Jagmeet Singh seeks to hold Prairie seats as election campaign enters homestretch
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is spending some of the final days of the federal election campaign in NDP-held Prairie cities that could be under threat, as Winnipeg candidates debate the balance between free speech and religious freedom.
Singh was campaigning Thursday in Winnipeg — where the party holds two seats – a day after visiting Edmonton, home to two other NDP MPs.
Winnipeg polling firm Probe Research reported Thursday that the NDP has been trailing the Liberals and Conservatives in Winnipeg since February — but a recent recovery in the party's popularity could see it hold both seats in the city as well as a third seat in northern Manitoba.
'With the NDP at risk of losing many seats elsewhere, retaining a Manitoba beachhead could be very important as the party seeks to rebuild following a difficult campaign,' says the polling firm's analysis.
Story continues below advertisement
Singh sought to strike a positive tone Thursday, saying New Democrats have pushed for real change at the federal level. He cited the new dental care program and the completion of a pharmacare agreement with Manitoba in February which will see Ottawa pay for diabetes medication and contraceptives.
'These three New Democrats delivered far more than all the Conservative MPs in this province combined,' Singh told reporters.
On a two-day campaign stop in Edmonton on Tuesday, Singh joined former Alberta NDP premier Rachel Notley to argue that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's United Conservative government offers a preview of the sort of divisive, American-style politics the federal Conservatives would bring to Ottawa.
On his Thursday stop in Winnipeg, Singh appeared alongside local candidate Jorge Requena Ramos, who has taken Liberal incumbent Ben Carr to task over calls for 'bubble zones' that would limit how close protests can come to sites like Jewish community centres and mosques.
Story continues below advertisement
The NDP supports these bubble zones and presented a successful House motion last November calling for 'protective bubble zones at places of worship' following heated protests over the Israel-Hamas war. But Ramos said these zones should not apply to sites that are being used for political speech.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
He was reacting to Carr saying it was inappropriate for supporters of Palestinian rights to protest on April 1 outside a Jewish community centre hosting a talk by two Israeli soldiers about their time in the Gaza Strip.
'I fully support bubble zones where they are necessary to protect our Charter rights. That includes the right to worship in a safe place of worship. I also believe in the freedom of peaceful expression, including outside a political event at a community centre,' Ramos wrote in a media statement.
Ramos, along with the Winnipeg South Centre candidates from the Communist and Green parties, wrote a letter to Carr demanding he meet them publicly to clarify his stance on 'bubble zones.'
The three were also named in flyers posted around the Winnipeg South Centre riding telling voters not to cast a ballot for Carr, accusing him of vocally opposing Palestine.
The NDP says Ramos only learned of those flyers Thursday.
Ramos took Carr to task for suggesting the April 1 protest was 'completely unacceptable' because it happened at a site housing a Jewish school and daycare.
Story continues below advertisement
Carr said he's open to a healthy debate on bubble zones but argued his opponents are 'conflating' reasonable limits on speech with an erosion of Charter rights.
'The point is that there are children who go to school and daycare, and to access community services in the building where the protest took place,' he said. 'And I think that it is reasonable to put protections in place to ensure that they are not subject to those demonstrations.'
Carr said it was 'perplexing' that the NDP 'was choosing to align itself with the Communist Party of Canada, given what we know about the way that communist-led dictatorships around the world, throughout history, have treated freedom of expression,' Carr said. 'The irony is certainly not lost on me.'
The NDP said it does not have control over who supports its positions.
Singh, meanwhile, focused again on the U.S. on Thursday, saying health care, environmental regulations, labour and treaty rights must be kept off the table when new trade talks begin with Washington.
He said the NDP will fight to protect these interests when trade negotiations between the new government and U.S. President Donald Trump's administration begin shortly after the election on Monday.
Singh's late campaign message to Canadians is a call for more New Democrats in the House of Commons to pressure a Mark Carney-led Liberal government on progressive priorities.
Story continues below advertisement
The NDP leader has said Ottawa works best when one party doesn't hold all the power.
–with files from The Canadian Press' David Baxter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
38 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Attorneys get more time to argue over contested copper mine on land sacred to Apaches
A U.S. district judge in Arizona has opened the door for the next round of legal wrangling as environmentalists and some Native Americas seek to stop the federal government from transferring land in Arizona for a massive copper mining project. Judge Dominic Lanza in a ruling issued Monday denied motions that sought to halt the transfer pending the outcome of the case. However, he did preclude the U.S. Forest Service from proceeding with the land exchange until 60 days after the agency issues a required environmental review. Lanza said that would give the parties more time to analyze the environmental report and file amended complaints. He said granting a preliminary injunction now would be premature since the review will differ in some ways from the one that spurred the legal challenge four years ago. 'It is unfortunate that the result of this order will be to force the parties to engage in another stressful, abbreviated round of briefing and litigation activity' when the new review is issued, he said, acknowledging the unusual circumstances. Attorneys for the federal government and the mining company agreed during a recent hearing to the 60-day delay. That time frame also is specified in the legislation that Congress passed and then-President Barack Obama signed in 2014 authorizing the exchange. The group Apache Stronghold, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and others welcomed more time to fight for Oak Flat, an area they consider as holy. 'In this critical moment, we call on the Trump administration and Congress to halt the transfer to a Chinese-owned mine, and honor what is sacred,' said Wendsler Nosie Sr., leader of Apache Stronghold. 'As we continue to fight in court, know this: Nothing will turn us away from defending the spiritual essence of our people, the lifeblood that connects us to the creator and this land.' A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling is consistent with prior decisions and gives the parties time to review the final environmental impact statement that will be issued later this month. 'We are confident the project satisfies all applicable legal requirements,' said Resolution president and general manager Vicky Peacey. She added that years of consultation with tribes and communities resulted in changes to the mining plan to reduce potential effects. The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land exchange was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014. San Carlos Apache Chairman Terry Rambler said Monday that the bill was not in the best interest of the American people, Arizona or his tribe. He said concerns persist about the mine's use of groundwater and the pending obliteration of the culturally significant site. Apache Stronghold and the tribe sued the U.S. government in 2021 to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected an appeal by the Apache group, letting lower court rulings stand. The project has support in nearby Superior and other traditional mining towns in the area. The company — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs.
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
The long history of Canada failing to hit its military spending targets
In an ever-more insecure world, Canada's federal government has announced it will spend two per cent of its GDP on military spending. That's the standard that members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization all agreed to back in 2006, but Canada has long been a laggard, to the extent that other governments, particularly the United States, have browbeaten the country for its meagre military spending. At present, Canada spends 1.37 per cent of GDP on the military. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In 2024, NATO released a report detailing which nations hit the two-per-cent target. Twenty-three of the defence's group's members were either at or above two per cent. This includes Montenegro, a Balkan country with a population smaller than that of Mississauga, and the two most recent NATO members, Sweden and Finland. Eight countries, including Canada, had not. Canada spends less than Italy on defence but more than Belgium. The lowest-spending NATO nation, Spain, puts 1.28 per cent of its GDP towards military spending. In July 2023, the Wall Street Journal editorial board called Canada's military spending 'pathetic .' NATO is currently considering bumping its threshold from two per cent to five per cent, something that world leaders are expected to discuss at the annual summit at The Hague in two weeks' time. Peter MacKay, who served as defence minister in the former Conservative government, told National Post in 2023 that he regrets that the Conservatives hadn't hit the target while they were in power. By 2014, he said, there was a 'great deal of fatigue around defence spending,' due to the years Canada had spent fighting in Afghanistan. 'We, the (Stephen) Harper government, were putting a lot of money into this effort to reach two per cent. And the department literally couldn't spend it fast enough,' he said. 'They would take the money and we would get wrapped around the axle literally on these big (procurement) projects. And we would, at the end of the year, have to send money back to the Treasury.' Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Monday that Canada will spend an additional $9.3 billion on defence during the 2025-2026 fiscal year, for a total of more than $62 billion, or about two per cent of GDP. But this isn't the first time that a Canadian prime minister has promised that the country would hit the target. Here's a non-exhaustive list of when Canada has promised to hit its NATO target and where its defence spending was at over the years. 1970s: At this point, Canada was spending 2.8 per cent of its GDP on its defence budget . While the 1970s were technically a period of détente in the Cold War, there were a number of close calls in the 1960s and the 1970s were a deeply unstable period. Throughout the mid-1970s, Canada's military spending began to decline, averaging about 1.9 per cent of GDP, before growing slightly through the 1980s to 2.1 per cent. April 1989: In the 1989 budget, Canada planned to cut $2.7 billion from its defence budget and close 14 of its Cold War bases. An entire military program, nearly $700 million for an icebreaker, was scrapped. November 2006: NATO member countries commit to two per cent of GDP going towards the military. At the time, Canada's defence spending was around 1.2 per cent of GDP. January 2007: During the war in Afghanistan, Stephen Harper's government was spending just over one per cent of GDP. In January 2007, the Defence Department presented Harper's cabinet with three spending options to grow the defence budget. The middle option was to spend $35 billion by 2025. As of 2025, defence spending was a bit above $30 billion . September 2014: At the NATO summit in Wales, allies reaffirmed their commitment to spending two per cent of GDP on military spending. However, just days before the meeting, figures released by the Department of National Defence showed that the federal government intended to shrink defence spending by $2.7 billion. (The government was pushing to balance the budget in advance of the 2015 election. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau won a majority government in that election.) June 2017: Then defence minister Harjit Sajjan announced an increase of $13.9 billion in military spending over the next decade, and a plan that would put 5,000 more troops in uniform, but still leave Canada short of hitting the two per cent target. At the time, defence spending was at around 1.19 per cent of GDP. October 2020: Canada's defence spending jumped to 1.45 per cent of GDP. However, that was not because of any new spending increases, but because the economy contracted during the COVID-19 pandemic. May 2022: Then defence minister Anita Anand said that Canada is on an ' upward trajectory ' when it comes to meeting NATO targets. However, in a virtual discussion hosted by the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, she stopped short of committing to a timeline. June 2022: The Parliamentary Budget Office said that if Canada was to reach the two-per-cent target by 2027, the country would need to spend more than $75 billion more over five years . April 2023: A leaked Pentagon assessment obtained by the Washington Post revealed that Trudeau had privately told NATO officials that Canada would never reach the alliance's defence-spending target of two per cent of GDP. July 2023: NATO released a statement saying that all members have agreed to spend at least two per cent. Canada agreed to the target, but at the time had no plan to reach it. In recent years, officials have defended the government's failure to meet the two per cent target, saying that Canada has increased its military spending by 70 per cent since 2014. The Liberals announced $2.6 billion over three years on Canada's mission in Latvia, $40 billion on NORAD modernization and billions in spending on the new F-35 fighter jets (a contract that is now being reviewed.) April 2024: The Canadian government unveiled its updated military policy — Our North, Strong and Free — which included $8.1 billion in further spending. However, it was not a commitment to reach two per cent. It would get Canada to 1.76 per cent by 2029-30. June 2024: Then prime minister Justin Trudeau announced at the end of the 2024 NATO summit that Canada would reach two per cent of GDP on military spending by 2032. 'We continually step up and punch above our weight, something that isn't always reflected in the crass mathematical calculation that certain people turn to very quickly,' Trudeau said at the time. 'Which is why we've always questioned the two per cent as the be-all, end-all of evaluating contributions to NATO.' In July, Blair said: 'It was important to be realistic about how long it was going to take to make these investments, to do it the right way.' November 2024: Exclusive Postmedia-Leger polling showed that 45 per cent of Canadians don't believe that Canada will hit its commitments on military spending. In order to achieve that, Canada would need to nearly double defence spending. Just one-fifth of Canadians told pollsters they think it's possible. January 2025: Then minister of national defence Bill Blair said that Canada could accelerate its timeline of hitting the two per cent target. Instead of 2032, Blair said that Canada could hit that benchmark by 2027 by simply accelerating the timeline set out in June 2024. April 2025: During the federal election, both the Liberals and the Conservatives promised to meet the NATO spending targets. The Liberals said they would do so by boosting spending by $18 billion over four years, while the Conservatives pledged to spend $17 billion over four years. In March, U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States wouldn't defend NATO allies that had not met their spending targets. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Carney easing into the job, and Canadians' low expectations suggest they're just fine with that
Opinion It's the honeymoon that is defying all the odds. Six weeks or so after the federal election, Prime Minister Mark Carney continues to do a remarkable job of growing support for his government. National public opinion polls show Carney's Liberal government gaining modestly in popularity even though, other than striking a new cabinet, jousting with U.S. President Donald Trump and gathering with Canada's premiers to talk about strategic infrastructure, he hasn't done that much. In some cases, he's done nothing at all. CHRIS YOUNG / THE CANADIAN PRESS Prime Minister Mark Carney has not done much since being elected, and yet his support continues to grow. The new prime minister, for example, has turned aside demands from inside and outside the House of Commons to table a budget before Parliament breaks for the summer at the end of this month. Among the biggest concerns about not having a budget is the fact that Carney would be making spending decisions without the direction of the House of Commons, a bad look for a minority government. Those arguments have not swayed Carney, who became the Liberal leader in early March and almost immediately called a federal election. He has promised to introduce a new spending plan sometime this fall. No matter. Carney's decision to skip the budget has had zero negative impact on his popularity. Nanos Research found that in early June, right as Carney was shunning demands for a budget, the Liberals had opened up a six-point lead over the Conservatives. That may not seem like a huge margin but when you consider how tight the April election was, it is statistically significant. Meanwhile, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's trend line is heading in the opposite direction. In the same Nanos poll, Poilievre's approval rating is hovering at about 28 per cent, a 12-point drop from the election. The fact that Poilievre lost his seat in the election but refused to resign as leader has, no doubt, contributed to his declining support. It all adds up to a somewhat surprising scenario: Carney has not really done anything since getting elected, and yet his support is continuing to grow. Abacus Data found that in early June, the Carney government had a 53-per-cent approval rating, up an astounding 30 points from the beginning of the year when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was still in charge. As well, Abacus found 38 per cent of Canadians believe the country is headed in the right direction, the highest level of optimism in government in three years. What, you may ask, is the basis for our growing optimism? Inflation has moderated and interest rates have gone down slightly, but not because of anything the Carney government has done. And none of his biggest campaign pledges — most notably approving strategic national infrastructure and easing the housing crisis — have been even partly fulfilled. Carney's continuing honeymoon appears to be built on a series of external factors that have combined to create a safe port in an otherwise stormy political environment. The biggest of these advantages is the simple fact that Carney is neither Trudeau nor Poilievre, two politicians that Canadians clearly did not want leading the country. Carney also continues to benefit from the fact that he has proven to be an able foe for the Trump administration's volatile rants and irrational trade policies. Carney is also, rather surprisingly, benefiting from historically low expectations. A Nanos survey taken in the first few days of June found that 38 per cent of respondents do not expect the Carney government to deliver on major pledges, or solve big problems, before the end of the year. Although 17 per cent do think there should be measurable progress on big files by summer, an almost equal number (about 12 per cent think) think tangible results won't come until next year. The final advantage that Carney is exploiting is that there are no other alternatives for voters to consider. The Tories remain shackled to Poilievre's desperate plan to remain as leader and await a byelection so he can be readmitted to the House of Commons. It's a bad idea that poll results suggest is only getting worse in the eyes of voters. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. The argument for keeping Poilievre was based on the fact that he received more votes and won more seats than the Tories had in the previous election. However, Poilievre's supporters ignore the fact that he has always been significantly less popular than his party, which makes him less of a saviour and more of a millstone going forward. And then there is the NDP, the only other party in the current political melodrama that has a theoretical hope of denting Carney's Teflon surface. Lamentably, nobody seems to want the job of leading the party now that Jagmeet Singh has been dispatched to the political graveyard. Without a dynamic leader, it's hard to imagine the NDP eating into anyone else's support. The stars have clearly aligned for the Carney government. He hasn't had to do the tough work of drafting a budget and his principal political opponents are too disorganized to mount any serious threat of toppling the minority government and triggering a new election. It won't last forever. But right now, with nothing but political tailwinds pushing Carney forward, it feels like it just might. Dan LettColumnist Dan Lett is a columnist for the Free Press, providing opinion and commentary on politics in Winnipeg and beyond. Born and raised in Toronto, Dan joined the Free Press in 1986. Read more about Dan. Dan's columns are built on facts and reactions, but offer his personal views through arguments and analysis. The Free Press' editing team reviews Dan's columns before they are posted online or published in print — part of the our tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
