BREAKING NEWS Embarrassing REAL reason Stephen Colbert's show was canceled after bosses hatched plot while star vacationed
Puck journalist Matthew Belloni revealed Colbert's astonishing lack of profitability Friday, hours after CNN first broke the news that the show was canceled because it was in the red.
Belloni outlined how The Late Show - whose cancelation was announced Thursday - costs $100m a year to produce, with Colbert, 61, getting paid between $15 million and $20 million a year to host.
Colbert beats ABC and NBC rivals Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon in the ratings, but that still wasn't enough to save him.
Late night shows have slumped in profitability in recent years as viewers shun the format in favor of streaming services or watching content on their phones.
Advertiser revenue has slumped sharply even in the last three years, Puck reported, making it harder to pull Colbert's show out of the red.
Colbert was reported to be 'not angry, actually' about his cancelation and was chatting with his staff in a 'matter-of-fact' way before Thursday's show, Puck reported.
Colbert, who will broadcast his final show in May 2026, was first informed his show was on the chopping block around July 4, it is claimed.
He the went on vacation, giving bosses at CBS time to plot behind his back, CNN reported.
Colbert had news of his cancelation confirmed Thursday.
He moved to share it as quickly as possible so that his staff would not learn of their impending unemployment via leaks to the press.
All three major late night hosts - Colbert, Kimmel and Fallon - have become notorious for their regular rants about President Trump, which many viewers have complained are boring and off-putting.
But Belloni said he didn't believe the famously anti-MAGA Colbert was axed to appease Donald Trump, who recently won a $15 million payout from CBS after suing them over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris he said was deceptively edited.
The axing of Colbert has delighted Trump, who posted about it on his TruthSocial network earlier today.
Colbert's ouster could also make it easier for CBS parent company Paramount's efforts to merge with media company Skydance in a deal that must be approved by Trump's Federal Communications Commission.
Colbert's axing came just days after he sniped at CBS bosses for settling with Trump, branding the deal a 'big fat bribe.'
The Late Show launched in 1993 under David Letterman to compete with longtime late night juggernaut The Tonight Show.
Colbert took over from Letterman in 2015 after his retirement.
More than three decades later, CBS's entry into the late night sphere sits at the top, with second-best Jimmy Kimmel Live! raking in an average of 1.772 million viewers.
Colbert, by comparison, collects an average of 2.417 million.
Colbert - who once played a conservative character on Comedy Central's satirical late night program The Colbert Report - often aired jokes at the conservative's expense.
Trump celebrated the news of the show's cancellation as a result.
'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings," he wrote in a Friday Truth Social post.
'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert,' he added, before talking up right-wing Fox New star Greg Gutfeld.
'[He's] better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show,' Trump added, referring to Jimmy Fallon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tracee Ellis Ross stuns fans after revealing how many pairs of underwear she packs for vacation
Tracee Ellis Ross is the internet's favorite rich, single aunty. And thanks to a recent TikTok she made showing what she does on vacation with her underwear, her fans are calling her more relatable than ever. In the video, Tracee says that a person can 'only pack so much underwear' and explains that rather than pack a month's worth of undies or paying hotels to wash her delicates, she does it herself. She broke down the process, saying that she uses shower gel, a bar of soap, and two sinks to hand wash her underwear before she rings them out, rolls them into a towel, and then hangs them up to dry. This video comes one day after Tracee spoke to Travel + Leisure editor-in-chief Jacqui Gifford about her packing essentials during an on stage interview at the annual World's Best Summit on July 15. She told Jacqui that along with a dress, bathing suit, and flip flop, 'there's always two undies' that she packs. Jacqui questioned Tracee on this, asking if she only brings two pairs of underwear. The Black-ish actress explained her underwear-washing process - the same one she eventually posted a video of - and moved on to talking about the importance of solo traveling. Tracee's fans praised this process, sharing that they too were raised to wash their intimates by hand. Many called her 'relatable' and 'likeable' for the act despite her celebrity But the internet paused there momentarily. With headlines stating Tracee only packed two pairs of underwear while traveling, some people were beginning to believe that that was all the underwear she'd bring with her on a trip. Considering Tracee's celebrity, some fans were confused by this. 'This can't be real, buy new ones,' one user even wrote on X, formerly Twitter. But after Tracee noticed the traction the article was getting, she decided to address the speculation by reposting one of the articles on her Instagram story. She captioned it saying, 'This is hilarious. I pack two pairs in my carry-on... in case my luggage doesn't make it.' Regardless, it seemed as though a majority of Tracee's fans didn't care for how much underwear she actually packed - they were too excited at the 'down-to-earth' display of her makeshift 'washing machine' to care. 'Why are you so normal and so extraordinary at the same time?' one user commented on her TikTok. After confused messages from fans, Tracee took to her Instagram stories to clarify that she only packs two pairs of underwear in her carry-on in case anything happens to her main luggage. But she did say that she doesn't pack many pairs despite the length of a trip Many people even shared that their own experiences, pointing out that they were raised to wash their intimates by hand just like Tracee. 'I love seeing things that show that celebrities are literally just normal people,' another wrote. 'This is why we love you Tracey! So relatable!' someone else added. Almost every other comment on Tracee's two-part videos (one for the washing process and the other for drying) mirrored similar sentiments: this act only made Tracee that much more likable. 'Miss Tracee, I didn't think I could love you more but after this, I do,' one fan confessed.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump team ‘cooked up' legal basis to go after Harvard funding, university lawyers tell judge
Attorneys for Harvard University have accused Donald Trump's administration of having 'cooked up' a bogus legal basis to pull $2.6 billion in federal funding from the nation's oldest university. In a court hearing on Monday, the university's legal team accused the administration of ' blatant, unrepentant ' First Amendment violations with its list of demands to 'address bias, improve viewpoint diversity, and end ideological capture,' including reviewing departments that 'fuel antisemitic harassment.' 'It's the constitutional third rail, or it should be, for the government to insist it can engage in viewpoint discrimination,' said Harvard's attorney Steven Lehotsky, arguing that the administration is threatening the university's independence. The White House and the university have sparred for months over the administration's escalating attempts to bend Harvard and other institutions to ideologically driven demands, particularly over opposition to pro-Palestine campus demonstrations against Israel's war in Gaza, which the administration claims are antisemitic. In April, the government emailed Harvard a set of demands, including to submit to a 'viewpoint diversity' audit and end diversity-based hiring and admissions practices. The administration then threatened to terminate more than $2 billion in federal grants. Those grants support research into Alzheimer's prevention, cancer treatment, and national security studies, among other projects. Harvard's federal lawsuit says the government 'fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism.' In court documents, attorneys for the university argue that the administration is wielding funding threats as 'leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard' while imperiling vital research in medicine, science and technology. The Trump administration denies the cuts were retaliatory and were under review long before the demand letter was sent in April. Massachusetts District Judge Allison Burroughs appeared unconvinced. 'You're not taking away grants from labs that have been antisemitic,' she told lawyers for the government during Monday's hearing in Boston. Burroughs argued that the government provided 'no documentation, no procedure' to determine whether Harvard had 'taken enough steps' to combat allegations of antisemitism. 'The consequences of that in terms of constitutional law are staggering,' she added. 'I don't think you can justify a contract action based on impermissible suppression of speech. Where do I have that wrong?' Department of Justice counsel Michael Velchik argued that the administration has authority to make such decisions about where funding should or shouldn't go, and that 'the government does not want to fund research at institutions that fail to address antisemitism to its satisfaction.' Monday's hearing follows months of tension between Harvard and the Trump administration, which has zeroed in on campus activism at prestigious universities as part of a multi-pronged attack on campus dissent; diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives; and immigration policies and international students. Department of Homeland Security has accused Harvard of fostering 'anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators,' and the president has complained that the university has not provided the government with information about foreign students he calls 'radicalized lunatics' and 'troublemakers' who 'should not be let back into our Country.' In May, the administration also tried to rescind Harvard's permissions to enroll international students and forced currently enrolled foreign students to leave the university or risk losing their legal status in the U.S. Judge Burroughs blocked that attempt day later in a separate lawsuit brought by the university. The General Services Administration also ordered federal agencies to consider canceling government contracts with Harvard, which the agency accused of continuing to 'engage in race discrimination, including in its admissions process and in other areas of student life' and failing to protect students from antisemitism. 'The gravy train of federal assistance to institutions like Harvard, which enrich their grossly overpaid bureaucrats with tax dollars from struggling American families, is coming to an end,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement when the cuts were first announced. 'Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege.' But the government 'has not — and cannot — identify any rational connection' between allegations of antisemitism and threats to research that 'aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation,' according to Harvard's complaint.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
The history of Native American sports name changes, from the Obama era to Trump's latest comments
President Donald Trump's social media posts calling for the NFL's Washington Commanders and Major League Baseball's Cleveland Guardians to revert to their old names has revived the conversation about Native American imagery in sports. Each team has indicated it has no plans to go back to names that were abandoned years ago in the aftermath of a reckoning over racial injustice, iconography and racism in the U.S. following the death of George Floyd. Other professional teams have maintained names and logos through criticism and calls from activists who say they are offensive. Here is a look at how the issue has unfolded: October 2013 Then-President Barack Obama told The Associated Press he would 'think about changing' the name of the Washington Redskins if he owned the team. 'I don't know whether our attachment to a particular name should override the real legitimate concerns that people have about these things,' Obama said. Trump soon after posted to Twitter: 'President should not be telling the Washington Redskins to change their name-our country has far bigger problems! FOCUS on them,not nonsense.' January 2018 The Cleveland Indians announced they would remove the Chief Wahoo logo from their uniforms the following year after decades of protests and complaints that the grinning, red-faced caricature used in one version or another since 1947 is racist. 'Major League Baseball is committed to building a culture of diversity and inclusion throughout the game,' Commissioner Rob Manfred said in a statement. He said the logo 'is no longer appropriate for on-field use.' The team said it would continue to sell merchandise with the logo in the Cleveland area. Summer 2020 After several sponsors publicly voiced their opposition to the name Redskins, longtime owner Dan Snyder said in early July the organization would undergo a 'thorough review." Snyder had said multiple times since buying the team in 1999 that he had no intent of changing it. Cleveland hours later said it was considering going away from Indians, the baseball team's name since 1915. Manager Terry Francona said he was in favor of a change. On July 13, Snyder announced the Redskins moniker was being retired after 87 years, dating to the team's time in Boston. Later in the month, the organization unveiled plans to be known as the Washington Football Team for at least one season, and that name remained through 2021. MLB's Atlanta Braves and the NHL's Chicago Blackhawks doubled down on their names. The Braves wrote in a letter to season-ticket holders they will 'always be' known as that, while the Blackhawks said they would continue to use their name and logo because it honors Native American leader Black Hawk of Illinois' Sac & Fox Nation. The Braves said they were reviewing the use of the tomahawk chop and chant, a discussion they started with Native American leaders in 2019. The Blackhawks banned headdresses at home games. In August, the NFL's Kansas City Chiefs followed suit, prohibiting the use of Native American headdresses, face paint and clothing at their stadium. They faced increased scrutiny over the tomahawk chop and chant around winning their first Super Bowl title that February. December 2020 Cleveland owner Paul Dolan announced the team would no longer be called the Indians following the 2021 season. 'It was a learning process for me and I think when fair-minded, open-minded people really look at it, think about it and maybe even spend some time studying it, I like to think they would come to the same conclusion: It's a name that had its time, but this is not the time now, and certainly going forward, the name is no longer acceptable in our world,' Dolan told the AP, adding he did not want an interim moniker like Washington's. Trump quote-tweeted a story about the change with the message: 'Oh no! What is going on? This is not good news, even for 'Indians'. Cancel culture at work!' July 2021 Seemingly out of the blue, Cleveland unveiled its new name, Guardians, in a video posted to social media. They completed the season as the Indians before becoming the Guardians in November. Cleveland's new name was inspired by the large landmark stone edifices — referred to as traffic guardians — that flank both ends of the Hope Memorial Bridge, which connects downtown to Ohio City. October 2021 The tomahawk chop was front and center as the Braves reached — and won — the World Series, with MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred endorsing the fan behavior, citing the support of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, based in North Carolina about three hours from Atlanta. 'The Native American community in that region is wholly supportive of the Braves program, including the chop,' Manfred said. 'For me, that's kind of the end of the story. In that market, we're taking into account the Native American community.' February 2022 After a lengthy process, Washington rebranded as the Commanders. Snyder said the change pays 'homage to our local roots and what it means to represent the nation's capital.' 'As we kick off our 90th season, it is important for our organization and fans to pay tribute to our past traditions, history, legacy and the greats that came before us,' Snyder said. 'We continue to honor and represent the burgundy and gold while forging a pathway to a new era in Washington.' President Joe Biden welcomed the name change by posting a picture on Twitter of Commander, his recently acquired German shepherd puppy, in front of the White House. 'I suppose there's room for two Commanders in this town,' Biden wrote. Summer 2023 A group led by Josh Harris, which included Basketball Hall of Famer Magic Johnson, finalized the purchase of the Commanders from Snyder for a North American pro sports record $6.05 billion. Harris and co-owner Mitch Rales, who grew up in the area of the team, used the word Redskins at their introductory news conference, sparking renewed chatter about the subject. Before the season started, Harris said ownership would not be going back to the old name. Summer 2024 Sen. Steve Daines, a Montana Republican, threatened to block a congressional bill to transfer land to potentially be used for a new football stadium in Washington unless the Commanders and the NFL honored the former Indian head logo in some way. The original logo was designed by a member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana. After lobbying on Capitol Hill by Harris and Commissioner Roger Goodell, the bill passed in December at the eleventh hour, and Biden signed it into law in January. It gave control of the RFK Stadium site from the federal government to the District of Columbia, which agreed to a deal with the team in April to build there, pending city council approval. February 3, 2025 After Washington made the playoffs and went on an improbable run to the NFC championship game with Offensive Rookie of the Year quarterback Jayden Daniels, Harris said at his season-ending news conference that the Commanders name was here to stay, quieting speculation about another rebrand. 'I think it's now being embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff, so, we're going with that,' Harris said. 'Now, in this building, the name Commanders means something. It's about players who love football, are great at football, hit hard, mentally tough, great teammates. It's really meaningful that that name is growing in meaning.' July 20, 2025 With the stadium deal not yet done, Trump threatened to block it if Washington did not go back to the name Redskins. Trump on his social media site posted: 'I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington." Asked about ways Trump could block the construction of a stadium where the team played during its glory days until moving to Maryland, Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser shifted the focus to hammering out a deal voted on by the council. 'What I'm concerned about is we haven't done our part, and so we need to complete our part so that the team can get to work, so that local businesses can get hired, so that we can start earning the tax revenue that will come when we deliver the Commanders stadium," Bowser said. ___
