
Austria trials DNA testing to uncover honey fraud
With fake honey flooding markets, and only a few European laboratories running such analysis, the small Austrian company Sinsoma began offering the tests two years ago.
'It is really something new for the honey market,' said Corinna Wallinger, head of sales at Sinsoma.
It is essential that technology 'always moves forward—just as the counterfeiters' do, she added.
Honey cannot have ingredients such as water or inexpensive sugar syrups—which might boost its volume—added to it, according to EU legislation.
But tests have shown that is common practice.
Between 2021 and 2022, 46 percent of the honey tested under an EU investigation as it entered the bloc was flagged as potentially adulterated, up from 14 percent in the 2015-17 period.
Of the suspicious consignments, 74 percent were of Chinese origin.
Beekeepers' livelihoods threatened
Seeking to better detect fraud, Austria's health and food safety agency (AGES) used DNA testing for the first time this year and is still evaluating the results.
European supermarket chain SPAR also ordered DNA tests for its honey.
The chain put its honeys—taken off the shelves late last year in Austria for testing—back after they passed DNA tests and another analysis.
Besides cheating consumers, fake honey threatens the livelihood of beekeepers, who struggle to compete with the far lower prices of imported honey—often blended from various countries—and are demanding more effective testing.
'We don't have a chance at all,' said Matthias Kopetzky, owner of the Wiener Bezirksimkerei, which takes care of up to 350 hives in Vienna, as bees buzzed around him on a meadow overlooking the capital.
While the European Union is the world's top honey producer after China, it is also the second-biggest importer after the United States.
Most of the bloc's honey imports come from Ukraine, China and Argentina, according to EU data.
An EU directive adopted last year stipulates that honey labels from mid-2026 must detail the countries of origin, as opposed to merely referencing a 'blend of EU and non-EU honeys'.
Beekeepers like Kopetzky hope the new rule will raise consumer awareness.
Brussels also set up a group of experts, with a mandate until 2028, to 'harmonise methods to detect adulteration in honey and trace the product back to the harvesting producer or importer'.
Rigorous process
Austria's Sinsoma has specialised in DNA testing.
'Honey is full of DNA traces, of information from the environment where bees collected the nectar. Every honey has a unique DNA profile,' Wallinger said.
When a honey sample lacks a wide range of DNA traces or for example contains a high proportion of DNA traces from rice or corn—which bees do not frequent—this indicates a honey is not genuine, she added.
Co-founded by Wallinger in 2018, Sinsoma now employs about a dozen people working in the small laboratory room and adjacent open office space in the quiet town of Voels near Innsbruck.
Sinsoma charges beekeepers €94 (RM466.7) for a basic DNA test targeting plants—about half of what a classic pollen test would normally cost, she said.
For the DNA profile, beekeepers also get a QR code which allows consumers to see exactly which plant species the bees making the honey have frequented, she said.
Experts warn the DNA method can detect certain types of fraud but not all, and that a rigorous process of validation is required to ensure trustworthy results.
Wallinger recognised the need for standardisation of the methods but said this will take time.
'It is always somewhat of an issue—and this is also the case at the EU level,' she said.
'If you always wait until you can use a standardised method to uncover a fake honey, then you will always be lagging behind what counterfeiters are doing.' — AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Barnama
15 minutes ago
- Barnama
Court Orders Foreign Student To Undergo Psychiatric Examination
KAJANG, Aug 20 (Bernama) -- A university student charged with eight counts of attempted murder and causing injury to seven victims has been ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation for a month starting today. Sessions Court Judge Normastura Ayub and Magistrate Fatin Dayana Jalil ruled this after allowing the application by Deputy Public Prosecutors Faelly Jeffrey Lanjungan and Siti Nur Alia Safri, who said the accused, Chinese national Liu Ting, 24, appeared confused and did not understand the charges read out. The court did not allow the accused to be granted bail and ordered the woman to be sent to Hospital Bahagia Ulu Kinta, Tanjung Rambutan in Perak for psychiatric examination, in addition to setting the case mention for Sept 19. Previously, Faelly did not offer bail because the charges against the accused were serious and non-bailable, and also requested that the accused be sent to Hospital Bahagia for psychiatric evaluation. 'As the charges were read, the accused appeared confused and as if she did not understand the charges. Therefore, we request that the accused receive psychiatric treatment at Hospital Bahagia," she said. In the Sessions Court, Liu pled not guilty to three charges: with intent to murder two men, aged 19 and 21, and causing injury to a 35-year-old woman, and if the accused had caused death, she would be guilty of murder. The charge is under Section 307 of the Penal Code, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison and a fine. If the act causes injury to any person, the offender will be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years in prison if convicted. For the other two charges, she also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to a 60-year-old woman by slashing her right arm with a knife, a weapon that could cause death if used improperly, and stabbing a 27-year-old man in the stomach with a knife. Both charges were filed under Section 326 of the Penal Code, which provides for a prison sentence of up to 20 years and a fine or whipping, if convicted.


New Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Stabbed foreign university student mulls action against university
KUALA LUMPUR: A Chinese student who was allegedly stabbed in the neck with a knife by her ex-boyfriend at a private university in July is considering filing a civil suit against the institution. Lawyers for 20-year-old Wu Jialin, who suffered a serious neck injury, said they are in the midst of finalising the defendants to the suit. "Wu's parents are considering legal action against the university's management over alleged negligence in ensuring student safety," the legal team told the New Straits Times. Meanwhile, the team said Wu was last week discharged from the Universiti Malaya Medical Centre in Petaling Jaya where she had been receiving treatment since the incident. "She is currently undergoing a recovery treatment for the physical and mental injuries sufferred due to the incident. "The road to recovery remains long and challenging." The whereabouts of Wu are kept private for safety purposes. Lawyers Muhamad Saifullah Muhamad Azmi, Chew Sin Yee, Mohd Safwan Saleh, and M. Partiben have been holding a watching brief for Wu at court proceedings. Wu is at risk of permanent disability after she sustained a deep, 10cm wound to her neck, requiring over 40 stitches allegedly inflicted by her ex-boyfriend, You Wei, also 21 and from China. You claimed trial to at the Shah Alam Sessions Court to a charge of causing grievous hurt against Wu with a dangerous weapon which could have caused her death at 6.30pm at a university on July 14. The charge, under Section 326 of the Penal Code, carries a maximum jail term of 20 years and a fine or whipping upon conviction. The case before judge Norazlin Othman is set for mention on Sept 17. You's lawyer, Revin Kumar, had said his client is a third-year student at the university and that he has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and is receiving treatment at a private clinic. Wu was reportedly involved in a confrontation when You allegedly stabbed her in the neck with a knife. Viral videos of the incident show university students rushing to assist her, attempting to stop the bleeding from her neck, while several male students restrained the suspect.


Focus Malaysia
3 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Malaysians fume China national get lenient sentence over assault on female immigration officer
WRONG is wrong. Break the law and you will get your comeuppance. That's precisely what happened when a mainland China woman pleaded guilty to causing harm to an immigration officer at KLIA Terminal 1 on Aug 14. The assailant identified as Fang Fuyan, had grabbed hold of the officer's headscarf and shoved it into a post. The altercation occurred over a misunderstanding pertaining to the visitor's prior entry records into Malaysia which required further checks. It was reported by BFM News (@NewsBFM) on X that the Sepang Magistrate's Court had slapped Fang with a RM2,000 fine and a month behind bars. A 31-year-old Chinese national pleaded guilty to injuring an immigration officer at KLIA last Thursday (Aug 14). The Sepang Magistrate's Court sentenced Fang Fuyuan to one month in jail and a RM2,000 fine. 🧵1 — BFM News (@NewsBFM) August 18, 2025 The post has already generated 517.7K views with many commenters expressing shock, horror and outrage that the tourist got away with a perceived light sentence. One commenter even suggested blacklisting not just the assailant but her entire family. One commenter made it ultra clear that he thought that the sentence was too lenient. The fine was also ridiculed for being chump change and thus ineffective as a deterrent. A few also opined that it was a waste of resources to jail the offender when it was better to just deport immediately. It was also surmised that if the offence had been committed by a local citizen, there would have been hell to pay, with even the pet cat's name exposed on social media. This commenter observed that not only the face of the assailant was pixelated but the sentence seemed rather light. While many citizens decried the seemingly lenient punishment meted out, the reality of the situation is rather more complicated. There is no doubt that the Visit Malaysia 2026 campaign is in the minds of the powers-that-be. Mainland Chinese represents a huge demographic with seven million targeted arrivals for next year's tourism extravaganza. It is obvious Malaysia needs to strike a balance between portraying itself as a safe, law-abiding country and a welcoming tourist destination. Lest it be forgotten that there will obviously several versions of the encounter that will flood social media, particularly in China. The authorities need to ensure the country's image and good name is not besmirched with allegations of impropriety or even rudeness from the immigration staff. A lot of effort has been made to woo visitors from China and the hospitality industry is dependent on them making the trek to Malaysia. This includes the 30-day visa-free entry for tourism purposes but this should NOT include the law being bent to suit the needs of visiting tourists, regardless of their numbers. One commenter simply declared that if you break the law, then you must face the consequences. – Aug 20, 2025