Western Province rugby has a new president and he's all about integrity
Kevin Kiewitz has been elected president of the WPRFU. Picture: Mark Ward/Gallo Images
Kevin Kiewitz was elected president of the Western Province Rugby Football Union (WPRFU) on Wednesday evening, securing 54% of the vote.
Upon his victory, he said he hopes to promote integrity and restore the union's reputation.
Moneeb Levy has taken up the position of deputy president with 63%, while Shamila Sulayman is the new vice-president, having received 57% of the vote.
The eight additional executive committee members are Achmat Jacobs, Andre Kermis, Anton Schelhase, Francois Bonthuys, Bulelani Mlakalaka, Siyabonga Hani, Ruben Machelm, and Riaaz Khan.
The lead-up to the elections was overshadowed by controversy around former WPRFU president Zelt Marais.
Controversy in the elections
Marais had been nominated for four positions: president, deputy president, vice-president, and executive committee member.
However, the South African Rugby Union (Saru) confirmed that an independent appeal panel had upheld a disciplinary sanction against him for misconduct.
These sanctions were derived from 'various statements made in communications to SA Rugby members and in public forums in 2022 and 2024'. These had brought the game into disrepute and spread misinformation, leading to a 10-year ban from any position in rugby and a suspended R50,000 fine.
Marais attempted to enter the premises and contest the election 'under protest', Rugby365 reported, but was blocked by security personnel.
His name was also removed from the ballot.
Kevin Kiewitz hopes to restore the WP brand
The union's new president is an attorney by profession. He previously served on the union's executive committee. There, he was instrumental in significant initiatives such as the sale of Newlands Stadium and the Red Disa equity deal. He resigned from his executive role in 2020, citing concerns over leadership decisions that he felt did not serve the game's best interests.
'For me, it's corporate governance, and leadership with integrity becomes important,' Kiewitz told SA Rugby magazine. 'Most importantly, you need to surround yourself with knowledgeable people… people with skills and that can contribute.
'We have this opportunity now to rectify this, and what excites me is to be a part of the solution… With leadership and integrity back at the table, we can rebuild and restore the Western Province brand.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
UFC Rankings: Dricus Du Plessis DROPS to lowest, Khamzat soars!
The latest UFC men's pound-for-pound rankings are out. Dricus has plummeted after his first loss. The official UFC men's pound-for-pound ranking has been updated following du Plessis title loss to Khamzat Chimaev at UFC 319. So, du Plessis has dropped to his lowest ranking. Meanwhile, Khamzat is the biggest climber. 1 Ilia Topuria 2 Islam Makhachev 3 Merab Dvalishvili 4 Khamzat Chimaev Rank increased by 10 5 Alexandre Pantoja Rank decreased by 1 6 Alexander Volkanovski 7 Magomed Ankalaev 8 Jack Della Maddalena 9 Tom Aspinall 10 Alex Pereira 11 Dricus Du Plessis Rank decreased by 7 12 Max Holloway Rank decreased by 1 13 Belal Muhammad Rank decreased by 1 14 Arman Tsarukyan Rank decreased by 1 15 Shavkat Rakhmonov NR So, du Plessis has dropped SEVEN places after losing the first fight of his UFC career against Chimaev. He fell from FOURTH position to 11th . Furthermore, Chimaev has soared since conquering dricus and becoming the new UFC middleweight champion at UFC 319. He has risen 10 spots up and now sits FOURTH in the latest men's pound-for-pound rankings. Please Note: The UFC's pound-for-pound rankings includes fighters from all weight classes. This does not mean that they are able to face each other as fighters compete within their respective weight classes. Dricus made over R50 million despite losing one of the most one-sided title bouts in UFC history. 'Just for stepping into the ring at UFC 319 at the United Centre in Chicago, Stillknocks walked away with a cool $3 million – over R52 million,' IOL reported. So, it is a bitter-sweet pill for du Plessis to swallow. He lost his middleweight championship and was defeated for the first time in his UFC career. However, he still made over R52 million just for stepping into the ring and showing up. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
MVC warns of greater secrecy following Ramaphosa's doubling of political donation limits
My Vote Counts warns that doubling political donation limits will increase secrecy, weaken democracy, and allow wealthy donors greater influence over South African politics, calling for transparency and accountability. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newpapers Advocacy NGO My Vote Counts (MVC) argues that President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent proclamation to double the disclosure threshold and annual donation limit in the Political Funding Act (PFA) will increase secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to unduly influence South Africa's politics. The proclamation, published on Monday, 18 August in the Government Gazette, raises the annual donation limit from R15 million to R30 million and increases the disclosure threshold from R100,000 to R200,000. MVC warned these changes 'will deepen secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to influence our politics and for corruption to occur.' While recognising the importance of funding for political parties in a democracy, MVC emphasised the need to balance adequate funding with transparency and safeguards against undue influence. The NGO said the decision to increase the limits 'does not strike such a balance' and called it 'a politically expedient power grab that diminishes our ability to exercise constitutional rights, namely, our political rights (section 19) and our right of access to information (section 32).' By doubling the disclosure threshold, MVC said, 'the details of all donations under R200,000 will not be known to the public. This is an enormous sum for most South Africans and donations of such amounts should be made public knowledge to facilitate scrutiny of parties' relationships with donors and ensure that donors are not receiving anything in return.' The State, MVC added, 'has never provided a legitimate reason why all donations should not be disclosed to the public.' Drawing from four years of disclosure data, MVC revealed 'a handful of wealthy individuals dominate our private political funding landscape.' ''Doubling the amount a donor can donate to a party in a year to R30m will give donors an even greater ability to have an outsized influence on our political system. It will also make parties more susceptible to undue influence. And because the law does not regulate donations from related parties through the different legal entities they control, wealthy donors can now have an even more significant impact.'' The NGO also criticised the law for failing to regulate donations from related parties through different legal entities, allowing wealthy donors to multiply their impact. MVC had hoped Parliament would use the opportunity to review the limits based on context-specific evidence. ''When the opportunity arose, My Vote Counts (MVC) was hopeful that Parliament would remedy the limits to make them fit for the South African context. This is an issue that MVC has long argued – that the original limits adopted in 2021 were not only too high, but had been adopted without due regard to empirical evidence and were therefore irrational and unlawful.'' However, MVC criticised Parliament for ignoring this research. 'Instead of taking the time to do the actual work of developing limits that are fit for South Africa,' the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs and the National Assembly 'decided to reject and ignore the research,' basing amendments on flawed original limits. Led by the ANC, MVC said most political parties favored 'less oversight and fewer restrictions on donations from wealthy donors, regardless of the consequences for democracy, and for transparency and accountability.' MVC said it is currently challenging the constitutionality of the PFA in the Western Cape High Court. The case argues that the original limits were 'irrational and unlawful' due to lack of empirical basis, and challenges the President's power to set the limits, which 'places too much power in a conflicted officeholder.' MVC noted that a judgment is pending, and a successful ruling could set aside the new amendments retrospectively. MVC called the recent proclamation 'a setback for our democracy' but vowed to continue advocating and litigating to ensure the PFA 'is constitutional and upholds the principles of transparency and accountability.' The NGO said they will also request the President to release 'the reasons and full record of factors that were considered as he applied his mind to this matter.' 'We cannot allow those in power to jeopardise our democracy and water down constitutionally protected rights for their narrow, self-serving interests,' said MVC. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
Financial crisis grips Merafong as COGTA committee raises alarm
The Gauteng Provincial Legislature's Portfolio Committee on Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA) has expressed serious concerns about the financial viability and governance of the Merafong City Local Municipality. A meeting held on August 19 revealed a municipality in crisis, with residents bearing the brunt of widespread service failures. The committee highlighted a number of critical issues: Service delivery failures: Residents of towns like Welverdiend have suffered from month-long electricity outages due to faulty transformers. The municipality's R1.4 billion debt to Rand Water has led to compromised water supply, with only 80% of service restored even after a R50 million payment. Infrastructure decay: The infrastructure in the Carletonville CBD continues to decline, and the municipality's own assessment shows it only achieved 34% of its service delivery targets in the past financial year. Non-compliance with directives: The committee noted that the municipality has failed to implement directives from the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). These directives, issued on April 1, 2025, included providing structured support, submitting monthly progress reports, and conducting forensic investigations into questionable procurement and appointments. The committee is particularly concerned that these issues have not yet been brought before the full Council. Questionable appointment: The committee also raised concerns about the appointment of a Deputy Chief Financial Officer in April 2024. The position does not align with the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA), and the committee will seek legal clarity from the MEC for CoGTA. Committee Chairperson, Hon. Mzi Khumalo, acknowledged that while Merafong faces significant challenges, there has been some progress in financial reporting and audit processes. He emphasized, however, that sustained recovery requires firm leadership, improved revenue collection, and stronger accountability. The committee has committed to rigorous oversight of the municipality's 10-point turnaround strategy and called on both the Department and the municipality to urgently comply with the NCOP's directives to address service delivery and governance failures.
