The beaches with the worst water quality in England revealed
The UK's Environment Agency tests England's bathing waters every year by taking samples in the summer to build up an assessment of the water quality, providing them with a classification from 'excellent' to 'poor'.
The classifications are based on the analysis of samples taken over a four-year period.
The Environment Agency tests the samples for bacteria to indicate if there is faecal matter in the water, which could come from sewage, livestock, wildlife, birds and road drainage.
If bathing water is classified as poor, then a sign advising against bathing will be displayed, yet the beach will remain open for people to use at their leisure.
In the 2024 study of all 455 bathing waters across England, 37 were classed as poor, and out of that group 19 were beaches.
Among those on the list were Porthluney in Cornwall, Lyme Regis Church Cliff Beach in Dorset and Bunster Beach in Somerset.
Further up north, Tynemouth Cullercoats in Tyne and Wear, Scarborough South Bay in North Yorkshire and Blackpool North in Lancashire landed in the 'poor' category.
Holiday Park Guru completed a further analysis of the Environment Agency's data, what they call its 'Brown Flag Awards' for 2025, and found that Lancashire actually ranks last as a county, since none of its bathing spots are yet to gain an 'excellent' rating.
Meanwhile, more than 90 per cent of Northumberland's beaches achieved the highest category for water cleanliness.
Despite having beaches on the poor quality list, Dorset, Devon, and Cornwall are highly rated, too.
However, Somerset, Cumbria, Merseyside and Kent are all counties that have less than desirable water quality at their bathing spots.
The publication also found that the Isle of Wight, County Durham, Lincolnshire and Suffolk saw all of their designated bathing areas gaining one of the top two ratings ('good' or 'excellent').
The Environment Agency has made its data public so bathers can make informed choices about where to relax and swim, as well as see what beaches are doing to improve their water quality.
As bathing spots are ever-changing, water pollution can be temporarily reduced, as rainfall, tides, weather and the season can all impact its quality.
Porthluney in Cornwall
Coastguards Beach, Erme Estuary in Devon
Lyme Regis Church Cliff Beach in Dorset
Southsea East in Hampshire
Deal Castle in Kent
Dymchurch in Kent
Littlestone in Kent
Blackpool North in Lancashire
St Annes North in Lancashire
Heacham in Norfolk
Weston Main, Weston Super Mare Sand Bay and Weston Super Mare Uphill Slipway in Somerset
Dunster Beach in Somerset
Blue Anchor West in Somerset
Bognor Regis, Aldwick in Sussex
Worthing Beach House in Sussex
Tynemouth Cullercoats in Tyne and Wear
Littlehaven Beach in Tyne and Wear
Scarborough South Bay in North Yorkshire
Bridlington South Beach in East Riding of Yorkshire
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
I was stranded on a cross-country train until a cleaner spotted me. Enough is enough
Disability and commuter organisations are urging the government to get accessibility back on the map in its upcoming Railways Bill. A disabled man who was stranded on a train before he was eventually spotted by a cleaner is joining a call to get the government to make railways more accessible for disabled travellers. Doug Paulley, who lives in Wetherby, West Yorkshire, spoke to Yahoo News about how he has spent years dealing with transport nightmares as a disabled man, including being left stranded on trains with no staff around to assist him. The wheelchair user recalled times where he had resorted to pulling the emergency cord to alert staff that he was still on board and had been left without assistance on a train that had reached its final stop, "with nobody on the train, even to answer the emergency button to find me". Paulley, a highly respected disability campaigner, won a judicial review challenging the government's attempt to close train ticket offices across England in December 2023. He said he wanted to share how "highly stressful" getting a train as a disabled traveller can be in the UK to highlight the urgent need to make rail travel significantly more accessible for disabled people. He is joining 10 disability and commuter organisations urging the government to get accessibility back on the map in its upcoming Railways Bill, with "all of the previous government's pledges abandoned." Their demands include full staffing for trains, stations and ticket offices, the government to set a deadline for all stations to have step-free access, as well as 'turn up and go' travel — allowing disabled passengers to travel spontaneously on the rail network without needing to pre-book assistance in advance. The Bill, which was placed under consultation in February, aims to reform the railways, bringing them back into public ownership as well as make booking trains easier, and less costly. But plans to put accessibility as a statutory duty "at the heart" of the new Great British Railways (GBR) appear to have been dropped in the latest consultation documents. 'I was just stuck there' Paulley told Yahoo News about one journey on a CrossCountry Trains service earlier this year where he was stranded at Newcastle station, and almost ended up unwillingly travelling to the other side of the country before staff noticed he was on board and needed assistance to get off the train. Speaking about the experience, Paulley told Yahoo News: "It wasn't supposed to be my train, but my train was running really late and you know how it is, you just get on whatever's available. "The train got to Newcastle, everybody got off, the lights went off and nobody was there. "In the end, I tweeted CrossCountry and they tried to get somebody to see me, but the driver got on to take the service south again, setting back in the direction of Taunton. "The cleaner spotted me and eventually they managed to attract the attention of a member of staff on the platform who got me off the train. "It's scary thinking that nobody checked the train to check that it was properly empty before turning everything off and leaving. I was just stuck there." Unreliable — and unsafe Paulley is keen to emphasise that it's "not just the journey" that is a nightmare for disabled people. "It causes stress and distress on the run-up and afterwards as well, and work. A lot of stations aren't accessible to me in that they've got no step free access to some or all platforms. "They're inaccessible to other people because they don't have the staff that they need, particularly in driver-only operated areas where there's no guards. "I can't just turn up at a non-staff station because there'll be nobody to put the ramp down. With a lack of level boarding, I just can't get on or off it. The spontaneity is gone. "They might try and book me an accessible taxi to somewhere else, but that is very unreliable and lots of the time very unsafe. "Even when there are staff present, they can often forget." Blocked from easy and convenient travel Currently, only 13% of disabled people can use trains with confidence and ease, according to research carried out by advocacy group Transport for All. Emma Vogelmann, co-CEO of Transport for All, told Yahoo News: 'Our trains should give everyone the freedom to make everyday journeys - to work, to school, or just for fun. "But ongoing problems with our rail system are blocking disabled people from being able to travel easily – basic facilities like lifts, waiting rooms and display screens are broken, locked or missing. "In July 2024, Keir Starmer promised that accessibility would be at the heart of our new rail system, that's all that's needed to put things on the right track, so everyone – disabled or not - can travel easily on our trains.' Rensa Gaunt, a spokesperson for Inclusion London, a deaf and disabled people's organisation, told Yahoo News: "Reliable access to transport unlocks jobs, education and community. But the current railway system blocks us from easy and convenient travel, and makes us reliant on assistance that doesn't always turn up. In some cases, we are left stuck on trains, or are forced to cancel our journeys partway through. "We support the call to restore accessibility as an urgent priority, and to strategically plan with disabled people for a railway that we can all use reliably. "We need this and it needs to happen. Otherwise, disabled people continue to be excluded and have terrible experiences on the rail for the foreseeable future." A Department for Transport spokesperson said: "Accessibility is a core priority for Great British Railways (GBR) and we are committed to delivering a rail system which allows disabled people to travel easily, confidently and with dignity. 'We are considering all options to ensure accessibility is at the heart of GBR, such as creating a powerful new passenger watchdog to ensure services work for disabled passengers, and later this year we will publish a roadmap setting out our approach to delivering a more accessible railway.'
Wall Street Journal
13 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Vacations for the Nerd in You
Some vacationers pine for naps on a beach, or thrill to ever-expanding hotel amenities. For Don Phillips, excitement about coming travel ramps up when he receives the reading list. In recent years, Phillips has traveled to England's University of Oxford to study Dickens and Celtic literature, and to Athens and Thessaloniki to study classic Greek texts. He is currently diving into the works of James Joyce in preparation for a weeklong Joyce course in Dublin.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
British Airways cabin crew member wins discrimination claim after being sacked for being 'too anxious to fly'
A British Airways cabin crew member has won a discrimination claim after she was sacked for being too anxious to fly. Jennifer Clifford worked for the airline for almost four decades before the coronavirus pandemic, an employment tribunal heard. It was during lockdown when Ms Clifford began developing symptoms of depression and stress after being placed on furlough. She was declared unfit to fly and was moved to a ground role, but was dismissed in 2022 due to her mental health issues. Ms Clifford sued BA because her manager Nigel Landy had 'minimised' the severity of her condition he described as 'just a little bit of anxiety', Reading Tribunal Court was told. During her period of leave, Ms Clifford was told that she would be made redundant in August 2020. Later that month, Clifford's redundancy was revoked and was offered an alternative role as cabin crew. But the role was two grades below that of an in-flight manager, leading Ms Clifford to appeal against that decision while also raising a grievance for the demotion. The court heard that Ms Clifford remained on furlough until September 2021 before starting a period of sick leave — her first in almost 40 years at BA. Ms Clifford later proposed a phased return from London Gatwick Airport, rather than her normal base at Heathrow. She said the changes would reduce her commuting time, which 'increased feelings of stress and anxiety arising in consequence of her disability'. In September 2022, BA informed Ms Clifford that if she did not make herself fit to fly then a day for her departure would be set. A termination date was set for March 2023, but Ms Clifford left in December 2022. However, Ms Clifford is set to receive a payout, with the tribunal saying that BA should have given her more credit for her acts of service. Upholding her claims of disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and unfair dismissal, Judge Emma Hawksworth concluded: 'Ms Clifford needed a phased return in a ground duties placement before returning to her full contractual flying role. 'That was because of the need to rebuild her confidence and to give time to adjust to working again, and these requirements arose from her disability. She remained unable, because of anxiety and depression, to return to her flying role when required to do so by (BA) at the end of the resourcing and recruitment placement. 'Mr Landy telling (Clifford) she had 'just a little bit of anxiety' was clumsy and suggested to [Clifford] that he was minimising her condition. It came across as an attempt to dismiss how she was feeling. '(Clifford) had very long service with (BA). She had had a lengthy period of absence from work, in part because of things for which she was not responsible: a long period of furlough and a long period when the respondent was considering her grievance. 'A reasonable employer would have given her a longer and more suitable phased return and would, in line with its policy, have considered redeployment to a ground based role before deciding to dismiss her.' Ms Clifford's additional claim of sex discrimination was dismissed by the judge.
