Relatives of dead infected blood victims will get compensation
The change follows a heavily critical report into the way victims of the worst treatment disaster in NHS history were being compensated.
A 'long overdue' memorial for thousands of victims of the scandal will also be created.
Earlier this month, the Infected Blood Inquiry made a series of recommendations to improve compensation for people who were both infected with contaminated blood and those indirectly affected by the scandal.
Sir Brian Langstaff, chairman of the inquiry, said the number of people who have been compensated to date is 'profoundly unsatisfactory' as he called for 'faster and fairer' compensation for victims.
The investigation found victims had been 'harmed further' by the compensation scheme's failings.
Responding to the report, the Government said that it was immediately accepting a number of the recommendations and will consult on others. It is not rejecting any of the recommendations.
Affected people's claims will no longer 'die with them' and their payments will be passed on to their estates.
People infected with HIV before 1982, who were previously ineligible, will be compensated - and the requirement for people with hepatitis to provide a date of diagnosis will be abolished.
It said it will consult on a number of issues including: how the scheme recognises the impact of interferon treatment for hepatitis which has been linked to severe side effects; how the scheme recognises severe psychological harm; and it will also consult on the scope of how victims of unethical research are to be compensated.
Elsewhere, the Government announced further interim payments to the estates of people who have died.
It also confirmed that Clive Smith, president of the Haemophilia Society, will be the chairman of the Infected Blood Memorial Committee.
Mr Smith will lead the work to create a national memorial to the victims of the scandal and will 'support memorials in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland'.
Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said: 'When I appeared before the inquiry in May, I said that I would take a constructive approach and, carefully, consider the issues that had been put to me.
'I have concentrated on removing barriers to quicker compensation, working with IBCA, and am determined to deliver improvements based on this new report.
'Our focus as we move forward must be working together to not only deliver justice to all those impacted, but also to restore trust in the state to people who have been let down too many times.'
David Foley, chief executive of IBCA, added: 'The community is at the heart of everything we do. We can only grow the service, and implement these new recommendations by listening to and acting on the views of the community.
'Some of the recommendations will take longer to implement, which we know may cause frustration and upset for some in the community.
'We will always act with transparency. That is why I can confirm that we will create a registration process, so that the community can tell us that they intend to make a claim.
'We will also develop the service for all groups, paying the first claims before the end of 2025. And we will improve transparency by sharing more of our processes, documents, data and plans on our website.'
Incoming memorial committee chairman Mr Smith said: 'A memorial to the thousands who have died from the contaminated blood scandal is long overdue.
'It is a great privilege to be asked to lead this important work on behalf of the community.
'I look forward to working with the whole community across the UK on building an appropriate memorial to those we have lost and to act as a lasting memorial to the nation of what can happen when patient safety is not prioritised.'
More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s.
More than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with lifelong health implications.
The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later.
But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the IBCA have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone.
Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA.
As of July 15, 587 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £400 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Waitrose issues ‘do not eat' warning for popular ready meal which poses allergy risk
Waitrose is recalling a popular ready meal after it said some products were 'mispacked', causing an allergy risk. The supermarket own-brand 'Indian takeaway for two' has been pulled from shelves because it contains sesame and soya, which are not mentioned on the label. According to the Food Standards Agency (FSA), which published the recall warning, the product is a health risk to anyone with an allergy to sesame or soya because spring rolls were mispacked in the box. All of the takeaway products sold in 1,412g boxes with the sell-by date 25 July 2025 are affected. No other products are affected by the recall. Those with an allergy to sesame or soya have been told not to eat the product and instead return it to their local Waitrose and Partners branch for a full refund. The FSA explained: 'Sometimes foods have to be withdrawn or recalled if there is a risk to consumers because the allergy labelling is missing or incorrect or if there is any other food allergy risk. When there is a food allergy risk, the FSA will issue an allergy alert.' A point-of-sale notice has also been issued to its customers. These notices explain why the product is being recalled and tell them what to do if they have bought the product. Soya is a food ingredient made from soy beans and is used to make soy sauce and tofu. Those with an allergy to soya can suffer an immediate reaction or a delayed reaction, according to Anaphylaxis UK. Symptoms of an immediate reaction include a rash, tingling or itching in the mouth, and swelling of the lips, eyes or face. It can also cause stomach pain and vomiting. Those who suffer from a delayed allergic reaction may experience stomach pain, diarrhoea and vomiting. Sesame seeds and sesame oil can cause allergic reactions, and these can sometimes be serious, Anaphylaxis UK said. In many cases, those who are allergic to sesame can experience a rash, known as hives, anywhere on the body. It can also trigger tingling or an itchy feeling in the mouth, swelling of the lips, face or eyes, and stomach pain and vomiting. In more serious cases, it can cause anaphylaxis, triggering swelling of the throat and breathing difficulties. Waitrose said in the recall: 'We apologise it has been necessary to recall this product and for the inconvenience caused.'
The Guardian
9 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sali Hughes on beauty: if your teen won't wear sunscreen, try tempting them with these products
Since Covid, anti-science conspiracy theories have been circulated ever more widely on social media. The most worrying to dermatologists is a growing movement against sunscreen, the best and most evidenced precaution (beyond covering up with clothing or staying indoors) that we can take against skin cancers, including melanoma. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. The conspiracy theorists claim that sunscreen causes cancer, rather than preventing it. Although there is no robust evidence to support this (and there is a mountain of clinical data showing the opposite), kids are inevitably most susceptible to the propaganda. Teen beauty brand Indu recently conducted a survey which found that 60% of teenage girls say they've been sunburnt on their face, but only 27% wear sunscreen daily. Teenage boys (including my own) are even less likely to wear SPF. So, while there's little we can do about the proliferation of online quackery, and the onus should be on social media platforms like TikTok, we can encourage our children to incorporate sunscreen into their daily routines. A non-greasy, quickly absorbed, makeup-friendly, high-protection SPF will help. Indu's own Everyday Hero SPF50 (£25) fits the bill. A lightweight synthetic sunscreen with a smooth, hydrated finish, it comes in a practical, backpack-friendly tube that should appeal to any gender. Bubble skincare is designed and marketed at teens and tweens, but I like its Solar Mate Daily Mineral Sunscreen SPF30 (£19) myself. This is a physical sunscreen, using zinc (my own preference over titanium), that goes on almost clear and has a matt, but not chalky, finish. It will appease young people who have been (wrongly) convinced that mineral SPF is somehow superior to synthetics. It now comes in an additional tinted version (£19) that can easily substitute for light, school-friendly makeup. The unaffordability of sunscreens is a hot topic in beauty. There's no doubt that prohibitive VAT-liable SPF prices will negatively impact health for people on lower incomes. I admire the dermatologist-founded brand Altruist enormously for its mission to democratise UV protection. Its Oily Skin Cream SPF50 (£9.50) is terrific for teen skin. It combines mineral and synthetic ingredients, and has a dry-to-the-touch finish that sits nicely under makeup. At just shy of a tenner, it's a comparatively inexpensive way to slot an essential healthcare product into a child's routine. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Model: Scout Waddington. Photography assistant: Declan Slattery. Hair and makeup: Sarah Cherry
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's 'most dangerous plant' strikes in Newcastle: Toddler is left with a blister the size of a PLUM after brushing past giant hogweed
A toddler was left with second-degree burns and an agonising blister 'the size of a plum' after a brush with 'Britain's most dangerous plant'. Brooklyn Bone, three, was probably exposed to giant hogweed while picking flowers on the way to childcare in Newcastle upon Tyne. The next day a blister appeared on his finger, and that night 'it seemed to blow up', quadrupling in size as it filled with pus. Mum Hether Irving said: 'I think he picked a flower on the way to childcare on Thursday morning and potentially came across it then. 'He was only exposed to it for a matter of minutes. 'It was the next day, on Friday afternoon, that I noticed a small blister on the edge of his nail. 'I knew something was wrong as through the night it seemed to blow up.' She continued: 'He was crying, holding his finger in the air, he couldn't have anything touch it, and he kept shaking. 'It blistered right the way down, half way to his knuckle, and by Saturday morning it was a huge pus-filled blister that had quadrupled in size. 'It was the size of a plum.' Little Brooklyn was taken to A&E at South Tyneside District Hospital. They said he had most likely had a brush with the dreaded giant hogweed. Known as 'Britain's most dangerous plant', it has sap that stops the skin protecting itself against the sun, leading to gruesome burns when exposed to daylight. And because it often causes no immediate pain, its victims can continue to burn in the sun heedless of any problem. On top of that, the plant can spread its sap with only a moment's exposure. At hospital, Brooklyn was put on the road to recovery. Some victims of the giant hogweed endure years of heightened sensitivity to sunlight where they were burned Miss Irving, a beautician, said: 'They immediately took pictures and explained what they thought it was. 'They lanced it and drained the fluid off, and we were sent up to the burns unit at the Royal Victoria Infirmary where he's being treated for second-degree burns. 'They have said it'll take up to four weeks to fully heal, and we have been back to hospital twice to change dressings. 'Each time it was very painful but the nurses were excellent.' There could be longer term damage too. Some victims of the giant hogweed endure years of heightened sensitivity to sunlight where they were burned. Glasgow pensioner, George Parsonage, last year said he was still troubled by a giant hogweed wound sustained in the 1960s. Brooklyn too must be extra careful in future. Hether, 40, said: 'They've said if he goes in the sun in future, he needs factor 50 on his finger as it's now very dangerous, as he will burn because of the hogweed.' She continued: 'I urge people not to let their children touch bushes, or things that seem harmless. 'We were lucky it was only one finger, I can't imagine what that would be like if it was a full arm or leg. 'It was absolutely horrific. His skin was peeled off half way down his finger to prevent infection.' The giant hogweed is native to the Caucasus, but was introduced to Britain as an ornamental plant in 1817, and its spread has now got out of control. It was called 'without a shadow of a doubt, the most dangerous plant in Britain' by Mike Duddy, of the Mersey Basin Rivers Trust in 2015. What is giant hogweed? Giant Hogweed is a non-native species to the UK. It was first introduced to the UK as an ornamental plant in the 19th century after being discovered in the Caucasus Mountains and Central Asia. The plant escaped and naturalised in the wild and can now be found throughout much of the UK - especially on river banks as its seeds are transported by the water. It has been spreading uncontrollably across Scotland for decades, producing up to 50,000 seeds which can survive for many years. But the sap of the weed, which looks like a giant version of the harmless plant cow parsley, is extremely toxic to humans and animals, causing horrific burns on the skin. The skin remains sensitive to UV light for many years - and can even cause blindness if near the eyes.
