
Millennial founder's best career advice for Gen Z: 'You don't get what you don't ask for'
Amanda Litman was just 26 when she co-founded Run For Something, a political organization that recruits and supports young, diverse candidates running for down-ballot office, in 2017.
As Run for Something grew, Litman found that in order to become the kind of leader she wanted to be — compassionate, transparent, effective and accountable — she would have to look outside traditional models of leadership.
Millennials and Gen Z are more diverse than previous generations, "so our leadership quite literally looks different," she says. "The models that worked for the old white men of the last three centuries don't necessarily make sense for us."
In the eight years she's served as president of Run for Something, Litman, 35, has watched fellow millennial and Gen Z leaders make fundamental changes to workplace culture as they rise to top positions.
Litman drew on her own experiences, as well as interviews with other millennial and Gen Z leaders like Snap Inc. CEO Evan Spiegel, comedian and producer Ilana Glazer, and activist David Hogg, for her new book "When We're In Charge: The Next Generation's Guide to Leadership."
Here's her advice for the latest crop of leaders.
According to Litman, the best professional advice she's ever received is "You don't get what you don't ask for."
This advice rings true no matter where you are on the career ladder, she says. For leaders, clarity is crucial when setting expectations for employees.
"You have a responsibility to make it clear what you are expecting, what you need, what you want out of people, and you want to make it as easy as possible for them to satisfy your demands," she says.
On the other end, Litman encourages early-career professionals to put themselves out there: "If you want help from someone, if you want time on someone's calendar, if you want to have coffee with that person you've never had a chance to interact with, you need to ask for it."
"The worst thing that happens is someone says no," she says. "The best thing that happens is they say yes, and you don't know what doors might open for you."
Litman is heartened to see emerging leaders taking charge and making changes in the workplace. One crucial difference she notices between today's leaders and previous generations is that the younger generation of leaders is particularly focused on creating a healthy, supportive work culture.
The Gen Z leaders Litman spoke to "really thought about the well-being of their teams," she says. "They thought about how to bring a sort of joy to the work in a way that I found really refreshing."
Though Gen Z is often stereotyped in the workforce as lazy, unreliable, or difficult, Litman pushes back against those perceptions.
"I think Gen Z wants a better balance between work and life, because they have seen how work can let you down," she says. "The career ladders that we thought we could climb no longer exist. The institutions that you thought you'd be able to work for are going through rolling layoffs. So why make your whole life about your job?"
She advises Gen Z leaders to "take what works and leave what doesn't" when developing their leadership philosophies.
"Don't assume that the way things were done yesterday has to be the way they're done tomorrow. You should know how things were done yesterday, but that doesn't dictate the future. You actually have a lot of agency over what could happen," she says.
,
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Interview Bias Is Real: How to Name and Overcome It Confidently
There are moments in a career conversation—whether it's a job interview, a pitch for freelance work, or a conversation with a potential client—where everything seems to be going fine. Until something shifts. Maybe it's a flicker in the interviewer's eyes when you walk into the room or turn your camera on. Maybe it's a slight hesitation when you mention your background. Or a question you expected, but it never comes—because legally, it can't. And yet, you know. You know that despite your portfolio, credentials, or stellar track record, something unspoken has entered the conversation. The elephant in the room. It could be your age—too old, too young. Your background—an accent, a name, a story that doesn't match expectations. Or your identity—gender, parenthood, or anything else that makes you 'not what they pictured.' Whatever it is, you can feel the silent questions: Will she be able to keep up with a young team? Will he understand our culture? Will she be too distracted with seven kids at home? These questions often can't be asked. But they're still answered—in the privacy of the interviewer's mind. And that's precisely why they're dangerous. We're entering an era where authenticity is not only accepted—it's expected. Particularly for Gen Z, but increasingly across the workforce, being real has become a professional advantage. According to Stanford research, Gen Z employees expect transparency and are drawn to people whose words and actions align. That push for transparency is transforming more than just workplace culture—it's reshaping how people want to interview, pitch, collaborate, and be perceived. Being guarded no longer feels like strength. Being real does. Most conversations about bias in hiring focus on the structural fixes. As Harvard Business School outlines, we train recruiters to avoid unconscious bias, diversify panels, and define roles more inclusively. These are critical, but they assume the bias is accidental—something to be corrected through awareness. Bias can be unconscious—but sometimes it's not. And even when it is, the effect is the same: assumptions get made in silence. What happens when the person on the other side of the table is asking themselves a very conscious question—one they know they can't say out loud? That's when the real danger begins. Because if they can't ask the question, they'll answer it themselves. And they'll answer it wrong. Behavioral science shows that we don't need to change people's beliefs to change their behavior. As Siri Chilazi, a senior researcher at the Women and Public Policy Program at Harvard Kennedy School and co-author of Make Work Fair, put it in a recent episode of The Future of Less Work: Instead of asking people to unlearn their bias, Siri's work focuses on designing systems that reduce the opportunity for bias to show up at all. That might mean standardizing interview questions so that every candidate is asked the same ones in the same order. Or it might mean evaluating responses one question at a time across all candidates, rather than building a subjective impression of each individual. These small shifts can make a big difference—turning hiring from a judgment call into a fair comparison. But even the smartest systems can't account for every assumption, every hesitation, every flicker in the conversation. And until those systems are the norm, individuals still have to navigate what's left unsaid. That's why when you're the one sitting across the table—and you sense the question they're not asking—you still need to be ready to answer it. Not because it's your responsibility to fix the system. But because it's your best chance to be seen for who you really are. That's why I recommend what might feel like a bold move: bring the elephant into the conversation. Not defensively. Not apologetically. Confidently, directly, and with intent. Let's say you sense age is in play. You're in your 50s, applying for a consulting gig in a tech startup led by 30-somethings. You could say: Or let's say you're a mother of seven. You're being considered for a high-responsibility role, and you can feel the hesitation in the room: Or maybe you're pitching a project and realize the client assumed you'd be local—until they heard your accent or saw your LinkedIn profile: This isn't about defending your identity. It's about owning your story. It's about answering the question they're not allowed to ask—on your terms. We often talk about inclusion as the responsibility of the hiring manager or organization. And yes, they have work to do. But when you're the one sitting in the room, waiting for a decision to be made, your power lies in your ability to name what they can't. Not everyone will be comfortable doing this. It requires emotional intelligence, timing, and a calm kind of courage. But being nice won't get you what you want. And the alternative is to be silently disqualified for the wrong reason—one you never got the chance to address. So the next time you feel the elephant walk into the room, don't ignore it. Invite it in. Name it. And then answer the question the way only you can. Because when you do, you're not just shifting the outcome of that conversation—you're changing the conversation itself.


Buzz Feed
a day ago
- Buzz Feed
Boomers, Tell Us How Trump Policies Have Impacted You
Recently, we asked Gen Z'ers to share how their lives have been personally impacted by the Trump administration, and they got candid about not being able to afford groceries due to tariffs, fearing the deportation of their immigrant parents, and their education being harmed by Trump's attacks on higher education institutions. Unsurprisingly, the majority of responses were like this one; Gen Z'ers expressing anger and worry for their future: The responses from Gen Z (a group that saw an increase in support for Donald Trump in the 2024 election) made me curious about the experiences of other generations. So, if you're a boomer (age 61-79), share how you've personally been impacted by Trump's recent policies. Maybe you're a retired boomer who now has to re-enter the workforce at 70 years old due to skyrocketing prices because of Trump's tariffs. Or maybe, you live in fear of Trump's "Big, beautiful, bill" passing, leading to millions being cut from Medicare, which is how you're able to pay to live in your assisted-living nursing home. Maybe due to Trump's funding cuts, you're local Social Security office is severely understaffed, so you haven't been able to access your benefits, leaving you to rely on financial aid from your children. Whatever the case may be, we want to hear about it. So, boomers, tell us how you're being impacted by Trump's policies and presidency as a whole in the comments. Or, if you'd like to remain anonymous, use the form below. You response could be featured in an upcoming post.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
2025 NBA Finals viewer's guide: Everything you need to know for Pacers-Thunder
The NBA Finals begin on Thursday between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder. Here's how to watch it and everything you need to know. NBA Finals schedule Game 1: IND @ OKC, Thursday (8:30 p.m. ET, ABC) Game 2: IND @ OKC, Sunday (8 p.m. ET, ABC) Game 3: OKC @ IND, June 11 (8:30 p.m. ET, ABC) Game 4: OKC @ IND, June 13 (8:30 p.m. ET, ABC) Game 5: IND @ OKC, June 16 (8:30 p.m. ET, ABC)* Game 6: OKC @ IND, June 19 (8:30 p.m. ET, ABC)* Game 7: IND @ OKC, June 22 (8 p.m. ET, ABC)* * = if necessary How to watch the NBA Finals If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission. Pricing and availability are subject to change. Advertisement What to know for the NBA Finals NBA Finals preview: Series breakdown Key matchups, the biggest X factor, intriguing questions, and more. Why Pacers-Thunder is the Finals blueprint We've seen prototypes before, but the game has since evolved. How the Pacers built a title contender Indiana applied a model that's becoming more popular among NBA teams. How the Thunder built a budding dynasty OKC has one of the most atypical models of team-building in NBA history. Three things to know about Pacers-Thunder This NBA Finals features star guards, fun styles and small markets. The Paul George trades that created contenders As it turns out, all you needed to do to reach the 2025 Finals was trade PG. Advertisement 7 reasons why the Pacers can win it all The 2024-25 Pacers have been one of the best stories all season. Why the Thunder are America's team Here are five reasons the NBA should be all-in on OKC. The first Gen Z champ will soon be crowned Is contending for a title increasingly becoming a young man's game? Why sportsbooks are rooting for the Thunder Oddsmakers don't think the Pacers have much of a chance in the Finals.