
Impact of Trump's tariffs ‘minimal' on India, say experts
India, the world's fifth-largest economy, is poised to emerge relatively unscathed from a new torrent of tariffs under President Trump's 'Liberation Day' plan.
While the move has sparked concerns over potential disruptions in international commerce, experts argue that the impact of these tariffs on India's economic trajectory will be minimal, with a projected slowdown of just 20-40 basis points in the current financial year.
In the face of global trade headwinds, India's strategic positioning and policy adaptability may allow it to not only weather the storm but also capitalise on emerging opportunities. As the world navigates shifting trade dynamics, the fastest-growing major economy's expansion remains firmly on track, say economists.
More importantly, the nation's strong domestic fundamentals, coupled with lower tariff exposure compared to peers, may even allow India to turn this challenge into a strategic advantage.
Trump's measures, designed to enforce reciprocal trade terms, also target several major economies, including China, Brazil, Japan, and the European Union.
According to Goldman Sachs, the tariffs could increase the total effective tariff on Indian goods by 19.5 per cent, potentially reducing exports by $15 billion — approximately 0.4 per cent of India's GDP. While this figure may seem concerning at first glance, a deeper analysis reveals a more resilient outlook.
India's trade relationship with the US remains robust, with bilateral trade reaching $124 billion in 2024. Indian exports to the US accounted for $81 billion, while imports stood at $44 billion, resulting in a substantial trade surplus of $37 billion. The US is India's largest export destination, absorbing 18 per cent of total outbound shipments — a sharp rise from just 6.0 per cent in 2006. Given this strong trade foundation, the direct impact of reciprocal tariffs is expected to be limited.
Brokerage firm Motilal Oswal estimates that India's exports in the six most vulnerable sectors constitute only 1.1 per cent of GDP. Even under a worst-case scenario, where exports to the US decline by $3.6 billion (0.1 per cent of GDP), the broader economic repercussions would be marginal, it said.
This assessment is based on a tariff differential of 9.0 per cent and an export elasticity of -0.5, meaning that a 1.0 per cent increase in tariffs could reduce exports by just 0.5 per cent.
India's tariff burden remains significantly lower than that of other key trading nations. Under the new US regime, Indian goods will face a 26 per cent duty — on par with the EU (20 per cent) and Japan (25 per cent) but far below the rates imposed on China (54 per cent), Vietnam (46 per cent), Sri Lanka (44 per cent), and Bangladesh (37 per cent). This discrepancy positions India favourably in the global supply chain, potentially allowing it to attract trade diversion from higher-tariff competitors.
Sujan Hajra, chief economist at Anand Rathi Group, notes that India's economic resilience could turn this trade headwind into an opportunity. 'Even if US exports decline by 10 per cent, the hit to GDP would be limited to around 0.2 per cent,' he explains. 'With lower tariff rates than key peers and a modest impact on exports, India may even gain from supply chain shifts.'
Financial markets have responded optimistically to the developments. The Indian rupee appreciated by 34 paise against the US dollar in early trading following the announcement, buoyed by a weaker greenback and falling crude oil prices. Forex traders attribute this resilience to India's strong macroeconomic fundamentals and the limited direct impact of tariffs.
HSBC's global trade forecast suggests a broader slowdown in export growth — from 2.9 per cent in 2024 to 1.3 per cent in 2025-26 — driven by reduced US import demand and global trade uncertainty. However, India's domestic consumption and investment-driven growth model insulates it from severe external shocks.
The Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO) acknowledges that US tariffs will affect Indian businesses but emphasises that India is better positioned than many competitors. 'We are in a lower tariff band compared to China, Vietnam, and others,' says Ajay Sahai, director-general of FIEO. 'While there will be an impact, we remain relatively well-placed.'
President Trump's remarks during his recent address highlighted India's historically high tariffs on American goods, which he claimed reached 56 per cent. In response, the US imposed a discounted reciprocal tariff of 26 per cent on Indian imports. Despite these tensions, India's long-term economic prospects remain strong.
Economist argue that while the new US tariffs introduce short-term uncertainties, India's economic fundamentals — strong domestic demand, a competitive export sector, and lower tariff exposure than peers — suggest minimal disruption. The IMF's January 2024 World Economic Outlook reaffirms India's status as the fastest-growing major economy, with projections indicating it could soon become the world's third-largest economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
31 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
EU, Britain reach post-Brexit deal on Gibraltar Border
12 June 2025 00:14 BRUSSELS (WAM)The European Union (EU) and Britain have agreed on the status of the overseas territory of Gibraltar, facilitating border crossings and resolving years of political territory has had its border arrangements with Spain as a significant point of contention since the United Kingdom's decision to withdraw from the EU in Wednesday's agreement, arrivals at Gibraltar Airport will present their passports to both Gibraltarian and Spanish border British Foreign Office stated that this system mirrors the model used by French police at London's St. Pancras station, the terminus for the Eurostar service connecting Britain with mainland Europe. "We have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again," British Foreign Minister David Lammy said.


Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Tariffs seen lifting underlying US consumer prices in May
US consumer prices likely increased moderately in May amid relatively cheaper gasoline, but the Trump administration's import tariffs probably started filtering through to other goods, potentially raising underlying inflation pressures. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) report from the labour Department on Wednesday could show the CPI less the volatile food and energy components rising by the most in four months. Economists said the increase in the so-called core CPI would be attributable to higher prices from President Donald Trump's sweeping import duties. May would mark the start of tariff-related high inflation readings that could last through year end, they said. Walmart last month said it would begin raising prices in late May and June. Economists said inflation has been slow to respond to tariffs as most retailers were selling merchandise accumulated before the duties took effect. 'Retailers showed remarkable restraint in April,' said Stephen Stanley, chief US economist at Santander US Capital Markets. 'May should bring the leading edge of price increases, with the maximum impact coming in June and July.' The CPI likely increased 0.2 per cent last month after advancing by the same margin in April, a Reuters survey of economists showed. Gasoline prices were mostly lower in May as concerns over global economic growth curbed crude oil prices. In the 12-months through May, the CPI was forecast increasing 2.5 per cent after rising 2.3 per cent in April. Some of the rise in the year-on-year CPI would reflect last year's low readings dropping out of the calculation. Core CPI is forecast to have climbed 0.3 per cent, which would be the biggest gain since January, after rising 0.2 per cent in April. In the 12 months through May, core CPI inflation is estimated to have increased 2.9 per cent after rising 2.8 per cent in April. The Federal Reserve tracks different inflation measures for its 2 per cent target. The US central bank is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25 per cent-4.50 per cent range next Wednesday while policymakers monitor the economic impact of the tariffs. The CPI data will come under close scrutiny in the months ahead after the Bureau of labour Statistics, the labour Department's agency that compiles the report and other economic releases including the closely watched employment report, announced last week the suspension of CPI data collection in three cities because of resource constraints. The BLS like all government agencies has been severely affected by mass firings, voluntary resignations, early retirements and hiring freezes, which are part of an unprecedented campaign by the White House to drastically reduce the size of government and remake it. The BLS has also announced that it would, effective with the release of the July Producer Price Index data in August, end the calculation and publication of about 350 indexes. That would include data from PPI industry, commodity, final demand-intermediate demand and special index classifications. Economists said that the BLS had with the CPI data reported a rise in the share of categories for which prices were calculated using a method called different cell imputation, which some viewed as less accurate. The BLS said on Tuesday its published data met rigorous standards, but did not address staffing issues. 'Data quality is evaluated through measures of variance, bias studies, and assessments of survey methods,' the agency said in a statement to Reuters. 'BLS continues to evaluate data quality.' A former BLS commissioner told Reuters that staff levels were considerably low at the agency. 'I understand that BLS staffing is down by at least 15% now, that's not reflected in any official numbers yet, because many of them are still being paid,' said Erica Groshen. 'They are not at work and it is impinging on the agencies. Also the hiring freeze means that they can't be replaced.' Groshen said the CPI report remained reliable, noting an increased shift towards electronic collection of data. 'At a national level, the standard errors aren't really affected very much, and the reliability is still good, but it's really disaggregated at the granular level, where you're starting to see some real losses,' she said. 'It's just not aiding publication standards, and so they're not putting it out, but they can still use it as input to the national numbers.' Other economists agreed, noting that the collection suspension only affected a small area. 'I don't see that as being a deal breaker,' said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College. 'The problem would be, if they start to have to suppress more of them or drop them out of the survey, then that could be more problematic.' Reuters


Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Ukraine Eyes Crypto Inclusion in National Reserves
Kyiv's parliament has introduced draft Bill 13356, empowering the National Bank of Ukraine to incorporate virtual assets—primarily Bitcoin—into its official gold and foreign-exchange reserves. The legislation would not compel the central bank to adopt such assets, but merely grant it the legal framework to do so. Lead author Yaroslav Zheleznyak, first deputy chair of the Rada's Finance Committee, highlighted that the bank would retain full discretion over timing, volume, and methodology of any crypto acquisitions. He described the measure as a pivotal move to 'integrate Ukraine into global financial innovations' and bolster macroeconomic resilience while catalysing the digital economy. Ukraine currently holds approximately 46,351 BTC—valued at over $5 billion—though these holdings originate from asset seizures, donations, and fundraising during wartime, and remain under civil-servant control rather than central-bank custody. If passed, the law would permit the bank to transition some of those coins into officially recognised reserves. ADVERTISEMENT The proposal mirrors a broader trend: several nations are charting similar initiatives. The United States launched a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under an executive order issued on 6 March by former President Trump, consolidating government‑owned cryptos into a national asset. Pakistan, Brazil and the Czech Republic are exploring mechanisms to incorporate digital assets into sovereign financial systems. El Salvador, which adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021, holds over 6,000 BTC, while Bhutan maintains mining‑powered reserves worth around $750 million. Yet the move is not without detractors. Critics emphasise Bitcoin's volatility, liquidity constraints and concentration within corporate entities like MicroStrategy, which undermine its suitability as a stable reserve asset. The Swiss National Bank's governor, Martin Schlegel, reaffirmed this stance on 25 April in Bern, warning that crypto lacks the stability and liquidity required for central‑bank reserve portfolios. ECB President Christine Lagarde has echoed similar concerns, stating that digital assets do not meet the criteria for eurozone reserve holdings. Proponents argue that strategic inclusion could buffer Ukraine against inflation and currency devaluation, offering rapid, secure transferability unmatched by physical assets. Zheleznyak's Telegram statement emphasised that implementation would be fully at the central bank's professional discretion. Operationalising the proposal will require establishing robust legal and procedural frameworks: anti‑money‑laundering protocols, cybersecurity safeguards, digital custody infrastructure, and accounting mechanisms. Banking analysts suggest that careful integration and risk management will be essential to balance innovation with financial stability. Ukraine's draft arrives amid growing global debate on digital money. Central bank digital currencies are being piloted worldwide, such as Turkey's digital lira, China's e‑renminbi, and Nigeria's e‑Naira. Meanwhile, debates continue over whether public‑sector balance sheets should venture into decentralised finance or maintain traditional gold‑forex portfolios. As parliamentarians prepare to debate Bill 13356, attention will turn to amendments that might specify asset types, risk parameters, and accounting standards—or narrow discretionary power for the central bank. The legislation must also align with IMF frameworks and comply with anti‑money‑laundering regulations.