
Austria trials DNA testing to uncover honey fraud
VOELS (Austria), April 27 — At a laboratory in Austria's mountainous Tyrol province, scientists are DNA testing about 100 honey samples a month to learn about their composition—and in some cases to determine whether they have been adulterated.
With fake honey flooding markets, and only a few European laboratories running such analysis, the small Austrian company Sinsoma began offering the tests two years ago.
'It is really something new for the honey market,' said Corinna Wallinger, head of sales at Sinsoma.
It is essential that technology 'always moves forward—just as the counterfeiters' do, she added.
Honey cannot have ingredients such as water or inexpensive sugar syrups—which might boost its volume—added to it, according to EU legislation.
But tests have shown that is common practice.
Between 2021 and 2022, 46 percent of the honey tested under an EU investigation as it entered the bloc was flagged as potentially adulterated, up from 14 percent in the 2015-17 period.
Of the suspicious consignments, 74 percent were of Chinese origin.
Beekeepers' livelihoods threatened
Seeking to better detect fraud, Austria's health and food safety agency (AGES) used DNA testing for the first time this year and is still evaluating the results.
European supermarket chain SPAR also ordered DNA tests for its honey.
The chain put its honeys—taken off the shelves late last year in Austria for testing—back after they passed DNA tests and another analysis.
Besides cheating consumers, fake honey threatens the livelihood of beekeepers, who struggle to compete with the far lower prices of imported honey—often blended from various countries—and are demanding more effective testing.
'We don't have a chance at all,' said Matthias Kopetzky, owner of the Wiener Bezirksimkerei, which takes care of up to 350 hives in Vienna, as bees buzzed around him on a meadow overlooking the capital.
While the European Union is the world's top honey producer after China, it is also the second-biggest importer after the United States.
Most of the bloc's honey imports come from Ukraine, China and Argentina, according to EU data.
An EU directive adopted last year stipulates that honey labels from mid-2026 must detail the countries of origin, as opposed to merely referencing a 'blend of EU and non-EU honeys'.
Beekeepers like Kopetzky hope the new rule will raise consumer awareness.
Brussels also set up a group of experts, with a mandate until 2028, to 'harmonise methods to detect adulteration in honey and trace the product back to the harvesting producer or importer'.
Rigorous process
Austria's Sinsoma has specialised in DNA testing.
'Honey is full of DNA traces, of information from the environment where bees collected the nectar. Every honey has a unique DNA profile,' Wallinger said.
When a honey sample lacks a wide range of DNA traces or for example contains a high proportion of DNA traces from rice or corn—which bees do not frequent—this indicates a honey is not genuine, she added.
Co-founded by Wallinger in 2018, Sinsoma now employs about a dozen people working in the small laboratory room and adjacent open office space in the quiet town of Voels near Innsbruck.
Sinsoma charges beekeepers €94 (RM466.7) for a basic DNA test targeting plants—about half of what a classic pollen test would normally cost, she said.
For the DNA profile, beekeepers also get a QR code which allows consumers to see exactly which plant species the bees making the honey have frequented, she said.
Experts warn the DNA method can detect certain types of fraud but not all, and that a rigorous process of validation is required to ensure trustworthy results.
Wallinger recognised the need for standardisation of the methods but said this will take time.
'It is always somewhat of an issue—and this is also the case at the EU level,' she said.
'If you always wait until you can use a standardised method to uncover a fake honey, then you will always be lagging behind what counterfeiters are doing.' — AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Sisters' Aidiladha shopping trip derailed by expired road tax
Compiled by SHERIDAN MAHAVERA and BEH YUEN HUI The Hari Raya Aidiladha celebration for two sisters was dashed when their motorcycle was abruptly seized by the authorities while they were on their way to buy headscarves, reported Harian Metro. The siblings, aged 18 and 22, were travelling from Chempaka to the Wakaf Che Yeh bazaar in Kota Baru when they were stopped at a road block mounted by the Road Transport Department (JPJ) in a special festive operation. Upon checking, the motorcycle's road tax was found to have expired in 2023. According to the elder girl, they did not realise that the road tax had expired as they rarely used the motorcycle. 'I have been working in Kuala Lumpur for a while now and my sister, who owns the bike, also works outside Kelantan. We did not realise that the road tax had expired,' the report quoted her as saying. She said she got back to her village on Thursday morning and rode with her sister to town to buy new tudung for Aidiladha. > It will be a solemn Aidiladha for three families in Kedah who lost their young sons in motorcycle crashes near Alor Setar on Thursday, the daily also reported. Three TVET students, all aged 19, were riding their motorcycles with another friend to their respective hometowns in the state when the accident occurred at KM49.4 of the North-South Expressway. Muhammad Habil Mohd Sobri, Muhammad Fahmi Jamel and Muhammad Arif Aifan Derani were on their way home to Gurun, Jeniang and Bukit Selambau, respectively. The above articles are compiled from the vernacular newspapers (Bahasa Malaysia, Chinese and Tamil dailies). As such, stories are grouped according to the respective language/medium. Where a paragraph begins with a, it denotes a separate news item.


The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Four charged over suspected involvement in ‘blessing' scams
A gold necklace, S$1,311 in cash and 10,050 yuan (S$1,800) were seized. - SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE SINGAPORE: Three women and a man have been charged in court over allegedly cheating victims of cash and gold in 'blessing' scams. Chinese nationals Zhong Weifeng, 58, Huang Ximing, 61, Huang Meiling, 56, and Huang Qinyan, 47, were charged with conspiracy to cheat on Friday (June 6). On June 2, Zhong and Huang Meiling approached one of the victims and led her to Huang Qinyan, who claimed to be a Chinese physician. The victim was told she was experiencing misfortune due to 'negative spiritual elements', the police said on June 6. To ward off misfortune, the woman was said to have handed $700 in cash and a gold necklace to Huang Qinyan, who placed the items in a plastic bag. Huang Qinyan performed a 'cleansing ritual' on the valuables, and the victim was told to keep the plastic bag, untouched, under her bed for a month. The woman checked the bag the next day and found that her valuables had been replaced with leaves. On June 4, the police received a report of another scam with a similar modus operandi. According to the police, the second victim was approached by two of the accused and convinced to place an envelope with cash into a black rubbish bag for safekeeping. She later discovered that her money had gone missing. Police investigations found that Huang Ximing was working together with the three women to cheat the victims. All four were arrested on June 5. A gold necklace, $1,311 in cash and 10,050 yuan (S$1,800) were seized. If convicted of conspiracy to cheat, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined. - The Straits Times/ANN


Focus Malaysia
14 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Landlord locks house with tenant's car, belongings over unpaid rent; is this legal in Malaysia?
'SAYA mau tengok wang saja.' (literally, 'Just show me the money'). It is surely not easy to be a strict houseowner; just ask this landlady who was forced to take drastic action over unpaid arrears in rental. In a video shared on X by Tony Montana (@Brohascomeback), a tenant was purportedly locked out of his rented premises and was trying to gain access by removing the locks. It was then that he (and the movers) were rudely greeted by a rather loud and irate woman believed to be the landlady. Obviously at the end of her tether, she simply exclaimed that the tenant can remove his belongings AFTER he has settled the arrears. Owner rumah cina tahan kereta dan barang sbb lambat keluar rumah setelah tamat penyewaan. 🤔 — Tony Montana 🦀 (@Brohascomeback) May 27, 2025 The post has already generated over 533.2K views at time of publication with netizens divided over the actions of the landlady. One commenter contended that landlords need to be cold and stone-hearted lest they be taken for a ride by unscrupulous tenants. If one is unable to pay rent, 'just go live by a cemetery or under a bridge' was his advice. Another netizen observed that it appears many netizens sided with the tenant simply because the landlady was a 'Type C' (slang for Chinese). Putting aside racial issues, is the landlady's action legal? It was argued that the landlady was well within her rights to lock the premises given the landlord's rights over the non-payment of rent would have been clearly spelt out in the tenancy agreement More than a few highlighted that the landlady had no right to take such action. One warned that the landlady could be spending time behind bars should the tenant make a police report. In Malaysia, landlords cannot legally lock up a rented property and seize a tenant's belongings if rent is unpaid without a court order or warrant. What remedies are available to the landlord? Under the Distress Act 1951, a landlord can apply to the court for a Writ of Distress (or Distress Action) to seize the tenant's removable property to recover unpaid rent. The seized property can then be sold to cover the rental arrears. Landlords are generally prohibited from using self-help methods like changing locks or shutting off utilities to evict a tenant or recover the property. The Specific Relief Act 1950 requires landlords to obtain a court order to evict a tenant and recover possession of the property. A landlord who illegally locks a tenant out or seizes their belongings without due process may face legal action from the tenant, potentially for trespassing or wrongful eviction. The law is clear on this. While it may be time-consuming and tedious, it cannot be side-stepped even if 'it does have a soft spot for the tenant compared to the landlord'. Such disputes are common and it must be incredibly frustrating. Apart from demanding larger deposit amount or carefully screening potential tenants, there is little landlords can do to avoid such pitfalls. Dealing with such tenants may be stress-inducing but that doesn't justify the landlady taking matters into her own hands. The law is crystal clear on that. – June 5, 2025