Can you guess the nation's fastest internet provider? New speed test reveals who
This marks AT&T's third straight win in Ookla's rankings, blending download/upload speeds and latency, while T-Mobile dominates mobile with 245Mbps medians and top 5G honors.
Frontier Fiber and Verizon Fios trail in fixed broadband, with cable giants like Cox, Xfinity, and Spectrum filling the lower spots—proving fiber's edge over cable in real-world tests.
The report draws from millions of Speedtest.net runs, requiring ISPs to hit 3% market share for inclusion, sidelining regional speedsters like Google Fiber despite city-level wins.
AT&T Fiber also shines regionally, topping speeds in 14 U.S. areas, while Xfinity claims eight—highlighting how location tweaks the speed game.
This Is Important Because…
Speed tests like Ookla's offer unbiased snapshots of average user experiences across plans, not just hyped max speeds, helping demystify ISP claims in a fiber boom era.
Fiber networks like AT&T's crush cable on uploads (296Mbps median) and latency, fueling demands for 4K streaming, gaming, and remote work—echoing global records like Japan's insane 402Tbps lab feats.
With T-Mobile leading mobile at 245Mbps, it spotlights 5G's rise, but fixed broadband's role in backbone stability matters as households juggle 20+ devices.
Reports like this influence ACSI scores, where AT&T ties T-Mobile for top satisfaction, pressuring providers to expand fiber amid Verizon's Frontier buyout buzz
Recommended Videos
Why I Should Care? Not all ISPs are equal by address; this data helps pick winners like Verizon Fios for gaming or T-Mobile for mobile backups, avoiding slowpoke traps
Amid rising costs, speed insights justify switches—pair with deals from our best home internet bundles guide to save on TV/internet combos
For future-proofing, fiber's dominance signals time to ditch cable, as cyber threats and IoT grow—AT&T's high consumer ratings (3.7/5) add trust.
What's Next? Competitors like Google Fiber may push boundaries in cities; expect 5G/fiber blends as T-Mobile teases faster gateways. Starlink, and other satellite internet providers were not mentioned in the report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
13 hours ago
- Android Authority
I tried T Sat side by side with Verizon's Skylo and neither worked as well as I'd hoped
Aamir Siddiqui / Android Authority Recently, T Satellite service officially became available for both existing T-Mobile customers and those on other networks that want satellite backup for emergencies. I have since signed up for the service myself and had the opportunity to field test it alongside a Galaxy S25 Edge that is capable of utilizing Skylo satellites via Verizon's network. As someone who lives smack dab in rural America, there are plenty of dead spots within a 20-35 minute drive from me. I picked a few different spots that I knew for a fact had legitimate dead spots that would work well for testing purposes. I brought along my own personal Galaxy S24 with T Satellite installed as well as the aforementioned Edge that was on loan in order to test Skylo side-by-side. The end result was an experience that was a bit more disappointing than I had expected, if I'm being honest. Do you find satellite phone backup service a worthwhile addition? 0 votes Yes, in theory but it sounds like it needs work. NaN % Yes, it is still helpful in extremely dead zones. NaN % No, I don't think it's that useful. NaN % Other (Tell us in the comments) NaN % Getting a signal is much harder than I thought it would be It didn't take long to find a location with poor signal, but that wasn't enough as it turned out. Both satellite backup systems require absolutely zero cellular signal before prompting a satellite connection. This means even if my phone couldn't call, text, or use data, it still was attempting to connect to the cellular network due to the presence of a very faint signal. To truly hit zero, I had to venture deep into the nearby forest until I found a spot far from towers but still clear enough for line-of-sight. The trouble was that both phones kept bouncing between no service and a cellular signal too weak to use, which meant neither stayed disconnected long enough to trigger satellite mode very easily. I got Skylo to connect first, though not without some work After parking my car, I started walking around, and within a few minutes, my Skylo-compatible device prompted me to connect to the satellite. Unfortunately, it wasn't that simple. While T Sat automatically connects like any standard cellular network (in theory), Skylo requires line-of-sight. That's when I got to play the fun game of 'move your phone left, right, left again, now spin around.' It took about five more minutes of moving around and praying desperately to the mobile gods for it to finally connect. It finally did! By then, I'd spent roughly 15 minutes or more trying to send one message in total. When I finally did send the message, I made sure to note the time and told my receiver to do the same on their end. It took another ten minutes or so before the message arrived. From the time I parked til the time I successfully got a single message out took about a total of roughly 30 minutes. In a real emergency, like being lost in the woods, that might be enough to cut it — but things could get dicey if I were injured or unable to reach a true dead spot. T Sat was both a better and worse experience The whole time I was searching for a Skylo connection, I also kept my other device out looking for Starlink access. Verizon's network eventually dropped out consistently enough to make a connection, but T-Mobile clung stubbornly to weak coverage. I walked another ten minutes without luck, returned to the car, and drove deeper into the area. Driving around 5 mph, I watched for the network to drop entirely. Finally finding a truly dead spot, I got out to test. At this point, my phone connected to the T Sat network far more easily than Skylo. It prompted me to connect, I confirmed, and it connected without any special moves. A few messages were sent successfully with only a slight delay of a few minutes. Both failed until they didn't, but which is better? Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority Ultimately, connecting initially was slightly easier with Verizon, though calibrating Skylo wasn't exactly smooth. Being in the woods surely didn't help, yet the line-of-sight was fairly clear. And let's face it, people needing emergency help are more likely to be in a wooded or high-elevation area than they would be in a large open cornfield or something. For T-Mobile, I found getting connected to Starlink was much harder because the cellular network clung to its weak connection longer. Let's not mistake this for meaning T-Mobile's network was stronger in the area, as both phones basically got dial-up-like speeds at best when I was in the wooded area. Once connected, I found Starlink's user experience was definitely the friendlier one, but I wasn't exactly impressed by either. Still, I walked away from the experience with a few takeaways: No satellite service is perfect yet. It depends heavily on your location and the quality of network signals. Starlink might excel in some areas, Skylo in others. It depends heavily on your location and the quality of network signals. Starlink might excel in some areas, Skylo in others. Starlink has more potential. I'd prefer T-Mobile's solution if it could automatically switch to satellite once the cellular connection becomes unusable, even if there's still a faint signal. I'd prefer T-Mobile's solution if it could automatically switch to satellite once the cellular connection becomes unusable, even if there's still a faint signal. Skylo has the advantage of being free. While T Sat might technically be superior, the $10-$15 monthly fee isn't worth it to me. However, this is moot if your high-end T-Mobile plan includes it for free. Just like cellular coverage, there's no simple answer. Every US region varies greatly regarding network infrastructure and congestion. At this stage, I certainly wouldn't go out of my way to pay for it unless you can confirm you'll regularly be in an area with zero coverage that will work with either service. Simply put, it's too unpredictable right now as to whether or not you'll even be able to use it. What if you go off-grid regularly but not in the same consistent area? You'd likely be better off with something more stable that can be used on demand over this. One possibility is to consider traditional satellite phone service through a hotspot device like the Iridium Go. Follow
Associated Press
15 hours ago
- Associated Press
TNQ Tech Launches World's First Mobile Sports Science Platform—Integrating Physical, Cognitive, Vision Performance Data
TNQ Tech Launches World's First Mobile Sports Science Platform — Powered by JUMP! — Integrating Physical, Cognitive, and Vision Performance Data 'We built this app to unify biomechanics, cognitive testing, and vision performance in one mobile platform — replacing costly, fragmented sports science systems.'— Nobuchika Yamaki, Founder & CEO, TNQ Tech NEWARK, DE, UNITED STATES, August 9, 2025 / / -- TNQ Tech, Co. Launches World's First Mobile Athlete Monitoring Platform — Replacing $10,000+ Sports Science Equipment TNQ Tech,Co., a sports technology innovator at the intersection of sports science, neuroscience, and behavioral science, today announced the U.S. launch of its JUMP! Performance Platform — the world's first mobile-based athlete monitoring system that integrates physical, cognitive, and vision performance measurement into a single ecosystem. The platform connects TNQ Tech's suite of AI-powered mobile applications — SAQ!, FAST!, Move!, Load!, BRAIN!, and EYES! — enabling coaches, teams, and sports scientists to collect, analyze, and store athlete data in one secure, centralized hub. Breaking the Silos in Sports Science Traditionally, measuring vertical jump height, sprint mechanics, workload ratios, cognitive reaction times, and eye tracking required multiple devices, separate data systems, and expensive lab setups. With JUMP! as the data hub, every test result from TNQ Tech's apps is automatically logged under a unified athlete profile, allowing cross-metric analysis such as: •Linking cognitive performance (BRAIN!) with biomechanical movement patterns (Move!) •Correlating training load trends (Load!) with jump performance (JUMP!) •Comparing visual tracking metrics (EYES!) with reaction time Key Components of the JUMP! Platform: •JUMP! – AI motion tracking for vertical jump height & central data hub •SAQ! – Sprint, agility, and quickness analysis •FAST! – Velocity-Based Training optimization •Move! – 3D motion analysis with GRF estimation and joint angles •Load! – Automatic ACWR calculation for workload monitoring •BRAIN! – Cognitive performance testing (reaction time, attention, stamina) •EYES! – Eye movement tracking for visual coordination Designed for Teams, Trainers, and Researchers With all data in one place, the JUMP! platform simplifies athlete monitoring, supports injury prevention programs, and accelerates data-driven decision-making for training optimization. 'Professional teams invest millions in performance technology, but most systems are fragmented and require multiple hardware setups,' said Nobuchika Yamaki, Founder & CEO of TNQ Tech. 'We built JUMP! to integrate everything into one mobile-first platform that works anywhere.' About TNQ Tech TNQ Tech's mission is to democratize performance science by replacing costly lab setups with accessible mobile technology. By combining AI motion tracking, cognitive testing, and vision performance measurement, TNQ Tech delivers a unified solution for athletes and coaches worldwide. Availability The JUMP! platform and integrated apps are available now for iOS via the App Store: •JUMP! – •SAQ! – •FAST! – •Move! – •Load! – •BRAIN! – •EYES! – For more information, visit . NOBUCHIKA YAMAKI TNQ Tech,Co. +1 934-253-1592 email us here Visit us on social media: LinkedIn Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Is Qualcomm the Best Semiconductor Stock to Buy Right Now?
Valued at $157.4 billion, Qualcomm (QCOM) has positioned itself as a strong contender in the semiconductor space by leading in mobile processors, making a significant push into artificial intelligence across devices, and expanding into automotive, internet of things, and data centers. The company just reported strong fiscal third quarter results and is still on track to meet its ambitious fiscal 2029 goal of $22 billion in combined automotive and IoT revenue. If the company's current trajectory continues, it could be one of the best growth plays in the semiconductor industry. QCOM stock is down 3.8% year-to-date, compared to the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index's ($NASX) gain of 10.9%. Let's find out if QCOM stock is a buy now on the dip. Qualcomm's Snapdragon Processors Are Leading the Charge In its fiscal 2025 third quarter, the company reported adjusted revenue of $10.4 billion, up 10% year-over-year. Adjusted earnings per share of $2.77 increased by 19% YoY, placing the company near the top of its guidance range. Qualcomm CDMA Technologies (QCT), the company's core chipset business, generated $9 billion in revenue, up 11% YoY, with Automotive (up 21%) and IoT (up 24%) showing particularly strong growth. Qualcomm's licensing segment, Qualcomm Technology Licensing (QTL), generated $1.3 billion in revenue. More News from Barchart Elon Musk Predicts Tesla Will 'Have Autonomous Ride-Hailing in Probably Half the Population of the US by the End of the Year' Should You Buy the 40% Post-Earnings Plunge in The Trade Desk Stock? Wedbush Thinks Palantir Is Speeding to $1 Trillion. Should You Buy PLTR Stock Now? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Qualcomm's Snapdragon Digital Chassis continues to win contracts in the automotive industry, with 12 new designs introduced this quarter and 50 vehicle launches planned for fiscal 2025. Qualcomm and Xiaomi (XIACY) have signed a multi-year agreement to collaborate on smartphones. Xiaomi's Snapdragon 8-series processors will power multiple generations of flagship devices in China and around the world, with shipment volumes increasing year after year. The Snapdragon 8 Elite continues to set the standard for mobile innovation, particularly in enabling the transition to AI-powered smartphones. Qualcomm reports that 124 AI smartphone designs have been shipped or announced, and AI adoption is accelerating. Qualcomm's push into PCs is only a year old, but it is already gaining traction. The Snapdragon X Series powers devices from Acer, Lenovo, Microsoft (MSFT), Dell (DELL), and Samsung, with over 100 designs planned for commercialization by 2026. Management also stated during the Q3 earnings call that the Snapdragon AR1 Gen 1 platform continues to dominate AI-powered smart glasses. Qualcomm now supports 19 partner designs, including Meta's (META) AI smart glasses, which have outperformed sales expectations, as well as the new Meta Oakley and expanded Ray-Ban lines. In Q3, Qualcomm returned $2.8 billion in share repurchases and $967 million in dividends, aligning with its policy of returning 100% of free cash flow. CEO Cristiano Amon forecasts fiscal 2025 to be its second straight year of over 15% year-over-year growth in total QCT non-Apple revenues. Total revenue could increase by 12% with a 16% increase in earnings, in line with consensus estimates. Currently, QCOM stock trades at 12 times forward earnings, lower than its five-year historical average of 21x, making it a reasonable AI-led semiconductor stock to buy now. New Growth Opportunities Qualcomm is expanding into data centers with NPU-based AI inference accelerator cards and custom SoCs based on its Oryon CPU. Qualcomm's planned acquisition of Alphawave IP Group, a leader in high-speed connectivity for data centers, AI, and networking, will strengthen the company's data center strategy. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2026. Furthermore, the company is in advanced discussions with a major hyperscaler, with potential revenue beginning in fiscal 2028. Qualcomm also signed a memorandum of understanding with HUMAIN to build advanced AI data centers in Saudi Arabia and beyond. Qualcomm also sees personal AI devices like smart glasses, wearables, and earbuds as a separate growth category from smartphones. With strengths in connectivity, low-power AI processing, and sensors, the company anticipates becoming the preferred supplier in this space. In Physical AI, Qualcomm is focusing on robotics, automation, and humanoid robots with its automotive-grade silicon, sensing, and AI capabilities. The company estimates that this could be a $1 trillion total addressable market opportunity over the next decade. Financially, the company is in a strong position to invest in its growth strategies. At the end of the third quarter, it had $12.3 billion in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable securities. What Do Analysts Say About QCOM Stock? Overall, Wall Street rates QCOM stock a 'Moderate Buy.' Out of the 32 analysts that cover the stock, 15 rate it a 'Strong Buy,' one suggests a 'Moderate Buy,' 15 rate it a 'Hold,' and one rates it a 'Strong Sell.' Its average target price of $178.65 suggests an upside potential of 21% from current levels. Its high target price of $225 implies a potential upside of 53% in the next 12 months. The Key Takeaway Qualcomm is executing on all fronts. It is strengthening its mobile dominance, expanding into PCs, leading in XR, accelerating automotive and IoT growth, and creating a new revenue stream in data centers. Its aggressive push into AI-enabled devices and infrastructure positions it for long-term double-digit growth, and a strong capital return program continues to reward shareholders, making it an excellent semiconductor stock to grab now. On the date of publication, Sushree Mohanty did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
