Tensions Rise Between Israel and France Over Palestinian State Recognition
'This is a time for seriousness and responsibility, not for conflation and manipulation,' the French presidency stated.
Netanyahu's accusations appeared in a letter addressed to Macron, in which Netanyahu claimed that antisemitism had 'surged' in France since Macron announced last month that he would recognize Palestinian statehood. Macron plans to make this formal recognition during a UN meeting in September, a decision that drew immediate backlash from Israel.
Netanyahu wrote, 'Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this antisemitic fire. It is not diplomacy; it is appeasement.' He argued that this move rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas's refusal to release hostages, and emboldens those who threaten French Jews. France Joins Growing List of Nations
By announcing its intention to recognize Palestinian statehood, France joins a growing list of nations that have taken similar steps since the Gaza war began nearly two years ago as at least 145 of the 193 UN member states now recognize or plan to recognize a Palestinian state.
France has long supported the 'two-state solution,' as the French government asserts that recognizing a Palestinian state counters Hamas, which governs Gaza and opposes a two-state solution.
Additionally, the Palestinian Authority's foreign ministry condemned Netanyahu's remarks as 'unjustified and hostile to peace.' The ministry stated, 'The old record of confusing criticism of the Israeli occupation and its crimes with antisemitism has become cracked and exposed, and no one is fooled.'
In response to Netanyahu's allegations, the French presidency emphasized that France 'protects and will always protect its Jewish citizens,' condemning violence against the French Jewish community as 'intolerable.' The presidency noted that since 2017, President Macron has consistently demanded strong actions against perpetrators of antisemitic acts, especially following the attack of 7 October, 2023.
Macron's office indicated that Netanyahu's allegations 'will not go unanswered.' Benjamin Haddad, Macron's minister for Europe, stated that France has 'no lessons to learn in the fight against antisemitism,' adding that the issue, which 'poisons our European societies,' must not be 'exploited.' Rising Antisemitism in France
France is home to Europe's largest Jewish community. Reported antisemitic acts in France surged from 436 in 2022 to 1,676 in 2023, before decreasing to 1,570 last year, according to the interior ministry.
On Tuesday, Netanyahu also criticized Australia, which plans to recognize Palestinian statehood next month. He labeled Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese a 'weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews.' This personal attack occurred amid a diplomatic spat after Australia canceled the visa of far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman.
Shortly after, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar announced the revocation of visas for Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority.
As tensions escalate, the international community watches closely, hoping for a resolution that promotes peace and stability in the region.
Short link :
Post Views: 14
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Global South can claim climate mantle at COP30
Of all the seismic geopolitical shifts in recent years, perhaps the most striking is the West's rapid decline as a force in global climate governance. Under President Donald Trump's second administration, the US has become both more aggressive and more isolationist. Meanwhile, the EU has grown timid, fragmented, and inward-looking. Will the Global South, especially Brazil, South Africa, India, and China, step up to fill the climate leadership vacuum? In 1972, at the UN's first major environmental conference in Stockholm, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi famously declared: 'Poverty is the worst form of pollution.' To this day, the Global South grapples with the challenge of pursuing sustainable development while promoting environmental responsibility. Many developing countries have long feared that climate policies might reinforce historical inequalities or constrain their growth. But now, the Global South has an opening to ensure that the international agenda reflects its priorities. Many policymakers recognize the need for a change. While global cooperation has produced numerous important climate commitments, such as those made at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and those contained in the 2015 Paris climate agreement, they remain largely unfulfilled. Moreover, financial support from the rich world has been well below what is needed, hindering climate action in developing countries, eroding trust in Western leaders, and lowering global ambitions. The Global South has no shortage of climate visionaries — from Wangari Maathai to Vandana Shiva and Chico Mendes — who have connected environmental protection with community empowerment. But the West has controlled the climate narrative for decades, because it dominates the science that informs the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the multilateral development banks that provide climate financing, and the global media outlets that shape public opinion. That is particularly true for the US. Despite its stumbles, such as when President George W. Bush withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol in 2001, the rhetorical ambition of other US presidents, including Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, ensured the West remained a leading voice in shaping the climate agenda, even when not matched by action. Trump's resurgence has brought that era to an end. The EU, weakened by the rise of the far right and preoccupied with bolstering its defenses, lacks the political will and has fallen short of providing the economic means to lead on international climate cooperation and finance. This collapse has shattered the idea of a coherent 'West,' if such a creature ever existed. But it could empower the Global South, which bears the brunt of climate shocks, to lead a more equitable and inclusive clean-energy transition. Despite short-term hurdles, in the long run, reducing fossil-fuel dependence — more feasible now that renewables are more scalable and reliable — can help stabilize economies and improve public health. Many Global South governments have already played key roles in shaping the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris climate agreement. China has also become the undisputed global leader in green tech, outpacing the West in the shift to renewables. Facing US trade barriers, China's surplus of solar panels, batteries, and wind turbines could be redirected to developing countries, strengthening their energy sovereignty. In today's fragmented world, multilateralism remains essential. Maiara Folly, Jayati Ghosh and Jorg Haas There are signs that Brazil, India, South Africa, and China are building on this foundation to forge a cohesive climate agenda ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference in Belem, Brazil, which is focused on collective action. In April, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres brought together 17 heads of state from the global south and the EU for a summit aimed at elevating countries' climate ambitions in the lead-up to COP30. Brazil has also leveraged its BRICS+ presidency to build momentum for COP30, creating a roadmap for expanding cooperation on energy security and establishing the BRICS Laboratory for Trade, Climate Change, and Sustainable Development. In early July, the BRICS+ Summit of presidents and heads of state approved a leaders' framework declaration on climate finance. Whether these initiatives will deliver tangible results remains uncertain, given BRICS+ countries' divergent interests. Meanwhile, South Africa is using its G20 presidency to amplify African voices and push for debt relief, green industrialization, and low-cost finance — in other words, it is attempting to address the structural barriers that prevent vulnerable countries from investing in climate mitigation and adaptation. With the right financial and technological support, the green transition can drive broad-based prosperity in the developing world. The costs of clean tech have plummeted, largely owing to China's industrial capacity, making some of the material conditions for climate leadership in the global south more favorable. Moreover, China could finance decarbonization projects in other countries through renminbi loans, export credits, and debt-for-clean-energy swaps. In today's fragmented world, multilateralism remains essential, and South-South cooperation on agreed climate targets offers a powerful platform to revitalize it. The Global South is also well-positioned to lead plurilateral initiatives that advance climate solutions. These coalitions of the willing are crucial for countering the Trump administration's bullying tactics — namely, the use of trade negotiations to shift other governments' investment priorities and weaken their green policies. Of course, Western countries must be held accountable at COP30 for their historic emissions and unmet climate-finance promises. But the summit represents a vital opportunity for the global south to demonstrate that climate and development goals are not mutually exclusive. To seize it, these countries' leaders must subordinate their differences to their overriding interest in presenting a clear-eyed vision of an energy transition that uplifts their people and protects the planet. • Maiara Folly is Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Brazil-based think tank Plataforma CIPO. • Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is a member of the Club of Rome's Transformational Economics Commission and Co-Chair of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation. • Jorg Haas is Head of the Globalization and Transformation Division at the Heinrich Boll Foundation. ©Project Syndicate
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
UN warns situation in Syria remains fragile amid shaky ceasefire
NEW YORK CITY: The UN's special envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, told the Security Council on Thursday that the situation in the country remains 'deeply fragile,' with a ceasefire in Sweida under growing strain and political tensions on the rise. He urged the international community to renew its efforts to protect civilians, ensure accountability, and support a Syrian-led political process that is capable of delivering lasting peace. Marking the anniversary of the 2013 chemical weapons attack in Ghouta, carried out by the forces of former President Bashar Assad, Pedersen described the occasion as 'a painful reminder of the suffering endured by Syrian civilians, and of the grave abuses and violations of international law that must never be repeated.' He urged council members to help Syria 'emerge from a dark past toward a brighter future.' The July 19 ceasefire agreement in Sweida has so far prevented a return to open conflict following a spike in violence, Pedersen said, but he warned that the peace remains tenuous. 'We are still seeing dangerous hostilities and skirmishes on the margins of Sweida and violence could resume at any moment,' he said. 'Absent more tangible and binding measures, including to build confidence, the ceasefire risks remaining fragile — an interim truce rather than the foundation for lasting stability.' He welcomed the creation by the US, Jordan and Syrian authorities of a trilateral working group to support the truce. However, he cautioned that 'a month of relative military calm belies a worsening political climate, with escalatory and zero-sum rhetoric hardening among many.' He also condemned ongoing Israeli ground operations in southwestern Syria, despite a pause in airstrikes. 'Such actions are unacceptable,' Pedersen said. 'We must insist on full respect for Syria's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.' The humanitarian cost of unrest, he added, remains severe, with more than 186,000 people displaced in Sweida, Daraa and rural Damascus. Access to affected areas is limited as a result of insecurity and road closures, and widespread damage to infrastructure compounds the suffering. Referring to reports of abuses during fighting in Sweida last month, including a video that appeared to show the execution of an unarmed man in a hospital, Pedersen said it was 'essential' that the conclusions of a fact-finding committee's investigation into such violations 'are made fully public and that all perpetrators — regardless of affiliation — are held responsible.' He called on all sides to combat divisive rhetoric and build a shared national vision, adding: 'Security forces must demonstrate that they are acting solely to protect all Syrians and do not constitute a threat.' To avoid future violence, Pedersen stressed the need for comprehensive reforms of the security sector, including disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of armed factions. He praised efforts by the new Syrian authorities to counter Daesh and Al-Qaeda but emphasized that 'continued vigilance' remains critical. On the political front, Pedersen noted a decree that was issued on Wednesday for indirect elections to appoint two-thirds of the 210 members of an interim People's Assembly. The remaining 70 will be appointed by the president. For this process to succeed, he said, it must be transparent, inclusive and allow the participation of all major groups within Syrian society, not only 'trusted individuals,' and include the 'equal and visible' representation of women. 'Anything less,' he warned, 'would entrench skepticism, aggravate the forces pulling Syria apart, and impede reconciliation.' He called for dialogue with all communities, including those critical of the interim authorities. Pedersen also voiced concern about stalled efforts to implement the March 10 agreement between the interim government and the Syrian Democratic Forces for the integration of the latter into state institutions, citing in particular recent flare-ups of violence in Aleppo. 'We hope that reported further contacts between interim authority officials and SDF representatives can be cemented into real compromise,' he said. He also underscored the role of civil society in the political transition process, and the important need for women to play a significant part. 'Syrian women continue to stress the necessity of meaningful political participation,' Pedersen said, while acknowledging the risks and pressures they face. Tom Fletcher, the UN's humanitarian chief, echoed Pedersen's concerns and warned that 'the humanitarian crisis is not over.' He said 16 million Syrians remain in need of support, a situation he described as 'dire.' UN teams are managing to provide life-saving aid to about 3.5 million people a month, despite funding shortfalls and access challenges, he revealed. 'Our humanitarian appeal for 2025 is only 14 percent funded,' Fletcher said, warning that budget cuts could reduce humanitarian staffing levels by 40 percent. Already, he noted, '16 percent of health facilities have suspended or reduced capacity.' He welcomed recent sanctions-relief measures announced by the US, EU and UK, but said it will take time to feel the full effects of this. 'We need investment in longer-term support for development and reconstruction that will allow the people of Syria to reduce, and ultimately end, reliance on humanitarian aid,' he said. 'With funding and access, we aim to no longer be needed.' Fletcher concluded his remarks with a direct appeal to members of the Security Council: 'The people of Syria do not need us to be commentators and problem-observers. They need us to move with genuine urgency, generosity and purpose.'
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
Gaza civilian death toll could be as high as 83%: Israeli data
LONDON: As many as 83 percent of Palestinian casualties in Gaza could be civilians, classified Israeli data suggests. A joint investigation by The Guardian, Hebrew-language Local Call and the Israeli-Palestinian +972 Magazine found that Israeli officials had been able to name 8,900 people killed or 'probably dead' in Gaza as members of Hamas and Islamic Jihad as of May this year. At the time, the total death toll from the war was believed to be at least 53,000 people according to local authorities, meaning that just 17 percent of those identified were combatants. The database used to assess combatant casualty figures is based on documents seized by the Israeli military in Gaza. In total, 47,653 Palestinians are identified as being members of Hamas or Islamic Jihad, meaning that a little under 40,000 are believed to be still alive The Israeli military also believes Gaza's health authorities' data on casualties to be reliable, Local Call reported, though these figures are likely to be an underestimate as thousands of people remain buried under rubble, and only bodies positively identified are counted. Therese Pettersson of the Uppsala Conflict Data Program told The Guardian: 'That proportion of civilians among those killed would be unusually high, particularly as it has been going on for such a long time. 'If you single out a particular city or battle in another conflict, you could find similar rates, but very rarely overall.' She added that since 1989, UCDP had only identified the siege of Srebrenica, the Rwandan genocide and the 2022 siege of Mariupol as conflicts that saw civilian casualties outnumber combatants. Previously, Israeli politicians have cited a far more balanced casualty rate, with some suggesting it could even be equal between combatants and civilians. Others have suggested in the past that 20,000 people killed in Gaza were militants. This could be on account of collating members of the enclave's civilian infrastructure or people with loose ties to fighters — such as police and politicians — with membership of militant groups, but it is also believed that civilians without ties to Islamic Jihad or Hamas are included in those tallies. One source who spent time with the Israeli military in Gaza told The Guardian that 'people are promoted to the rank of terrorist after their death,' adding: 'If I had listened to the brigade, I would have come to the conclusion that we had killed 200 percent of Hamas operatives in the area.' Retired Gen. Itzhak Brik, a former commander of Israel's military colleges, told The Guardian that he had been told by former colleagues the numbers were inflated. 'There is absolutely no connection between the numbers that are announced and what is actually happening,' he said. 'It is just one big bluff.' Palestinian analyst Muhammad Shehada told the newspaper that by last December, the number of dead Hamas and Islamic Jihad members from their own data was around 6,500. 'Israel expands the boundaries so they can define every single person in Gaza as Hamas,' he said. 'All of it is killing in the moment for tactical purposes that have nothing to do with extinguishing a threat.' Moreover, the number of dead, and the disparity between civilian and combatant deaths, may have increased since May, with hunger now believed to be widespread due to a lack of food in Gaza, and an increase in the number of civilian deaths at aid distribution sites in the enclave. The impending Israeli ground offensive in the north of Gaza will likely further widen this gap. So far, in excess of 62,000 people are believed to have been killed in the enclave. Mary Kaldor, professor of global governance at the London School of Economics, said the nature of the Gaza conflict is also causing a disproportionate number of civilian casualties. 'In Gaza we are talking about a campaign of targeted assassinations, really, rather than battles, and they are carried out with no concern for civilians,' she added. Comparing Gaza to recent conflicts in Syria, Yemen and Sudan, she said: 'These are wars where the armed groups tend to avoid battle. They don't want to fight each other, they want to control territory and they do that by killing civilians. 'Maybe that is the same with Israel, and this is a model of war (in Gaza) that is about dominating a population and controlling land. Maybe the objective always was forced displacement.' Neta Crawford, professor of international relations at Oxford University, said tactics used by Israel mark a 'worrisome' departure from previously established norms to protect civilians. 'They say they're using the same kinds of procedures for civilian casualty estimation and mitigation as states like the United States. But if you look at these casualty rates, and their practices with the bombing and the destruction of civilian infrastructure, it is clear that they are not,' she said. In a statement to The Guardian, the Israeli military said the figures published in the investigation 'are incorrect.'
