
Dam gamble on Siang: China moves ahead with its mega project - Will India's response face local resistance?
The goal was to assess the possibility of building a massive dam across the Siang River, called the Brahmaputra in Assam and Yarlung Zangbo in China.
But on the opposite bank, in Parong, anger was already building.
The local Adi community, opposed to the dam, had been staging protests. Authorities tried to keep operations quiet, planning to start work in Begging and later ferry equipment across the river.
However, within a week, resistance intensified.
Protesters marched to Begging, cut off its only link to the outside world, a hanging bridge — and damaged the drilling machines, bringing the survey to a halt, ET reported.
Despite growing unrest, law enforcement remained restrained, avoiding confrontation in the sensitive border area. The authorities, cautious of escalation, suspended operations temporarily.
NHPC engineers stationed at the proposed drilling location withdrew to Pasighat, the primary town along the Siang, leaving the contested riverbank quiet.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Remember Him? Take A Deep Breath Before You See Him Now
The Noodle Box
Undo
This tranquility is temporary.
The government remains committed to constructing the Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP), a Rs 1,50,000 crore initiative. The project features a 267-m-tall dam with 9.2 billion cubic metres (bcm) storage capacity, designed as a strategic reserve against potential upstream water releases by China.
The 11,000 MW project offers Arunachal Pradesh 12% free electricity and revenue participation.
The timing aligns with Beijing's recent groundbreaking of the world's largest dam upstream on the Brahmaputra, initiating strategic water management in the Eastern Himalayas.
A critical question emerges: will India's defensive dam strategy provide effective deterrence or exacerbate environmental vulnerabilities in this sensitive region.
The timing is telling. Just days ago, China began work on what is expected to be the world's largest dam on the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra River.
India's own plans for a massive dam on the Siang — the river's name in Arunachal Pradesh, appear to be a strategic response.
But the move raises a critical question.
Can India's proposed dam act as a credible counter to China's project, or will it deepen environmental and social challenges in the fragile Eastern Himalayan region?
"It (the Chinese dam) is going to cause an existential threat to our tribes and our livelihoods.
It is quite serious because China could even use this as a sort of 'water bomb'," Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu told PTI on July 9, just days before Beijing formally announced the commencement of construction.
China's first move
China was the first to disturb the fragile peace along the McMahon Line. In 2020, amid rising military tensions with India in Ladakh's Galwan Valley, Beijing unveiled plans for a massive hydropower project on the Yarlung Zangbo.
It was folded into China's 14th Five-Year Plan, signaling how seriously the country views its strategic importance.
That dam, now under construction in Nyingchi near the Great Bend of the river, is expected to outsize even China's famous Three Gorges Dam.
It will feature five cascading power stations, generate 300 million megawatthours (MWh) annually, and cost roughly $168 billion. Premier Li Qiang formally launched the project on July 19, calling it the 'project of the century.'
China has also created a state-owned firm, China Yajiang Group — to manage construction.
China's capital markets have reacted with enthusiasm. Stocks of key engineering firms surged after the announcement, and the CSI Construction & Engineering Index jumped 4% to hit a 7-month high.
India's strategic response
India's proposed SUMP project is seen as a direct counter to China's dam. The aim: to establish a strategic foothold on the Siang river before it becomes heavily regulated upstream.
However, while China's project is already underway, India's remains stuck at the pre-feasibility stage.
The project has run into stiff resistance from local communities in Arunachal Pradesh. On May 21, when two rigs were quietly moved into the village of Begging to start pre-feasibility drilling, protests broke out on the opposite bank in Parong.
Within a week, angry villagers destroyed the rigs and cut off access by damaging a fragile hanging bridge — the only connection to the outside world.
Ecological and cultural fears
Many are also worried about the environmental impact of two mega dams facing off across the McMahon Line. The Eastern Himalayas are a seismically active and ecologically fragile zone.
Experts warn that the scale of these projects could disrupt the delicate balance of the region's rivers and biodiversity.
A bigger concern is the potential for water diversion. According to internal government documents, 84% of the Siang's winter flow in Arunachal Pradesh originates in China.
If Beijing decides to divert or block this flow, the Brahmaputra could shrink drastically in the dry season, especially in Upper Assam, before tributaries replenish it downstream, ET reported.
Assam's position
Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has tried to downplay the risks, arguing that 70% of the Brahmaputra's flow comes from Indian territory and Bhutan, not China.
However, experts argue that this may be true on an annual average — but not during the critical winter months, when Chinese-origin water dominates the flow.
Could the Brahmaputra shrink?
Though the Brahmaputra is often seen as a mighty and resilient river, the data reveals a more complex picture, especially during the dry winter months.
As per internal documents related to India's proposed Siang Upper Middle Stage Project (SUMP), 84% of the Brahmaputra's water in Arunachal Pradesh between November and April originates in China.
This raises serious concerns.
If China diverts or controls the flow upstream through its new mega dam project on the Yarlung Zangbo, the river's volume downstream, especially in Upper Assam—could drop dramatically.
In its early stretches, before tributaries join in, the Brahmaputra may shrink to a trickle, threatening the region's ecological balance and biodiversity.
The looming presence of two massive dams—one on each side of the McMahon Line—adds urgency to the issue. Experts and locals alike are asking: What will happen to the river and the people who depend on it if both projects go ahead?
Voices from the ground: Protests and fears
In January, during a visit to the proposed dam sites in Arunachal Pradesh—Parong, Dite Dime, and Ugeng—a sense of fear and resistance was clearly visible.
Villagers in Parong, which has around 125 families, voiced strong opposition.
'We are not just opposing the dam, we are against any feasibility studies being conducted here,' Tato Pabin, a local resident of Parong told ET. 'Our orange farms, which thrive in the low-lying areas along the river, will be completely wiped out," he added.
Parong has emerged as the frontrunner site for the dam. The other two locations, Dite Dime and Ugeng, appear to have been dropped from active consideration, according to an official familiar with the project.
Widespread impact on villages
While a full assessment is still pending, initial estimates suggest that nearly 59 villages could be affected by the dam. Of these, at least 15 villages may require complete relocation.
So far, only three villages—Pangkang, Riga, and Riew—have given their approval for the project. The rest remain either opposed or undecided, reflecting widespread apprehension in the region.
Beyond the human and environmental cost, the proposed dam poses risks to vital infrastructure.
A key stretch of road leading to the Tuting Advanced Landing Ground, a strategically important military airstrip near the China border, could be submerged if the project proceeds.
This would force authorities to construct an alternative route at a higher elevation—a major logistical and financial undertaking—to maintain military and civilian access in this sensitive frontier zone.
As both countries push forward with dam projects, the geopolitical and ecological stakes are higher than ever. Whether India's dam becomes a deterrent or a new source of conflict — or environmental damage — remains to be seen.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
19 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Big Headload Fell...": Railway Minister On What Led To Delhi Station Tragedy
New Delhi: A big headload that "fell from one of the passengers" led to the tragedy at New Delhi Railway Station that killed 18 people, Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said today in response to a member's query. It resulted in the "tripping of passengers on the stairs", said the minister. In response to a query by Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman in Rajya Sabha, Mr Vaishnaw shared details from the report by a high-level inquiry committee that was constituted to examine the circumstances leading to the "unfortunate incident". Mr Suman had asked the Railway Minister about the status of the report of the committee constituted to investigate the stampede and the corrective steps taken by the government. Eighteen people were killed and 15 were injured on February 15 at the New Delhi Railway Station, which witnessed a surge of passengers waiting to board trains for Prayagraj -- where the Maha Kumbh was underway at the time. In a post on X that night, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that he was "distressed by the stampede". However, in the Railway Minister's statement, there was no mention of the word "stampede". On the day of the tragedy, around 49,000 general tickets were sold at the railway stations, 13,000 more than the daily average, Mr Vaishnaw had informed the Lok Sabha in March. In his response today, the minister stated that sufficient crowd management measures were in place that day to manage the high number of passengers at the station. There was a "gradual increase of passenger density on the foot over bridge (FOB) after 8.15 pm", mentioned the written reply. "Many of the passengers were carrying big headloads, affecting smooth movement on the FOB. There was a big headload falling from one of the passengers, and the pressure was passed on to the stairs of platforms 14 and 15, resulting in the tripping of passengers on the stairs. This led to an incident at 8.48 pm on FOB-3," the minister said. "Consequently, passengers fell on each other," he said. Compensation of Rs 10 lakh was given to the families of each victim, Rs 2.5 lakh to those seriously injured, and Rs 1 lakh to those with simple injuries. "A total amount of Rs 2.01 crore has been paid to 33 victims and their family members," Mr Vaishnaw said. To manage large crowds better, the railways have put new measures in place. These include permanent holding areas, access control for confirmed ticket holders at 73 stations, wider foot overbridges, CCTV cameras, and war rooms at major stations. The Maha Kumbh Mela, the 45-day event that ended in February, led to record ticket sales, emphasising the importance of solid crowd management during such events.


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat
Donald Trump orders U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia after Medvedev's warning sparks global tension- In a dramatic turn of global events, President Donald Trump has ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to be strategically deployed near Russian waters. This powerful move comes after Russia's Dmitry Medvedev, former president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council, made what Trump called 'foolish and inflammatory' threats, evoking Cold War-era nuclear rhetoric. The decision is not just a military maneuver—it is a strong geopolitical message amid rising global tensions and ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Donald Trump responds to Medvedev's nuclear threats with submarine deployment Tensions between the U.S. and Russia are reaching a boiling point after President Donald Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to reposition closer to Russian waters. This dramatic military maneuver was a direct response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's alarming nuclear rhetoric, where he warned of retaliatory measures over Trump's Ukraine ceasefire deadline. Trump framed the move as a "precaution," yet it marks one of the boldest nuclear postures by a U.S. president since the Cold War. His administration is sending a clear signal: America won't tolerate escalatory threats from Moscow. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Project Management Artificial Intelligence Degree Data Science Others Product Management MBA Leadership Finance Healthcare CXO Public Policy Operations Management PGDM MCA Data Science Management Technology Cybersecurity Data Analytics healthcare others Design Thinking Digital Marketing Skills you'll gain: Project Planning & Governance Agile Software Development Practices Project Management Tools & Software Techniques Scrum Framework Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Programme in IT Project Management Starts on Jun 20, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Portfolio Management Project Planning & Risk Analysis Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection Adaptive & Agile Project Management Duration: 6 Months IIT Delhi Certificate Programme in Project Management Starts on May 30, 2024 Get Details But Trump's move isn't just about deterring Russia militarily—it's part of a broader pressure campaign that includes punishing economic measures. Alongside the submarine deployment, Trump is ramping up tariffs and trade restrictions, directly tying them to global alliances and behavior, especially countries with growing ties to Russia. This includes India, a key member of the BRICS alliance, which has continued importing discounted Russian oil and weapons. With NATO on edge and global markets rattled, Trump's military and economic posture is designed to reassert American dominance on multiple fronts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Things Women Should NEVER Wear! Undo Trump, reacting via his Truth Social account, stressed that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore such escalatory language. Calling Medvedev's rhetoric 'provocative,' Trump revealed that two nuclear-powered submarines have been moved to undisclosed locations near Russia 'as a precautionary measure.' His words echoed a deepening concern that the world is again walking a tightrope between diplomacy and destruction. US nuclear submarines positioned as warning signal to Russia The deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia serves a dual purpose—military deterrence and strategic signaling. While Trump emphasized that the move is defensive and meant to 'avoid unintended consequences,' analysts say this marks one of the most visible escalations between the U.S. and Russia in recent years. Live Events The submarines involved are part of the U.S. Navy's Ohio-class ballistic missile fleet, capable of carrying dozens of nuclear warheads. Their undetectable stealth and immense power make them one of the most formidable assets in America's strategic arsenal. This development is especially critical as it comes at a time when U.S.–Russia relations are already strained over the prolonged war in Ukraine, cyber threats, and economic sanctions. Trump's decisive move may shift the global chessboard and intensify calls for diplomatic engagement before the situation spirals further. Dmitry Medvedev revives Cold War-era nuclear warnings At the center of this high-stakes exchange is Dmitry Medvedev, who has increasingly taken on a more hawkish and aggressive tone in recent months. In his latest statement, Medvedev dismissed Trump's suggested Ukraine ceasefire plans and instead referenced Russia's massive nuclear arsenal. He also mentioned the 'Dead Hand' system —a Cold War legacy technology rumored to automatically launch Russia's nuclear weapons if national leadership is wiped out. This chilling detail sent shockwaves through Western governments and likely played a major role in Trump's rapid military response. Medvedev's public comments appear designed to demonstrate Russia's refusal to be bullied or coerced into surrendering geopolitical ground, especially in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. Is Trump targeting India and BRICS with tariffs over Russia ties? Yes, and the message is loud and clear. President Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports, followed by a penalty tied to India's continued trade with Russia. His administration is increasingly frustrated with BRICS nations—including India, Brazil, and China—who've maintained or deepened economic ties with Moscow despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. India's position is particularly sensitive: while it maintains strategic autonomy, its oil purchases from Russia and growing defense partnerships have drawn Trump's ire. U.S. officials even suggested India is being "made an example" to deter other nations from ignoring Washington's red lines. Trump's trade strategy is deeply intertwined with his foreign policy objectives. He's not only seeking better deals for the U.S. but also using tariffs as leverage to isolate Russia and disrupt emerging multipolar alliances like BRICS. Some U.S. lawmakers have gone as far as proposing 500% secondary tariffs on countries that continue to fund what they call "Putin's war machine." The timing is no coincidence—Trump's submarine deployment near Russia and economic pressure on India are part of the same high-stakes chess game. By linking military deterrence with aggressive trade tactics, Trump is reshaping the global order on his terms. Trump's decision sends global markets and foreign leaders on alert The announcement came as a shock to many international leaders, with NATO allies quickly convening emergency briefings to assess potential fallout. Several European nations have voiced concern about the dangerous path being carved by nuclear saber-rattling on both sides. Financial markets also reacted with caution. Global stocks dipped, oil prices surged, and defense stocks rallied as investors priced in the risk of growing military conflict. Analysts warned that such volatile moves could create long-term instability unless world leaders return to diplomatic channels. The United Nations issued a statement urging both the U.S. and Russia to exercise restraint and avoid inflammatory actions that could further escalate nuclear tensions. The Ukraine war continues to fuel global geopolitical instability The Ukraine–Russia war, now in its third year, remains a core source of global instability. President Trump has repeatedly insisted that Russia must agree to a ceasefire and begin peace talks, warning of strict deadlines and harsher consequences. However, Moscow has resisted U.S. pressure, and the Kremlin continues to frame the conflict as a defensive effort against NATO expansion. Trump's latest move underscores just how intertwined the nuclear issue has become with the broader Ukraine war. Experts fear that any misstep—verbal or strategic—could ignite a new, more dangerous chapter in this long-running conflict. Analysts warn of heightened nuclear risk and diplomatic breakdown Nuclear policy experts across the globe have raised alarms, cautioning that any military escalation involving nuclear assets, especially submarines, could be misinterpreted as a preparation for attack. 'This is a very delicate moment,' said Dr. Elena Petrov, a nuclear strategy analyst at the Atlantic Institute. 'By publicizing the submarine deployment, Trump is both deterring aggression and potentially increasing the likelihood of misunderstanding or miscalculation by the Russians.' She added that in a world where communication can be instantaneous but filtered through political rhetoric, leaders must be especially cautious. 'What's said online or in speeches can spark real-world consequences—especially when nuclear weapons are involved.' Trump defends the move as necessary caution, not aggression In the face of mounting criticism, President Trump defended his decision. He emphasized that the U.S. had no plans to initiate conflict but could not sit idle while a senior Russian official made what he termed 'reckless threats.' Trump insisted the move was not just about protecting American interests but also about showing strength in the face of intimidation. 'Words matter,' he wrote. 'When someone threatens nuclear retaliation, we must take it seriously.' This response plays into Trump's broader strategy of projecting American strength on the world stage, particularly in matters involving national security, energy dominance, and great power competition. Will nuclear brinkmanship replace diplomacy? The current climate raises difficult questions about the future of international diplomacy. With both Washington and Moscow hardening their stances, and with war still raging in Eastern Europe, the room for peaceful resolution appears to be narrowing. Analysts warn that mutual threats and weapons deployments only serve to erode what little trust remains between the superpowers. The absence of formal arms control talks, especially after the collapse of key nuclear treaties in recent years, makes these moments even more dangerous. Whether this incident becomes a turning point for reengagement—or the beginning of a new era of nuclear brinkmanship—remains to be seen. He world watches as nuclear tension rises between U.S. and Russia Trump's bold decision to deploy nuclear submarines close to Russian territory has transformed a war of words into a potential flashpoint. His warning to Medvedev—combined with the reality of submarine positioning—sends a clear message that the U.S. is ready to defend its interests and allies, even at great risk. At the same time, the move has rattled the international community, highlighting the urgent need for renewed diplomacy, strategic calm, and nuclear de-escalation. For now, all eyes are on what happens next—because in a world with nuclear weapons, miscommunication can become catastrophe in a matter of minutes. FAQs: Q1: Why did Donald Trump deploy nuclear submarines near Russia? To respond to Medvedev's nuclear threats and rising tensions over Ukraine. Q2: What did Dmitry Medvedev say that triggered Trump's decision? He warned of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear retaliation system, the 'Dead Hand.'


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Collegs, univs asked to implement Shaktishree initiative by selecting coordinator
Bhubaneswar: State govt on Friday asked govt and non-govt aided colleges, and public universities to implement the Shaktishree initiative by identifying a woman faculty member to serve as the 'Sanjojika' (coordinator) for the purpose. Higher education director Kaliprasanna Mahapatra wrote to the registrars of all state public universities and the principals of all govt and non-govt aided colleges to immediately nominate the woman faculty member who will be responsible for guiding, mentoring, and coordinating the efforts of the 'Shaktishree Empowerment Cell' and liaising with the relevant authorities. As part of Shaktishree, govt aims to empower girl students and ensure their safety and well-being. "The Shaktishree Sanjojika should be a student-friendly female faculty member with demonstrated experience, interest, and commitment in the areas of gender equity, student welfare, empowerment, and social justice. She should have strong leadership, organisational and communication skills, along with the ability to engage effectively with students, faculty and external stakeholders. She should promote gender sensitivity and awareness among students through regular sessions and campaigns," read the letter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Max Estates Estate 360: 3 & 4 BHK @ ₹6 Cr+ Max Estates - Estate 361 Book Now Undo "She should conduct or organise training, workshops, seminars and events on self-defence, health awareness, legal literacy, life skills and ethical values as per the calendar to foster positive values supporting girls' rights and empowerment. She will facilitate access to support services for women in distress, including providing them with proper help and legal assistance in coordination with local authorities. She can ensure a gender-inclusive learning environment and promote respectful, safe, and inclusive workplaces free from bullying and bias," it added. A 'Sanjojika' can mentor 'Shaktishree Saathis' and student volunteers to lead peer engagement activities. She can liaise with 'Shaktishree Apa', local authorities, NGOs and service providers for awareness and support services. She will organise events commemorating important national and international days related to women's rights, safety and empowerment through creative and participatory platforms such as debates, street plays, skits, poster-making, and slogan writing. She can plan and implement regular activities aligned with the objectives of the initiative. She will submit timely reports, success stories and impact documentation to relevant authorities. The college and university authorities have been requested to identify the Sanjojika and assign responsibility by Aug 4.