logo
Why Cameras Are Popping Up in Eldercare Facilities

Why Cameras Are Popping Up in Eldercare Facilities

Yahoo21-04-2025
The assisted living facility in Edina, Minnesota, where Jean Peters and her siblings moved their mother in 2011, looked lovely. 'But then you start uncovering things,' Peters said.
Her mother, Jackie Hourigan, widowed and developing memory problems at 82, too often was still in bed when her children came to see her midmorning.
'She wasn't being toileted, so her pants would be soaked,' said Peters, 69, a retired nurse-practitioner in Bloomington, Minnesota. 'They didn't give her water. They didn't get her up for meals.' Her mother dwindled to 94 pounds.
Most ominously, Peters said, 'we noticed bruises on her arm that we couldn't account for.' Complaints to administrators — in person, by phone, and by email — brought 'tons of excuses.'
So Peters bought an inexpensive camera at Best Buy. She and her sisters installed it atop the refrigerator in her mother's apartment, worrying that the facility might evict her if the staff noticed it.
Monitoring from an app on their phones, the family saw Hourigan going hours without being changed. They saw and heard an aide loudly berating her and handling her roughly as she helped her dress.
They watched as another aide awakened her for breakfast and left the room even though Hourigan was unable to open the heavy apartment door and go to the dining room. 'It was traumatic to learn that we were right,' Peters said.
After filing a police report and a lawsuit, and after her mother's 2014 death, Peters in 2016 helped found Elder Voice Advocates, which lobbied for a state law permitting cameras in residents' rooms in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. Minnesota passed it in 2019.
Though they remain a contentious subject, cameras in care facilities are gaining ground. By 2020, eight states had joined Minnesota in enacting laws allowing them, according to the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care: Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Washington.
The legislative pace has picked up since, with nine more states enacting laws: Connecticut, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nevada, Ohio, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming. Legislation is pending in several others.
California and Maryland have adopted guidelines, not laws. The state governments in New Jersey and Wisconsin will lend cameras to families concerned about loved ones' safety.
But bills have also gone down to defeat, most recently in Arizona. For the second year, a camera bill passed the House of Representatives overwhelmingly but, in March, failed to get a floor vote in the state Senate.
'My temperature is a little high right now,' said state Rep. Quang Nguyen, a Republican who is the bill's primary sponsor and plans to reintroduce it. He blamed opposition from industry groups, which in Arizona included LeadingAge, which represents nonprofit aging services providers, for the bill's failure to pass.
The American Health Care Association, whose members are mostly for-profit long-term care providers, doesn't take a national position on cameras. But its local affiliate also opposed the bill.
'These people voting no should be called out in public and told, 'You don't care about the elderly population,'' Nguyen said.
A few camera laws cover only nursing homes, but the majority include assisted living facilities. Most mandate that the resident (and roommates, if any) provide written consent. Some call for signs alerting staffers and visitors that their interactions may be recorded.
The laws often prohibit tampering with cameras or retaliating against residents who use them, and include 'some talk about who has access to the footage and whether it can be used in litigation,' added Lori Smetanka, executive director of the National Consumer Voice.
It's unclear how seriously facilities take these laws. Several relatives interviewed for this article reported that administrators told them cameras weren't permitted, then never mentioned the issue again. Cameras placed in the room remained.
Why the legislative surge? During the Covid-19 pandemic, families were locked out of facilities for months, Smetanka pointed out. 'People want eyes on their loved ones.'
Changes in technology probably also contributed, as Americans became more familiar and comfortable with video chatting and virtual assistants. Cameras have become nearly ubiquitous — in public spaces, in workplaces, in police cars and on officers' uniforms, in people's pockets.
A central question remains unanswered: Do cameras bolster the quality of care?
Initially, the push for cameras reflected fears about loved ones' safety. Kari Shaw's family, for instance, had already been victimized by a trusted home care nurse who stole her mother's prescribed pain medications.
So when Shaw, who lives in San Diego, and her sisters moved their mother into assisted living in Maple Grove, Minnesota, they immediately installed a motion-activated camera in her apartment.
Their mother, 91, has severe physical disabilities and uses a wheelchair. 'Why wait for something to happen?' Shaw said.
In particular, 'people with dementia are at high risk,' added Eilon Caspi, a gerontologist and researcher of elder mistreatment. 'And they may not be capable of reporting incidents or recalling details.'
More recently, however, families are using cameras simply to stay in touch.
Anne Swardson, who lives in Virginia and in France, uses an Echo Show, an Alexa-enabled device by Amazon, for video visits with her mother, 96, in memory care in Fort Collins, Colorado. 'She's incapable of touching any buttons, but this screen just comes on,' Swardson said.
Art Siegel and his brothers were struggling to talk to their mother, who, at 101, is in assisted living in Florida; her portable phone frequently died because she forgot to charge it. 'It was worrying,' said Siegel, who lives in San Francisco and had to call the facility and ask the staff to check on her.
Now, with an old-fashioned phone installed next to her favorite chair and a camera trained on the chair, they know when she's available to talk.
As the debate over cameras continues, a central question remains unanswered: Do they bolster the quality of care? 'There's zero research cited to back up these bills,' said Clara Berridge, a gerontologist at the University of Washington studies technology in elder care.
Even when cameras detect problems, they can't substitute for improved care that would prevent them.
'Do cameras actually deter abuse and neglect? Does it cause a facility to change its policies or improve?'
Both camera opponents and supporters cite concerns about residents' privacy and dignity in a setting where they are being helped to wash, dress, and use the bathroom.
'Consider, too, the importance of ensuring privacy during visits related to spiritual, legal, financial, or other personal issues,' Lisa Sanders, a spokesperson for LeadingAge, said in a statement.
Though cameras can be turned off, it's probably impractical to expect residents or a stretched-thin staff to do so.
Moreover, surveillance can treat those staff members as 'suspects who have to be deterred from bad behavior,' Berridge said. She has seen facilities installing cameras in all residents' rooms: 'Everyone is living under surveillance. Is that what we want for our elders and our future selves?'
Ultimately, experts said, even when cameras detect problems, they can't substitute for improved care that would prevent them — an effort that will require engagement from families, better staffing, training and monitoring by facilities, and more active federal and state oversight.
'I think of cameras as a symptom, not a solution,' Berridge said. 'It's a band-aid that can distract from the harder problem of how we provide quality long-term care.'
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF. Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing.
This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
The post Why Cameras Are Popping Up in Eldercare Facilities appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Ultrahuman Ring Air Shamed Me Into Ditching Unhealthy Habits
The Ultrahuman Ring Air Shamed Me Into Ditching Unhealthy Habits

CNET

time2 hours ago

  • CNET

The Ultrahuman Ring Air Shamed Me Into Ditching Unhealthy Habits

This is a little embarrassing to admit as someone who reviews wearables for a living, but the Ultrahuman Ring Air is my first-ever smart ring. I've tested just about every smartwatch and fitness tracker on the market, but never a ring. And honestly, that probably makes me the perfect person to review it -- not as a biohacking pro, but as someone who went into this exactly how most buyers would: curious, slightly skeptical and wondering whether it would make me ditch my smartwatch. Better yet, would it actually improve my habits? Turns out, it did. Not because the data was perfectly accurate (more on that later), but because after over a month of wearing the Ultrahuman Ring Air, the simple act of logging consistently made me more aware of how my daily routine, especially sleep, impacts my body. It didn't replace my smartwatch, but it complemented it in a way I didn't expect. 7.4 / 10 SCORE Ultrahuman Ring AIR $349 at Best Buy Pros No subscription needed for full health data Lightweight and comfortable for 24/7 wear Nearly weeklong battery life, even on max settings Aging metrics that actually help flag bad habits Flexible tracking for things like shift work or pregnancy Cons Heart rate tracking is inaccurate during workouts Auto workout detection is unreliable No indicator for proper sensor placement on the ring App can be overwhelming and confusing to navigate Noticeable scratches and wear after a month of use Ultrahuman Ring AIR 7.4/10 CNET Score $349 at Best Buy The Ultrahuman Ring Air can be a good entry point for anyone curious about testing the smart ring waters, especially if you're looking for something more subtle than a smartwatch. It's designed for background, long-term health tracking rather than on-the-spot reads, with a lightweight design and longer battery life that makes it easier to wear 24/7 (ideal for sleep tracking). At $349 (plus $50 more for the brushed rose gold finish), it's still an investment, but it feels like slightly less of a commitment than competitors like Oura, which lock many key insights behind a monthly subscription. But this ring isn't for everyone. You need to be ready to dive into the data and do a little sleuthing of your own to interpret your metrics and figure out which ones are helpful for you. Some, like Cardio Age and Sleep Score, were self-explanatory and useful at a glance, while others, like temperature tracking and stress, are harder to find or decode. Sometimes, it felt like I was doom-scrolling my own vitals, clicking on one stat only to tumble down a rabbit hole of more questions than answers. And there were definitely times when the data didn't match reality. All that said, I walked away feeling more mindful of my sleep, stress and even unexpected metrics like UV exposure. And honestly, the consistency of logging -- even without perfect accuracy -- was enough to push me toward better habits. The Ultrahuman Ring Air feels light and comfortable. It's thicker (height-wise) than most rings I wear, but it doesn't scream "tech gadget" like other wearables. Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET Better design than a smartwatch, but not quite jewelry After ordering a smart ring, the next step is finding the right size. I thought I knew my ring size and was ready to skip ahead -- but trust me, don't. Like most smart ring makers, Ultrahuman sends a sizing kit, and it's worth doing properly. I was between sizes, so I wore two of the included sample rings for about 48 hours to figure out the best fit. I ended up choosing the larger one so I could comfortably swap it between my middle, index and thumb -- especially since my fingers tend to swell with humidity or at certain times of the month. I went with the bionic gold finish, which felt like a nice balance; it didn't scream "fitness tracker," but it also wouldn't pass for a delicate piece of jewelry. Compared to the giant slab of a smartwatch I usually wear, it was refreshingly subtle on my middle finger, albeit somewhat thick (height-wise) even on my longer-than-average fingers. The side profile of the Ultrahuman Ring is relatively thin compared to other smart rings. Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET The ring itself is super lightweight (between 2.4 and 3.6 grams, depending on size) with a titanium exterior and a hypoallergenic resin interior. For comparison, it's slightly lighter and thinner than the Oura Ring. After a month of daily wear, which includes wrestling three kids, power walking with metal dumbbells on the regular and generally living the chaotic life of someone who doesn't wear jewelry for a reason, it's held up surprisingly well. Most days, I forget I'm even wearing it. That said, the gold exterior has picked up a handful of micro-scratches after just over a month of daily wear. Not shocking, considering my torture-tester tendencies, but worth noting if you're hoping for something completely scratch-proof. Micro-scratches on the Ultrahuman Ring Air show signs of wear after over a month of use. Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET Battery life is surprisingly great (even in Turbo mode) Ultrahuman claims four to six days of battery life, but I was pleasantly surprised to consistently hit the higher end, even while running it on all cylinders. The ring offers three battery modes: Turbo, Chill, and Critical, each adjusting data collection to extend battery life. I kept it in Turbo mode, which tracks the maximum amount of data, and still averaged about six days per charge. That alone made me more consistent with sleep tracking; something I usually dread with a smartwatch, since charging often ends up colliding with bedtime or peak workout time. The charging puck is a little black ring stand similar to that of the Oura Ring. An LED signals when it's fully charged, which takes about 3 hours. The Ultrahuman app, which is used for pairing the ring and configuring its settings, also sends reminders when the battery is getting low, which I appreciated. Health tracking: Decoding the data maze is not for the faint of heart The Ultrahuman Ring Air tracks just about everything you'd expect -- stress, sleep, heart rate, skin temperature, VO2 max and daily activity. But it also collects data on a dozen other things you may not need. You can even layer on more insights with what Ultrahuman calls "PowerPlugs." These are data widgets that use existing metrics (or general guidelines) to translate into actionable advice. For example, I added the cycle and ovulation tracker, the Vitamin D (UV exposure) tracker and PowerPlugs for caffeine timing and circadian rhythm. They help figure out the best times to get sunlight, drink caffeine and schedule workouts to improve sleep and keep energy levels up. There are also specific PowerPlugs for shift workers that adjust metrics to irregular schedules, and one for pregnancy that provides week-by-week insights. Some metrics are exclusive to Ultrahuman, which essentially translates your health data into something everyone understands: how well (or poorly) you're aging. Healthy aging has become a major focus for wearables in general, with companies like Oura and Samsung leaning heavily into age-based stats as a way to help users understand their overall wellness. The Ultrahuman app assigns a predicted "age" to different categories like cardio fitness, brain health and pulse health, using indicators like heart rate variability (HRV), sleep debt and skin temperature deviations. None of these age metrics are clinically validated, but something about seeing how my habits might be accelerating the aging process genuinely motivated me to make some changes. Learning that my "Brain Age" was older than my actual age was enough to scare me into cutting back my late-night social media scrolling and getting to bed earlier. Apparently, my lack of sleep was fast-tracking neurological decay, and I definitely don't want to end up with a chronic case of mommy-brain fog. Although I get as tired of notifications as everyone else, I appreciate that the app sends text alerts for some of these metrics. Since the ring doesn't have a screen of its own, the alerts are the only way to urge you to take immediate action on the data. Otherwise, you'd have to wade through the maze of metrics retroactively in the app. Some alerts are obvious, like telling me I slept less last night (no need for shade, ring, I was there). Others are begrudgingly helpful -- like a well-intentioned nagging parent -- such as telling me to cut off caffeine after 2 p.m. And a few are actually welcome, like telling me the best time to get outside to optimize my UV exposure and regulate my circadian rhythm. It's incredible having this much data literally at your fingertips -- figuring out what to do with it is another story. Sure, every metric has a little "i" button explaining what it means, but that's not the same as knowing what actually deserves your attention. Whether due to the way the app is laid out, how the metrics are grouped or just the sheer volume of information, it's easy to get overwhelmed inside the app. And unfortunately, it doesn't do much to guide you toward what matters most on any given day. I really wish the app had a single dashboard that summarized any key deviations from my baseline across all categories, something like: "Hey, your heart rate variability dipped, your temperature spiked and your stress is elevated. Maybe take it easy today." Right now, you only see those flags if you click into each individual metric, like Dynamic Recovery or Sleep. Does one flag mean something's off? Or does it take three for me to consider skipping a workout? It didn't always line up with how I felt, either. One night, the app flagged a temperature spike even though I felt perfectly fine. But another time, when I was actually sick, the only signal was a dip in my HRV. Fitness tracking puts accuracy into question It's interesting how one inconsistency can plant a seed of doubt in the whole experience -- and that's exactly what happened with heart rate tracking. During a 35-minute 5K run, the Ultrahuman Ring Air correctly detected the activity but logged it as a 70-minute workout. The ring can auto-detect certain outdoor activities like running and walking, then asks you to confirm them once you open the app. Technically, I could adjust the start and stop times to better match the run, but the heart rate was off regardless. Heart rate data from a 5K run on the Ultrahuman app (left) versus a Polar chest strap (right). Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET My Polar chest strap clocked me peaking at 176 bpm, while the Ultrahuman Ring topped out at 124 bpm, missing two full heart rate zones. For indoor workouts like Pilates, weightlifting or anything that doesn't dramatically spike heart rate, the ring won't even register it unless you manually start a workout in the app. That moment really forced the question: If it's not getting this right, what else is it getting wrong, mainly when so many other metrics, like recovery, stress and sleep, rely on accurate heart rate data running in the background? It's not just workouts, either. Twice during my month of testing, the ring also gave me "extra sleep credit" for time I was very much awake -- just binge-watching on the couch. (Not the first wearable to make that mistake, but still.) The sensors on the Ultrahuman Ring are discreet, but there's no clear indicator to show when they're properly positioned on your finger, which can affect accuracy. Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET It also highlights another truth about wearables: accuracy depends heavily on sensor type and placement. Rings simply don't capture heart rate as well as chest straps (or even some wrist-based trackers), especially during high-impact activities. Unlike a watch that stays snug in one spot, the ring tends to naturally turn around my finger throughout the day, and it's not as obvious when the sensors are in a less desirable place (top of the finger versus the bottom). The Samsung Galaxy Ring and Oura Ring both have a small line on the surface indicating which side the sensors are on. That tiny difference matters, especially when tracking sudden heart rate spikes. All of this is a good reminder that the Ultrahuman Ring Air isn't meant to be a fitness tracker first. Its strength is in long-term wellness tracking that comes with consistent use, especially during rest and not on-the-spot workout data. If you go in with that mindset, your expectations will be a lot more grounded. The Ultrahuman Ring Air is a great smartwatch companion, but lacks accuracy for true fitness tracking. Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET Bottom line: Should you buy it? For $350, the Ultrahuman Ring Air is a solid first smart ring for most people. It's not flawless, especially when it comes to workout tracking, but it's a great wellness companion that can help you improve or adopt healthier habits. The lack of a subscription alone makes it one of the most accessible smart rings out there. It's perfect for biohackers, data nerds or anyone curious enough to geek out over their body's inner workings. Just be ready to do a little of the homework yourself. The ring won't replace my smartwatch anytime soon, but I was surprised to realize how well it complements the watch. Where my watch handles live-workout tracking, the ring picks up the slack on sleep, recovery and long-term wellness. Its strength isn't in hyper-accurate data, but in the consistency of logging it. That consistency -- and the fact that it translates the data into something tangible like age -- was enough to help me spot some not-so-healthy habits and push me toward better ones. Even in its imperfections, that says a lot about what this ring can offer.

Daywatch: Man with asbestosis gets lifesaving lung transplant
Daywatch: Man with asbestosis gets lifesaving lung transplant

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Daywatch: Man with asbestosis gets lifesaving lung transplant

Good morning, Chicago. Michael Mihalik had a secret. As he celebrated Christmas with his four children, he thought it was probably his last. So in between the food and presents, he told them elaborate goodbyes in his head. He was suffering from asbestosis, an occupational lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers. The condition leads to lung tissue scarring and shortness of breath, which Mihalik knew all too well. By December 2023, he needed 10 liters of supplemental oxygen just to sit — 15 liters for any kind of movement, he said. 'I just gave up on everything. I figured this was my destiny,' said Mihalik, 66, of Kewanna, Indiana. 'It's my time to go home. The Lord wants me. I'll just go home.' But then, by chance during that Christmas trip, he saw an article in a newspaper about a successful lung transplant for an asbestosis patient. He said he bought at least five copies of the newspaper. The information in it led him to doctors at Loyola University Medical Center, where, six months ago, he received a double lung transplant. Now Mihalik wants to share what's possible for the thousands of others diagnosed with the disease, which he came to view as a 'slow death,' especially as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reconsiders the Biden administration's ban on the last type of asbestos used in the United States — chrysotile asbestos, known as 'white' asbestos — to determine whether it went 'beyond what is necessary.' Read the full story from the Tribune's Rebecca Johnson. Here are the top stories you need to know to start your day, including what to know about Gov. JB Pritzker's new running mate, a preview of the NASCAR Street Race before its third and possibly final run and why Illinois loves its roadside monsters. Today's eNewspaper edition | Subscribe to more newsletters | Asking Eric | Horoscopes | Puzzles & Games | Today in History Republican leaders in the House are sprinting toward a vote today on President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, determined to seize momentum from a hard-fought vote in the Senate while essentially daring members to defy their party's leader and vote against it. President Donald Trump said yesterday that Israel has agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and warned Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. Elevating a former top aide with legislative and executive experience — and a life story different from his own — Gov. JB Pritzker yesterday announced Christian Mitchell would be his third term running mate. 'He's a guy who knows how to get big things done, and I've worked with him to get it done, and I'm excited for the people of Illinois to get to know him,' Pritzker said in Peoria. Aldermen tried to send a clear message to Chicago police: Do not cooperate with President Donald Trump's deportation efforts. And several members of the City Council's Immigration Committee left the marathon meeting frustrated, unable to get clear answers about the role of responding officers during a June 4 deportation raid where U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents clashed with protesters and several aldermen. The owner of two allegedly fraudulent COVID-19 testing labs linked to a disgraced former executive of Loretto Hospital pleaded not guilty yesterday to charges he was part of a sprawling fraud scheme that siphoned more than $290 million in federal funds for testing that never occurred. While serving as a dean of discipline in the Chicago Public Schools system, Brian Crowder approached a 15-year-old student in the lunchroom at a Little Village school and asked her for her SnapChat username, the woman, now an adult, testified yesterday. Slightly confused, the woman said she gave him the information for her social media account. That led him to start messaging her, she said, before entering into a relationship with her. Flush with salary-cap room, the Chicago Blackhawks looked to land a big fish — or at least a medium-sized one — on the first day of NHL free agency yesterday. What they reeled in was forward Sam Lafferty — again — and former Winnipeg Jets forward Dominic Toninato, 31, who signed a two-year, two-way contract for $850,000. That's it, writes Phil Thompson. The annual NASCAR Chicago Street Race is upon us, and the forecast calls for a 50% chance of thunderstorms and 100% chance of flooding the airwaves with shots of The Bean, the beach, skyscrapers and deep-dish pizza. But as the street race enters its third and possibly final run through Grant Park this July Fourth weekend, it may be time to take stock of a hard to quantify but potentially invaluable benefit: a seemingly endless loop through the Loop on national TV. 'Jurassic World Rebirth' is a genuinely peculiar seesaw, with 'Godzilla' and 'Rogue One' director Gareth Edwards managing some occasionally striking jolts amid a lot of tonal uncertainty, writes Tribune film critic Michael Phillips. Rarely an exuberant spirit as a filmmaker, Edwards here directs a rather mournful script by veteran pro David Koepp, the primary adapting writer on the '93 franchise-starter. 'Illinois is like a wonderland of large things,' said Rolando Pujol, whose dizzying new book, 'The Great American Retro Road Trip: A Celebration of Roadside Americana,' is an obsessive taxonomy of the vintage fiberglass megafauna (and more) amongst us. 'My Illinois to-see list numbers in the hundreds. But incongruous, anomalous, larger-than-life objects are American DNA, part of our collective self-identity. We develop attachment to large things. They become signposts in our lives.' Midwestern farms provide a bounty of produce in summer and fall, harvesting seasonal fruits and vegetables ranging from asparagus to zucchini. Whatever you're shopping for, here's our map and searchable list of farmers markets in Chicago and the suburbs. No, she isn't green. Well, not her coat anyways. The newest addition to Shedd Aquarium's rescued sea otters officially has a name: Jade. The aquarium revealed the name in a news release after a public vote. Winning over three other handpicked options, 'Jade' pays homage to Jade Cove south of Monterey, California, near where the otter was rescued.

What does Trump's tax bill mean for N.H.?
What does Trump's tax bill mean for N.H.?

Boston Globe

time17 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

What does Trump's tax bill mean for N.H.?

Senator Maggie Hassan said the bill passed by the Senate 'will hurt Granite Staters for generations to come.' Advertisement The bill has to pass the House again before Trump can sign it into law. He's set a target of doing so by Friday – the Fourth of July. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Here are three ways the bill could impact New Hampshire. Medicaid There are about The bill includes a provision requiring some adults to work, volunteer or attend school for 80 hours a month in order to enroll in Medicaid, unless they qualify for an exception, according to the Advertisement New administrative burdens could cost the state tens of millions of dollars in technology upgrades and personnel costs, according to Jim Monahan, who leads an ad-hoc group of healthcare advocates in New Hampshire. Having nearly 50,000 people suddenly lose coverage could increase the cost of uncompensated care for providers, and Monahan's group warned it could drive up commercial insurance rates. Food assistance and SNAP The Currently, there are about 77,000 people in New Hampshire who receive SNAP benefits. Planned Parenthood The Republican budget passed by the Senate also includes a provision banning Planned Parenthood health centers nationally from participating in the Medicaid program. The program helps people with lower incomes get some types of basic reproductive health care including birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment, according to a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood NH Action Fund. In New Hampshire, Planned Parenthood of Northern New England sees about 10,000 patients per year at four health centers, and one in five of those patients have Medicaid insurance. Kayla Montgomery, vice president of Public Affairs for the Planned Parenthood New Hampshire Action Fund, said for now, none of the New Hampshire health centers are at risk of closing. Advertisement Amanda Gokee can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store