Broaden the rates base and fresh new takes on the state of Israel
Time to broaden the municipal rates base
The DA in eThekwini has formally called for a report from the Municipality's Legal and Compliance Unit to the Finance Committee on the status of the High Court application concerning the levying of rates on land owned by the Ingonyama Trust Board (ITB).
This request was made during the meeting of the Municipal Public Accounts Committee (Mpac) on May 6, 2025.
At a prior Mpac meeting on March 13, 2025, when the issue of outstanding rates claimed from the ITB was raised, it was revealed that the ITB had taken the view that responsibility for the rates should fall either on the Traditional Councils occupying the land or the Department of Land Affairs.
The Department had, in other municipalities, paid rates on such land and was thus expected to do the same in eThekwini. It was also reported that the Municipality had approached the High Court to obtain a declaratory order to determine which of these parties, the ITB, the Department of Land Affairs, or the Traditional Councils, should be liable for these rates.
The DA has now requested that the Legal and Compliance Unit submit a full report to the Finance Committee, detailing the positions and arguments of all parties involved in the litigation.
It is critical to note that eThekwini Municipality currently bears the costs of infrastructure development and maintenance in these areas, this includes roads, water networks, and electricity supply, despite receiving no rates revenue from the ITB properties that benefit from these services.
The DA remains concerned that the Municipality's rates base is not broad enough to support the equitable delivery of services across the metro. A large proportion of the municipality consists of rural and peri-urban areas, which places strain on municipal resources.
More than five years ago, the Municipality resolved to introduce a flat monthly rate of R100 on properties in these rural and peri-urban zones.
However, the implementation of this decision has continually stalled due to administrative and logistical difficulties.
In the interests of transparency and fairness to the ratepayers who do contribute to the municipal fiscus, the DA calls on the Municipality to clarify its position and demonstrate genuine intent to integrate ITB land into the formal rates base. | Councillor Warren Burne DA eThekwini Councillor
Let's be clear about Israel conflict
Israel's borders were defined in 1920 at San Remo, when the British Mandate for Palestine was created as the reconstituted homeland of the Jews.
In 1922, the League of Nations ratified the San Remo accords.
In 1923, Britain severed 78% of the mandate to create Transjordan.
In 1945, article 80 of the UN charter solidified that what was promised the Jews could not be over-ridden.
The 1947 UN partition plan (resolution 181) was a recommendation to split the mandate between Jews and Arabs. The Zionists agreed, but the Arabs, under the leadership of Nazi War criminal, Haj Amin al-Husseini, refused and launched a war to 'drive the Jews into the sea'.
Five Arab armies joined in. They failed. Their humiliation was a 'Nakba' – a catastrophe.
The advancing armies had demanded the Arab residents leave so they could blast the Jews away. The leaders promised they would soon return and take over. The armies spread the story of a Jewish massacre at Deir Yassin, which never happened, but it struck terror into the population and 700 000 residents fled into neighbouring countries.
Islamists have turned history on its head.
They claim the Zionists forced out the 700 000 Arabs, precipitating the war, when in truth, it was the war that created the refugee migration.
Fighting lasted from 1947 to 1949, ending with an armistice. Jordan and Egypt illegally occupied Judea, Samaria and Gaza. 30 000 Jews were killed or forced out of these areas, their synagogues destroyed and their properties turned over to Arab squatters.
Israel recaptured the area in 1967 and offered to make peace, but Arab leaders in Khartoum vowed 'no peace, no negotiations and no recognition of Israel'. | Len Bennett Ottawa, Canada
We have all been missing the point
The war in Gaza has been polarising. We've seen it on Piers Morgan's show, on Al Jazeera, SABC and CNN, to name but a few.
I have come to the conclusion that all this bickering about who is right and who is wrong has less to do with land and more to do with who the true Israel really is.
As a Christian, I always believed that Israel was a chosen nation of people meant to reflect God to the world and to have dominion over the earth, but it h as taken until now for me to take the time to reflect, and ask myself who the people of Israel really are.
We all have these assumptions of who God's chosen people are, yet we never question what the purpose was of God creating man, and woman in His likeness?
Was it to see who would over-power who over a piece of land?
I don't think so. Think a bit deeper!
Then there's the issue of what it means to be a Jew, or a Gentile. In the Old Testament, the Jews were the ones who, by birthright, automatically qualified as God's people, yet their hearts were filled with bitterness, like a stone. They lacked having a true relationship with God and got caught up in activities, much like some religions today require of their followers. Thus, the birth and the life of Jesus, the Messiah – God's one and only Son, brought about a massive change.
Some would call it 'going against the grain', but He had truly flipped the script, which He did by performing miracles, challenging the so-called Biblical experts, the Pharisees and Saducees, by answering their most difficult questions, with His own questions.
This caused a huge rift among the people of the time, and even today, we have Jews living in Israel who still hold onto the idea of an Almighty God, yet, do not believe, like many today, that Jesus is the Messiah. They still believe in old Testament rituals and earning their way to the Father, through works.
While we argue about Israel 'stealing' land in Gaza and committing 'genocide', have we ever asked if Israel was really only established in 1948, or have they always been God's chosen people?
The answer is that it is not the people who physically live in Israel, but all those who believe in God the Father and have acknowledged the Son, Jesus Christ, as Saviour.
We are fixating on a people who occupy land in the Middle East, while God has been trying to teach us that only through a relationship with Him we can be saved.
The Israel that we read about in the Word of God is not modern-day Israel, but those who believe in the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. | L Oosthuizen Durban
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
34 minutes ago
- The Citizen
E-toll debt bites into traffic light repair budget
The DA has raised serious concerns about an imminent budget shortfall that will see Gauteng's provincial traffic light maintenance grind to a halt before the end of July. This looming crisis threatens the safety and mobility of millions of road users across the province, including key urban areas such as Pretoria. 'This will affect the whole of the province,' warned Evert du Plessis, DA Gauteng spokesperson for Roads and Transport. 'There are traffic lights that belong to and are maintained by the province in every metro and municipality. Pretoria will definitely be affected as well.' The budget shortfall was revealed during a recent Gauteng Provincial Legislature (GPL) Transport, Roads, and Logistics Committee meeting. Committee members were told that the allocated funds will be exhausted before the end of July, just three months into the financial year. In Pretoria, provincial roads, designated by the letter 'R', crisscross the city and act as vital connectors between suburbs and national routes. These include major corridors like the R55 and connecting streets, where intersections often depend on traffic signals to regulate the complex flow of daily commuters. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that provincial roads often intersect with national (Sanral) and municipal roads, creating shared responsibilities between all three spheres of government. 'We don't have a specific list for dysfunctional traffic lights on Tshwane's provincial roads as it changes on a daily basis,' explained Du Plessis. 'There are, however, a substantial number of provincial and national roads that cross metro boundaries. So all three tiers of government must take responsibility for their own infrastructure.' However, without a functional maintenance budget, Gauteng's provincial authorities will soon no longer be able to service their share of these intersections. Du Plessis said this shortfall is more than just an administrative hiccup. 'Non-functioning traffic lights pose a real threat to public safety, placing motorists and pedestrians at risk of collisions, violent crime at intersections, and delays that disrupt the daily routines of workers, parents, and emergency services. 'For the remaining nine months of the year, motorists could be stuck in gridlock, relying on pointsmen instead of functioning systems to reach their destinations,' he said. The DA has linked the budget collapse to Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi's decision to commit provincial funds to paying off e-toll debt, an obligation the province was never legally bound to. Lesufi said on March 18 that the Gauteng government will absorb the e-toll debt and will continue to service it. He also confirmed that the provincial government has gone to the Development Bank of Southern Africa for a loan to be able to service the shortfall on e-tolls. The total e-toll debt that the provincial government has to pay back is more than R20-billion. This includes R12.9-billion for the historical debt, R4-billion for interest, and R4-billion for maintenance. The government has agreed to repay this debt in five equal annual instalments, with the first payment of R3.8-billion being made on September 30, 2024. 'This is another example of service delivery money being squashed by an irrational political commitment,' said Du Plessis. The party has called on Gauteng MEC for Roads, Transport and Logistics, Kedibone Diale-Thabela, and the head of the department, Thulani Mdadane, to urgently redirect funding and prevent a province-wide gridlock. 'New technology and the assistance of law enforcement would also go a long way to address this ever-escalating problem,' he added. The DA pledged to continue pressing the issue in the GPL, demanding answers and accountability from the ANC-led provincial government. 'A DA-led Gauteng government would not allow residents to be placed in such dangerous or frustrating situations,' he said. 'We will prioritise funding for traffic lights as a matter of extreme urgency to ensure the safety and well-being of all road users in Gauteng.' Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to bennittb@ or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading! Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here
Daily Maverick
12 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The DA's employment equity case attempts to reverse transformation and entrench white minority privilege
The Democratic Alliance's (DA's) legal challenge to the Employment Equity Amendment Act (EEAA) is a thinly veiled attempt to reverse economic transformation and thereby entrench white minority privilege. The party's claim that its court action is in opposition to 'grand social engineering' rings hollow given the enduring legacy of apartheid's social and economic architecture. In truth, the DA's stance on EEAA is an ideological inheritance, a continuation of their historical resistance to redress; part of its raison d'être to fossilise colonial and apartheid racial and gender hierarchies. To appreciate this, let us briefly consider the Department of Employment and Labour's 24th Commission for Employment Equity (CEE) Annual Report (2023/24). It exposes the fiction that the private sector is a transformed happy terrain which the DA seeks to shield from the supposed 'interference' of the government. The report illustrates a country still struggling to shrug off the shadow of economic apartheid. For example, while the white population group constitutes 7.7% of the nation's economically active population (EAP), it nevertheless held 62.1% of top management level positions in 2023. Representing 2.6% of the EAP, South Africans of Indian descent held 11.6% of these posts. At 80.7% of EAP, black Africans hold 17.2% of top management roles, while coloureds, at 9% of the EAP, account for a paltry 6.1%. These disparities are neither natural nor God ordained; they are an outcome of Verwoerdian economic violence against Africans, coloureds and Indians. The CEE report also damningly notes that the majority of recruitment, promotion and skills-development opportunities at this highest echelon continue to flow to the white population group. This is not merit, it is the perpetuation of a boardroom order where white privilege remains the default. Conveyor belt of privilege The disparity reflected at top management cascades downwards to the senior management level where whites at 7.7% of EAP occupy 48.5% of positions, Indians who constitute 2.6% of EAP hold 12.4%, while black Africans hold 27.6% of positions despite being 80.7% of the population. The lion's share of opportunities still flows to those already at the top, which means that transformation is perpetually decked against a conveyor belt of privilege. The private sector emerges as the stronghold of this resistance. While the government has made commendable strides, achieving 74.7% black African representation at top management, the private sector languishes with a pitiful 14% black African representation at this level, effectively maintaining the apartheid-era status quo, where 65.1% of top posts are held by white individuals. Alongside racial disparities is gender inequality. Across all sectors, men dominate top management by more than two-and-a-half times females (roughly 73% male). While the government shows marginally better female representation at 35.4% in top leadership, the private sector registers 10% less, at 25.8%. This glass ceiling, often a result of old boys' clubs dressing up exclusion as 'culture fit', is an outcome of a patriarchal culture which compounds racial exclusion and puts paid to the mythology of a self-correcting market. Nowhere is this private-sector exceptionalism and entrenched bias more grotesque than in the DA-run Western Cape, their self-proclaimed bastion of good governance. There, white males alone occupy a staggering 57.2% of top management positions and 34.4% at senior management level. This is in a province where white people constitute only 17% of the population, compared with 42% coloured and 38% black African – who together form 80% of the residents. This is not a reflection of a 'dearth of qualified candidates'; it is a damning testament to a systemic racial and gender bias thriving under a political administration that pays lip service to equality while actively fighting the tools designed to achieve it. Coloured and black African professionals are corralled into the lower tiers by an exclusionary 'culture fit' that walks and quacks like 'job reservation' in post-apartheid South Africa. These are the gatekeepers making crucial investment and employment decisions and shaping institutional cultures that too often exclude black African, coloured and Indian talent. In its affidavit to the North Gauteng High Court, the DA wilfully misrepresents the amended Section 15A of the EEAA, which empowers the minister to set 'numerical targets', as a draconian imposition of immutable 'quotas'. Yet, the original Employment Equity Act (EEA), in Section 15(3), explicitly clarifies that affirmative action measures 'include preferential treatment and numerical goals, but exclude quotas'. The Constitution itself was drafted to smash apartheid's economic architecture, not to immortalise it, and the Employment Equity Act is one of our key demolition hammers. Transformation failure The current amendments provide a desperately needed impetus precisely because the 'context-sensitive employer-led plans' so cherished by the DA have demonstrably failed to achieve substantive transformation, as the CEE statistics brutally confirm. Furthermore, the Act is far from being the rigid cudgel the DA portrays. Section 15A (3) explicitly provides for nuanced, differentiated targets responsive to occupational levels, sub-sectors or regions. Critically, Section 42(4) explicitly permits any employer to 'raise any reasonable ground to justify its failure to comply'. The Act has consistently emphasised the appointment of 'suitably qualified' individuals. Nothing in the Act prohibits the appointment of a candidate from a non-designated group if a diligent, exhaustive search does not find a suitably qualified candidate from a designated group. In practice, the Act operates much like our critical-skills visa process – nuanced, consultative and always mindful of maintaining standards. This inherent flexibility exposes the DA's opposition as ideological warfare rather than a practical critique. Their true grievance is with the erosion of racial privilege. Qualified franchise, swart gevaar This position is not new for the DA. As recently as 1978, 47 years ago, the DA, then called the Progressive Party, championed a qualified franchise for black people over universal adult suffrage or 'one person, one vote'. Revealing – more than it concealed – its contempt for black people, this party, which claims liberal credentials, argued that black people needed to have attained a certain level of education and own property in order to vote. No doubt a strategy to manage the savages. After rebranding as the Democratic Party, it opposed the Labour Relations Act of 1995 and the original Employment Equity Act of 1998 on grounds that these laws offend against 'meritocracy'. You can accuse the DA as you will, but inconsistency in protecting white minority privilege cannot be one of its faults. The DA's dire prophecy that the Act will cripple investment or decimate employment is an old swart gevaar red herring pure and simple. After the original EEA took effect, between 2001 and 2007, South Africa's economy grew between 4.5%-5.5%, while unemployment dropped by 11%, proving that equity policies can coexist with economic expansion. The real drags on investment are challenges such as energy and logistics bottlenecks and crime, not the presence of black African women and men in the C-suite. By selectively championing Section 9(1) of the Constitution (equality) while ignoring the clear mandate of Section 9(2) – the solemn duty to enact measures that advance those historically disadvantaged by unfair discrimination – the DA reveals its true colours. It aligns itself with every white-supremacist argument ever used to defy meaningful change. This constitutional mandate demands decisive, active intervention, not passive hope or transformation on its terms – optional, non-binding and perpetually negotiable. No Bantustan boardrooms The EEAA, fortified by the undeniable truth of the CEE's findings, stands as an indispensable instrument in our protracted struggle to dismantle structural racism, unlock the full spectrum of South African talent and forge an inclusive economy – a boardroom that is not a Bantustan reflecting a 7% minority. We cannot allow the boardrooms of corporate South Africa to remain gated enclaves. The consequences for doing so would be more than symbolic. These are the individuals who shape investment decisions, workplace cultures and corporate governance. If they do not reflect our nation, neither will our economy. Besides, we can forget about social and political stability – something to which the DA either pays lip service or does not appreciate, or both. The DA has no history of genuinely advancing the interests of black people in general, Africans, coloureds and Indians in particular, in our country. Its historic positions are consistent with this latest offensive and an affront to the eradication of the legacy of colonialism and apartheid. South Africans must ask – whose freedom is advanced if the DA wins? Certainly not the coloured engineer passed over because she 'won't fit the culture'. Not the black African professional locked out of a training programme because the boardroom is 'already diverse enough'. The only winners would be those who mistake yesterday's privilege for today's right.
Eyewitness News
14 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Gauteng DA accuses provincial govt of failing to prioritise residents' safety
JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance (DA) has accused the Gauteng government of failing to prioritise the safety of residents in the province, citing that there are more than 100 unfilled vacancies for mechanics within the provincial police department. The party believes this has contributed to delays in the repair of South African Police Service (SAPS) vehicles, which often leads to a shortage of crime-fighting resources. DA's Shadow MEC of Gauteng Community Safety said this undermines crime prevention efforts. "This is unacceptable and shows that the Lesufi-led government is not prioritising the protection of the people of Gauteng or addressing unemployment. Many crimes could have been prevented if these positions had been filled, helping police combat crime by ensuring that vehicles are readily available for policing.' Meanwhile, in response to DA's questions, Premier Panyaza Lesufi wrote that the posts can only be filled by applicants who have the required skills and qualifications.
