logo
Ohio leaders at odds about property tax relief in budget

Ohio leaders at odds about property tax relief in budget

Yahooa day ago

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — State lawmakers will be passing a multi-billion-dollar state budget in just a few weeks, but more changes are coming to the spending bill on Tuesday.
Public school teachers said they hope some of the changes are in school funding.
'We're just asking for things to be made fair,' Ironton City Schools physical education teacher Daniel Murphy said.
Murphy said he grew up in a low-income house, went to public school and is now a teacher and president of his local union. Without his public school, he said none of it would have been possible.
'It's a stamp on what public education can truly do when it's given a fair, equal cut of the budget,' Murphy said.
Murphy said that's why budget talks worry him right now, and said it risks cutting programs for students.
'How does that effect funding for meals? How does that directly affect us on how we do our after-school activities,' Murphy said.
Under the proposal, schools do see an increase in funding compared to the past two years, but the 'fair school funding plan' that was created several budget cycles ago is no longer in play.
'If we had done what some call the 'third phase,' it would've been a $1.8 billion increase in school funding, which pretty much would've wiped out other funding we did for daycare, a whole number of other things,' Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima) said.
Instead, schools now see $550 million in the house version of the budget; Huffman called it substantial.
Property tax relief plays into all of this too. Right now, the state budget has a relief plan that works like this: if you live in a school district that carried over more than 30% of its budget from the previous year, your property tax bill will go down. But Republican leadership between chambers is at odds about the proposal.
'The 30% number was based on the fact that prior to this conversation, the school standard was 25% carryover,' Huffman said.
'I think 30% is too low. I think it fails to account for some of the unforeseen circumstances that schools that may have to deal with from a capital perspective,' Ohio Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) said.
The proposal would impact 486 of the state's 600-some school districts. Huffman touts this as likely the largest property tax relief in the state's history, estimated to help Ohioans save $4.2 billion dollars. But will he compromise on the 30%?
'It's not a matter of sort of, 'well how about 70%, how about 50%,' or whatever,' he said. 'It's 'what is the reason that some other number is appropriate,' so I guess I'd have to have that argument as to what would be appropriate.'
McColley said schools need enough money to be ready for unforeseen circumstances, like replacing a boiler or a getting a new roof. But he said he can see that too much stored money is not ideal.
'Acknowledging that if a school is carrying over very large amounts of money, is that really a good thing either? So, we'll see where we end up,' McColley said. 'I don't know that we've reached a final idea as to what we're going to do.'
The Senate is planning to amend the state budget on Tuesday. Once the Senate passes its version of the state budget, the House and Senate will need to come to an agreement by July 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk praises 'competent and good-hearted' ally Jared Isaacman after Trump drops him as nominee to head NASA
Musk praises 'competent and good-hearted' ally Jared Isaacman after Trump drops him as nominee to head NASA

Business Insider

time31 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Musk praises 'competent and good-hearted' ally Jared Isaacman after Trump drops him as nominee to head NASA

Elon Musk has praised his close ally Jared Isaacman after President Donald Trump dropped him as his nominee for NASA administrator on Saturday. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was withdrawing Isaacman's nomination after a "thorough review of prior associations" and that he would soon announced a new, "mission aligned" nominee. News of Trump's decision broke earlier in the day, and Musk was swift to respond. "It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted," he wrote in a post on X. Isaacman, the founder of payments company Shift4, was part of the SpaceX Polaris Dawn crew in 2024 and led the first private space walk. In a social media statement Saturday, Isaacman said he was "incredibly grateful to President Trump" and "all those who supported me throughout this journey." "I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry," he continued, adding: "I have not flown my last mission." Trump had nominated Isaacman in December, calling him an "accomplished business leader" and saying he was "ideally suited to lead NASA" forward. Isaacman's subsequent removal as nominee comes days after Musk said he was stepping back from his role as a "special government employee" in the Trump administration, ending his time with the White House DOGE office. Trump's move appears to have come as a shock to supporters of Isaacman, with some experts questioning what it means for NASA. Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said missing out on Isaacman was "bad news for the agency." "So not having @rookisaacman as boss of NASA is bad news for the agency. Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being NASA head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario," he wrote on X. Montana Republican Senator Tim Sheehy also took to X to air his support for Isaacman, saying he was a "strong choice" to head NASA and that he "strongly" opposed any efforts to "derail his nomination."

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon backs surprising tax change
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon backs surprising tax change

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon backs surprising tax change

Certain political truths have stood the test of time. Republicans' love for tax cuts has been one of those political truths. Modern Republican presidents are responsible for the most significant cuts in history. President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Economic Recovery Act of 1981, which lowered the highest individual tax rate from 70% to 50% and the lowest to 11% from 14%, along with the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which lowered the highest capital gains tax rate from 28% to 20%. Related: Jamie Dimon sends stark warning on the economy President George W. Bush enacted the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts that gave the top 1% of households an average tax cut of over $570,000 between 2004 and 2012, increasing their after-tax income by more than 5% each of those years. President Donald Trump continued that legacy wth the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered the top marginal tax rate from 39.6% to 37% and increased the standard deductions for single and married filers, among other changes. Those provisions are scheduled to expire in December, but the Republican-controlled Senate and House of Representatives are working on legislation making them permanent. JP Morgan (JPM) 's CEO has been smart enough to describe himself as politically agnostic, calling himself "barely a Democrat" and telling CNBC, "My heart is Democratic but my brain is kind of Republican." New comments from Dimon at the Reagan National Economic Forum make it seem that Dimon's brain is also moving over to the Democratic side. Image source:On Friday, Jamie Dimon told the mostly Republican crowd in Washington, D.C., that he supports taxing carried interest, the compensation paid to private investment fund managers. This compensation is taxed at a much lower rate than regular income, giving a significant tax benefit for the lucky few Americans who qualify. According to Reuters, Dimon said, "We absolutely should be taxing carried interest," echoing President Donald Trump's sentiment. Related: Elon Musk has surprising message on Big Beautiful Bill income tax cuts This change, which has received bipartisan support over the years but never came to pass, would severely hurt the bottom line for hedge funds, private equity firms, and similar financial institutions. Even in 2015, Trump said, "The hedge fund guys are getting away with murder," but nothing changed during his presidency. It's estimated that the government loses about $20 billion in annual tax revenue from the rule. Dimon and Trump's stance on this tax loophole may indicate that the country's finances are reaching their tipping point. Despite Moody's recent unprecedented credit downgrade, the White House's latest budget proposal is expected to explode the deficit. More economy American car company takes drastic action in response to tariffsTariff repeal couldn't come at a better time for US businesses Wall Street's TACO trade gains momentum and stock market rally The bill includes a slate of tax cuts, including increases to the Social Security income tax deduction and breaks for tips and overtime, as well as a revamped State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction. According to the Tax Foundation, the bill would increase the country's 10-year budget deficit by $2.6 trillion while reducing federal tax revenue by $4.1 trillion. In essence, it increases spending while taking in less income than the government already does. But the $20 billion from closing the tax loopholes is better than nothing. Related: DOGE cuts are already saving Elon Musk billions The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

GOP Senator Tells Car Crash Town Hall ‘We're All Going to Die'
GOP Senator Tells Car Crash Town Hall ‘We're All Going to Die'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

GOP Senator Tells Car Crash Town Hall ‘We're All Going to Die'

Republican Senator Joni Ernst's meeting with her constituents went off the rails on Friday when she faced angry protests over Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' In one jaw-dropping moment, the senator gave a flippant response, further agitating the crowd when being pressed over the cuts to Medicaid and other benefits like food assistance. While Ernst was talking about who was eligible for benefits, someone in the audience could be heard raising concerns that people would die. 'Well, we all are going to die, so for heaven's sake,' Ernst responded with a smile. A rumble went through the crowd. It was a standout moment as many constituents took issue with the bill passed in the House and now headed to the Senate for cutting Medicaid and other benefits. The fiery town hall in rural Butler County, Iowa, is the latest in a series of Republican events where lawmakers have returned home from Washington to be lambasted by livid constituents. In other vitriolic confrontations at the Iowa meeting, one angry attendee blasted the Trump administration's actions as a 'Nazi blitzkrieg' and another branded Ernst a 'coward.' The Congressional Budget Office estimates millions will lose Medicaid coverage, but Ernst denied the legislation cuts the low-income insurance program and insisted the bill would make it so people who are not eligible would not be receiving benefits. The 'big, beautiful bill' was the priority for many of the attendees who showed up early on a Friday to give the senator an earful, but it was not the only matter that got constituents going. One man, a teacher who said he served in the Navy, told Ernst to her face that Trump is destroying the federal government and claimed the House and Senate had been 'rendered useless.' 'You folks have let it happen. You sat back and done nothing,' he said as the crowd applauded. 'The House is the best example. We're still seeing on the Senate. It looks like there's a little gumption to fight back against the new dictator. But this has been like a Nazi blitzkrieg and you folks have sat back and done nothing.' He then blasted her for voting for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and accused her of being scared. 'Are you afraid of Trump, are you corrupt like Trump, or are you just at the point you don't care anymore, and that's why you don't do anything?' he asked. His question prompted a round of cheers and applause from the crowd. 'Obviously, I don't agree because I don't think our country is being destroyed,' Ernst responded as the crowd grumbled. Another person shouted about squealing as Ernst talked about her focus on government spending. The senator fired back, saying: 'I'm not squealing, ma'am.' At another point, a constituent stood up to ask her about a provision of the House bill that would restrict the federal courts from enforcing contempt orders and warned about it unraveling the government's system of checks and balances. He asked her if she would pledge not to vote for the bill or any other that contains the 'poisonous provision.' Ernst argued that while the House wrote one version of the bill, the Senate would have its own version of the legislation. She claimed that due to Senate rules, their reconciliation bill has to stick to mandatory spending. 'I don't know anything about that provision that talks about mandatory spending or revenues, so a lot of what has been wrapped up into the House bill will be flushed out in what we call the Byrd bath in the Senate,' Ernst said. However, her answer did not satisfy attendees in the auditorium who shouted out follow-up questions. Ernst responded that the provision would not be in the Senate bill. As she tried to move on to the next question, disgruntled constituents loudly disapproved and said they didn't trust it. One woman could be clearly heard as she called the senator a 'coward.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store