Bill to ban young kittens and puppies being imported into UK passed by MPs
The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law.
Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.'
He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial.
'Crucially, the Bill places a duty on the Government to use these regulation-making powers to first deliver three key measures – a ban on the import of puppies and kittens under six months old, a ban on the import of heavily pregnant dogs and cats that are more than 42 days pregnant, and a ban on the import of dogs and cats who've been mutilated.'
He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse.
He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation.
'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'
Labour MP Peter Lamb (Crawley) directly named Meta, which owns Facebook, as a company that publishes content featuring animal abuse.
He said: 'There are far too many groups online which are dedicated to animal abuse. Constituents of mine have been involved in attempts to try and shut these groups down over the years.
'They'll also often find that instead of finding support on the part of social media companies, to try and address these problems, instead it is they who are reported and face their own accounts being shut down by those perpetrators.'
He added: 'We cannot rest on our laurels and Meta must be made to answer for the fact that they are not acting to bring an end to animal abuse on their networks, and that they are profiting actively from the advertising which appears on that network, and advertisers must be aware that part of what they are paying for, when they pay to advertise on Facebook, is maintenance of animal abuse networks.'
Environment minister Emma Hardy said: 'These measures represent a crucial step forward in our collective efforts to tackle the pet smuggling trade.'
Ms Hardy added: 'We want to see fewer low-welfare operations supply pets to the GB market and fundamentally less animals to suffer because of this.'
She continued: 'As set out in the Government's manifesto, we are committed to ending puppy smuggling and delivering a better future for our animals and I am pleased to say that this Bill does just that.
'It's key measures deliver crucial recommendations put forward by the Efra (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) select committee and tackle multiple concerns that have been raised by stakeholders regarding loopholes in our current pet travel rules.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour want to use you & your home as cash cows – so council spending can keep spiralling and migrants can keep coming
NO one can say that this government is short of ideas. It is just that every single one of them involves one thing: How to extract even more of our money. 3 3 This week alone has seen a bewildering number of proposals dangled before us, many of which revolve around using our homes as cash cows. One day we learned that Rachel Reeves is considering replacing stamp duty and council tax with a new property tax which would be levied annually on our homes, proportionate to their current value. Then it turned out that actually this new tax wouldn't necessarily mean abolishing council tax — it would run alongside it, raising money from any home sold for more than £500,000. If fact, it transpired that we could face rising council tax bills. Angela Rayner reportedly wants them ratcheted up in more prosperous areas in order to subsidise poorer ones. Then came another suggestion: That higher-value homes might lose their exemption from capital gains tax. It could mean anyone selling a family home having to pay 24 per cent of the profit they have made on their property since they bought it, possibly decades ago. The Chancellor seems to have it in her head that Britain is in the midst of a housing crisis caused by greedy Baby Boomers — those born between the mid- 1940s and 1960s. They have monopolised the housing stock, and therefore she is justified in milking them for all they are worth. It is the same mentality that saw the Bolsheviks blaming the middle classes for every ill and sending them off to the gulags after the Russian Revolution. Is Labour's National Insurance hike a tax on working people? Last year's Budget already meted out punishment for buy to let investors, who were whacked with a two per cent rise in stamp duty. Now Reeves is coming for owner-occupiers too. But it shouldn't take her too much to realise that her proposals would make the housing crisis even worse. If you levy CGT on the sales of family homes, it will act as a huge disincentive for people to sell up and downsize. Why bother, when much of the capital you hoped to release would be gobbled up by the taxman? Punitive taxes on property ownership are just a wealth tax by another name, but they would hit millions of pensioners who are asset-rich but cash-poor. Just because a house has rocketed in value since it was bought in the 1970s doesn't mean that its owner feels wealthy. It is still the same house, whatever it is worth. The real reason for the housing crisis is low rates of house building combined with high rates of migration. 'PUNISHING HOMEOWNERS' When you are building fewer than 200,000 new homes a year but allowing the population to swell by 700,000 a year, it is a recipe for acute shortage. You can't solve that by punishing homeowners. As for council tax, Reeves seems to think that homeowners are getting a free ride. True, it is wrong that in one case a £36million mansion in Kensington was found to have a lower council tax bill than a flat out near Heathrow airport. But overall, council taxpayers have been stung in recent years. According to the Taxpayers' Alliance, the average bill rose by 79 per cent in real terms, ie adjusted for inflation, between 1993/94 and 2023/24. The odd absurdity in the council tax system should not be used as an excuse to push up bills for millions of homeowners. Over the years we have faced higher and higher bills for an ever-lousier service. The more we pay, the more our bins seem to go unemptied and deeper the potholes on our streets. Councils like to blame rising social care costs for their poor finances, but that is only part of the story. 3 Other important factors are poor investments in commercial property made by many councils, and the soaring cost of over-generous local government pension schemes. Freedom of information requests to 300 councils last year revealed that a quarter of what we pay in council tax is disappearing straight into council workers' pension funds. In one case, Basingstoke and Deane Council was found to be paying more into staff pensions than it was raising in council tax. Another reason we are paying more but getting less is lousy productivity. Astonishingly, some councils think the way to right this is to move workers to a four-day week — which they foolishly think will magically lead to them producing more. I have a better idea. Shift unproductive workers on to a zero-hour week. That might just help encourage the rest to put in a bit more effort. 'FLAPPING AROUND' The Government is flapping around for ways of raising extra revenue because Labour backbenchers have made it impossible to cut public spending. Reeves' plan to trim a modest £5billion from the benefits bill was quickly reversed when Keir Starmer realised he could suffer the humiliation of a Commons defeat. That has put an end to Reeves' efforts to balance the books with a combination of spending cuts as well as tax rises. Now, we are just getting the tax rises instead. We are being hammered because Labour MPs refuse to believe there is any such thing as wasteful public spending. Sadly, there is — and it permeates every area of government. But clearly the current government isn't going to do anything about it.
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Epping's win over asylum hotel is glorious but I know where they'll put evicted migrants & it's bad news for some Brits
SHAZAAM! And in one glorious moment, the government's asylum seeker policies lay in complete ruins. Now, they are in BIG trouble. I say a glorious moment — and it is. For years it has quietly infuriated the ordinary people of England that asylum seekers are housed at our expense in hotels. 8 8 8 And even in some cases get gym membership, or hair extensions! And come down every morning to a full English. While you are pouring milk on your last Weetabix and wondering how to feed the kids. It's no use the lefties howling. 'No, no, it's not like that at all! And in any case most of the migrants go for the continental breakfast option. You know, croissants and stuff.' It is EXACTLY like that, as we have seen. Not to mention the stress on local communities who suddenly get a whole bunch of young men from a different culture dumped on them. Not all of the young men being as nice as pie. Anyway, Epping — where the residents protested about migrants in a local hotel — has won its court battle. As a result there will be no more migrants staying in that hotel. Victory! And now lots of other councils have followed suit. They too will be kicking out the illegals. The government is absolutely spitting feathers. The problem now, then, is where are these migrants to go. My suggestion last week was tents. Or South Georgia. Or Rockall. But the Government won't buy that idea, sadly. And this is where we need to watch them very carefully. To see what they come up with. Because it's largely in the south that migrants are held in hotels. In the north of England, because of cheap property prices, they tend to be housed in what are called Houses in Multiple Occupation. 16 arrested after protests outside Epping migrant hotel as ring of steel ramps up around TWO asylum seeker centres And so with the hotel option being closed down, it may be that the Government decides to swamp the north of England with migrants. Because it can do so cheaply. It may think (being pretty stupid) that is the only option. The local councils in the north need to shout out a big fat NO to that notion. These are the areas of the UK that already have the biggest social problems. They are also our poorest regions. The last thing these communities want or need is for boatload after boatload of asylum seekers to be dumped on their doorsteps. I think we can trust the councils run by Reform UK to oppose this idea completely. And so the Government will expect the Labour-run councils to help them out. And that means more and more problems for the Government. Because the voters will see that its Reform which says no to housing illegal asylum seekers. And the Labour Party which says yes. And that will be another few hundred thousand votes lost to Sir Keir Starmer at the next election. In the meantime, we might hope that this all sharpens the Government's concentration a little. And that they step up with more measures to stop the asylum seekers arriving here in the first place. As I said last week, a law that says anyone who tries to come here illegally will be barred from ever being allowed to stay would be the first thing to do. But I bet Labour doesn't have the gonads to do it. YES, inflation is up again. Almost double the Bank of England 's target rate. That means no reduction in interest rates. And further down the line, another cash crisis for the poorest of us. Is there any section of the economy Labour hasn't hurt? GET SET FOR AN EXODUS 8 RACHEL Reeves ' next plan to bankrupt everybody in the country is to put a tax on our homes. Don't forget, we've already been taxed on the money we spent on our homes. Now it is reported that she wants a property tax. But only at the more expensive end of the market. Anything that seems aspirational, anything that rewards hard work – the Chancellor will tax it. Soon we'll be left with a country full of skanks. Because everybody who works hard and saves dosh will have fled. DANGER DOLPHIN A DOLPHIN called Reggie has been attacking women off the Dorset coast. Especially if he sees that they are wearing a wetsuit. He swims up to them and seemingly tries to push their heads under water by jumping on their backs. I suspect it's because he's bored stiff with them making awe-stricken 'oohs' and 'ahhs' whenever he hoves into view. And taking selfies. He's basically saying: 'Go on, shove this on WhatsApp, you ditzy cow.' PANTS FOR PC VICTIM WHILE searching through Lea-Ann Sullivan's bedroom drawer, a copper found a pair of her knickers and quickly put them in his back pocket. The policeman, Marcin Zielinski, resigned from the force and has since been sent to prison. Lea-Ann is not happy, though. She said she is constantly thinking: 'What did he want them for? Why did he take them? What's he going to do with them? How many more people has he done it to?' Well, I could give Lea-Ann the answer to some of those questions. All but the last one, in fact. It is not recorded if PC Perv was allowed to keep the knickers. NAIVE ZOE SO WRONG 8 THERE was a woman on the BBC Newsnight programme who showed exactly why asylum seekers have become such a problem. She was called Zoe Gardner. Probably still is. And she thought the protests against the asylum seekers had been organised by ' Nazis and fascists'. She said a solution to the problem would be to build 'not for profit' homes for ALL of the asylum seekers. And that none of them were 'illegal'. She had a grasp of the subject you might have expected in a reasonably responsive four-year-old child. An absolute halfwit. Naive and hating of her own countrymen. And absolutely certain she was right. KEEP IT FIT FOR MOOR THE Government is proposing to ban the winter burning of heather moorland. Good. Come February the moors near me resemble a warzone. All of this activity to protect one bird – the grouse. The Moorland Association, which represents landowners, says the Government should think again. Controlled burning prevents wildfires, the association says. What rubbish. In fact, the so-called controlled burning can lead to wildfires itself, according to the RSPB. We need to reform the grouse moors. And make them fit habitats for a vast array of wildlife, not just grouse. TWISTS ON THE BORING NAME OLIVER 8 8 OK, so the most popular name for baby boys in the UK is Muhammad. But Oliver is high up on the list too. In fact, everywhere I looked in the country, Oliver was coming out near the top. I think I marginally prefer Muhammad, no offence. Know what the most popular girl's name was? Olivia. Have we lost our imaginations? We'll soon be an entire nation of Olivers and Olivias. If you're about to pup, here are a few suggestions for racy alternatives to Oliver and Olivia, with a bit of back history so you can explain the reasoning to rellies. Sputnik – to commemorate the first satellite. Gnasher – to commemorate Dennis the Menace's dog. PraiseGod Barebones – to commemorate a roundhead politician from the 17th century. Reeves – in homage to our brilliant Chancellor. Bakelite – to honour the first commercially available plastic. Nebuchadnezzar – after the Babylonian king. Ngerulmud – 'because she was conceived when we were on holiday on Palau. It's the capital, you know.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Failure to study languages ‘damages Britain's reputation'
The refusal of Britons to speak another language damages the country's reputation as a global player, according to the former schools minister. Nick Gibb said the government should consider making languages compulsory at GCSE, reversing a decision taken two decades ago. On Thursday hundreds of thousands of teenagers will receive their GCSE results in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. About a fifth are expected to achieve at least a grade 7 or A. Spanish is expected to have overtaken French for the first time but language entries in general — particularly German — have plummeted in recent years. Gibb helped oversee GCSE reform in the 2010s alongside Michael Gove, a decade after languages became optional. He told The Times: 'It's regrettable and very bad for Britain's reputation that we seem to refuse to speak other people's languages. Businesses will always want these people [who speak foreign languages], they will employ people from elsewhere or from private schools. It's damaging to our reputation as a global player.' Gove and Gibb introduced the English baccalaureate (EBacc) grouping, which was supposed to drive up language entries by measuring schools on how many pupils took English, maths, a science, humanities and language at GCSE. The target was for 90 per cent of children to be taking all five EBacc subjects by this year but it has stalled at about 40 per cent, mainly because of the lack of language entries. • What to do now if you didn't get the GCSE results you wanted Gibb said: 'There was an initial jump in languages [after the EBacc introduction] then it tailed off although we have seen a big surge in history, geography and individual sciences.' He said the reason that his government had not initially made languages compulsory was that low numbers meant it was not possible overnight. 'But if the EBacc is not working then the government should consider whether, over a period of time, it makes it [a language] compulsory over a long lead-in time. You could say for example, the intent is that the compulsion at GCSE would return by 2030, for Year 7 students starting this September.' Gibb said caution was needed with policy changes to ensure there were enough language teachers. Provisional figures for England indicate German will suffer the biggest annual fall in any GCSE subject this year, of 7.6 per cent, down to about 32,400. French fell 1.9 per cent to just over 128,000 while nearly 43,000 took other modern languages — a total of about 335,000 out of 5.7 million entries. Spanish is up 1.6 per cent to nearly 132,000. In 2004, the last year that a language was compulsory at GCSE, in England 118,000 pupils took German, 296,000 took French, 59,600 took Spanish and 28,600 took other modern languages — a total of more than 502,000 out of 5.35 million entries • The Times view: Culture and horizons of young Britons limited without language While only 40 per cent of pupils entered the EBacc combination of GCSEs in 2023-24, 86 per cent took four of the five subjects. Eighty-nine per cent of these were missing languages, up from 86 per cent in 2019. Gibb, who has co-written a book called Reforming Lessons about the changes he introduced, also criticised schools for starting to teach GCSE-type questions too early, in Years 7 and 8. This can put children off reading for pleasure at the start of secondary school, he said. 'Some teach the text for five years, it's terrible. You shouldn't be analysing text you will cover at 15 at the age of 12. If I had been in office longer I would have done something about that.' Gibb said schools should introduce pupils to more challenging books as a class, showing them how to tackle harder material to prepare them for GCSEs. 'It would give them the confidence to read Dickens on their own,' he said. 'I think there's no age limit for being read to. We were read to until sixth-form when at school. It's easier to understand text that is read to you.' Gibb praised schools in the David Ross Education Trust, which have teachers reading aloud to pupils each day during tutor time. Kai Veitch is bucking the trend of falling language study by choosing to study German for a specific reason: he wants to race for Mercedes. The 15-year-old karting talent has set his sights on Formula 1, and one day hopes to drive for the German team (Georgia Lambert writes). 'When I first decided to take the subject, I did it because I wanted to try and drive for Mercedes one day,' he said, adding that his other choices in computer science and geography would also benefit his career. As he heads into Year 11 this September, Veitch is not only preparing for his GCSEs next year but also racing full-time across Europe in the Senior Rotax class, competing against adult drivers in elite karting championships. A student at Minerva Virtual Academy, an online school offering one-to-one mentoring and flexible pacing for Send learners and others requiring adaptable options, the teenage chose a more adaptable educational path after mainstream schooling proved unable to meet his needs. 'I'm aiming to race in Formula 4 next year, and I know a lot of the top teams are based in places like Germany and Italy. Even just understanding some of the language helps with communication. If you want to go far in motorsport, it's not just about speed; it's also about how well you work with your team. Language plays a part in that,' Veitch said. 'Now that I'm racing across Europe, I see how languages help in real situations, talking to engineers, teams, or even just showing respect in another country. In a sport like this, it gives you an edge.' Kai began karting at 11 and moved to the senior class at 14 to challenge himself againstadult competition. He races most weekends and trains between events. Despite the traveldemands, he continues his full academic study through the online school. 'It means I can keep learning while I'm away racing. I log into classes from hotels or trackside, and I have deadlines like everyone else. It's not easier, it's just more flexible.'
