Farmer says daughter 'disillusioned' by inheritance tax proposals
Ms Godsell of Godsell's Cheese said her family were "quite alarmed" following the tax announcement.She said farmers, who are "asset rich, cash poor" produce "the most important thing you need to live", food, but do not feel valued by the government."It's a long day, not very good pay, but we've got passion and we need to be rewarded with some profit," she said."I think what the farm inheritance tax hasn't taken into consideration is land is very expensive but that is one of our tools."It's going to mean a lot of family farms are going to go."
Ellie Isaac, a senior surveyor at property experts Bruton Knowles, said it is "really important" for farmers to speak to their families and mitigate inheritance circumstances ahead of time."Keep your records as up to date as possible," she said."No one wants to talk about when husband, wife, mum, dad passes away but [people should] talk about it so you know what the plan is, make sure wills are up to date, and people are aware of who is being passed what."
Mr Day from the NFU said the news of the inheritance tax had left its members "devastated"."Farmers aren't earning a lot of money because commodity prices are so low," he said."Inflation is so high... this is an additional tax now that we've suddenly got to go and find the money for at a time when agriculture is at its lowest ebb."The government said most estates claiming Agricultural and Business Property Reliefs will be "unaffected" by the changes. "The latest data shows that 40% of Agricultural Property Relief - worth £219m - was directed to just 117 estates," A HM Treasury spokesperson said. "The money raised will go towards public services we all rely on every day instead."We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers' profits."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
JD Vance visits farm shop owned by Tory donor's wife
JD Vance has been pictured visiting a Cotswolds farm shop owned by the wife of a Tory donor. The US vice-president visited Daylesford Farm, owned by Baroness Bamford, on Monday during his holiday in the Cotswolds. The businesswoman, who founded the Daylesford Organic farm shops chain, is the wife of Lord Bamford, the chairman of construction equipment manufacturer JCB. The Tory peer, his brother Mark, and their company have donated more than £10m to the Conservatives over the past 20 years. Lord Bamford reportedly gave £3.94m to the party during the 2019 election campaign. Boris Johnson's wedding to Carrie Symonds in 2022 was also held at Lord Bamford's 18th-century estate, Daylesford House, in Gloucestershire. Mr Vance arrived at Daylesford Farm Shop in a convoy of armoured cars. He was shown around by Lord Bamford and took interest in the bread counter, where he was seen trying samples during his three-hour visit. A room inside was closed off for Mr Vance to enjoy lunch before he left via a back door. The Daylesford Farm Shop sells a variety of high-end organic produce, including bread, meat, fish, and seasonal fruits and vegetables. It also provides ready-to-cook meals, organic wines, candles and skincare products. Mr Vance, his wife Usha and their three children, began their summer holiday in the UK being hosted by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, at Chevening, his grace-and-favour country house in Kent. The vice-president's break has been peppered with official meetings on topics such as Ukraine and an intervention over the state of freedom of speech in Britain. On Sunday, the Vances were given exclusive access to Hampton Court Palace, the former home of Henry VIII. Mr Vance toured the grounds as a throng of tourists massed at the gates, watched over by secret service agents.
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
UK nuclear safety rules to be relaxed to speed up new power plants
Ministers are preparing to relax Britain's nuclear safety rules after a government report found that a culture of 'gold-plating' and 'risk aversion' was responsible for huge delays and ballooning costs. In an effort to speed up the development of Sizewell C and a new generation of small modular reactors (SMR) ministers will pledge to take on the 'needless bureaucracy' that can add billions of pounds to the costs. A taskforce appointed by Sir Keir Starmer found that regulation in the nuclear sector had become unnecessarily 'complex and inconsistent' and 'lacked proportionality'. It said a 'culture of risk aversion' was inflating the costs and timescales of new clean power projects as well as increasing the cost of replacing the UK's nuclear deterrent. The report, first reported by The Times, called for 'more fundamental and meaningful changes' to environmental protections than ministers have so far been willing to countenance. It said fast-track planning processes should be introduced for a new generation of SMRs built to standard designs and that a ban on nuclear reactors in 'semi-urban' areas must be rethought. The government's change of approach comes amid growing concerns from industry that regulators are taking an overly cautious approach to the risks posed by nuclear power stations. In one case, developers of a planned nuclear power station in Wales were told they would have to install filters to reduce radioactive discharges equivalent to one fiftieth of the dose from a dental x-ray. Under current rules reactors must be designed so that, even in the event of a meltdown, the radiation released would be no greater than natural background levels found in Cornwall. This is an event with a likelihood of occurring once in a million years. In June the government announced that Rolls-Royce had been selected as the preferred bidder to build the country's first SMRs with £2.5 billion of government support. The decision came a decade after George Osborne, then chancellor, championed the technology and pledged government support to get it off the ground. Ministers have so far commissioned just three reactors, none expected before 2035. The Czech Republic chose Rolls-Royce to supply six SMRs within a year, with plans for up to six units from the mid-2030s. The taskforce is due to propose a number of specific recommendations to ministers in the autumn and government sources said the intention was to implement them rapidly. Miatta Fahnbulleh, the minister for energy consumers, said it was time for a 'new approach' to nuclear regulation. 'For too long, big British infrastructure projects have been held back by needless bureaucracy,' she said. 'It's time for a new approach to getting nuclear projects off the ground more quickly, and at a lower cost. We look forward to working with the expert taskforce to modernise outdated regulations so we can unlock growth, jobs and energy security for the British people.' • Hinkley Point C's soaring costs blamed on red tape Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, said: 'If the UK is serious about energy security and creating good jobs, we need a regulatory framework that is more proportionate and built for delivery — one that upholds safety and public trust while giving investors the confidence to move at pace. 'Smarter regulation will mean projects are approved faster, built more efficiently, and delivered at lower cost to consumers. The nuclear industry stands ready to work with government and regulators to make that happen.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Manchester United fan group postpones protest against Sir Jim Ratcliffe
A Manchester United supporters' group has postponed a demonstration against the club's ownership planned for the day of their opening game of the Premier League season. The 1958 had organised a protest march to Old Trafford on August 17, ahead of United's clash with Arsenal, with banners referring to minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. The 1958 has overseen numerous demonstrations in recent years, principally aimed at unpopular majority shareholders the Glazers, but frustration has now spread to Ratcliffe. The billionaire British businessman, who owns a 28.94 per cent stake in United, has instigated wide – often unpopular – changes since taking over day-to-day operational control from the Glazers in February 2024. 'Jim Ratcliffe chose to get into bed with the Glazers and, in our opinion, is helping keep them in charge,' said a group representative, who added Ratcliffe was 'no saviour' and 'like a (red) devil in disguise,' last week. However, after conducting a survey, the group has acknowledged opinion is split and the time is not right for a protest. A statement read: 'With a fanbase as diverse and passionate as ours, finding the right balance isn't always easy. We've had to consider momentum, timing, fan appetite, broader consequences of protest activity whilst assessing how current and future decisions may impact us as fans. 'Given the current sentiment within the fanbase and particularly in light of these recent survey results, it's clear there is no unified view on the direction of the club under Ratcliffe. 'That split is real, and we believe it would be irresponsible to risk creating a situation that could result in any 'red on red' conflict inside or outside the stadium.' The group say almost 63 per cent of the near 26,000 respondents to their survey said Ratcliffe and his Ineos company should be held to account for their decisions so far by means of a protest. However, 68 per cent also believed they should be given more time.
