United Nations experts call for Starmer's Chagos deal to be suspended
UN special rapporteurs Nicolas Levrat, KP Ashwini, Bernard Duhaime, and Bina D'Costa have slammed the agreement, which hands back sovereignty of the archipelago to Mauritius and leases back the UK-US military base on Diego Garcia for £101m per year for 99 years, for failing to protect the rights of Chagossians.
It follows Sir Keir's government moving rapidly last month to prevent a High Court appeal against the treaty by representatives of the Chagossian community, who had opposed the deal.
Now, the prime minister is under pressure from critics on all sides to suspend the deal just weeks after he signed it with Mauritius.
The attack from the UN comes as the Tories have tabled legislation in parliament to block the deal from coming into law.
In a statement on Tuesday the UN experts said: 'By maintaining a foreign military presence of the United Kingdom and the United States on Diego Garcia and preventing the Chagossian people from returning to Diego Garcia, the agreement appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return, which also hinders their ability to exercise their cultural rights in accessing their ancestral lands from which they were expelled.'
They added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. This includes their right to adequate and effective remedy and reparations, including restitution, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition, as well as their cultural rights.'
The deal is also being criticised in the UK for potentially undermining the UK/US base on Diego Garcia, which is seen as crucial to western defence.
While the government claimed that the overall cost would be £3bn for the taxpayer, critics have estimated that over the 99-year lease period, it will cost £30bn potentially eating up the extra spending on the defence budget.
Sir Keir and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have maintained that they had to do the deal because a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that the islands should be handed back to Mauritius threatened the existence of the crucial military airbase.
They warned that the UK would face a number of legal challenges which could make the operation of the base of Diego Garcia impossible.
The deal was signed after Donald Trump gave it his blessing, despite lobbying from Nigel Farage.
But the UN experts were highly critical of the government's refusal to properly engage with Chagossians who have been made homeless by their removal from Diego Garcia and the impact of the deal.
They said: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Why Reform UK should be represented in the House of Lords
Much diminished from the glory days when it fielded prime ministers and vetoed legislation, the House of Lords remains an important part of Britain's democracy. Though still in constitutional limbo while politicians argue over whether it should be reformed or abolished, the Lords, with or without hereditary peers, performs an essential task in scrutinising legislation, raising issues of public concern and tidying up poorly drafted laws. Its strength is that it is increasingly non-partisan. Many peers are appointed after a lifetime of public service and sit as crossbenchers. They bring varied experience to the chamber, independent opinions and voting patterns untrammelled by party diktats. True, too many are still appointed as reward for slavish loyalty, as compensation for careers cut short or for filling party coffers. True, some recent appointments have been breathtaking in their frivolity and cynicism. It is true also that there are simply too many peers, with some turning up only for the minimum time to qualify for the daily allowance while their voices remain unheard and their views unknown. However it is finally constituted, the upper chamber, as in other western democracies, should be broadly representative of the nation, its voters and its vital interests. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, is therefore absolutely right in demanding that his party should be represented. It won 4.1 million votes in the general election, gained many seats in local elections, controls ten councils outright and may do well in future elections. The Greens, the Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru and the Ulster Unionists, all winning fewer votes, have 13 peers between them. • Reform peers? We don't need Putin apologists, says John Healey Bizarrely, nomination to the Lords is entirely in the prime minister's gift. There are several serious politicians affiliated to Reform. Sir Keir Starmer should put their names forward straight away.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour's attempt to find successor to Diane Abbott ‘under way'
Moves to find a successor to Diane Abbott in the parliamentary seat she has represented since 1987 are under way, prompting concern that her fate has been decided before an investigation into her latest suspension has concluded. Figures on Labour's national executive committee (NEC) have spoken to potential contenders, teeing them up for a future contest in her constituency of Hackney North and Stoke Newington, and giving them informal advice on how to prepare, according to a party source. Abbott was suspended from the party in July for repeating that Jewish people do not experience racism in the same way as Black people, a statement that had earned her a previous suspension in April 2023. Labour said there would be no discussion of potential successor as an investigation was ongoing. The party said there had been no discussions about alternative candidates at any NEC meetings and no proposals put to NEC members about a selection process. Abbott said: 'It does seem to be rather pre-empting the results of the investigation.' One figure on the left of the party said talk of replacing Abbott risked inflaming tensions between the leadership and grassroots members. 'There's no appetite among members for a stitch-up, they would want this to be fair after everything that's happened,' they said. Abbott, who as the longest-serving female MP has the honorary title of mother of the house, lost the Labour whip in autumn 2023 after she wrote a letter to the Observer in which she argued that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people did not experience racism in the same way as Black people and likened their experience to that of people with red hair. Abbott said the letter published was a draft version, and that her comments had been taken out of context. She was readmitted to the party in time to retain her seat at the general election, but was suspended again last month after telling the BBC in an interview that she did not regret the remarks. The Guardian understands that potential successors to Abbott include those who were in the frame to replace before general election, among them the London assembly member Sem Moema and the Hackney councillor Mete Coban. Abbott's latest suspension caused unease among some party insiders, including NEC members, but they said her decision to repeat her original comments, despite previously apologising, made it harder for them to defend her. Labour sources have briefed that Abbott is unlikely to be readmitted to the parliamentary Labour party. It is thought that she plans to stand down at the next election, if not sooner. Sources close to the process said discussions about a potential successor are too important to be left to the last minute. Under party rules, a suspended MP is barred from standing as a candidate until their case is resolved. The NEC has the power to trigger a selection process if a sitting MP is not endorsed to stand again. The row over Abbott's future comes as Labour prepares for its autumn conference. The disciplinary process over Abbott's original Observer letter became one of the longest and most prominent internal rows of Keir Starmer's leadership. Allies accused party leaders of deliberately dragging their feet to prevent her re-selection, while Labour HQ insisted the investigation was handled according to the rules. The seat is regarded as ultra-safe for Labour, even although her majority last year was halved to 15,000 last year amid a challenge from the Greens.
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
VJ Day: The WW2 veteran who moved Queen Camilla to tears
When Capt Yavar Abbas stood on stage in front of King Charles III and Queen Camilla on Friday, he wasn't expecting to make was at the official commemoration for the 80th anniversary of VJ - Victory over Japan - Day in Staffordshire as one of the last remaining veterans. Yavar was about to give a short address about his experience on the Asian front. But he decided to go off told the audience he wished "to salute my brave King who is here with his beloved Queen in spite of the fact that he's under treatment for cancer".The King and Queen became visibly emotional. Yavar went on to tell the crowd he had been free of cancer too for the past 25 years, receiving a round of is 104, and his journey to this moment, which he told to me when I met him earlier this year, is extraordinary. He was born in Charkhari, a state in British India, in what he describes as a "one-horse town". Officially his birth date is registered in 1921, but Yavar says he was born on 15 December 1920. He was a student when Britain declared war on Nazi Germany on behalf of India in early December 1941, there was a new enemy and a new front. Japan had attacked the US naval base at Pearl Harbor. Hours later, Japanese forces targeted British colonies in South East Asia. And in just a few months, Japan had taken territory that had been part of the British Empire for more than a century, including Malaya (now Malaysia), Singapore and Burma (now Myanmar).By mid-1942 Yavar had to make an important decision - fight for the British or for Indian independence. He could not believe how quickly parts of the British Empire had fallen to Japan. There was a palpable fear that India could be next."I was not a supporter of British imperialism, in fact I detested it," Yavar tells me. At the time, there was a growing pro-independence movement calling for the British to "Quit India," which was brutally was aware fighting for the British would mean fighting a war in the name of freedom - while Indians were not free from colonial rule. But, like many Indian nationalists, he did not want Nazism and fascism to prevail. "I had to choose and hope that if I joined the [British Indian] army, after the war, as they had been promising, I would get independence." So Yavar enlisted - and became one of around 2.5 million Indian soldiers to sign up. Initially he joined the 11th Sikh regiment and was posted to a "God-forsaken place" in a remote part of East Bengal, where he spent his days guarding a strategic site - and felt disappointed at the lack of among the British officers frustrated him too. "I found myself in a version of Dad's Army, in the company of white, middle-aged men as my fellow officers, who still considered India to be a crown colony on which they'll have continuing control for the foreseeable future."One day in the mess, Yavar spotted an advert in The Army Gazette for officers to be trained as combat cameramen. He applied and was soon accepted. In this role he joined the newly formed British 14th Army, whose aim was to win back territory lost to Japan. The troops of this army were well-trained for jungle warfare, and had better equipment. A multi-national force, in time it would number up to a million soldiers - mostly Indian, but also from other parts of the British Empire - including West and East Africa. This army felt completely different to Yavar: "It was wonderful camaraderie. There were British and Indians mixing with each other." Yavar would go on to film on the front lines at many major Allied-Japanese battles of the Burma campaign from 1944. He would travel in his jeep with an assistant, armed with a pistol and a Vinten film camera, a tripod, and many rolls of film. He sent his rushes to Calcutta (now Kolkata), along with dope sheets explaining what the shots were. There they were edited, and the film distributed for propaganda or was at the siege of Imphal and the battle of Kohima when Japan invaded the strategic north-eastern Indian towns. Japan's aim was to cut off the Allied supply line to China. Repelling Japanese forces at Imphal and Kohima was hugely significant, because success in taking these towns could allow Japan to progress deeper into India and expand its battles have been described by some historians as among the most significant of World War Two. British, Gurkha, Indian and African troops decisively halted the offensive into India. Tens of thousands of Japanese forces died. Many killed themselves rather than being taken prisoner in defeat. Yavar cannot forget the aftermath of the battles. "It was a horrible sight, Japanese with swords sticking out of their bodies, instead of falling into enemy hands." The British advance to re-take Burma began was around 30 miles (50km) from Mandalay when he had a brush with death. He tells me how the Japanese put up stiff resistance, and the Allies couldn't advance, so they took cover in shallow trenches. He was in one with a Gurkha unit, but continued to film. He thinks a sniper saw his camera and shot towards him. The Gurkha beside him was hit in the temple and died. Yavar's camera shattered. "I'm lucky to be alive," he Battle of Mandalay was a crucial one for the Allies. If they managed to take it, the road to the capital Rangoon (now Yangon), would be open to them. Yavar was in a tank, and decided he needed a better shot of the action. "I just climbed up on top of the trunk and started filming." The turret opened and he was told by another officer to get down for his own safety. "It was a stupid thing to do, but that's the kind of thing you do when you're young." The gun battle was intense and the aim was to capture the Japanese stronghold of Fort Dufferin. Yavar filmed the enemy positions being bombed relentlessly from the air. "They kept on pounding them, pounding them, pounding them," he recalls.I went to the Imperial War Museum in London and found the footage that Yavar filmed that day. Even without sound, the raw, unedited, black and white images are as dramatic as Yavar described. I returned to his home to show him the footage which he had never seen. As he watched it, the events from 80 years all come back and he points at the screen as he remembers."That's my shot," he tells me as the British flag is raised in victory over the strategic Fort shakes his head watching the images. "It's bizarre to be sitting here and watching all that, and to think that I was in the middle of that." He says he cannot believe now that 80 years ago he was happy to shoot Japanese forces with his camera, as well as his gun. "I'm not very proud of that," Yavar says, "but that's how you feel when you are on the front."Yavar has something to show me, that he had found that morning. He takes out a faded notepad with loose leaves of paper that have yellowed with age. It's his diary from the front line. He had carried an ink pot with him in battle and written in the diary with his fountain pen. He reads out an entry from the day that Fort Dufferin fell on 20 March 1945."Thank goodness it is all over and that I'm still alive. I can still hear the noise of shelling not far away. Maybe it is the Japanese guns firing at the Fort. I'll find out tomorrow. Two o'clock in the morning now, and I must go to sleep." Yavar wonders aloud how in the midst of battle he found time to sit and write this when he had to be up again at five in the morning.I ask him if he thinks he is brave. He looks at me as if that is a strange question. "Absolutely not," he VE Day, 8 May 1945 - when the war ended in Europe - Yavar was in Rangoon filming the recently re-taken capital. However, it was so inconsequential he didn't note it in his diary. Little had changed for him. The war against Japan was still ongoing. But then, completely unexpectedly months later, America dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan unconditionally surrendered on 15 August 1945, the day that VJ Day is marked each the war, Yavar was posted with the 268 Indian Brigade as part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Forces under the overall command of US Gen Douglas McArthur. He went to Hiroshima months after the bombing. Yavar says he saw the wasteland and people with horrific injuries. "There were no buildings, it was just one tower that was left. Otherwise the whole thing was flat."It's the first time since we have spoken that Yavar's bearing changes - he has a look of horror as he remembers."It still haunts me," he says. "I couldn't believe that human beings could do this to each other. Hiroshima was a terrible experience."The British did leave India, as Yavar had hoped. In August 1947, India was partitioned and two new states were born: Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan. Yavar was a witness to the bloody aftermath, and was heartbroken at the decision to divide India. Two years later, he came to Britain. He worked for many years at the BBC as a news cameraman travelling the world. He would go on to be an acclaimed independent film-maker, winning numerous awards. VJ Day - on 15 August - is not a day Yavar ever celebrates. Current events weigh heavily on him. Yavar's message, as one of the last remaining survivors of World War Two, is clear."War is a crime. War must be banned. I think it's mad. We didn't achieve anything really."He says at the time he felt he was part of something worthwhile, for the sake of humanity - he doesn't feel that wars engulfing the world 80 years on - particularly Gaza - are on his mind."We seem to have learnt nothing, " Yavar tells me. "The killing of innocent men, women, children, and even babies goes on. And the world, with some honourable exceptions, watches in silence..."It was all futile, because it's still happening. We haven't learned anything at all."
