAU event, moderated by political strategist Simon Rosenberg, drew supporters from across Florida, including some who drove from Sarasota, Fla., to hear Jolly speak. 'Bring sanity back,' said attendee and Sarasota resident Michele Zinser. 'I think [Jolly] is very calm. He listens, and I appreciate that.' Zinser, an independent, resonates with Jolly's mission to tackle the affordability crisis. 'I know he doesn't come in with a strong right-wing agenda, which is what we've been suffering in Sarasota county,' she said. 'I'm about to become a democrat, I'm afraid.' Scott Benarde, a registered Democrat, event sponsor and frequent watcher of MSNBC, attended to show support for Jolly. 'I really believe in this guy, I think he's knowledgeable, decent, honest and cares and knows what the heck he's talking about. I think he really has a shot of becoming Florida's next governor,' said Scott Benarde, a registered Democrat and event sponsor. Attendees emphasized how Jolly's Republican background could appeal to voters tired of current leadership. 'He was a Republican. He understands the republican party probably better than a lot of Democrats,' said Betsey Hull, who attended with concerns about affordable housing for her daughters. 'We need somebody that will unite the state.' With 16 months until the election, Jolly reports early conversations with national Democratic Party leadership about potential support, while working to build relationships with diverse communities across the state, including Black pastors in Orlando, Fla. 'A year from now, we'll be working with each other towards change,' he said. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: AT FAU, David Jolly embraces political shift in bid for Florida governor