Keir Starmer's approval among Scots at an all-time low
The internal party split over welfare reforms has left Labour MPs in despair at the standard of political leadership from 10 Downing Street.
A new poll by Ipsos, in partnership with STV News, shows 64% of Scots are dissatisfied with Starmer's performance as Prime Minister.
READ MORE:
Ipsos interviewed a representative sample of 1,066 adults between June 12 and June 18 – before the peak of the welfare cuts row and ahead of the Prime Minister's U-turn.
The Scottish Political Monitor reveals Starmer's approval ratings have 'fallen markedly' compared with a year ago, when his Labour Government won the 2024 general election in a landslide.
Only 22% of the Scottish public are satisfied with the way Starmer is doing his job, giving him a net-satisfaction rating of -42 in Scotland.
Among voters who supported Labour at the 2024 General Election, almost half (49%) say they are dissatisfied.
Starmer's ratings have also fallen behind Nigel Farage's. Some 24% say they are satisfied by the Reform UK leader's performance. Although he remains unpopular among the Scottish public, with 54% of Scots saying they are dissatisfied with him.
'These new results show how dramatically Scotland's political landscape has shifted compared with a year ago,' Emily Gray, managing director of Ipsos in Scotland, said.
'Reform UK have made significant strides in Scotland to become the third largest party in both Westminster and Holyrood voting intentions.
'While neither Nigel Farage nor Keir Starmer are popular amongst the Scottish public at present, Starmer's ratings have now fallen behind Farage's, far from the situation the Prime Minister would want as he marks his first anniversary in Downing Street this week.'
Reform UK is set to receive the third-largest share of the votes at the next Holyrood election, according to the poll.
While the SNP is currently leading on Scottish Parliament voting intentions, with 34% of voters saying they would vote for the party, 14% said they would vote for Nigel Farage's Reform.
The Scottish Political Monitor also reveals a change in fortunes for Labour, who are expected to lose seats but remain the second largest party at Holyrood with 23% of the vote.
'A key question for Labour is whether it will be able to win voter support back ahead of next May's Holyrood elections,' Ms Gray said.
'While the SNP will be pleased that the results show them leading on both Holyrood and Westminster voting intentions, there are also warning signs for the party.
'Their vote share still lags behind what the party achieved at the last Holyrood elections in 2021, and John Swinney's approval ratings are lower than they were a year ago.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Jeremy Corbyn says new party is coming - but stops short of Zarah Sultana claim
It comes after ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana announced last night she was quitting the party to "co-lead" the founding of a new group with the former party leader Jeremy Corbyn says his new political party is on the way - but isn't ready yet. It comes after ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana announced last night she was quitting the party to "co-lead" the founding of a new group with the former party leader. And it follows reports that Mr Corbyn was unhappy with the way Ms Sultana announced the move last night. In a statement on X, Mr Corbyn welcomed Ms Sultana's decision to leave Labour - but stopped short of confirming he was co-leading the party with her. "Real change is coming," he wrote. "One year on from the election, this Labour government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. "Our country needs to change direction, now. "Congratulations to Zara Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. "I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. "The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. Discussions are ongoing - and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. "Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope." Ms Sultana said in her statement that she would "co-lead the founding of a new party" with Corbyn - as well as other Independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country. She also cited a long list of reasons for her exit, including the scrapping of winter fuel payments for pensioners, cuts for disabled people and the two-child benefit cap as well as the UK government being an "active participant" in genocide. In a statement shared to X on Thursday evening, Sultana voiced her frustration with the party, saying "Labour has completely failed to improve people's lives." The 31-year-old wrote in her statement: "Today, after 14 years, I'm resigning from the Labour Party. Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other Independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country." "Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper," she added. "Just 50 families now own more wealth than half the UK population. Poverty is growing, inequality is obscene and the two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises. "A year ago, I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and lift 400,000 children out of poverty. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. Now, the government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much. Meanwhile, a billionaire-backed grifter is leading the polls, because Labour has completely failed to improve people's lives." Sultana, who has repeatedly spoken out against the UK selling arms to Israel, said the British people oppose the genocide in Gaza, and "are not going to take this anymore." She said: "Across the political establishment, from Farage to Starmer, they smear people of conscience trying to stop a genocide in Gaza as terrorists. But the truth is clear: this government is an active participant in genocide. And the British people oppose it. We are not going to take this anymore. "We're not an island of strangers; we're an island that's suffering. We need homes and lives we can actually afford, not rip-off bills we pay every month to a tiny elite bathing in cash. We need our money spent on public services, not forever wars. In 2029, the choice will be stark: socialism or barbarism. "Billionaires already have three parties fighting for them. It's time the rest of us had one." She concluded her statement by encouraging Brits to turn to the new party. "Join us. The time is now," she said.
North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
MPs back move to protect llamas and alpacas from dog attacks
Dog owners already face a fine if their pet attacks or worries farm animals listed in the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953, such as cattle, sheep, pigs and horses. But after a Commons debate, MPs have agreed to add 'camelids' to this list, giving llamas and alpacas in England and Wales similar protections as they have in Scotland. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, which now faces further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date, will also see unlimited fines rolled out in dog attack cases, lifting a £1,000 cap. 'They're no laughing matter, alpacas and llamas,' Labour MP Peter Lamb said. 'The Inca empire never developed the wheel. 'The entirety of that empire was built off the back of alpacas and llamas and, as a result, they are an animal that's worthy of great respect.' Mr Lamb said he had heard of 'pretty harrowing cases of what happened to that livestock' at a centre in Tilgate Park in Crawley, West Sussex, where he was the borough council leader. 'In one case, a sheep was just literally set on fire whilst still alive and while the Bill does not directly deal with that, I think some of the mentality that goes into disrespecting these animals is worthy of note,' he said. 'But what we have done is very often, far more often than that, had dogs set on these animals, or at least, people have not been in control of these. 'And we've eventually had to remove the sheep entirely from the publicly accessible areas on the basis of that.' Conservative MP for Chester South and Eddisbury Aphra Brandreth, who proposed the private member's Bill, told the Commons: 'Livestock worrying, as we know, has devastating consequences for both animals and farmers.' She added: 'The damage of a livestock attack can be horrific, causing brutal injuries which are tragically often fatal. 'There are instances of stress causing pregnant livestock to miscarry, and separation of mothers and young leading to hypothermia or starvation. 'I've seen pictures from farmers in my constituency where attacks have mutilated their calves beyond any hope of keeping them alive. 'The consequences, no matter what the scale of an attack, are profound.' As part of the draft new law, authorities would get the powers to treat attacking livestock as separate to 'worrying', which includes chasing farm animals in a way which could cause injury, suffering or loss or 'diminution in their produce'. The Bill would also expand the 1953 Act's scope, which applies on agricultural land, to roads and paths, where animals might be herded. Labour MP Mike Reader praised Ms Brandreth for her 'responsible and balanced approach'. The Northampton South MP said it was 'positive that this expands that definition to roads and paths, because it sets clear requirements that when someone is accessing land, particularly throughout Northamptonshire where there're so many paths that run through farmland, there's a clear definition in the law to both protect farmers but also to set clear boundaries for those who are perhaps walking their dogs… when they access farmland'. Environment minister Emma Hardy said the Government was 'fully committed to supporting this important Bill as it progresses through the other place', before the Bill cleared the Commons at third reading.
North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Gender critical campaigners demand action from government on toilet access
Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against which went to the Supreme Court, are threatening a lawsuit against Scottish ministers – with the latest letter demanding action by a deadline of next Wednesday. The Supreme Court's ruling in April said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Sex Matters say the government must make a statement that all single-sex facilities on its estate must be interpreted as meaning biological sex. Ministers, including John Swinney, say they accept the judgment and have convened a working group to review their policies, as well as having discussions with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. The campaign group, led by Maya Forstater, sent its first letter before action in June and another was sent to Scottish Government officials on Wednesday. The latest letter gives the government seven days to respond and says: 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.' It notes there are 1,016 toilets across the government's core estate, in a mixture of unisex and separate-sex facilities. The letter calls on the government to make a statement that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'. A Scottish Government's official responded to Sex Matters' previous letter, saying they accept the Supreme Court ruling. The letter, dated June 27, said: 'We are now taking action to implement the ruling. 'This includes the establishment of a short life working group to review existing policies, guidance and legislation which may be impacted by the judgment. 'The work of this group is under way and covers all relevant portfolios across government. 'This work is enabling us towards a state of readiness to take all necessary steps to implement the ruling.' The government has been approached for further comment.
