AMD's Radeon RX 9070 XT price has supposedly leaked in MicroCenter's listing, and I honestly hope this is a joke
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
MicroCenter's AMD Radeon RX 9070 GPU listing hints at potential $699 MSRP
The listed prices could likely be placeholders
AMD's full RDNA 4 GPU reveal will take place on February 28
AMD's Radeon RX 9000 GPU series launch is almost upon us, with the official reveal set for February 28. All eyes are set on the RX 9070 XT GPU's performance capabilities and price point - and now, we might have our answer on the latter, and it may not sit well with fans.
As reported by VideoCardz, AMD's Radeon RX 9070 series has been listed on MicroCenter with the RX 9070 XT supposedly starting at $699, while its RX 9070 counterpart is listed at $649. This also includes some other overclocked models for both the RX 9070 XT and non-XT - which we won't post since it's been taken down - and these prices are similar to those listed for Nvidia's new Blackwell GPU lineup, which has seen drastic retailer inflation, with some of the new Radeon cards listed for as much as $1,099.
It's important to note these aren't official prices and AMD's official reveal tomorrow could be drastically different - but a previous leak suggested that Team Red is aiming for a sub-$700 price point, which would corroborate some of MicroCenter's listings.
Considering the RX 9070 XT's potential position as a competitor to Nvidia's RTX 5070 Ti ($749 / £729 / around AU$1509), if it clocks in at the purported $699 (based on MicroCenter's listings), it may not be cheaper enough to convince gamers looking for GPU alternatives amid Team Green's current Blackwell launch hiccups.
Although it could still end up being the ideal substitute for RTX 5000 series GPUs that are currently either out of stock or simply overpriced, there's no guarantee the same won't happen to Team Red's RDNA 4 GPUs. Scalpers could strike again, especially if the new GPUs are impressive - while this is always a threat regardless of retail prices, the suspected $699 price point isn't very appealing, especially at a time when AMD's fiercest rival is already on the back foot.
As I've stated on numerous occasions, the GPU market is in dire need of some serious competition as Nvidia continues to take it by storm. Team Green is in a vulnerable state right now, as RTX 5000 series GPUs are virtually impossible to attain at MSRP (along with a whole host of teething issues, including missing ROPs on some shipped cards), so AMD's RDNA 4 GPU launch is the perfect opportunity for Team Red to claw back some market share.
Frustratingly, it looks like Team Red could bow out of the battle before it even starts - if MicroCenter's listed prices end up being legitimate, I truly believe AMD stands no chance at competing with Nvidia this generation. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX, the current flagship GPU - which is still one of the closest to the RTX 4090 alongside the RTX 4080 Super - is supposedly going to remain AMD's most powerful consumer GPU, and that card can be found at slightly higher prices than the RTX 5070 Ti's $729.
If the Radeon RX 9070 XT cannot beat either of those GPUs at a potential $699 MSRP, I fear that it will be dead on arrival. Plenty of fans already look toward Nvidia for the best performance, especially when using ray tracing - while RDNA 4 promises to improve on ray tracing performance, it'll be a major challenge to match Team Green's successes in that region.
I'm hoping that by tomorrow, I can eat my words after AMD finally opens the lid on its new GPU offerings, but honestly? I'd be willing to bet that MicroCenter's leak is accurate...
Evidence mounts that RX 9070 XT GPU could equal Nvidia RTX 4080's performance – I just hope AMD doesn't mess up pricing
Nvidia's RTX 5070 Ti may be getting the competition it needs as the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT's performance leaks
Watch out, Nvidia – AMD's rumored to have a plan to unleash RX 9070 reviews to run interference with RTX 5070 GPU's big launch day

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Big Tech Is Back in S&P 500 Driver's Seat as Profit Engines Hum
The same technology giants that helped drag the S&P 500 to the brink of a bear market in April are giving the recovery in US equities some legs. Nvidia Corp. put a bow on a better-than-expected earnings season for Big Tech last week by delivering a strong outlook for revenue, despite US restrictions on sales of its chips in China. With Nvidia and Microsoft Corp. rallying back to the cusp of record highs, traders are betting the group is poised to lift the broader market.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Wall Street might be missing on Nvidia
Decoding a public company's earnings report in the 24 hours after its release could be maddening. Here's why. A company that beats on sales and earnings estimates could see its stock pounded after one slip of the tongue from a CEO or CFO on the earnings call (which you can now listen in on with Yahoo Finance). Look at the 20% plunge Gap's (GAP) stock took on Friday after the company reported across-the-board beats but issued a tariff warning many should have seen coming. Gap CEO Richard Dickson made a compelling case on the state of the business on Yahoo Finance. A company that misses on sales and earnings estimates could see its stock price skyrocket as analysts and investors reason 'bad news' like this was 'priced into the stock' months ago. What was not priced in? The positive hype about future growth on the earnings call. Maddening. I have generally been on the side of the fence that says companies don't deserve passes for missed numbers or bad quarters that weren't properly guided. The numbers are the numbers. You assess them, crunch them, ponder them further, repeat this process 75 more times, and make a decision on the stock. It's not rocket science. To that end, I don't believe AI chip darling Nvidia (NVDA) fully deserves the free pass it got this week for a confusing quarter that was un-Nvidia-like. It reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.81, compared to estimates of $0.93, though the company posted a second (adjusted) EPS figure of $0.96 after excluding "H20 charge and related tax impact." In other words, the $0.96 figure represents what Nvidia would've made had its China business not gone poof courtesy of Trump's chip export control — a reality that does not exist. Nvidia has earned a legion of fans on Wall Street through years of strong execution and fundamentals. Analysts have been quick to 'exclude' the fall of its once lucrative China business. Every single research note after the results was chock-full of "let's blow more smoke for the Nvidia bulls." Price targets were hiked. All the Nvidia positives were bolded in the PDF docs. Sure, CEO Jensen Huang made a point to mention on the earnings call that demand for its AI chips remains strong. Profit margins will likely trend back to historically normal levels later this year, CFO Colette Kress said. But in my view, the earnings still fell far short of a consensus figure — and one that investors have little visibility into this round. The uncertainty of the China impact led analysts to estimate figures that included and didn't include the H20 loss. What made up the final consensus estimate? It's anybody's guess. And how do you ignore a giant chunk of Nvidia's sales in China simply vanishing? How do you completely wipe that out of your forecast model and think earnings power will still be the same? That loss will put pressure on all other areas of the operation to accelerate in the near term, medium term, and long term. I dig what Jensen said about the potential for robotics. I'm just not sure it's going to drastically drive Nvidia's business in the next eight quarters like the China business would have. Am I off the mark here? Should one only look at the many positives of Nvidia all the time? I am curious. Get at me on X @BrianSozzi. I always enjoy hearing new perspectives. I want to conclude by saying I don't hate Nvidia. It's more of a challenge to you to always question the "consensus" view on a stock. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Sign in to access your portfolio


Business Upturn
3 hours ago
- Business Upturn
From Startup to State Asset? Former Hedge Fund Manager Warns Elon Musk's Dojo Is Quietly Becoming National Infrastructure
BALTIMORE, June 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — It started as a Tesla project. But according to former hedge fund manager Enrique Abeyta's recent briefing, Elon Musk's Dojo may soon be functioning as critical U.S. infrastructure — without anyone officially calling it that. What began as an AI chip built to replace Nvidia has quickly evolved into a full-stack platform capable of running autonomous vehicles, training machine vision systems, and powering physical AI across industries. 'This is how it happens,' Abeyta says. 'You build something private… and then one day, the government needs it more than anyone else.' The Private Chip That's Becoming Public Policy Dojo was born out of necessity — after Nvidia couldn't meet Musk's needs. The result? A custom chip now reported to be 6x more powerful than Nvidia's best-selling model, optimized for training AI on real-world video at massive scale. Every day, Tesla's fleet feeds Dojo with 160 billion frames of visual data, helping the system learn how to operate in the physical world — without human help. On June 1st, Tesla is expected to launch a robotaxi with no steering wheel, no pedals, and no fallback to human control. AI Without a Kill Switch Dojo's value isn't just speed — it's autonomy. Abeyta believes that's what makes it so appealing to government agencies quietly searching for domestic alternatives to foreign tech dependence. 'Once you control the AI, the chips, the vehicles, and the data — you're not a car company anymore,' he says. 'You're a national asset in everything but name.' And the signs are already here: According to internal reports, one of Musk's key Dojo partners is 'expecting to receive billions of dollars from the Trump administration. ' That aligns with a recent executive order from President Trump, aimed at 'removing barriers to American AI innovation.' The Tesla Effect: When Platforms Become Policy This wouldn't be the first time Musk built something the government eventually leaned on — from satellites to EV infrastructure. But Abeyta says Dojo is different . It's not about energy or communication. It's about machine-level control over physical environments — and that means its future may not be up to Tesla at all. About Enrique Abeyta Enrique Abeyta is a former hedge fund manager with more than two decades of experience tracking large-scale industrial and capital transformations. After managing nearly $4 billion in institutional funds, he now leads Breaking Profits, a research platform focused on identifying the hidden infrastructure reshaping America's future — from finance to tech to defense. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press Group Email: [email protected]